Botulinum Toxin A as a Treatment for Provoked Vestibulodynia: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Phase 2 randomized study of abobotulinumtoxinA in patients with provoked vestibulodynia: dose-finding results

BACKGROUND

Hypertonicity of the pelvic floor muscles is commonly associated with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD); therefore, patients may benefit from treatments that relax the pelvic floor.

AIM

To define optimal (safe and efficacious) doses of abobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) for the treatment of PVD associated with hypertonic pelvic floor muscle dysfunction and to explore use of a novel endpoint for pain assessment for PVD.

METHODS

This phase 2, randomized, placebo-controlled study comprised two steps: dose escalation (Stage 1) and dose expansion (Stage 2). Stage 1 included up to four treatment cycles; Cycle 1 was double blind, Cycles 2-4 open label. Patients were assessed for retreatment every 6 weeks. Stage 2 was not conducted because of early study termination by the sponsor, unrelated to observed safety signals. Enrolled patients-premenopausal women with PVD with associated pelvic-floor hypertonia-were randomized (n = 60) 4:1 to receive aboBoNT-A (doses: 100, 300, 400, or 500 units [U]) or placebo.

OUTCOMES

The primary endpoint was safety. Additionally, a novel composite endpoint, dilator maximum tested size was evaluated. This endpoint combined assessment of vaginal-dilator tolerability with patient-reported pain assessment on an 11-point numeric rating scale, used as a surrogate measure of sexual activity in this study.

RESULTS

All treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate in intensity, with no serious AEs or AEs leading to withdrawal reported in the double-blind period. AEs of special interest (urinary incontinence, anal sphincter atonia) were observed at low incidence and predominantly with higher aboBoNT-A doses. The dilator test composite score might be a useful endpoint for pain assessment, with a greater reduction in pain score noted for the 300 U dose group compared with other dose groups and placebo.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

aboBoNT-A was well tolerated in patients with PVD and a novel method for assessing dilator-induced pain was introduced.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

The study provided valuable data on use of aboBoNT-A in women with primary or secondary PVD and introduced a novel composite endpoint for assessing dilator-induced pain. Study limitations included the small sample size, limiting formal statistical analysis.

CONCLUSION

aboBoNT-A was well tolerated in patients with PVD with no safety signals reported. Further studies are warranted to demonstrate clinically meaningful benefits with repeated treatment.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03598777.

Efficacy of Rehabilitative Techniques on Pain Relief in Patients With Vulvodynia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Vulvodynia is a chronic clinical condition characterized by provoked or non-provoked vulvar pain for at least 3 months of unknown etiology. The onset of vulvodynia involves a complex interplay of peripheral and central pain mechanisms, such as pelvic floor muscle and autonomic dysfunction, and interpersonal factors. A stepwise approach of pelvic floor physical therapy as medical management is suggested. In this scenario, by this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of rehabilitation interventions in patients with vulvodynia.

METHODS

On October 13, 2022, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed the efficacy of the rehabilitative approach to pain during intercourse in patients with vulvodynia. The quality assessment was performed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The trial registration number is CRD42021257449. At the end of the search, 9 studies were included for a total of 332 patients. A pairwise meta-analysis was performed to highlight the efficacy of rehabilitative approaches for reducing pain during intercourse, as measured with a visual analog scale or a numerical rating scale.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis showed that all these rehabilitative approaches had an overall effect size of -1.43 (95% CI = -2.69 to -0.17) in decreasing vulvodynia pain in terms of the visual analog scale. In the subgroup analysis, a significant effect size in acupuncture (effect size = -2.36; 95% CI = -3.83 to -0.89) and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (effect size = -2.94; 95% CI = -4.31 to -1.57; I2 = 58%) was observed. According to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, a low risk of bias for outcome selection in 89% of studies.

CONCLUSION

Findings from this meta-analysis suggested that the physical agent modalities and complementary medicine techniques in people with vulvodynia appear to be more effective than placebo, sham, or waiting list. Further evidence on physical agent modalities and complementary therapies are warranted in the future.

IMPACT

This was the first systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to provide evidence on the efficacy of rehabilitation interventions in patients with vulvodynia.

Individualized multidisciplinary therapy for vulvodynia

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this review was to develop strategies for individualizing multidisciplinary therapy for vulvodynia.

METHODS

We conducted two literature searches; the first one focused on clinical trials assessing vulvodynia treatments published after the recommendations of the expert committee of the Fourth International Consultation on Sexual Medicine. The second search targeted studies identifying predictive factors and mediators of vulvodynia treatments, published from the earliest date to October 2022.

RESULTS

Based on data from 55 relevant studies, we developed models of individualized multidisciplinary therapy targeting groups of women less responsive to multidisciplinary therapy (characterized by women with higher vulvar pain intensity, impaired sexual functioning, and vulvodynia secondary subtype) and to physical therapy, as an isolated treatment (characterized by women with increased pelvic floor muscle tone and vulvodynia primary subtype). Each individualized multidisciplinary therapy model comprises three components: psychotherapy, medical care, and physical therapy. These components provide distinct therapeutic modalities for distinct subgroups of women with vulvodynia; the women subgroups were identified according to the characteristics of women, the disease, partners, and relationships. Additionally, for women with provoked vestibulodynia who exhibit less benefits from vestibulectomy (such as those with higher levels of erotophobia, greater vulvar pain intensity, and the primary subtype) and encounter resistance to individualized multidisciplinary therapy, we suggest additional conservative treatments before performing vestibulectomy.

CONCLUSION

Our study is a pioneer in the development of models that allow the individualization of multidisciplinary therapy for vulvodynia and represents a significant advance in the clinical practice of gynecologists, physiotherapists, and psychologists.

Botulinum Toxin for the Management of Pelvic Floor Tension Myalgia and Persistent Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature on use of botulinum toxin to treat pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain.

DATA SOURCES

The ClinicalTrials.gov , PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched from inception to November 2022 by two independent assessors (B.L.K. and F.G.L.). Identified studies were screened by title and abstract and included after full-text review. Data extraction was subsequently performed and recorded in Microsoft Excel.

METHODS

This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines after registration in PROSPERO (CRD42022289132). All randomized studies, prospective studies with more than five participants, and retrospective studies with more than 10 participants published in English or French and assessing the use of botulinum toxin for the treatment of pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain in women were included. Meta-analyses were performed on randomized data.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Of 4,722 articles identified, 24 satisfied inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials totaling 329 participants demonstrated no differences in patient- and clinician-reported outcome measures, including pain, dyspareunia, sexual function, and vaginal manometry. Mean duration of follow-up was 6 months. A qualitative analysis of 14 prospective and four retrospective studies including 804 participants is supportive of botulinum toxin; however, the quality of data is low, and there is marked heterogeneity between studies.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analyses of randomized data do not support the use of botulinum toxin to treat pelvic floor tension myalgia and persistent pelvic pain. Failure of these data to confirm the findings of nonrandomized prospective studies that suggest a treatment benefit may be attributable to the absence of placebo control and confounding outcomes obtained from an active comparator group. Further randomized controlled trials with true placebo are strongly recommended.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42022289132.

Botulinum toxin injection in vulva and vagina. Evidence from a literature systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Botulinum toxin (BoNT) administration has been proposed in the gynecologic field for pelvic, vulvar and vaginal disorders. On this regard, we aimed assessing the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of BoNT usage in the treatment of vaginal, vulvar and pelvic pain disorders.

METHODS

We searched for all the original articles without date restriction until 31.12.2021. We included all the original articles which administered botulinum toxin in the vulva or vagina of women suffering from vaginismus, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain. Only English language studies and those performed in humans were eligible. We excluded all case reports and pilot study from the qualitative analysis, although we accurately evaluated them. 22 original studies were finally included in the systematic review.

RESULTS

Botulinum toxin injection was found to be effective in improving vulvar and vaginal dyspareunia, vaginismus, and chronic pelvic pain. No irreversible side effects were detected. Major side effects reported were transient urinary or fecal incontinence, constipation and rectal pain. The risk of bias assessment proved original articles to be of medium quality. No metanalysis could have been performed since lack of congruency in the definition of pathology and methods of botulinum toxin administration.

CONCLUSION

Data extraction pointed out different endpoints and different methods of analysis. Studies focus on different types of participants and use various techniques and timing. According to the best evidence available, different techniques provide evidence about positive outcomes, with the need for a standardized protocol.

Treatment of Vestibulodynia with Submucosal Injections of IncobotulinumtoxinA into Targeted Painful Points: An Open-Label Exploratory Study

The studies carried out to date on vulvodynia treatment with botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) have followed generic injection protocols and reported contradictory outcomes on its effects. The aim of the present study was thus to propose a protocol for injecting BoNT/A into targeted painful points, to comprehensively assess the clinical effect of BoNT/A treatment and identify the risk/protective factors for successful treatment. Thirty-five vestibulodynia patients were treated with submucosal injections of incobotulinumtoxinA and assessed 8, 12 and 24 weeks after their treatment. Their clinical and pelvic statuses were assessed from self-reported questionnaires (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), Marinoff's Dyspareunia Scale (MDS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Catastrophizing Scale (CS)), physical examinations and surface electromyography (sEMG). The patients reported a reduction in provoked vestibulodynia (FSFI, p < 0.01; Collapse

Key Words

• algometer
• botulinum toxin A
• sexual function
• surface electromyography
• vestibulodynia
• vulvodynia

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Female
• Vulvodynia/drug therapy
• Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use
• Pain
• Pain Threshold

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Paula Villa-Muñoz Servicio De Ginecología Y Obstetricia, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (P.V.-M.); (F.J.N.-A.)
Monica Albaladejo-Belmonte Centro De Investigación E Innovación En Bioingeniería (CI2B), Universitat Politècnica De València, 46022 Valencia, Spain;
Francisco J. Nohales-Alfonso Servicio De Ginecología Y Obstetricia, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (P.V.-M.); (F.J.N.-A.)
Jose Alberola-Rubio Sonda Devices S.L., 46004 Valencia, Spain;
Javier Garcia-Casado Centro De Investigación E Innovación En Bioingeniería (CI2B), Universitat Politècnica De València, 46022 Valencia, Spain;

Collapse

Pharmacological Treatments for Localized Provoked Vulvodynia: A Scoping Review

Introduction

Localized provoked vulvodynia (LPV) is a chronic pain condition without an identifiable cause that is localized to a portion of the vulva and provoked by pressure or touch. LPV is a commonly occurring but poorly understood condition lacking consensus on management.

Method

This scoping review used Arksey and O'Malley's approach to identify and evaluate literature published between 2010 and 2023 that addressed the question: What is the current evidence on the efficacy or effectiveness of pharmacological treatments in the management of LPV?

Results

This review evaluated 18 papers reporting on the efficacy or effectiveness of oral, topical, and injectable medications. Seven of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Oral gabapentin and oral desipramine showed some improvement in sexual function compared to placebo. Small sample sizes and methodological issues limited confidence in interpreting findings. Pain was reduced in descriptive studies of tricyclic antidepressants, milnacipran, injectable anesthetics, and botulinum toxin. Where pain did not improve with treatment, some oral medications improved participants' mood and sexual function. Some topical agents may be effective in reducing peripherally mediated neuropathic pain. Botulinum toxin was the most well-studied injectable but yielded mixed outcomes related to pain, quality of life, and sexual function.

Conclusion

There is a lack of convincing evidence to draw conclusions about the efficacy or effectiveness of pharmacological therapies for LPV. The breadth of therapies for treating LPV warrants the development of evidence-based, consensus guidelines for measuring treatment outcomes and improving comparisons across studies. Recommendations for research include addressing methodological shortcomings and diversifying the participant pool to increase the generalizability of findings.

Applications of botulinum toxin to the female pelvic floor: Botulinum toxin for genito-pelvic pain penetration disorder and chronic pelvic pain in women

Chronic pain conditions like genito-pelvic pain penetration disorder and chronic pelvic pain cause significant morbidity in women worldwide and yet are underdiagnosed and undertreated. While the use of botulinum toxin for pain conditions has expanded, there are few randomized controlled studies of botulinum toxin for pelvic pain conditions in women. This paper provides an update on the current status and context for considering botulinum toxin treatment for these conditions to complement and expand currently available approaches. High quality clinical trials to evaluate safety and efficacy and to determine optimal doses and approaches to injection are urgently needed.

Pharmacotherapy for female sexual dysfunctions (FSDs): what is on the market and where is this field heading?

INTRODUCTION

Female sexual dysfunctions (FSDs) are common in women of any age and have a huge impact on quality of life and relationships. They have a multifaceted etiology limiting the development of pharmacotherapies with a high rate of effectiveness. Safety issues are also a concern.

AREAS COVERED

The authors report the most recent advances in pharmacotherapy for premenopausal and postmenopausal women with a main focus on hypoactive sexual desire disorders (HSDD) and associated sexual symptoms. Good levels of evidence have emerged for psychoactive agents, such as flibanserin and bremelanotide, as well as hormonal compounds (transdermal testosterone). The authors also report briefly on intravaginal DHEA (prasterone), local estrogen therapy (LET), and ospemifene to manage effectively vulvovaginal atrophy/genitourinary syndrome of menopause (VVA/GSM). In addition, they discuss promising therapeutic options highlighting the main reasons that hamper the availability of new labeled products. Finally, they include the importance of the multimodal approach to address FSDs.

EXPERT OPINION

Approved pharmacotherapies for FSD are limited. Validated multidimensional instruments and adequate objective measures of physical and mental responses to sexual external and internal incentives are mandatory to identify women suitable to chronic or on-demand treatments and to assess their pattern of response in research and practice.

Botulinum Toxin a for Provoked Vestibulodynia: 12 Months' Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is a common pain disorder afflicting primarily young women, and botulinum toxin A (BTA) has been to a limited extent tested as a treatment.

AIM

Evaluate outcome 12 months after injection with BTA as a treatment for PVD.

METHODS

We conducted a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of twice repeated injections of 50 units of BTA or placebo in the bulbocavernosus muscles, 3 months apart, in women with PVD. Treatment outcome after six months', failed to show any significant difference in pain reduction between the groups, as previously reported. Here, we report treatment outcomes 12 months after the first injections. In addition to injections, participants where instructed to perform pelvic floor exercises during month 6-12. 38 participants/group was calculated to achieve a statistical power of 80% based on an effect size of 20 VAS units (mean score range 56-76±31 SD).

OUTCOMES

Primary outcome was self-reported dyspareunia or pain at tampon use, using a visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-100. Secondary outcomes were vaginal pressure measurements, psychological health, sexual function and distress.

RESULTS

From the initial 88 randomized women with PVD, 75 remained at 12 months; 38 in the BTA and 37 in the placebo group. There was no significant difference in primary outcome between the groups. Vaginal pressure in the BTA group had been restored to pre-treatment levels, with no differences between the groups at 12 months. There was an increase in sexual function in the BTA group, with a Female Sexual Function Index of 22.8 (±4.8) compared to the placebo group to 19.7 (±5.0), P=.048. No differences were observed in sexual distress, stress and anxiety. There was an increase in number of women attempting intercourse in the BTA group (74%) compared with placebo (43%), P=.005. Too few patients performed the pelvic floor exercises for this intervention to be analyzed.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This study highlights BTA as a safe treatment option for patients with PVD.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

The randomized, double-blinded design and repeated treatments are the major strengths of this study and it is the first study to objectively evaluate muscular effect after BTA injections. The major shortcoming is that few participants performed the pelvic floor exercises, preventing analyses.

CONCLUSION

At 12 months' follow up, no significant difference in reduction of dyspareunia or pain at tampon use was observed. Women receiving BTA attempted intercourse more often and improved their sexual function compared with women receiving placebo.

Treatment of Provoked Vulvodynia: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Treatment recommendations for provoked vulvodynia (PVD) are based on clinical experiences and there is a need for systematically summarizing the controlled trials in this field.

AIM

To provide an overview of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies of intervention for PVD, and to assess the certainty of the scientific evidence, in order to advance treatment guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

The search was conducted in CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane Library, Embase (Embase.com), Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO (EBSCO) and Scopus. Databases were searched from January 1, 1990 to January 29, 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Population: Premenopausal women with PVD.

INTERVENTIONS

Pharmacological, surgical, psychosocial and physiotherapy, either alone or as combined/team-based interventions.

CONTROL

No treatment, waiting-list, placebo or other defined treatment.

OUTCOMES

Pain during intercourse, pain upon pressure or touch of the vaginal opening, sexual function/satisfaction, quality of life, psychological distress, adverse events and complications.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies of interventions with a control group.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

2 reviewers independently screened citations for eligibility and assessed relevant studies for risk of bias using established tools. The results from each intervention were summarized. Studies were synthesized using a narrative approach, as meta-analyses were not considered appropriate. For each outcome, we assessed the certainty of evidence using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

Most results of the evaluated studies in this systematic review were found to have very low certainty of evidence, which means that we are unable to draw any conclusions about effects of the interventions. Multimodal physiotherapy compared with lidocaine treatment was the only intervention with some evidential support (low certainty of evidence for significant treatment effects favoring physiotherapy). It was not possible to perform meta-analyses due to a heterogeneity in interventions and comparisons. In addition, there was a heterogeneity in outcome measures, which underlines the need to establish joint core outcome sets.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Our result underscores the need of stringent trials and defined core outcome sets for PVD.

STRENGTH AND LIMITATIONS

Standard procedures for systematic reviews and the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome model for clinical questions were used. The strict eligibility criteria resulted in limited number of studies which might have resulted in a loss of important information.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review underlines the need for more methodologically stringent trials on interventions for PVD, particularly for multimodal treatments approaches. For future research, there is a demand for joint core outcome sets. Bohm-Starke N, Ramsay KW, Lytsy P, et al. Treatment of Provoked Vulvodynia: A Systematic Review. J Sex Med 2022;19:789-808.