Gender Diverse Representation in Patient Simulation: A Scoping Review

Simulation Bridges LGBTQ+ Educational Gaps in Gynecologic Care: Menstrual Suppression for a Gender and Sexually Diverse Patient

Introduction

LGBTQ+ patients have decreased access to culturally competent gynecologic care, which contributes to health care inequity. We designed an interdisciplinary educational initiative for improving gender and sexually diverse gynecologic care among OB/GYN residents.

Methods

Residents were given optional American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Modules on Transgender Care, a lecture about LGBTQ+ health issues, and a standardized patient simulation followed by a debrief. The case of a 25-year-old assigned female at birth (AFAB), nonbinary, pansexual patient (played by an AFAB nonbinary, pansexual individual) presented for menstrual suppression. Due to known provider discomfort in this setting, learners were assessed with postintervention surveys, rather than during the simulation, to help foster psychological safety.

Results

Pre- and postsurveys assessing LGBTQ+ competence and perceived helpfulness of the training were administered to 11 residents. Statistically significant increases (p < .05) were observed in comfort working with LGBTQ+ patients, knowledge regarding health needs for LGBTQ+ patients, comfort discussing sexual health practices with transgender/gender diverse patients, and confidence in ability to provide resources for LGBTQ+ patients. There were positive trends in reducing assumptions of a patient's gender identity and sexual orientation (p = .05), confidence asking a patient's name and pronouns (p = .06), supervising trainees caring for gender and sexually diverse patients (p = .07), and comfort using inclusive language (p = .08).

Discussion

Interdisciplinary education, including simulation, can increase resident confidence in providing gynecologic care for gender and sexually diverse patients, enhance cultural competence of providers, and help reduce inequities in LGBTQ+ gynecologic care.

When language engenders discomfort

Language holds power & can harm: @justin_p_boyle and Justin Bullock explore the cisheteropatriarchy and epistemic violence regarding language in #MedEd.

Educational guidelines on sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristics biases in medical education

A commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging in medical education requires addressing both explicit and implicit biases based on sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristics and the intersectionality with other identities. Heterosexism and heteronormative attitudes contribute to health and healthcare disparities for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer or questioning, intersex, asexual individuals. Student, trainee, and faculty competencies in medical education curricula regarding the care of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer or questioning, intersex, asexual patients and those who are gender nonconforming or born with differences of sex development allow for better understanding and belonging within the clinical learning environment of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer/questioning, intersex, asexual learners and educators. The Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics issued a call to action to achieve a future free from racism and bias through inclusivity in obstetrics and gynecology education and healthcare, which led to the creation of the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Guidelines Task Force. The task force initially addressed racism, racial- and ethnicity-based bias, and discrimination in medical education and additionally identified other groups that are subject to bias and discrimination, including sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristic identities, persons with disabilities, and individuals with various religious and spiritual practices. In this scholarly perspective, the authors expand on previously developed guidelines to address sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, and sex characteristics bias, heterosexism, and heteronormative attitudes in obstetrics and gynecology educational products, materials, and clinical learning environments to improve access and equitable care to vulnerable individuals of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer or questioning, intersex, asexual community.

Medical schools as cisgendered organizations

Organizations and their practices contribute to the marginalization of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) populations by rewarding gender normativity and punishing gender transgression. The present study draws on data gleaned from four focus groups completed in 2023 with a total of 19 participants to explore TGD U.S. medical students' perceptions of TGD content inclusion in their medical school curricula. Using abductive analysis, I argue that curricular oversights which omit socio-political contexts regarding TGD health and healthcare, as well as continued pathologization of TGD communities and people, contribute to a hostile learning environment for TGD medical students and residents. I conceptualize medical schools as cisgendered organizations where inequities devaluing TGD people and experiences are embedded in the organizational structure, including curriculum development and implementation. I provide recommendations for medical schools and stakeholders to align their formal, informal, and hidden curricula through practical means (e.g., incorporating TGD standardized patients throughout) and structural means (e.g. hiring and supporting TGD faculty across disciplines to assist with curriculum development and training), and argue for governing bodies to push back against legislative restriction and criminalization of TGD medical care.

Epistemic Peerhood as a Model To Improve Gender-Affirming Care in Medical Education

Issue: Inadequate training around gender-affirming care is a critical gap in health care and medical education that causes disparities and leads to injury for transgender, nonbinary, and other gender-diverse patients. In contrast to this widespread provider knowledge gap, gender-diverse patients bring critical knowledge from their own experiences to health care. Embracing varied epistemologies, or sources of knowledge, within medical education has the potential to enhance gender-affirming care by intentionally placing value on the lived experiences and emphasizing the credibility of gender-diverse patients. Evidence: In this article, the authors endorse a model of epistemic peerhood in which the embodied knowledge of gender-diverse patients and the authoritative knowledge of providers are each valued for their contribution to care. The authors reflect on experiences developing gender-affirming healthcare curricula and how medical education has not yet adequately addressed gender-diverse care without embracing community knowledge. Implications: The authors identify three vital areas to integrate epistemic peerhood in medical training to address gaps in gender-affirming care: (1) collaborative student training methods that reflect embodied knowledge in the absence of, or in addition to, clinical expertise on gender-affirming care; (2) sustainable partnerships between academic programs and gender-diverse communities that foster continuous engagement from collaborators with lived experience; and (3) broad community input about best practices for representing gender diversity in patient simulation. Embracing epistemic peerhood in each of these areas would result in broader gender-diverse community representation and leadership in medical education, which would ultimately strengthen gender-affirming healthcare training.

Assessing Patient Goals for Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: A Standardized Patient Case for Medical Students

Introduction

Inadequate coverage of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) health in the UME curriculum contributes to the scarcity of competent physicians to care for TGD patients. Increasing TGD health skills-based curricula in UME can help address TGD health disparities. We developed a standardized patient (SP) case to assess TGD health skills-based competencies and attitudes among medical students.

Methods

An interdisciplinary team, including individuals with lived TGD experience, developed the SP case that was completed by second-year medical students at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in January 2020. After the TGD SP session, students and faculty completed a postsession survey to assess the degree to which the case met the learning objectives. Students were assessed via self-reports, faculty reports, and SP video evaluations.

Results

Seventy second-year medical students, 30 faculty facilitators, and eight SPs participated in 2020. Students reported being significantly more prepared to care for TGD patients (Z = -5.68, p < .001) and to obtain a gender history (Z = -5.82, p < .001). Both faculty and students felt that skills for caring for TGD patients were important in medical education and agreed the case should remain in the curriculum.

Discussion

The case effectively honed and assessed students' ability to collect a gender history and discuss goals for hormone therapy with TGD patients. It should complement ongoing curricula to effectively train medical students in TGD health care. Developing these skills in students directly addresses the barriers that many TGD patients experience in health care settings.