Planned Mode of Delivery of Preterm Twins and Neonatal and 2-Year Outcomes

Cesarean delivery is associated with lower neonatal mortality among breech pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preterm deliveries ≤32 weeks of gestation

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between actual and planned modes of delivery, neonatal mortality, and short-term outcomes among preterm pregnancies ≤32 weeks of gestation.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search was conducted in 3 main databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to November 16, 2022. The protocol was registered in advance in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022377870).

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Eligible studies examined pregnancies ≤32nd gestational week. All infants received active care, and the outcomes were reported separately by different modes of delivery. Singleton and twin pregnancies at vertex and breech presentations were included. Studies that included pregnancies complicated with preeclampsia and abruptio placentae were excluded. Primary outcomes were neonatal mortality and intraventricular hemorrhage.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Articles were selected by title, abstract, and full text, and disagreements were resolved by consensus. Random effects model-based odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated for dichotomous outcomes. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions-I was used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

A total of 19 observational studies were included involving a total of 16,042 preterm infants in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Actual cesarean delivery improves survival (odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.9) and decreases the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage (odds ratio, 0.70; confidence interval, 0.57-0.85) compared to vaginal delivery. Planned cesarean delivery does not improve the survival of very and extremely preterm infants compared to vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-1.44). Subset analysis found significantly lower odds of death for singleton breech preterm deliveries born by both planned (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.98) and actual (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.88) cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSION

Cesarean delivery should be the mode of delivery for preterm ≤32 weeks of gestation breech births due to the higher mortality in preterm infants born via vaginal delivery.

Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in preterm twins less than 32 weeks of gestation or birthweight under 1500 g: a systematic review and meta-analyses

BACKGROUND

The mode of delivery for twins born before 32 weeks of gestation remains controversial. Our purpose is to conduct a meta-analysis of twin pregnancies less than 32 weeks or twin weight less than 1500 g, so as to find a suitable delivery mode.

METHODS

We searched PubMed database, Cochrane Library database, and EMBASE database through December 2022. This protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023386946) prior to initiation. Studies that compared vaginal delivery to cesarean section for newborns less than 32 weeks of gestation or birthweight under 1500 g were included. The primary result was neonatal mortality rate. Secondary result was neonatal morbidity. The quality of literatures included in the research was evaluated in accordance with Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) literature quality evaluation scale. We use odds ratio (OR) as the effect index for binary variables. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. P < 0. 05 indicated statistically significant difference.

RESULTS

Our search generated 5310 articles, and a total of 8 articles comprising a total of 14,703 newborns were included in the analysis. The odds ratios of neonatal mortality rate were for twins delivered by vaginal delivery compared to cesarean section were 0.84 (95% CI 0.57-1.24, P = 0.38). The 5-min Apgar score < 7 (95% CI 0.44-1.75, P = 0.72), necrotizing enterocolitis (95% CI 0.81-1.19, P = 0.82), intraventricular hemorrhage (95% CI 0.41-1.86, P = 0.71), periventricular leukomalacia (95% CI 0.16-4.52, P = 0.84), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (95% CI 0.88-1.36, P = 0.42), and respiratory distress syndrome (95% CI 0.23-2.01, P = 0.48) were not statistically significant between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

We have observed that vaginal delivery does not confer an increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality in twins born before 32 weeks of gestation. However, the current results are affected by substantial heterogeneity and confounding factors. We still need high-quality randomized-controlled studies require to address this important question.

Timing of antenatal corticosteroids and survival without neurologic disabilities at 5½ years in children born before 35 weeks of gestation

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of antenatal corticosteroids for neonatal preterm complications wanes beyond 7 days after treatment. The neurodevelopmental effects of longer treatment-to-birth intervals have not been adequately evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the impact of antenatal corticosteroid timing on survival without moderate or severe neurologic disabilities at 5½ years.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of the EPIPAGE-2 study, a national population-based cohort (France) that recruited neonates in 2011 and followed them up at 5½ years (results first reported in 2021). Participants were children born alive between 24+0 and 34+6 weeks, with a complete corticosteroid course, delivery >48 hours after the first injection, and neither limitation of care decided before birth nor severe congenital malformation. The study included 2613 children, 2427 of whom were alive at 5½ years; 71.9% (1739/2427) had a neurologic assessment at this age; 1537 had a clinical examination (complete for 1532), and 202 were assessed with a postal questionnaire. Exposure was defined as the interval between the first injection of the last antenatal corticosteroid course and delivery in days, studied in 2 categories (days 3-7 and after day 7), in 4 categories (days 3-7, 8-14, 15-21, and after day 21), and continuously in days. The main outcome was survival at 5½ years without moderate/severe neurologic disabilities, defined as moderate/severe cerebral palsy, or unilateral or bilateral blindness or deafness, or Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient 2 standard deviations below the mean. A multivariate analysis with a generalized estimated equation logistic regression model assessed the statistical association between the main outcomes and the interval from the first corticosteroid injection of the last course to birth. Multivariate analyses were adjusted for potential confounders, defined with a directed acyclic graph: gestational age in days, number of corticosteroid courses, multiple pregnancy, and cause of prematurity in 5 categories. Because neurologic follow-up was complete in only 63.2% of cases (1532/2427), the analyses used imputed data.

RESULTS

Among 2613 children, 186 died between birth and 5½ years. Overall survival was 96.6% (95% confidence interval, 95.9-97.0), and survival without moderate or severe neurologic disabilities was 86.0% (95% confidence interval, 84.7-87.0). Survival without moderate or severe neurologic disabilities was lower after day 7 (85.0%) than during the interval from day 3 to day 7 (87.0%) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.89).

CONCLUSION

The association of a >7-day interval between antenatal corticosteroid administration and birth with a lower rate of survival without moderate or severe neurologic disabilities among children aged 5½ years emphasizes the importance of better targeting women at risk of preterm delivery to optimize the timing and thus benefits of treatment.

Short-term neonatal and long-term infant outcome of late-preterm twins: nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the short- and long-term outcome of late-preterm compared with term birth in twin pregnancy.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study included all women who had a twin delivery between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2010 recorded in the claims database of the Korea National Health Insurance, with at least one follow-up recorded in the database of the National Health Screening Program for Infants and Children. Outcomes were analyzed at the pregnancy level, with adverse outcome being defined as an adverse outcome in one or both twins, identified by a diagnosis according to the International Classification of Diseases 10^th Revision. The primary short-term outcome was composite morbidity, which included any of the following: transient tachypnea, respiratory distress syndrome, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage and bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Long-term adverse outcome included any neurological or neurodevelopmental outcome, defined by prespecified neurological and developmental diagnoses; these were assessed by following up all neonates until the end of 2018, by which time they were 8-11 years of age. Outcomes were compared between twins delivered late preterm (34 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks) and those delivered at term (≥ 37 weeks).

RESULTS

Among 17 189 women who delivered twins at ≥ 34 weeks of gestation during the study period, 5032 (29.27%) women delivered in the late-preterm period. On multivariate analysis, compared with the twins delivered at term, the late-preterm twins had an increased risk for the primary short-term outcome of composite morbidity (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.09; 95% CI, 1.90-2.30), including transient tachypnea (aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.64-2.09), respiratory distress syndrome (aOR, 2.31; 95% CI, 2.04-2.62), necrotizing enterocolitis (aOR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.20-3.69) and intraventricular hemorrhage (aOR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.46-3.11). For the long-term outcome, the late-preterm twins also had an increased risk for any neurological or neurodevelopmental outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.07-1.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Twins delivered in the late-preterm period have an increased risk for short- and long-term morbidity compared with twins delivered at term. These results should be considered when determining the timing of delivery in uncomplicated twin pregnancy. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Mode of delivery in multiple pregnancies

The mode of delivery in multiple pregnancies has been subject to vigorous debates during the last few decades. Although observational and retrospective data were accumulated, it was not until the publication of the Twin Birth Study that evidence-based recommendations could emerge. However, although some of the most pressing questions were answered by the Twin Birth Study, other questions were left outside the scope of the study. The questions were of great interest and included the following topics: the impact of gestational age, the influence of chorionicity, and the generalizability of the results for women with a previous uterine scar. The current evidence supported a trial of labor in dichorionic-diamniotic or monochorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancies in which the first twin is in cephalic presentation at ≥32 weeks' gestation. Dichorionic-diamniotic, monochorionic-diamniotic, and monochorionic-monoamniotic twins should be delivered at 37 0/7 to 38 0/7, 36 0/7 to 37 0/7, and 32 0/7 to 34 0/7 weeks' gestation, respectively. Breech extraction done by a competent healthcare provider seemed to offer a higher chance of successful vaginal delivery of the second twin than the external cephalic version. The current data did not allow for a clear recommendation regarding the mode of delivery in very preterm birth of low birthweight twins, but most studies did not demonstrate a clear benefit of cesarean delivery vs trial of labor. Furthermore, a trial of labor seemed safe in women with a previous cesarean delivery. Cesarean delivery is likely beneficial for twin pregnancies with the first twin in breech presentation, monochorionic-monoamniotic twins, and higher-order multiple pregnancies. In all multiple pregnancies, delivery should be performed by an experienced practitioner competent in multiple pregnancy deliveries.

Vaginal delivery of the second twin in unengaged cephalic presentation

In accordance with women's preferences guidelines, referring to population-based and randomized trials, which recommends counseling women with vertex-first twins to attempt a vaginal delivery. Yet, the rising rates of twin caesareans are associated with the decline in skills of senior and junior obstetricians. Although noncephalic second twins have been in the focus of interest, prompt delivery of cephalic second twins can be trickier when the head does not engage. We illustrate how to avoid complications during instrumental delivery or internal podalic version and breech extraction of the second twin encouraging to start when membranes are still intact.