1
|
Paik H, Hee Hong Y, Eun Kim T, Gyeong Jeong H, Ki Kim S, Ryeol Lee J. Factors associated with successful intraoperative oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation during open pelvic surgery for gynecologic indications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 301:43-48. [PMID: 39088939 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.07.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The study investigated factors associated with successful intra-operative oocyte retrieval for fertility preservation during transabdominal gynecologic surgery. STUDY DESIGN A total of 29 patients who underwent intraoperative oocyte retrieval during staging surgery at a single academic hospital from May 2014 to August 2022 were enrolled in this study, and their outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS Among 29 patients who underwent intra-operative oocyte retrieval during staging surgery, oocytes were obtained in 24 patients, representing 82.8 % of the retrieval rate (24/29), and two patients returned to use cryopreserved oocytes (6.9 %). Among 24 women who succeeded in obtaining oocytes, 20 patients succeeded in oocyte cryopreservation, and two patients proceeded to embryo cryopreservation. The cryopreservation rate was 91.7 % (22/24). All patients with failed oocyte retrieval (n = 5) and cryopreservation (n = 7) were diagnosed with malignancy. AMH of those with successful cryopreservation oocytes was higher than those without cryopreservation (4.10 ng/mL vs. 1.18 ng/mL, p = 0.003). A higher portion of the unstimulated cycle was observed in those with failed cryopreservation (8.3 % vs. 40.0 %, p = 0.01). No complications were noted. CONCLUSION For women planning to undergo open pelvic surgery, intra-operative oocyte retrieval is a feasible option. High serum AMH and ovarian stimulation before surgery may predict successful oocyte cryopreservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haerin Paik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Hee Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Eun Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye Gyeong Jeong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seul Ki Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung Ryeol Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is more frequent in post-menopausal women, however it can also occur in young premenopausal women. After diagnosis and cancer staging, health care providers should address the possibility of infertility and might offer fertility preservation options. Chemotherapy, frequently used when treating ovarian cancer, has proven to cause extensive ovarian damage. Standard surgery may be aggressive and the recurrence risk may not be relevant enough to opt for these approaches. Fertility sparing surgery has been progressively accepted and many alternative surgical approaches have proven to be successful in both cancer treatment, fertility preservation and low recurrence rates. Though there are several techniques available for fertility preservation in cancer patients, when dealing with ovarian cancer patients, oocyte and embryo cryopreservation are the only suitable. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation has been largely studied, but no data on ovarian cancer patients exist, due to the risk of reimplanting cancer cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ana Sofia Pais
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Teresa Almeida Santos
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mandelbaum RS, Klar M, Takiuchi T, Bainvoll L, Matsuzaki S, Paulson RJ, Matsuo K. Fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Contemporary oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2020; 46:1263-1281. [PMID: 32500605 DOI: 10.1111/jog.14302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) can be a devastating diagnosis in women of reproductive age who desire future fertility. However, in early-stage disease, fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) can be considered in appropriately selected patients. METHODS This is a narrative descriptive review of the recent literature on FSS for EOC from oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives. RESULTS The recurrence rate following FSS performed for stage I EOC in published retrospective studies collectively is 13% but ranges from 5 to 29%, while mortality ranges from 0 to 18%. Five-year disease-free survival following FSS is over 90% but decreases with higher stage and grade. Recurrences following FSS are more likely to be localized with a more favorable prognosis compared to recurrences following radical surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in women with high-risk disease, and strategies to minimize gonadotoxicity during chemotherapy such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists may be considered. Oocyte, embryo and/or ovarian cryopreservation can also be offered to patients desiring future biologic children. Reproductive outcomes following FSS, including pregnancy and miscarriage rates, resemble those of the general population, with a chance of successful pregnancy of nearly 80%. CONCLUSION In retrospective data, FSS appears to be oncologically safe in stage IA and IC grade 1-2 non-clear cell EOC. In patients with grade 3 tumors or clear cell histology, treatment can be individualized, weighing a slightly higher risk of recurrence with fertility goals. A multidisciplinary approach with oncology and reproductive endocrinology may be of utility to help these patients achieve their fertility goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel S Mandelbaum
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tsuyoshi Takiuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Liat Bainvoll
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shinya Matsuzaki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Richard J Paulson
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peyser A, Hershlag A, Sakaris A, Singer T. Vaginal cuff dehiscence following controlled ovarian stimulation recognized during egg retrieval. FERTILITY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2019; 5:11. [PMID: 31741740 PMCID: PMC6849304 DOI: 10.1186/s40738-019-0064-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Vaginal cuff dehiscence is a rare complication of hysterectomy. Those who choose to undergo controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) and oocyte cryopreservation following hysterectomy must be aware that elevated abdominal pressure from stimulation as well as transvaginal ultrasound use during monitoring may increase the risk of cuff dehiscence. Case We present a case of a 25-year-old patient who had undergone a hysterectomy four months prior for endometrial cancer who was found to have vaginal cuff dehiscence which was recognized at the time of egg retrieval after COS. Prompt recognition and appropriate management led to successful treatment. Conclusion Patients presenting for oocyte cryopreservation following hysterectomy are at risk for cuff dehiscence. Providers should allow ample time for proper cuff healing prior to COS and oocyte cryopreservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Peyser
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
| | - Avner Hershlag
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
| | - Antoinette Sakaris
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
| | - Tomer Singer
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tomao F, Di Pinto A, Sassu CM, Bardhi E, Di Donato V, Muzii L, Petrella MC, Peccatori FA, Panici PB. Fertility preservation in ovarian tumours. Ecancermedicalscience 2018; 12:885. [PMID: 30679952 PMCID: PMC6345054 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
A considerable number of patients with a cancer diagnosis are of childbearing age and have not satisfied their desire for a family. Despite ovarian cancer (OC) usually occurring in older patients, 3%-14% are diagnosed at a fertile age with the overall 5-year survival rate being 91.2% in women ≤44 years of age when it is found at 1A-B stage. In this scenario, testing the safety and the efficacy of fertility sparing strategies in OC patients is very important overall in terms of quality of life. Unfortunately, the lack of randomised trials to validate conservative approaches does not guarantee the safety of fertility preservation strategies. However, evidence-based data from descriptive series suggest that in selected cases, the preservation of the uterus and at least one part of the ovary does not lead to a high risk of relapse. This conservative surgery helps to maintain organ function, giving patients of childbearing age the possibility to preserve their fertility. We hereby analysed the main evidence from the international literature on this topic in order to highlight the selected criteria for conservative management of OC patients, including healthy BRCA mutations carriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Tomao
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Di Pinto
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Carolina Maria Sassu
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Erlisa Bardhi
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
- Department of Gynaecological and Obstetrical Sciences and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Kim SY, Lee JR. Fertility preservation option in young women with ovarian cancer. Future Oncol 2016; 12:1695-8. [PMID: 27193251 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- So-Youn Kim
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Jung Ryeol Lee
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam City, Kyeonggi-do, Korea.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tomao F, Peccatori F, Del Pup L, Franchi D, Zanagnolo V, Panici PB, Colombo N. Special issues in fertility preservation for gynecologic malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2015; 97:206-19. [PMID: 26358422 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2015] [Revised: 07/25/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Gynecologic malignancies account for 1,09 million new cancer cases worldwide consisting of about 12% of tumors affecting female population. About 10% of all female cancer survivors are younger than 40 years of age. Since cancers affecting female genital organs are usually treated by radical surgery, chemotherapy or chemoradiation approaches that induce permanent damage of reproductive functions, the development of strategies for fertility preservation represent one of the most important goals for gynecologic oncology. In this scenario, the newly defined oncofertility discipline acquires increasing interest, offering patients maximal chances to make an adequate decision about future fertility, based on their oncologic diagnosis and prognosis. However, the majority of physicians do not pay particular attention to these issues, even if impressive progresses have been made in this field in the last decades. Possibly, it is due to the lack of strong evidences from clinical trials without an adequate number of cases to establish safety and efficacy of these procedures. In this review we will discuss the most recently debated options for fertility preservation in gynecologic oncology, highlighting issues and controversies related to oncofertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federica Tomao
- European Institute of Oncology "IEO", Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy; University of Rome "Sapienza", Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161 Rome, Italy.
| | - Fedro Peccatori
- European Institute of Oncology "IEO", Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Lino Del Pup
- National Cancer Institute "CRO", Via Franco Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano PD, Italy
| | - Dorella Franchi
- European Institute of Oncology "IEO", Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Vanna Zanagnolo
- European Institute of Oncology "IEO", Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Nicoletta Colombo
- European Institute of Oncology "IEO", Via Giuseppe Ripamonti 435, 20141 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|