Electromyographic Comparison of the Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Suprainguinal and Infrainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Blockade of the Obturator Nerve in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block in pediatric-aged patients: An educational focused review

Regional anesthesia has become an integral component of postoperative analgesia and multimodal analgesia during surgery, providing opioid sparing effects and maintaining a beneficial adverse effect profile. Although neuraxial techniques were initially the primary techniques used for intraoperative and postoperative anesthesia and analgesia, many of these techniques have been replaced by selective nerve blockade. This has been facilitated by the widespread use of ultrasound-guided over conventional landmark techniques. Fascia iliaca compartment blockade (FICB) is performed by depositing a local anesthetic agent underneath the FI fascial sheath which lies on top of the iliopsoas muscle. With the landmark technique, the FICB is more commonly applied using an approach below the inguinal ligament. Advancements in the use of ultrasound have led to development of a potentially superior suprainguinal fascia iliaca (SIFI) block for hip and thigh surgery. An improved cephalad distribution of the local anesthetic solution within the fascia iliaca compartment and comparable analgesic efficacy compared to the more invasive lumbar plexus block has resulted in increased use of the SIFI block in both adults and pediatric-aged patients. The SIFI block aims to target the femoral nerve (FN), lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN), and obturator nerve (ON), thus providing analgesic coverage for hip, femur, and thigh surgery. Although the FN and LFCN are reported to be consistently blocked by the suprainguinal approach, blockade of the ON may be less reliable and requires a higher volume of the local anesthetic agent, proving this technique to be a volume-dependent block. A lower volume of local anesthetic solution may be associated with block failure, especially in the area supplied by the ON and less frequently in the distribution of the LFCN. Thus, local anesthetic concentration must be adjusted in smaller children and infants to maintain effective volume while not exceeding local anesthetic dosing limitations. The current manuscript reviews the innervation of the lower extremity including the anatomy of the fascia iliaca compartment, outlines different approaches for the fascia iliaca block, and reviews the current practice of SIFI blockade in adults and children.

Supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block versus peri-capsular nerve group (PNEG) block for pain management in patients with hip fracture: A double-blind randomised comparative trial

BACKGROUND

Regional analgesia has been recommended to alleviate pain caused by hip fractures. Both the supra-inguinal fascia iliaca block (S-FIB) and the peri‑capsular nerve group (PENG) block provide better analgesia than conventional fascia iliaca block for patients with hip fractures, but which one is superior remains equivocal. This study aimed to determine the superiority of S-FIB or PENG block for patients awaiting hip surgery.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, randomised comparative trial, patients with hip fractures awaiting operation were randomly allocated to receive either S-FIB with 30 ml 0.35 % ropivacaine or PENG block with 20 ml 0.35 % ropivacaine. Primary outcomes were pain scores (numeric rating scale, NRS, 0-10) at rest and during passive movement 30 min after nerve block. Secondary outcomes included pain scores at rest and during movement 10 and 20 min after nerve block and during positioning for spinal anaesthesia, time spent for performing nerve block and spinal anaesthesia, and the quality of positioning for spinal anaesthesia.

RESULTS

One-hundred patients were enrolled and 91 patients completed the trial (S-FIB group n = 46, PENG group n = 45). No significant difference was noted between these two groups in the pain scores (median [interquartile range]) either at rest (0 [0-0] vs 0 [0-0], P = 0.151) or during passive movement (3 [1-6] vs 3 [2-5], P = 0.99) at 30 min after nerve block. However, within-group analysis revealed that a significant reduction in pain score at rest was noted as early as 20 min after PENG block while that was noted only at 30 min after S-FIB. In addition, less time was required to perform PENG than S-FIB the block (3.1 [2.3-3.9] vs. 4.6 [3.1-5.6] minutes, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our result suggests that with a lower dose of local anaesthetic, a shorter procedure time and earlier analgesic effect, PENG block may be preferred to S-FIB for patients with hip fracture awaiting surgery.

Ultrasound-Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in Patients Undergoing Hip Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

The use of fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) has been widely encouraged for hip surgery; however, meta-analyses showed mixed results in terms of its efficacy in reduction in analgesic consumption and pain score. These meta-analyses included all forms of FICB approaches, which may diminish the effect size of the therapy. Suprainguinal FICB (s-FICB) has been shown to be superior to other FICB approaches including the ultrasound-guided infrainguinal approach and the landmark approach. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to compare opioid consumption, pain score, and complications after s-FICB to control for patients undergoing hip surgery. The study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42023460377). We performed a systematic literature search in Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases from inception to 16 August 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of s-FICB versus control for patients undergoing hip surgery. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers, and disagreements were resolved by consensus or by discussion with a third investigator. The primary outcome is the 24-hour oral morphine equivalent daily dose (oMMED). The secondary outcome includes oMMED at different timepoints, and pain score. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (Cochrane, London, England) was used to assess the risk of bias. The certainty of evidence was assessed via the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data were synthesized using a random-effects model. Trial sequence analysis is performed on opioid consumption 24 hours post operation. Eleven randomized controlled trials were included. Arthroscopic hip surgery was performed in three studies involving 222 patients, hip and femur fracture surgeries were performed in three studies involving 149 patients, and total hip arthroplasty was performed in five studies involving 483 patients. In studies involving arthroscopic hip surgery, s-FICB did not improve intra-operative and post-operative opioid consumption and post-operative pain score. In studies involving hip and femur fracture surgeries, s-FICB was associated with a non-significant difference in opioid consumption at 24 hours after surgery and post-operative pain score at 12 hours and 24 hours after surgery. However, the result of the trial sequential analysis (TSA) was not definitive, indicating that additional research is necessary to draw conclusive outcomes. In studies involving total hip arthroplasty, s-FICB was associated with a significant reduction in post-operative opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours with conclusive results in trial sequential analysis. In conclusion, s-FICB is superior to placebo for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. For patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery, s-FICB is unlikely to be beneficial. With regard to hip fracture surgery, additional research is necessary to draw conclusive outcomes.

Comparison of Dye Spread Pattern and Nerve Involvement between Suprainguinal and Infrainguinal Fascia Iliaca Blocks with Different Injectate Volumes: A Cadaveric Evaluation

Background and Objectives: Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) is an effective and relatively safe technique in perioperative pain management for hip surgery. However, blockade of the obturator nerve (ON) using this technique remains controversial. This study aimed to compare dye spread patterns and nerve involvement in the suprainguinal FICB (S-FICB) and infrainguinal FICB (I-FICB) approaches using different volumes of dye. Materials and Methods: Following randomization, 6 S-FICBs and 6 I-FICBs were performed on the left or right sides of 6 unembalmed cadavers. For each block, 30 mL or 60 mL of dye solution was injected. The extent of dye spreading and the staining pattern in the lumbar plexus branches were investigated using anatomical dissection. Results: Twelve injections were successfully completed. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) and femoral nerve (FN) were consistently stained in all injections. Extended dye spread toward lumbar plexus branches was observed volume-dependently in S-FICBs. However, I-FICBs with an increased volume only showed dye spreading in the caudad direction limited to within the fascia iliaca. When 30 mL of dye was used, the ON was not stained with either approach. A stained ON was only observed in S-FICBs when 60 mL of dye was used. Conclusions: In this cadaveric evaluation, the ON was not stained in either FICB approach with the volume of injectate commonly used in clinical practice. The S-FICBs but not I-FICBs using a high volume of injectate resulted in extended spreading to the lumbar plexus branches.

Lumbar erector spinae plane block versus infrainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block for pain management after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided facia iliaca compartment (FIC) and erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks in managing postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty surgery.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients were randomized into 2 groups (n = 30): one that received FIC blocks and one that received ESP blocks. FIC and ESP blocks were performed with 30 mL 0.25% bupivacaine at the end of the surgery. The patients received intravenous tramadol and patient-controlled postoperative analgesia. The pain scores, opioid consumption, and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

The dynamic pain scores on movement in the postoperative first hour were significantly lower in the ESP block group than in the FIC block group (3 [2-4] vs 4 [2-5], respectively; P = .035). Data are expressed as median (25th-75th percentiles). Postoperative opioid consumption within the first postoperative 8 hours was significantly higher in the FIC block group than in the ESP block group (80 mg [61-100] vs 100 mg [80-120], respectively; P = .010). The adverse effects of opioids did not differ between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

ESP and infrainguinal FIC blocks provided similar postoperative analgesia 24 hours after total hip arthroplasty. The ESP block is more beneficial than the FIC block in terms of pain scores and opioid consumption in the early hours of the postoperative period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05621161).

95% effective volume of ropivacaine for ultrasound‑guided supra‑inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block

BACKGROUND

Hip arthroplasty is effective in treating hip diseases, such as osteoarthritis and hip fracture, but it often brings severe trauma and pain. In recent years, ultrasound-guided supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block(S-FICB) has become a widely used nerve block method for analgesia in hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients preparing for hip arthroplasty were prospectively enrolled. S-FICB was performed under ultrasound guidance, and inject 0.33% ropivacaine into the space. Using the biased-coin design (BCD) sequential allocation method. The initial volume of 0.33% ropivacaine was 30ml. In case of failure, the next patient received a higher volume (defined as the previous volume with an increment of 1.2 mL). If the previous patient had a successful block, the next patient was randomized to a lower volume (defined as the previous volume with a decrement of 1.2 mL), with a probability of b = 0.05, or the same volume, with a probability of 1 - b = 0.95. The study was stopped when 45 successful blocks were achieved.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (84.9%) were blocked successfully. The 95% effective volume (EV95) was 34.06ml (95%CI 33.35 ~ 36.28ml). There were 31 patients with non-fracture in this study. The quadriceps muscle strength decreased in only two patients. Moreover, they both received 34.8ml of ropivacaine for S-FICB. Twenty-two patients had hip fractures. There were 3 patients (14%) with failed blocks and 19 patients (86%) with successful blocks. However, all fracture patients experienced less pain after S-FICB.

CONCLUSION

EV95 of 0.33% ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided S-FICB was 34.06ml.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2100052214, registration date: 2021 October 22).

Anesthetic Effect of the Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block with Different Approaches on Total Hip Arthroplasty and Its Effect on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Inflammation

Objective

The objective of this article is to make a comparison of the anesthetic effects of the inside and outside fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to study the effect of the different approaches of the FICB on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and serum inflammatory cytokines in THA patients.

Methods

A total of 60 patients who received THA treatment from January 2021 to December 2021 were divided into two groups, namely, Inside group (inside approach of the FICB) and Outside group (outside approach of the FICB), according to the different approaches of the FICB. Forty-eight hours after surgery, we compared the use of ropacaine dosage, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, the use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score, the incidence of POCD, and the serum levels of IL-1, IL-6. Secondary indicators include surgical indicators and the quality of anesthesia cannula.

Results

The ratio of re-fix the catheter, intubation time, and the use of ropacaine dosage at 48 h after surgery in the Outside group were significantly higher than that in the Inside group (p &lt; 0.05), while the depth of cannulation in the Outside group was significantly lower than that in the Inside group (p &lt; 0.05). VAS scores were comparable between the Inside and the Outside groups, except at 24 h after surgery. The use of PCA from 24 to 48 h after surgery in the Outside group was significantly higher than that in the Inside group (p &lt; 0.05). The MMSE score and the incidence of POCD in the Outside group were higher than that in the Inside group. At the same time, the serum IL-1β levels at 1 and 6 h after surgery and the serum IL-6 levels at 1, 6, 24, and 48 h after surgery in the Outside group were significantly higher than that in the Inside group (p &lt; 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with the outside approach of the FICB, the inside approach of the FICB has better anesthetic effect, better postoperative analgesia, fewer postoperative analgesics, lower incidence of POCD, and lower serum cytokines during the treatment of THA patients.

Development of Guidance Techniques for Regional Anesthesia: Past, Present and Future

Regional anesthesia has been widely used in clinical practice. Over the past 30 years, various guidance techniques have been developed for regional anesthesia ranging from paresthesia progressing to neurostimulation and currently ultrasound guidance. Especially, the use of point-of-care ultrasound greatly enhances the success rate of regional anesthesia. However, the poor imaging quality of ultrasound in patients with obesity, fat infiltration, etc., limits the use of ultrasound. The combined use of ultrasound with neurostimulator, electromyography, pressure monitoring, etc. is advocated in order to facilitate regional anesthesia in this cohort of patients. The accumulated evidence has shown that the ultrasound combined with other techniques (UCOT) can help to solve the difficulties of puncture location caused by obesity, anatomical variation, and other factors when using ultrasound guidance alone. In recent years, with the development of medical image fusion and medical image artificial intelligence identification technology, guidance techniques for regional anesthesia have advanced considerably. To understand the advantages and disadvantages of the various guidance techniques for regional anesthesia developed in recent years and to guide their rational clinical application, this paper reviews these techniques, describing the progression from the early use of paresthesia to the latest UCOT, as well as the latest research on UCOT, and the prospects for the development of new guidance techniques for regional anesthesia.

Cadaveric investigation of the minimum effective volume for ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block

BACKGROUND

This cadaveric dose-finding study investigated the minimum effective volume of dye in 90% of cases (MEV90), required to stain the femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous and obturator nerves for ultrasound-guided suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SIFIB).

METHODS

In cadaveric specimens of the lower limb, the block needle was advanced, medial to the anterosuperior iliac spine, until its tip was positioned between the internal oblique and iliacus muscles underneath the fascia iliaca. The dye was injected inside the fascia iliaca compartment. Volume assignment was carried out using a biased coin design, whereby the volume of dye administered to each cadaveric specimen depended on the response of the previous one. In case of failure, the next one received a higher volume (defined as the previous volume with an increment of 2.5 mL). If the previous cadaveric specimen had a successful block, the next one was randomized to a lower volume (defined as the previous volume with a decrement of 2.5 mL), with a probability of b=0.11, or the same volume, with a probability of 1-b=0.89. Success was defined as the staining of the femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator nerves on dissection.

RESULTS

Thirty-six cadavers (60 cadaveric specimens) were included in the study. Using isotonic regression and bootstrap CI, the MEV90 for ultrasound-guided SIFIB was estimated to be 62.5 mL (95% CI 60 to 65).

CONCLUSION

For ultrasound-guided SIFIB, the MEV90 of dye required to stain the femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous and obturator nerves is 62.5 mL. Further studies are required to correlate this finding with the MEV90 of local anesthetic in human subjects.

Anatomical considerations for obturator nerve block with fascia iliaca compartment block

This report reviews the topographical and functional anatomy relevant for assessing whether or not the obturator nerve (ON) can be anesthetized using a fascia iliaca compartment (FIC) block. The ON does not cross the FIC. This means that the ON would only be blocked by an FIC block if the injectate spreads to the ON outside of the FIC. Such a phenomena would require the creation of one or more artificial passageways to the ON in the retro-psoas compartment or the retroperitoneal compartment by disrupting the normal anatomical integrity of the FI. Due to this requirement for an artificial pathway, an FIC block probably does not block the ON.

Ultrasound-Guided Comparison of Psoas Compartment Block and Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Pain Management in Pediatric Developmental Dysplasia of Hip Surgeries

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare psoas compartment block (PCB) and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (SFIB) in terms of pain management and the need for additional systemic analgesia in the perioperative phase of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty pediatric patients were randomized into the PCB group and the SFIB group. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores were used to assess postoperative pain during the initial 24 h after extubation. Sufentanil consumption, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) demands, and complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

The NRS pain scores were significantly lower in the PCB group than in the SFIB group at 0, 4, 8, 12, and 24 h after extubation (all P < 0.01). Postoperatively, 13.8% of patients in the PCB cohort received additional administration of sufentanil, in contrast to 63.3% of the SFIB cohort (P < 0.01). In the PCB group, 0 (0-0) mcg/kg sufentanil was administered, while in the SFIB group 0.1 (0-0.2) mcg/kg (P < 0.01). In addition, the PCB group had fewer PCA demands than the SFIB group within the initial 24 h (P < 0.01). It took less operating time to achieve SFIB as compared to PCB (P < 0.01). No adverse events related to two techniques were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

PCB provided a better perioperative pain management in pediatric patients with the DDH surgeries compared to SFIB. It also reduced the need for supplementary systemic analgesia.