Increasing Access to Intrauterine Devices and Contraceptive Implants: ACOG Committee Statement No. 5

Continuity of Health Insurance Coverage and Choice of Contraception Method

Objective: To evaluate whether part-year or year-round uninsurance is associated with reduced likelihood of using prescription contraception methods rather than using nonprescription methods or using no contraceptive methods. Methods: We identified nonpregnant and sexually active female respondents participating in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1997 cohort between 2007 and 2019. At each interview, we classified the contraceptive method used most frequently as prescription, nonprescription, or none, and used mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression to predict contraceptive method based on health insurance coverage over the past year (classified as continuous private, continuous public, part-year uninsured, or year-round uninsured). Results: Our sample included 3,738 respondents and 18,678 observations (person-years). In the most recent interview, 35% of respondents used prescription contraception, 16% used nonprescription methods only, and 49% used no method. On multivariable analysis using all available years of data, respondents with part-year uninsurance were 20% less likely to use prescription rather than nonprescription methods, as compared to respondents with continuous private insurance (95% confidence interval: -31%, -6%; p = 0.007), but did not differ on the likelihood of using prescription methods rather than no method. Conclusions: Part-year uninsurance was associated with lower use of prescription contraceptive methods rather than nonprescription methods when compared with continuous private insurance coverage. Use of prescription contraceptives was lowest among people with year-round uninsurance. Policy efforts ensuring continuous insurance coverage with greater flexibility of eligibility and enrollment periods may promote greater access to prescription contraceptives.

Social determinants of choosing telemedicine for contraceptive care: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Compare demographic characteristics and contraception choices among individuals seeking contraception care via telemedicine versus in-person.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of contraception visits from June-September 2021 at Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest. We assessed demographics and contraception choices. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate effect of language, age, income, having children, and insurance type on choosing telemedicine.

RESULTS

We included 16,855 patients: 2383 (14.1%) telemedicine visits and 14,472 (85.9%) in-person visits; 149/2383 (6.3%) non-English speakers used telemedicine compared to 1194/14,472 (8.3%) who used in-person care. A higher proportion of the telemedicine cohort had public insurance compared to the in-person cohort (2312/2383 [97.0%] telemedicine vs 11,646/14,472 [80.5%] in-person). Among the telemedicine cohort, a higher proportion of patients chose a barrier method (691/2363 [29.2%] telemedicine vs 1564/14,215 [11.0%] in-person) and short-acting method (1248/2363 [52.8%] telemedicine vs 5834/14,215 [41.0%] in-person) compared to in-person. A higher proportion of in-person patients chose long-acting reversible contraception (2681/14,215 [18.9%] in-person vs 179/2363 [7.6%] telemedicine) and injection (3779/14,215 [26.6%] in-person vs 115/2363 [4.9%] telemedicine) compared to telemedicine. Speaking Spanish was associated with decreased odds of choosing telemedicine after adjusting for covariates (aOR 0.53 [95% CI 0.44-0.64], p < 0.001). Older age, having children, lower income, and public insurance were associated with increased odds of choosing telemedicine.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemedicine for contraception visits was associated with language, age, parity, income, and insurance. Despite small absolute difference in the proportion of patients that speak Spanish, in adjusted multivariate analysis speaking Spanish was associated with lower odds of choosing telemedicine.

IMPLICATIONS

Increasing access for people with limited technology as well as those who prefer non-English languages is essential to promote equitable reproductive care. Prospective research that focuses on patient experience and preferences is needed to better guide access to equitable, person-centered contraception care.