1
|
Gupta S, Pillai RR, Ghosh A. Efficacy of Screening and Brief Intervention for Alcohol Misuse in Opioid Agonist Maintenance Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Psychoactive Drugs 2024:1-11. [PMID: 39528345 DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2024.2428139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
Alcohol misuse is common in persons on opioid agonist maintenance treatment (OAMT). We tested the efficacy of screening and brief intervention (SBI) for harmful/hazardous alcohol use in buprenorphine/naloxone (BNX)-assisted OAMT. It was a double-blind, parallel-group, randomized trial, where 150 participants with alcohol misuse (Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test - AUDIT 8-19) on BNX were allocated equally to receive either a single session SBI or screening and brief advice (control). Participants were followed up at three months. The primary outcome was the change in AUDIT; other outcomes were risk transition, change in the frequency of heavy drinking, days of abstinence from alcohol, Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels, non-prescription opioid use, and adherence to BNX. Follow-up data was gathered from 138 participants. SBI participants had a higher reduction in AUDIT scores at the follow-up (F = 129. 173, df = 1, p < .001, ηp2 =.469). A higher proportion of participants transitioned to a low-risk category in the SBI group. The SBI group showed a higher reduction in heavy drinking and days of alcohol abstinence. Although the proportion of persons with normal serum GGT increased in both groups, the difference was not significant at the follow-up. The SBI group performed better in non-prescription opioid use and BNX adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surabhi Gupta
- Drug Deaddiction and Treatment Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Renjith R Pillai
- Drug Deaddiction and Treatment Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Abhishek Ghosh
- Drug Deaddiction and Treatment Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Santo T, Gisev N, Campbell G, Colledge-Frisby S, Wilson J, Tran LT, Lynch M, Martino-Burke D, Taylor S, Degenhardt L. Prevalence of comorbid substance use disorders among people with opioid use disorder: A systematic review & meta-analysis. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2024; 128:104434. [PMID: 38677160 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comorbid substance use disorders (SUDs) among people with opioid use disorder (OUD) contribute to poor clinical outcomes, including overdose and mortality. We present the first systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of specific non-opioid SUDs among people with OUD. METHODS We searched Embase, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from 1990 to 2022 for studies that used Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) or International Classification of Diseases (ICD) criteria to assess the prevalence of non-opioid SUDs among individuals with OUD. We used random-effects meta-analyses with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) to pool current and lifetime prevalence estimates separately. Meta-regressions and stratified meta-analyses were used to examine differences in prevalence estimates by sample characteristics and methodological factors. RESULTS Of the 36,971 publications identified, we included data from 194 studies and 77,212 participants with OUD. The prevalence of any comorbid SUD among people with OUD was 59.5% (95%CI 49.1-69.5%) for current non-opioid SUDs, with 72.0% (95%CI 52.5-87.9%) experiencing a comorbid SUD in their lifetime. Of the studies that examined current comorbid SUDs, cocaine use disorder (30.5%, 95%CI 23.0-38.7%) was most common, followed by alcohol (27.1%, 95%CI 24.4- 30.0%), cannabis (22.7%, 95%CI 19.0-26.6%), sedative (16.1%, 95%CI 13.1-19.3%), and methamphetamine (11.4%, 95%CI 6.8-17.1%) use disorders. Substantial heterogeneity (I2>90%) across estimates was observed. Substantial heterogeneity (I2>90%) was observed across estimates, with significant variations in prevalence identified across geographic locations, recruitment settings, and other study-level factors. CONCLUSION Findings from this study emphasize the importance of comorbid SUD treatment access for people with OUD. Our estimates can inform the provision of treatment and harm reduction strategies for people with OUD and specific subpopulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Santo
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Natasa Gisev
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gabrielle Campbell
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
| | - Samantha Colledge-Frisby
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Melbourne, Australia; Disease Elimination Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jack Wilson
- Matilda Centre, The University of the Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Lucy Thi Tran
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michelle Lynch
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Martino-Burke
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sophia Taylor
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louisa Degenhardt
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hawkins EJ, Malte CA, Hagedorn HJ, Gordon AJ, Williams EC, Trim RS, Blanchard BE, Lott A, Danner AN, Saxon AJ. Buprenorphine Receipt and Retention for Opioid Use Disorder Following an Initiative to Increase Access in Primary Care. J Addict Med 2024; 18:240-247. [PMID: 38329814 PMCID: PMC11150106 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000001275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Buprenorphine, a medication for opioid use disorder (OUD), is underutilized in general medical settings. Further, it is inequitably received by racialized groups and persons with comorbidities. The Veterans Health Administration launched an initiative to increase buprenorphine receipt in primary care. The project's objective was to identify patient-related factors associated with buprenorphine receipt and retention in primary care clinics (n = 18) participating in the initiative. METHODS Retrospective cohort quality improvement evaluation of patients 18 years or older with 2 or more primary care visits in a 1-year period and an OUD diagnosis in the year before the first primary care visit (index date). Buprenorphine receipt was the proportion of patients with OUD who received 1 or more buprenorphine prescriptions from primary care providers during the post-index year and retention the proportion who received buprenorphine for 180 days or longer. RESULTS Of 2880 patients with OUD seen in primary care, 11.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.6%-12.9%) received buprenorphine in primary care, 58.2% (95% CI, 52.8%-63.3%) of whom were retained on buprenorphine for 180 days or longer. Patients with alcohol use disorder (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.57), nonopioid drug use disorder (AOR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.93), and serious mental illness (AOR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97) had lower buprenorphine receipt. Those with an anxiety disorder had higher buprenorphine receipt (AOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04-1.95). Buprenorphine receipt (AOR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.35-0.87) and 180-day retention (AOR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.19-0.84) were less likely among non-Hispanic Black patients. CONCLUSIONS Further integration of addiction services in primary care may be needed to enhance buprenorphine receipt for patients with comorbid substance use disorders, and interventions are needed to address disparities in receipt and retention among non-Hispanic Black patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J. Hawkins
- Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D) Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Carol A. Malte
- Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D) Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Hildi J. Hagedorn
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
- HSR&D Center for Care Delivery & Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Adam J. Gordon
- HSR&D Center of Innovation: Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, Salt Lake City, UT
- Program for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Knowledge and Advocacy (PARCKA), Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Emily C. Williams
- Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D) Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
- Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ryan S. Trim
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Brittany E. Blanchard
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| | - Aline Lott
- Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D) Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Anissa N. Danner
- Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D) Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
| | - Andrew J. Saxon
- Health Services Research & Development (HSR&D) Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, Veterans Affairs (VA) Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
- Center of Excellence in Substance Addiction Treatment and Education, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|