To tube or not to tube: a skeptic's guide to nonintubated thoracic surgery

[Anesthesia and Surgery of the Trachea]

This article aims to review the current anaesthetic management of tracheal resections.Apart from the "traditional" approach of induction of general anaesthesia with conventional tracheal intubation and cross-field intubation or jet ventilation during the resection phase, there has lately been a trend towards less invasive techniques.Regional anaesthesia, laryngeal mask airways and preservation of spontaneous ventilation are among the new anaesthetic approaches. Current data suggest potential advantages compared with conventional tracheal intubation.Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may provide adequate gas exchange and/or cardiovascular support for complex resections and reconstructions. In addition, it may serve as a reliable "backup" technique, in case of oxygenation difficulties with the use of other devices.Given the vast spectrum of different anaesthetic approaches to tracheal surgery, interdisciplinary planning is essential to identify the optimal technique on a case-by-case basis. During that process, the localisation and consistency of the airway lesion, comorbidities and the functional status of the respiratory system and specific surgical approach need to be taken into account.As there is a lack of high-quality data, evidence-based comparisons of different anaesthetic techniques are not possible.

A surgical Decision-making scoring model for spontaneous ventilation- and mechanical ventilation-video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in non-small-cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUNDS

Spontaneous ventilation-video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SV-VATS) has been applied to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in many centers. Since it remains a new and challenging surgical technique, only selected patients can be performed SV-VATS. We aim to conduct a retrospective single-center study to develop a clinical decision-making model to make surgery decision between SV-VATS and MV (mechanical ventilation) -VATS in NSCLC patients more objectively and individually.

METHODS

Four thousand three hundred sixty-eight NSCLC patients undergoing SV-VATS or MV-VATS in the department of thoracic surgery between 2011 and 2018 were included. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were used to identify potential factors influencing the surgical decisions. Factors with statistical significance were selected for constructing the Surgical Decision-making Scoring (SDS) model. The performance of the model was validated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The Surgical Decision-making Scoring (SDS) model was built guided by the clinical judgment and statistically significant results of univariate and multivariate regression analyses of potential predictors, including smoking status (p = 0.03), BMI (p < 0.001), ACCI (p = 0.04), T stage (p < 0.001), N stage (p < 0.001), ASA grade (p < 0.001) and surgical technique (p < 0.001). The AUC of the training group and the testing group were 0.72 and 0.70, respectively. The calibration curves and the DCA curve revealed that the SDS model has a desired performance in predicting the surgical decision.

CONCLUSIONS

This SDS model is the first clinical decision-making model developed for an individual NSCLC patient to make decision between SV-VATS and MV-VATS.

ANESTHESIA FOR NON-INTUBATED VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY

With the growing adoption of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols across all surgical groups, including thoracic surgery, coupled with improved video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) equipment and techniques, nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery has gained significant popularity in recent years. Avoiding tracheal intubation with an endotracheal or double-lumen tube and general anesthesia may reduce or eliminate the risks associated with traditional mechanical ventilation, one-lung ventilation, and general anesthesia. Studies have shown a trend toward better preservation of postoperative respiratory function and improved postoperative lengths of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality; however, these have not been conclusively proven. This review article discusses the advantages of nonintubated VATS, the types of thoracic surgery in which this technique has been described, patient selection, appropriate anesthetic techniques, surgical concerns, potential complications relevant to the anesthesiologist during the conduct of nonintubated VATS surgery, and suggested management of these complications.

Application of laryngeal mask airway anesthesia with preserved spontaneous breathing in children undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery

Purpose

To investigate the feasibility and safety of non-intubated general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing combined with paravertebral nerve blocks (PVNB) in young children undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and to determine its significance for rapid recovery after pediatric thoracic surgery.

Methods

The data of 46 children aged 6-36 months with an American Society of Anesthesiologists status of I-II who underwent elective VATS under general anesthesia were retrospectively analyzed. Of these patients, 25 underwent non-intubated general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing combined with PVNB (non-intubation group), and 21 received conventional intubated general anesthesia combined with local infiltration anesthesia (intubation group). The following perioperative parameters were compared between the two groups: heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure, saturation of pulse oximetry (SpO₂), partial pressure end-tidal carbon dioxide, time from the completion of the operation to extubation or removing laryngeal masks, time to first feeding after the operation, length of postoperative in-hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and hospitalization expenses.

Results

The operations were completed successfully in both groups. When the non-intubation group was compared with the intubation group, the minimal SpO₂ level during the surgery was higher (93% vs. 88%, P < 0.001), which might indicate better oxygenation. There was no significant difference of the duration of surgery and intraoperative blood loss between two groups. Compared to the intubation group, the duration of anesthesia (P = 0.027), time from the completion of the operation to extubation (P < 0.001), time to the first feeding after surgery (P < 0.001), and length of postoperative in-hospital stay (P < 0.001) were significantly reduced in the non-intubation group. The incidence of postoperative complications was not significantly different.

Conclusions

Non-intubated general anesthesia with spontaneous breathing combined with PVNB is safe and feasible in young children undergoing VATS and can promote rapid recovery in young children undergoing thoracoscopic surgery.

Anesthesia for tracheal and carinal resection and reconstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current anesthetic management of tracheal and carinal resection and reconstruction.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to the traditional anesthetic approach using conventional tracheal intubation after induction of general anesthesia and cross-field intubation or jet-ventilation once the airway has been surgically opened, there is a trend toward less invasive anesthetic procedures. Regional anesthetic techniques and approaches focusing on the maintenance of spontaneous respiration have emerged. Especially for cervical tracheal stenosis, laryngeal mask airways appear to be an advantageous alternative to tracheal intubation.Extracorporeal support can ensure adequate gas exchange and/or perfusion during complex resections and reconstructions without interference of airway devices with the operative field. It also serves as an effective rescue technique in case other approaches fail.

SUMMARY

The spectrum of available anesthetic techniques for major airway surgery is immense. To find the safest approach for the individual patient, comprehensive interdisciplinary planning is essential. The location and anatomic consistency of the stenosis, comorbidities, the functional status of respiratory system, as well as the planned reconstructive technique need to be considered. Until more data is available, however, a reliable evidence-based comparison of different approaches is not possible.

The Anesthetic Management of Patients Undergoing Nonintubated Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Purpose of Review

This review focuses on describing the procedural and anesthetic management of patients undergoing nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopy surgery.

Recent Findings

Most thoracic surgery is performed under general endotracheal anesthesia with either a double lumen endotracheal tube or a bronchial blocker. In an attempt to lessen the incidence and severity of postoperative complications, the nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic technique was developed, where the surgical procedure is performed under regional anesthesia with sedation. Currently, this technique is recommended for the elderly and in patients with severe cardiopulmonary disease who are at increased risk of complications after general anesthesia. It is the role of the anesthesia team to assist in the decisions whether the patient is a candidate and which block should be performed and to carefully monitor these patients in the operating room.

Summary

Nonintubated video-assisted thoracic surgery is an emerging technique with the goal of reducing postoperative complications. The anesthetic technique is highly variable and ranges from general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway with a truncal block to thoracic epidural anesthesia with minimal to no block. It is important to have excellent communication with the surgical team and the patient to ensure a safe, successful procedure.