Stage IIIA Endometrial Carcinoma: Outcome and Predictors of Survival

Prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer patients

Although peritoneal cytology has been shown to be an independant predictor of survival in endometrial cancer, the present international federation of gynaecology and obstetrics (FIGO) staging system does not involve it for risk stratification. This work aimed to assess the prognostic importance of PPC (positive peritoneal cytology) in endometrial cancer patients. The medical profiles of uterine carcinoma patients were reviewed who were referred to Khatam-al- Anbia and Bahman hospital within 2010-2019. The factors possibly affecting peritoneal fluid cytology in all patients were analysed. There was a considerable association between survival and the number of lymph nodes involvement (95% CI = 2.5 - 12.51, OR = 5.59, p < .001), stage 3 (95% CI = 2.95-22.10, OR = 7.12, p < .001), stage IV (95% CI = 2.14 - 30.09, OR = 8.04, p < .001), Grade (95% CI = 4.4-47.7, OR = 14.54, p < .001). Positive peritoneal cytology was revealed in our study, as an independent prognostic factor in patients with endometrial cancer. Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? Peritoneal cytology is one of the independent risk factors for poor survival for endometrial cancer, but international federation of gynaecology and obstetrics (FIGO) staging system does not involve it for risk stratification.What do the results of this study add? Positive peritoneal cytology was revealed in our study, as an independent prognostic factor in patients with endometrial cancer.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? It is recommended peritoneal cytology for future FIGO staging reviews. Till now, peritoneal washings need to be still regarded as a key part for precise risk-stratification.

Clinico-pathological significance of suspicious peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Suspicious peritoneal cytology refers to the result of peritoneal cytology testing that is insufficient in either quality or quantity for a definitive diagnosis of malignancy. This study examined characteristics and survival outcomes related to suspicious peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A population-based retrospective study by querying the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was conducted. A total of 41,229 women with Stage I-III endometrial cancer who had peritoneal cytologic sampling at hysterectomy from 2010 to 2016 were examined. A Cox proportional hazard regression model and a competing risk analysis with Fine-Gray model were fitted to assess survival outcome related to suspicious peritoneal cytology.

RESULTS

Suspicious peritoneal cytology was seen in 702 (1.7%) cases. In multivariable models, suspicious peritoneal cytology was associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer mortality (subdistribution-hazard ratio [HR] 1.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.20, p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (adjusted-HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.27-1.90, p < 0.001) compared with negative peritoneal cytology. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that suspicious peritoneal cytology had discrete overall survival improvement compared with malignant peritoneal cytology in a propensity score weighting model (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72-0.99, p = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that suspicious peritoneal cytology may be a prognostic factor for decreased survival in endometrial cancer.

Association Between Adjuvant Therapy and Survival in Stage II-III Endometrial Cancer: Influence of Malignant Peritoneal Cytology

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the survival effect of adjuvant therapy in stage II-III endometrial cancer based on peritoneal cytology results.

METHODS

The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was retrospectively queried to examine 7467 women with stage II-III endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy, and with available peritoneal cytology results, from 2010 to 2016. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was fitted to assess the association between adjuvant therapy and all-cause mortality stratified by peritoneal cytology results.

RESULTS

Malignant peritoneal cytology was reported in 1662 (22.3%) women and was associated with non-endometrioid histology, higher tumor stage, and nodal metastasis (p < 0.05). In a propensity score-weighted model, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with increased all-cause mortality compared with negative peritoneal cytology (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 1.23-1.48). Adjuvant therapy types varied based on histology and peritoneal cytology results. In non-endometrioid histology, the combination of chemotherapy and whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) was associated with improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy or WPRT alone irrespective of the peritoneal cytology results (p < 0.05). The combination of chemotherapy and WPRT was also associated with improved overall survival in women with endometrioid histology and malignant peritoneal cytology (p = 0.026). Women with endometrioid histology and negative peritoneal cytology represented the most common subpopulation (46.5%), and overall survival was similar regardless of which of the three adjuvant therapy modalities was used (p = 0.319).

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant peritoneal cytology is prevalent and prognostic in stage II-III endometrial cancer. This study found that the surgeon's choice and benefit of adjuvant therapy for women with stage II-III endometrial cancer differed depending on the status of peritoneal cytology.

Trends in peritoneal cytology evaluation at hysterectomy for endometrial cancer in the United States

OBJECTIVE

The collection of a peritoneal cytologic sample at the time of surgery for endometrial cancer has traditionally been an important part of surgical staging. In 2009, the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics revised the cancer staging schema for endometrial cancer and removed peritoneal cytology from the staging criteria. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics organization, however, recommend evaluation of peritoneal cytology at the time of hysterectomy. This study examined population-based trends, characteristics, and outcomes of peritoneal cytologic sampling for endometrial cancer surgery following the 2009 staging revision in the United States.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study querying the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to examine women with stage I-III endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy from 2010 to 2017. Trends, characteristics, and survival associated with peritoneal cytologic evaluation at the time of hysterectomy were assessed in multivariable analysis and with propensity score weighting.

RESULTS

Among 62,809 women who underwent hysterectomy, 43,873 (69.9%) had peritoneal cytologic evaluation at surgery and 18,936 (30.1%) did not. Utilization of peritoneal cytologic evaluation decreased from 75.5% to 64.9% during the study period (P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, more recent year of surgery was independently associated with a decreased likelihood of performance of peritoneal cytology (adjusted-odds ratio of peritoneal cytology evaluation in 2017 versus 2010 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.60). Peritoneal cytologic evaluation at the time of hysterectomy was associated with improved all-cause mortality (hazard ratio in the whole cohort 0.94, 95%CI 0.89-0.99; and hazard ratio in endometrioid histology 0.90, 95%CI 0.84-0.97).

CONCLUSION

Performance of peritoneal cytologic sampling has gradually decreased following the 2009 staging revision in the United States. Our study suggests that peritoneal cytology evaluation at hysterectomy may be associated with improved survival in certain tumor groups.

Malignant peritoneal cytology and increased mortality risk in stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine the survival of women with stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer with malignant peritoneal cytology.

METHODS

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted to examine the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 2010 to 2016. Women with stage I serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, undifferentiated, and mixed endometrial cancer with known peritoneal cytology results at hysterectomy were examined (N = 4506). Propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the measured covariates, and survival outcomes were assessed according to peritoneal cytology results.

RESULTS

Malignant peritoneal cytology was reported in 401 (8.9%) women. In multivariable analysis, older age, serous histology, and large tumors were associated with an increased likelihood of malignant peritoneal cytology (all, P < 0.05). In a propensity score weighted model, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with a nearly two-fold increase in all-cause mortality risk compared to negative peritoneal cytology (5-year rates, 63.4% versus 80.2%, hazard ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.78-2.66). In sensitivity analyses, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with decreased overall survival in old and young age groups, serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, and mixed histology groups, stage T1a disease, and staged and unstaged cases, but not for stage T1b disease. Difference in 5-year overall survival rates between the malignant and negative peritoneal cytology groups was particularly large among those with clear cell histology (24.0%), stage T1a disease (19.4%), aged >78 years (18.2%), and serous tumors (17.6%).

CONCLUSION

Malignant peritoneal cytology can be prevalent in stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer. Our study suggests that malignant peritoneal cytology is a prognostic factor for decreased survival in stage I non-endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Malignant peritoneal cytology and decreased survival of women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

To examine the association between malignant peritoneal cytology and survival in women with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program from 2010 to 2016. Women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer who had peritoneal cytology testing at hysterectomy were examined (N = 24,800). Characteristics and survival related to malignant peritoneal cytology were assessed. The propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the measured covariates.

FINDINGS

Malignant peritoneal cytology was reported in 1081 (4.4%) women. In multivariable analysis, stage IB disease and moderately/poorly differentiated tumours were associated with an increased likelihood of malignant peritoneal cytology (both P < 0.05). In a weighted model, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with decreased cause-specific survival (5-year rates, 92.1% versus 96.8%, hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56-2.52) and overall survival (89.4% versus 93.1%, HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.16-1.72). In sensitivity analyses, malignant peritoneal cytology was associated with decreased overall survival in the high-intermediate-risk group (5-year rates, 77.8% versus 83.6%, HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.20-2.06) and decreased cause-specific survival in the low-risk group (95.4% versus 98.0%, HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.01-2.68). In the high-intermediate-risk group with malignant peritoneal cytology, postoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared to whole pelvic radiotherapy (5-year rates, 82.7% versus 64.6%, HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.96). This association was not observed in negative cytology cases (81.5% versus 79.7%, HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53-1.14).

INTERPRETATION

Malignant peritoneal cytology may be associated with decreased survival in stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer.

SATEN III—Splitting Adjuvant Treatment of stage III ENdometrial cancers: an international, multicenter study

Introduction

The purposes of this study were to compare adjuvant treatment modalities and to determine prognostic factors in stage III endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC).

Methods

SATEN III was a retrospective study involving 13 centers from 10 countries. Patients who had been operated on between 1998 and 2018 and diagnosed with stage III endometrioid EC were analyzed.

Results

A total of 990 women were identified; 317 with stage IIIA, 18 with stage IIIB, and 655 with stage IIIC diseases. The median follow-up was 42 months. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with stage III EC by adjuvant treatment modality was 68.5% for radiotherapy (RT), 54.6% for chemotherapy (CT), and 69.4% for chemoradiation (CRT) (p=0.11). The 5-year overall survival (OS) for those patients was 75.6% for RT, 75% for CT, and 80.7% for CRT (p=0.48). For patients with stage IIIA disease treated by RT versus CT versus CRT, the 5-year OS rates were 75.6%, 75.0%, and 80.7%, respectively (p=0.48). Negative peritoneal cytology (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.86; p=0.02) and performance of lymphadenectomy (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.77, p=0.001) were independent predictors for improved OS for stage IIIA EC. For women with stage IIIC EC treated by RT, CT, and CRT, the 5-year OS rates were 78.9%, 67.0%, and 69.8%, respectively (p=0.08). Independent prognostic factors for better OS for stage IIIC disease were age <60 (HR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.36 to 0.69, p<0.001), grade 1 or 2 disease (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.94, p=0.014; and HR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.46 to 0.91, p=0.014, respectively), absence of cervical stromal involvement (HR: 063, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.86, p=0.004) and performance of para-aortic lymphadenectomy (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.72, p<0.001).

Discussion

Although not statistically significant, CRT seemed to be a better adjuvant treatment option for stage IIIA endometrioid EC. Systematic lymphadenectomy seemed to improve survival outcomes in stage III endometrioid EC.

Patterns of care and outcomes for women with uterine cancer and ovarian metastases

OBJECTIVE

For women with uterine cancer with metastases isolated to the adnexa (stage IIIA) optimal adjuvant therapy is unknown. We performed a population-based analysis to examine the use of chemotherapy, vaginal brachytherapy, and external beam therapy (in women with stage IIIA uterine cancer.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with stage IIIA uterine cancer with ovarian metastasis from 2004 to 2012. We explored the use of chemotherapy, vaginal brachytherapy, and external beam therapy over time. Multivariable models were developed to examine factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

We identified 4088 women with uterine cancer and ovarian metastases. Overall, 56.2% of women received chemotherapy. Vaginal brachytherapy was used in 11.1%, while 36.6% received external beam therapy. Five-year survival was 64.7 % (95% CI, 62.9% to 66.5%). In a multivariable model, chemotherapy was associated with a 38% decrease in mortality (HR = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.71). Similarly, both external beam therapy (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.85) and vaginal brachytherapy (HR = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.85) were associated with improved survival. When the cohort was limited to women who received chemotherapy, radiation was associated with improved overall survival (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.90). There was no difference in survival between the use of external beam therapy and vaginal brachytherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemotherapy was associated with a decrease in mortality in women with endometrial cancer and ovarian metastases. The addition of radiation therapy was associated with improved overall survival, although there was no difference between external beam therapy and vaginal brachytherapy.

Prognostic significance of peritoneal cytology in low-intermediate risk endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

There is uncertainty surrounding the prognostic value and clinical utility of peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer. Our primary objective was to determine if positive cytology is associated with disease-free and overall survival in women treated surgically for endometrial cancer, specifically those with low or intermediate risk disease.

METHODS

This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of British Columbia Cancer Registry patients who underwent surgery with peritoneal washings for endometrioid-type endometrial cancer from 2003 to 2009. Low risk was defined as Stage IA grade 1 or 2, and intermediate risk defined as Stage IA grade 3, or Stage IB grade 1 or 2 tumours. Five-year overall and disease free-survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimation. Potential covariates including peritoneal cytology, grade, depth of myometrial invasion, LVSI, age, and adjuvant therapy were evaluated in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

There were 849 patients, of whom 370 (43.6%) and 298 (35.1%) had low- and intermediate-risk disease, respectively. Overall, forty-nine (5.8%) patients had positive cytology, including 6 and 9 with low- and intermediate-risk respectively (2.2% within low and intermediate risk combined). Positive peritoneal cytology was not significantly associated with disease-free (HR 3.17, 95% CI 0.91-11.03) or overall survival (HR 1.33, 95% CI 0.47-3.76) in low and intermediate risk patients. Only age and extensive LVSI were associated with lower overall survival (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.08-1.13, and HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.02-5.61, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive peritoneal cytology was not associated with disease-free and overall survival in women with low and intermediate risk endometrial cancer.

The risk of lymph node metastasis with positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To determine the correlation between positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) and lymph node metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer grossly confined to the uterus.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1988 and 2005. Only patients with endometrial cancer grossly confined to the uterus who had undergone a complete staging procedure (lymph node removal) were included. Statistical analysis used the χ2 test and logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 22,947 patients were identified. Positive peritoneal cytology was present in 3.5% of the patients. The incidence of lymph node metastasis was significantly higher among patients with PPC compared to those with negative peritoneal cytology for all histologic types examined (P < 0.0001): endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 28.7% versus 6.9%; adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified, 35.4% versus 5.8%; clear cell/serous carcinoma, 41.4% versus 19.0%, and carcinosarcoma,; 38.4% versus 14.4%. After adjusting for other contributing factors in the multivariable model, PPC remained an independent predictor of lymph node metastasis (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that patients with positive washings are at significant risk of nodal metastasis and adverse prognosis. Although no longer a part of the current International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging criteria, peritoneal cytology status should continue to inform clinical decision making in endometrial cancer.

Positive peritoneal cytology is an independent risk-factor in early stage endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

In light of the recent changes in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system, the objective of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of positive peritoneal cytology (PPC) among patients with early stage endometrial cancer.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1988 and 2005. Only those patients with stage I/II endometrial cancer who had undergone a complete staging procedure (lymph-node removal) were included. Statistical analyses used Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier log rank, and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

A total of 14,704 patients were identified: 14,219 with negative peritoneal cytology (NPC) and 485 with positive peritoneal cytology. More patients with PPC compared to those with NPC were diagnosed with high-risk factors such grade III disease (40.2% vs. 23.8%, p<0.0001), and unfavorable histologic types such as clear cell/serous carcinoma (17.5% vs. 7.5%, p=<0.0001) and carcinosarcoma (9.3% vs. 5.6%, p<0.0001). When compared to patients with negative peritoneal cytology, survival was significantly worse among patients with positive peritoneal cytology (p<0.0001): 5-year disease specific survival 95.1% vs. 80.8% in endometrioid adenocarcinoma; 78.0% vs. 50.4% in clear cell/serous cancer; and 64.7% vs. 32.3% in carcinosarcoma. After adjusting for other contributing factors in the multivariable model, PPC remained an independent predictor of poor survival (p<0.0001) in all histologic types examined.

CONCLUSION

PPC is an independent risk factor in patients with early stage endometrial cancer. Although, no longer a part of the current FIGO staging criteria, peritoneal cytology status should still be considered for accurate risk-stratification of these patients.

Radiological manifestations of metastasis to the ovary

MRI is an effective tool for detection of ovarian neoplastic lesions. However, there are no highly specific radiological features that differentiate primary from metastatic ovarian masses. Histological diagnosis preoperatively is not always possible as there is a risk of disseminating an otherwise early stage primary ovarian cancer. The preoperative diagnosis of an ovarian lesion is therefore heavily dependent on the radiological features. The radiologist must rely on a combination of knowing the natural history of any known primary cancer, together with the radiological features such as bilaterality, mucinous appearance, pseudomyxoma as well as the clinical progress of the primary tumour in order to evaluate and predict the likelihood of metastatic disease. Even if a non-ovarian primary cancer is known, an ovarian mass cannot always be assumed to be a secondary lesion. Some tumours, such as BRAC-positive breast cancer, are known to have a high rate of concomitant primary ovarian cancer. Conversely, other tumours, such as gastric and appendiceal cancer, are known to have a high rate of ovarian metastatic disease. However, histology remains the only true way to determine an ovarian metastasis from a primary lesion.

Prognostic Value of the 2009 FIGO Staging for Endometrial Cancer: An Illustration of the E3N Cohort

Objective

To compare the prognostic values of the 1988 and 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classifications for endometrial cancer.

Materials and Methods

From 1990 to 2008, patients undergoing surgery for endometrial cancer were extracted from the French prospective “Etude Epidémiologique auprès de femmes de l’Education Nationale” cohort study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) an available detailed histologic report of primary surgical procedure and (2) available cause and date of death. Concordance indexes for the 1988 and 2009 FIGO classifications were compared.

Results

Three hundred ninety-seven patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The concordance index for the 2009 FIGO classification was lower than that of the 1988 FIGO classification (0.76 vs 0.77, respectively).

Conclusion

In this study, the 1988 FIGO classification for endometrial cancer is at least as accurate as the 2009 FIGO classification for predicting endometrial cancer mortality.

Comparative performance of the 2009 international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics' staging system for uterine corpus cancer

OBJECTIVE

To perform a population-based analysis comparing the performance of the 1988 and 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging systems.

METHODS

Women with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus treated between 1988 and 2006 and recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were analyzed. Women were classified based on 1988 and 2009 FIGO staging systems. Major changes in the 2009 system include: 1) classification of patients with stage IA and IB tumors as stage IA; 2) elimination of stage IIA; and 3) stratification of stage IIIC into pelvic nodes only (IIIC1) or paraaortic nodal (IIIC2) involvement. Survival and use of adjuvant therapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 81,902 women were identified. Based on the 1988 staging system, survival for stage IA was 90.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90-91%) compared with 88.9% (95% CI 88-89%) for IB tumors. In the 2009 system, survival was 89.6% (95% CI 89-90%) for stage IA and 77.6% (95% CI 76-79%) for stage IB. The survival for FIGO 1988 stage IIA was superior to stage IC, whereas in the 2009 system, survival for stage II was inferior to all stage I patients. The newly defined stage IIIC substages are prognostically different. Survival for stage IIIC1 was 57.0% (95% CI 54-60%) compared with 49.4% (95% CI 46-53%) for stage IIIC2.

CONCLUSION

The 2009 FIGO staging system for uterine corpus cancer is highly prognostic. The reduction in stage I substages and the separation of stage III will further clarify important prognostic features.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.