Current aspects of perioperative fluid handling in vascular surgery

Liberal versus Modified Intraoperative Fluid Management in Abdominal-flap Breast Reconstructions. A Clinical Study

Background:

The outcome of reconstructive microsurgery is influenced by the intraoperative anesthetic regimen. The aim of this study was to compare the impact on the intra- and postoperative complication rates of our modified fluid management (MFM) protocol with a previously used liberal fluid management protocol in abdominal-flap breast reconstructions.

Methods:

This retrospective study analyzed adverse events related to secondary unilateral abdominal-flap breast reconstructions in two patient cohorts, one with a liberal fluid management protocol and one with a MFM protocol. In the MFM protocol, intravenous fluid resuscitation was restricted and colloid use was minimized. Both noradrenaline and propofol were implemented as standard in the MFM protocol. The primary endpoints were surgical and medical complications, as observed intraoperatively or postoperatively, during or shortly after the hospital stay.

Results:

Of the 214 patients included in the study, 172 patients followed the MFM protocol. Prior radiotherapy was more frequent in the MFM protocol. Surgical procedures to achieve venous superdrainage were more often used in the MFM cohort. Intraoperative as well as postoperative complications occurred significantly more frequently in the liberal fluid management cohort and were specifically associated with partial and total flap failures. Prior radiotherapy, additional venous drainage, or choice of inhalation agent did not have an observable impact on outcome.

Conclusions:

The incidence of adverse events during and after autologous breast reconstructive procedures was reduced with the introduction of an MFM protocol. Strict intraoperative fluid control combined with norepinephrine and propofol was both beneficial and safe.

Fluid balance after continuous renal replacement therapy initiation and outcome in paediatric multiple organ failure

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple organ failure (MOF) often receive large amounts of resuscitation fluid, making them at high risk of fluid overload (FO). Our main objective was to investigate if the ability to achieve a negative fluid balance during the first 3 continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) days was associated with mortality in children with MOF.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study in a tertiary multidisciplinary academic paediatric hospital. The study included 63 patients (age 0-18 years) with 3 or more failing organs receiving CRRT due to acute kidney injury and/or fluid overload.

RESULTS

The median age was 4 months, and PICU mortality was 29%. Survivors had significantly lower degree of FO at CRRT initiation, (median 15% (Interquartile range 9-22)) than non-survivors (24% (17%-37%), P = 0.002). On PICU admission, PIM-3 score was significantly higher in non-survivors (P = 0.01), but at CRRT initiation there was no difference in PELOD-2 score (P = 0.98). Mortality in patients achieving a cumulative net negative fluid balance during the first 3 days after CRRT initiation was 12%, compared to 86% in those not achieving this (P < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, the inability to achieve a net negative fluid balance during 3 days after CRRT initiation (P < 0.0001) and FO >20% at CRRT initiation (P = 0.0019) remained associated with mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that early fluid removal is associated with improved patient outcome in critically ill children receiving CRRT, and that prompt measures should be taken to prevent fluid overload in critical illness. These results need to be verified in further, prospective studies.

Mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), a marker of positive fluid balance in critically ill patients: results of the ENVOL study

Background

The optimal control of blood volume without fluid overload is a main challenge in the daily care of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Accordingly this study focused on the identification of biomarkers to help characterize fluid overload status.

Methods

Sixty-seven patients were studied from ICU admission to day 7 (D₇). Blood and urine samples were taken daily and sodium and water balance strictly calculated resulting in a total cumulative assessment of ∆Na⁺ and ∆H₂O. Furthermore, plasmatic biomarkers (cortisol, epinephrine, norepinephrine, renin, angiotensin II, aldosterone, pro-endothelin, copeptine, atrial natriuretic peptide, erythropoietin, mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM)) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were measured at D₂, D₅ and D₇. Blood volumes were measured with ⁵¹Cr fixed on red blood cells at D₂ and D₇.

Results

The ∆Na⁺ or ∆H₂O were increased in all patients but never related to blood volumes at D₂ nor D₇. Total blood volumes were at normal values with constantly low red blood cell volumes and normal or decreased plasmatic volume. Weight, plasmatic proteins, and hemoglobin were weakly related to ∆Na⁺ or ∆H₂O. Amongst all tested biomarkers, only MR-proADM was related to sodium and fluid overload. This biomarker was also a predictor of SOFA scores.

Conclusions

Plasmatic concentration in MR-proADM seems to be a good surrogate for evaluation of ∆Na⁺ or ∆H₂O and predicts sodium and extracellular fluid overload.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01858675 in May 13, 2013.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1540-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

How the Nurse Anesthetist Decides to Manage Perioperative Fluid Status

PURPOSE

To determine the factors that affect how nurse anesthetists in a county in Sweden decide how to manage perioperative fluid status.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted at two surgical wards in a county hospital.

METHODS

Sixteen nurse anesthetists were interviewed to explore how nurse anesthetists assess patients' intraoperative fluid requirements and the subsequent measures adopted.

FINDING

Three categories emerged through content analysis: clinical criteria and the thought process that drives decision making, interdependence in decision making, and uncertainty in decision making.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed differences with regard to fluid management among nurse anesthetists in a county in Sweden. For the assessments and subsequent measures that are carried out to ensure optimal fluid therapy, more research is needed to provide evidence, and evidence-based guidelines need to be developed in Sweden.

Intraoperative Fluid Restriction in Pancreatic Surgery: A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial

Background

Perioperative fluid restriction in a variety of operations has shown improvement of: complications, recovery of gastrointestinal function and length of stay (LOS). We investigated effects of crystalloid fluid restriction in pancreatic surgery. Our hypothesis: enhanced recovery of gastrointestinal function.

Methods

In this double-blinded randomized trial, patients scheduled to undergo pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) were randomized: standard (S:10ml/kg/hr) or restricted (R:5ml/kg/hr) fluid protocols. Primary endpoint: gastric emptying scintigraphically assessed on postoperative day 7.

Results

In 66 randomized patients, complications and 6-year survival were analyzed. 54 patients were analyzed in intention to treat: 24 S-group and 30 R-group. 32 patients actually underwent a PD and 16 patients had a palliative gastrojejunostomy bypass operation in the full protocol analysis. The median gastric emptying time (T½) was 104 minutes (S-group, 95% confidence interval: 74–369) versus 159 minutes (R-group, 95% confidence interval: 61–204) (P = 0.893, NS). Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 10 patients in the S-group and in 13 patients in the R-group (45% and 50%, P = 0.779, NS). The primary outcome parameter, gastric emptying time, did not show a statistically significant difference between groups.

Conclusion

A fluid regimen of 10ml/kg/hr or 5ml/kg/hr during pancreatic surgery did not lead to statistically significant differences in gastric emptying. A larger study would be needed to draw definite conclusions about fluid restriction in pancreatic surgery.

Trial registration

ISRCTN62621488

Degradation of the endothelial glycocalyx in clinical settings: searching for the sheddases

The endothelial glycocalyx has a profound influence at the vascular wall on the transmission of shear stress, on the maintenance of a selective permeability barrier and a low hydraulic conductivity, and on attenuating firm adhesion of blood leukocytes and platelets. Major constituents of the glycocalyx, including syndecans, heparan sulphates and hyaluronan, are shed from the endothelial surface under various acute and chronic clinical conditions, the best characterized being ischaemia and hypoxia, sepsis and inflammation, atherosclerosis, diabetes, renal disease and haemorrhagic viral infections. Damage has also been detected by in vivo microscopic techniques. Matrix metalloproteases may shed syndecans and heparanase, released from activated mast cells, cleaves heparan sulphates from core proteins. According to new data, not only hyaluronidase but also the serine proteases thrombin, elastase, proteinase 3 and plasminogen, as well as cathepsin B lead to loss of hyaluronan from the endothelial surface layer, suggesting a wide array of potentially destructive conditions. Appropriately, pharmacological agents such as inhibitors of inflammation, antithrombin and inhibitors of metalloproteases display potential to attenuate shedding of the glycocalyx in various experimental models. Also, plasma components, especially albumin, stabilize the glycocalyx and contribute to the endothelial surface layer. Though symptoms of the above listed diseases and conditions correlate with sequelae expected from disturbance of the endothelial glycocalyx (oedema, inflammation, leukocyte and platelet adhesion, low reflow), therapeutic studies to prove a causal connection have yet to be designed. With respect to studies on humans, some clinical evidence exists for benefits from application of sulodexide, a preparation delivering precursors of the glycocalyx constituent heparan sulphate. At present, the simplest option for protecting the glycocalyx seems to be to ensure an adequate level of albumin. However, also in this case, definite proof of causality needs to be delivered.

[Fluid therapy in cardiac surgery. An update]

The anesthetist has 2 major tools for optimizing haemodynamics in cardiac surgery: Vasoactive drugs and the intravascular volume. It is necessary to identify which patients would benefit from one or the other therapies for a suitable response to treatment. Hemodynamic monitoring with the different existing parameters (pressure, volumetric static, volumetric functional and echocardiography) allows the management of these patients to be optimized. In this article a review is presented on the most recent and relevant publications, and the different tools available to control the management of the fluid therapy in this context, and to suggest a few guidelines for the haemodynamics monitoring of patients submitted to cardiac surgery. A systematic search has been made in PubMed, limiting the results to the publications over the last five years up to February 2012.

Pulse pressure variation: where are we today?

In the present review we will describe and discuss the physiological and technological background necessary in understanding the dynamic parameters of fluid responsiveness and how they relate to recent softwares and algorithms' applications. We will also discuss the potential clinical applications of these parameters in the management of patients under general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation along with the potential improvements in the computational algorithms.

Perioperative haemodynamic therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the perioperative monitoring tools and targets for haemodynamic optimization and to assess the influence of goal-directed therapy (GDT) on organ function, complications and outcome in different categories of surgical patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The choice of perioperative haemodynamic monitoring for GDT depends on the surgery-related and the patient-related risk. Conventional monitoring and minimally invasive approaches can be used for perioperative optimization of low-risk to moderate-risk patients. Thermodilution methods and continuous cardiac output/oxygen transport monitoring are the most reliable techniques for major surgery and high-risk/unstable patients. An important goal of perioperative haemodynamic therapy is to maintain cardiac function and organ perfusion, optimizing the balance between oxygen delivery and consumption. Several studies, using different monitoring tools and end-points, have shown that GDT provides optimal haemodynamic performance, improves organ function, reduces the number of complications and time to ICU and hospital discharge and decreases the mortality rate in high-risk surgical patients.

SUMMARY

GDT provides a number of benefits in major surgery. Based on adequate monitoring, the goal-directed algorithms facilitate early detection of pathophysiological changes and influence the perioperative haemodynamic therapy that can improve the clinical outcome. The perioperative GDT should be early, adequate and individualized for every patient.

Influence of non-ventilatory options on postoperative outcome

Perioperative patient handling should urgently be updated according to current evidence and, if none is available, at least according to physiological knowledge. To prevent pulmonary aspiration, preoperative fasting for 2 h (clear fluids) and 6 h (solid food) and abdication of 20 min for smoking is sufficient. Beta-blockage requires an indication. Bowel preparation should be abandoned and minimal invasive surgery as well as local and regional anaesthesia should be used where possible. Fluid therapy should be rational and requirement-adapted, and hypothermia, postoperative nausea and vomiting, unnecessary drains, tubes and catheters avoided. A multi-modal opioid-sparing pain therapy, sufficient oxygenation as well as early nutrition and mobilisation all play an important role for patient outcome. Recent studies have postulated that combining single-modality evidence-based care principles into a multi-modal effort to enhance postoperative recovery has improved patient outcome. Henrik Kehlet termed such a principle the 'fast-track concept', comprehending the entire perioperative phase starting with preoperative preparation, over atraumatic surgical and anaesthesiological techniques reducing the neuroendocrine stress response and also comprising the postoperative treatment. This strategy has been shown to positively influence organ function, homeostasis, morbidity, need for hospitalisation and convalescence and, therefore, to reduce costs. Despite these promising results, general implementation of evidence-based measures leaves a lot to be desired. Further development of surgical minimally invasive techniques and ongoing evaluation of procedure-specific strategies is urgently warranted.