Do racial and ethnic disparities lead to the undertreatment of pain? Are there solutions?

The Prevalence of Persistent Toe Walking in Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder and the Odds of Subsequent Surgery

Persistent toe walking is associated with autism spectrum disorder. The true prevalence of persistent toe walking and odds of progression to surgery in children with and without autism remains unclear. This retrospective descriptive study identified patients ages 3 to 17 years who were enrolled in our healthcare system over a 2-year period. Using international classification of disease codes, we identified all children with autism and persistent toe walking, and excluded children with conditions that may independently cause toe walking. Data on Achilles lengthening surgeries, sex, race and body mass index was gathered. The toe walking prevalence amongst children with and without autism was calculated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis controlling for sex, race and body mass index was used to determine independent risk factors for persistent toe walking and surgery. Of the children who met inclusion criteria (N = 284,925), 4622 (1.6%) had persistent toe walking. Prevalence of persistent toe walking was higher amongst children with autism (6.3% vs 1.5%, p < .01), as were odds of persistent toe walking (OR 4.13, 95% CI 3.74 to 4.56, p < .01). Males and White patients had higher odds of persistent toe walking compared to females and patients of any other race, respectively (p < .01 for all). Although children with autism and toe walking had higher rates of surgery than their counterparts without autism (4.3% vs 2.6%, p = .04), this difference was not significant after controlling for sex, race and BMI (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.95 to 2.69, p > .05).

The Association Between Experienced Discrimination and Pain in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

BACKGROUND

The relationship between experienced discrimination and its effects on pain interference and management among racial disparities is not well explored. This research investigated these associations among Black and White U.S. adults.

METHODS

The analysis involved 9369 Black and White adults in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS), assessing experiences of discrimination, pain interference (SF-12), and pain treatment, incorporating factors like demographics, comorbidities, and stress.

RESULTS

Black participants experiencing moderate discrimination were found to have a 41% increased likelihood of pain interference (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.02-1.95), similaritythose facing high levels of discrimination also showed a 41% increase (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.86) compared to those without such experiences. White individuals reporting moderate discrimination also faced a heightened risk, with a 21% greater chance of pain interference (aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.01-1.45). Notably, the presence of moderate discrimination among Black participants correlated with a 12% reduced probability of receiving pain treatment (aOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.56-1.37). Furthermore, Black, and White individuals who reported discrimination when seeking employment had a 33% (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-0.98) and 32% (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96) lower likelihood, respectively, of receiving treated pain.

CONCLUSION

The study elucidates how discrimination exacerbates pain interference and restricts access to treatment, affecting Black and White individuals differently. These findings underscore an urgent need for strategies to counteract discrimination's negative effects on healthcare outcomes. Addressing these disparities is crucial for advancing health equity and improving the overall quality of care.

Provider Implicit Racial Bias in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

This study is to (1) assess implicit racial bias among pediatric providers and (2) use virtual patient (VP) vignettes to determine the impact of implicit racial bias on clinical decision-making in pediatric sickle cell disease (SCD) pain care.

DESIGN/METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted at a mid-sized, freestanding children's hospital in the northeast. Participants (N = 52) were pediatric SCD providers (87% cisgender female, 90% White, M age = 38.78). Providers completed a demographic questionnaire, the race Implicit Association Test (IAT) with adult and child faces, and a measure of SCD explicit bias (5-point Likert scale). Providers also made clinical decisions for four VP vignettes depicting Black and White youth in the emergency department (ED) with either SCD or cancer pain. Frequency tables were calculated.

RESULTS

On the race IAT, providers demonstrated a pro-White implicit bias for both adult (81%) and child (89%) faces. Responses to the explicit bias measure reflected low levels of agreement with negative stereotypes about SCD patients. No significant differences emerged in providers' pain treatment decisions for Black vs. White, or SCD vs. cancer VPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate pediatric providers harbor implicit racial bias similar to the general population. Findings from VP vignettes did not demonstrate that pain treatment decision-making differed based on race or diagnosis. This may be due to standardized protocols and procedures in the pediatric emergency setting. Future research is needed to clarify the role of implicit bias in clinical decision-making and the potential efficacy of treatment protocols in preventing biases from interfering with pediatric SCD pain care.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Headache Care and Research

ABSTRACT

This article reviews the disparities faced by individuals who experience headache disorders and discusses potential solutions to deliver equitable care. Disparities exist in the diagnosis and treatment of headache disorders with regard to race, ethnicity, sex, gender, sexual orientation, geography, and socioeconomic status. Furthermore, research in the realm of headache disparities is inadequate, and the clinical trial representation of patients from underserved communities is poor. Many barriers exist to optimizing care for underserved communities and this article addresses these barriers and presents ways to combat them.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #68: Sickle cell disease in pregnancy

Pregnant individuals with sickle cell disease have an increased risk of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. However, prepregnancy counseling and multidisciplinary care can lead to favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes. In this consult series, we summarize what is known about sickle cell disease and provide guidance for sickle cell disease management during pregnancy. The following are Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommendations.

Retrospective study of disparities in regional anesthesia and discharge opioid prescriptions at a veterans affairs medical center

Background: Abundant literature acknowledges healthcare disparities exist in medicine, especially in pain management, but disparities related to peri-operative pain management in veterans undergoing total knee arthroplasties (TKA) has not been previously described. TKAs are becoming increasingly common, and evidence suggests that perioperative regional anesthesia improves post TKA outcomes. This study aimed to determine if healthcare disparities exist pertaining to the use of regional anesthesia and the prescribing of discharge opioids for TKAs in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System (VAHCS). We hypothesized that race-based disparities would be present in the use of regional anesthesia and discharge opioid prescribing at our institution. Our secondary hypothesis was that older patients would be more likely to receive regional anesthesia and lower quantities of opioids at discharge. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of Atlanta VAHCS patients who underwent elective unilateral primary or revision TKA surgery between 2014 and 2020. A total of 653 patients were included. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the impact of patient demographics on nerve block use and multivariate linear regression was used to model the impact of patient demographics on total oral morphine equivalents prescribed. Results: Our results showed that Black patients were as likely to receive regional anesthesia for their TKAs (p=0.85) but did receive less opioid pain medications at discharge (p<0.001) than White patients. We also found that older patients ( > 50 years old) had significantly lower odds ratio of receiving regional anesthesia and received less opioid pain medications post TKA discharge. Conclusions: Our study showed age-based disparities in regional anesthesia utilization and discharge opioid prescriptions. It also showed race-based disparities in discharge opioid prescriptions. Our results demonstrate the need to better understand why these differences exist within this open access system and suggests solutions based on the socioecological model to diminish them.

Implementing Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Disparities in Utilization in an Urban Pain Medicine Practice

Purpose

The COVID-19 pandemic led to a drastic expansion in utilizing telemedicine, circumventing some of the geographical barriers to accessing pain care. However, uncertainties around the impact of telemedicine across various sociodemographic groups still exist, prompting further exploration. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of sociodemographic factors in telemedicine utilization during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Patients and methods

All outpatient non-procedural visits at the pain medicine division of a large academic institution in the epicenter of the pandemic (New York, USA), between March 2019 and October 2021, were retrospectively included. Sociodemographic data including gender, age, ethnicity/race, postal code, and type of health insurance, across three time periods associated with the COVID-19 pandemic - pre-lockdown (in-office visits only), lockdown (telemedicine visits only) and post-lockdown (offering both in-office and telemedicine visits) - were analyzed and compared.

Results

In total, 12,615 unique patients - The majority being women (58%) - were seen during the whole study period. In the post-lockdown period, telemedicine was utilized by 42% of all patients. Follow-up visits, younger patients, white patients, patients residing further away from the hospital, and privately insured patients were more likely to utilize telemedicine post-lockdown (p <0.05). Older patients, minorities, Manhattan residents, and Medicare/Medicaid recipients, were more likely to use in-office visits post-lockdown (p <0.05).

Conclusion

We identified disparities in the utilization of telemedicine in Pain Medicine, which may be due to socioeconomic factors such as lack of access to reliable internet access, cost of devices, and technological know-how. This emphasizes the need for further studies to better understand the reasons for and barriers to telemedicine use. This could help inform policymaking to safeguard equitable access to telemedicine use for pain care.

The Stigma Surrounding Opioid Use as a Barrier to Cancer-Pain Management: An Overview of Experiences with Fear, Shame, and Poorly Controlled Pain in the Context of Advanced Cancer

Cancer-related pain affects a majority of patients with advanced cancer and is often undertreated. The treatment of this pain is largely reliant on the use of opioids, which are essential medicines for symptom management and the maintenance of quality of life (QoL) for patients with advanced cancer. While there are cancer-specific guidelines for the treatment of pain, widespread publication and policy changes in response to the opioid epidemic have drastically impacted perceptions of opioid use. This overview therefore aims to investigate how manifestations of opioid stigma impact pain management in cancer settings, with an emphasis on the experiences of patients with advanced cancer. Opioid use has been widely stigmatized in multiple domains, including public, healthcare, and patient populations. Physician hesitancy in prescribing and pharmacist vigilance in dispensing were identified as barriers to optimal pain management, and may contribute to stigma in the context of advanced cancer. Evidence in the literature suggests that opioid stigma may result in patient deviations from prescription instructions, which generally leads to pain undertreatment. Patients reflected on experiencing shame and fear surrounding their prescription opioid use and feeling uncomfortable communicating with their healthcare providers on these topics. Our findings indicate that future work is required to educate patients and providers in order to de-stigmatize opioid use. Through alleviating stigma, patients may be better able to make decisions regarding their pain management which lead to freedom from cancer-related pain and improved QoL.

Error traps in the perioperative care of children with chronic pain

Pediatric patients with a history of chronic pain frequently have complex health needs that are challenging to meet in the perioperative period. Error traps are consequences or errors that are known to occur due to either gaps in knowledge or cognitive errors. Avoiding common error traps in these children can contribute to improved patient care and patient outcomes and overall better patient and family satisfaction. In patients with chronic pain, common errors during their perioperative care included as follows: failure to adequately prepare the patient and family; failure to incorporate past pain history and therapy into current treatment plans; failure to provide adequate multimodal analgesia; and failure to provide multidisciplinary and multimodal analgesia by incorporating other services such as mental health services and physical therapy. Cognitive errors may play a role in these error traps. Recognizing and avoiding them may improve and optimize pain care and outcome.

Household Food Insufficiency and Chronic Pain among Children in the US: A National Study

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of pediatric chronic pain by household food sufficiency status and examine whether food insufficiency would be associated with greater risk for chronic pain. We analyzed data from the 2019-2020 National Survey of Children's Health of 48,410 children (6-17 years) in the United States. Across the sample, 26.1% (95% CI: 25.2-27.0) experienced mild food insufficiency and 5.1% (95% CI: 4.6-5.7) moderate/severe food insufficiency. The prevalence of chronic pain was higher among children with mild (13.7%) and moderate/severe food insufficiency (20.6%) relative to children in food-sufficient households (6.7%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for a priori covariates (individual: age, sex, race/ethnicity, anxiety, depression, other health conditions, adverse childhood events; household: poverty, parent education, physical and mental health; community: region of residence), multivariable logistic regression revealed that children with mild food insufficiency had 1.6 times greater odds of having chronic pain (95% CI: 1.4-1.9, p < 0.0001) and those with moderate/severe food insufficiency, 1.9 higher odds (95% CI: 1.4-2.7, p < 0.0001) relative to food-sufficient children. The dose-response relationship between food insufficiency and childhood chronic pain highlights the importance of further research to identify underlying mechanisms and evaluate the impact of food insufficiency on the onset and persistence of chronic pain across the lifespan.