Natural History of Placenta Previa in Twins:

Trophectoderm grade is associated with the risk of placenta previa in frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer cycles

STUDY QUESTION

Do obstetric and perinatal complications vary according to different blastocyst developmental parameters after frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer (SBT) cycles?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Pregnancies following the transfer of a blastocyst with a grade C trophectoderm (TE) were associated with an increased risk of placenta previa compared to those with a blastocyst of grade A TE.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Existing studies investigating the effect of blastocyst morphology grades on birth outcomes have mostly focused on fetal growth and have produced conflicting results, while the risk of obstetric complications has rarely been reported. Additionally, growing evidence has suggested that the appearance of TE cells could serve as the most important parameter for predicting implantation and live birth. Given that the TE ultimately develops into the placenta, it is plausible that this independent predictor may also impact placentation.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This retrospective cohort study at a tertiary-care academic medical center included 6018 singleton deliveries after frozen-thawed SBT cycles between January 2017 and December 2021.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Singleton pregnancies were grouped into two groups according to blastocyst developmental stage (Days 5 and 6), four groups according to embryo expansion (Stages 3, 4, 5, and 6), three groups according to inner cell mass (ICM) quality (A, B, and C), and three groups according to TE quality (A, B, and C). The main outcomes included pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, preterm premature rupture of membrane, placenta previa, placental abruption, placenta accreta, postpartum hemorrhage, preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age, and birth defects. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to evaluate the effect of blastocyst developmental stage, embryo expansion stage, ICM grade, and TE grade on measured outcomes adjusting for potential confounders.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

No association was found between blastocyst developmental stage and obstetric or perinatal outcomes both before and after adjusting for potential confounders, and similar results were found with regard to embryo expansion stage and ICM grade. Meanwhile, the incidence of placenta previa derived from a blastocyst with TE of grade C was higher compared with those derived from a blastocyst with TE of grade A (1.7%, 2.4%, and 4.0% for A, B, and C, respectively, P = 0.001 for all comparisons). After adjusting for potential covariates, TE grade C blastocysts had 2.81 times the likelihood of resulting in placenta previa compared to TE grade A blastocysts (adjusted odds ratio 2.81, 95% CI 1.11-7.09). No statistically significant differences were detected between any other measured outcomes and TE grades both before or after adjustment.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study is limited by its retrospective, single-center design. Additionally, although the sample size was relatively large for the study group, the sample size for certain subgroups was relatively small and lacked adequate power, particularly the ICM grade C group. Therefore, these results should be interpreted with caution.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The study extends our knowledge of the potential downstream effect of TE grade on placental abnormalities.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2705500, 2023YFC2705501, 2023YFC2705505, 2019YFA0802604); National Natural Science Foundation of China (82130046, 82320108009, 82371660, 32300710); Shanghai leading talent program, Innovative research team of high-level local universities in Shanghai (SHSMU-ZLCX20210201, SHSMU-ZLCX20210200, SHSMU-ZLCX20180401), Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital Clinical Research Innovation Cultivation Fund Program (RJPY-DZX-003), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (23Y11901400), Shanghai's Top Priority Research Center Construction Project (2023ZZ02002), and Three-Year Action Plan for Strengthening the Construction of the Public Health System in Shanghai (GWVI-11.1-36). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

The impact of maternal ABO blood type on obstetric and perinatal outcomes after frozen embryo transfer

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the maternal ABO blood type affect obstetric and perinatal outcomes following frozen embryo transfer (FET)?

DESIGN

A retrospective study was performed at a university-affiliated fertility centre, involving women with singleton and twin deliveries conceived by FET. Subjects were divided into four groups based on ABO blood type. The primary end-points were obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 20,981 women were involved, with 15,830 having singletons and 5151 delivering twins. In singleton pregnancies, women with blood group B had a slight but significantly increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus compared to women with blood group O (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.34). Furthermore, singletons born to women with the B antigen (blood type B or AB) were more likely to be large for gestational age (LGA) and with macrosomia. In twin pregnancies, blood type AB was related to a decreased risk of hypertensive diseases of pregnancy (aOR 0.58; 95% CI 0.37-0.92), while blood type A was associated with a higher risk of placenta praevia (aOR 2.04; 95% CI 1.15-3.60). When compared with the O blood group, twins from the AB blood group had a lower risk of low birthweight (aOR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71-0.98) but a higher risk of LGA (aOR 1.26; 95% CI 1.05-1.52).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the ABO blood group may influence the obstetric and perinatal outcomes for both singletons and twins. These findings emphasize that patient characteristics could be, at least partly, responsible for adverse maternal and birth outcomes following IVF.

A unique placenta previa risk factor profile for pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology

OBJECTIVE

To define specific risk factors for placenta previa in pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Fertility centers and inpatient obstetric units in Massachusetts.

PATIENT(S)

Patients conceiving with ART and delivering at 20 weeks gestation or later between 2011 and 2017 in Massachusetts.

INTERVENTION(S)

Patient demographic and medical factors and specific components of their cycles. Data were obtained by linking vital records of the State of Massachusetts to reproductive clinic data obtained from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System, and then supplementing this information with laboratory and obstetric data from 2 large academic hospitals.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Associations were tested between multiple cycle- and patient-related factors and placenta previa or low-lying placenta at delivery. After testing for confounders, multivariate models were adjusted for maternal age, history of prior cesarean delivery and birth plurality, and are reported as adjusted relative risks (aRR).

RESULT(S)

We included 18,939 pregnancies, with 553 (2.9%) having placenta previa at delivery. Advanced maternal age (aRR, 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.48), endometriosis, (aRR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.71-2.86), and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (aRR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.59) were associated with placenta previa, whereas multiple births (aRR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.81) and a history of polycystic ovary syndrome or ovulation disorders (aRR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.46-0.75) had negative associations. The endometriosis association was strong in nulliparas and the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation association was strong in parous patients in a stratified analysis. No association was seen with prior history of cesarean delivery.

CONCLUSION(S)

Patients conceiving with ART do not have the typical previa risk factors of prior cesarean delivery and multiple gestations, whereas endometriosis and fresh embryo transfers contributed moderate risk. The embryo transfer process itself may affect previa development in this population.

The association of endometriosis with placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review the effect of endometriosis on the prevalence of placenta previa and postpartum hemorrhage in pregnant patients and the surgical outcomes of pregnant patients with endometriosis developing placenta previa.

DATA SOURCES

In compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was conducted on December 31, 2020, using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Comparative studies between pregnant women with and without endometriosis and studies that investigated the surgical outcomes of patients with and without endometriosis developing placenta previa were included.

METHODS

Here, 2 reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts, completed data extraction, and assessed the reporting quality using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool.

RESULTS

Overall, 19 studies (from 2010 to 2020) met the inclusion criteria (98,463 pregnancies with endometriosis and 7,184,313 pregnancies without endometriosis). In the adjusted pooled analysis, endometriosis was associated with a higher rate of placenta previa (adjusted odds ratio, 3.17; 95% confidence interval, 2.58-3.89), whereas the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage was similar between pregnant women with and without endometriosis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.34). When the analysis was restricted to histologically confirmed endometriosis cases, the relationship of endometriosis with placenta previa (adjusted odds ratio, 4.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.74-10.30) and postpartum hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio, 1.29; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-3.34) was consistent with results from the nonrestricted analysis. There was no study that examined the surgical outcomes of patients with endometriosis developing placenta previa patients. However, there are 3 studies that examined the effect of endometriosis on surgical outcomes during cesarean delivery: 1 study showing that endometriosis was associated with increased intraoperative bleeding during emergent cesarean delivery; the other study showing that endometriosis was associated with an increased incidence of postpartum hemorrhage during cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.2), especially in primiparous women with singleton pregnancies (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.0); and another study suggesting a significantly higher rate of hysterectomy (7.1%) and bladder injury (7.1%) in patients with endometriosis than in those without endometriosis.

CONCLUSION

Endometriosis can potentially be associated with adverse surgical outcomes during cesarean delivery. Although there is a correlation between endometriosis and increased rate of placenta previa, the surgical outcomes of patients with endometriosis developing placenta previa remain understudied.

Placental Implantation Disorders

Primary disorders of placental implantation have immediate consequences for the outcome of a pregnancy. These disorders have been known to clinical science for more than a century, but have been relatively rare. Recent epidemiologic obstetric data have indicated that the rise in their incidence over the last 2 decades has been iatrogenic in origin. In particular, the rising numbers of pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization (IVF) and the increased use of caesarean section for delivery have been associated with higher frequencies of previa implantation, accreta placentation, abnormal placental shapes, and velamentous cord insertion. These disorders often occur together.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Multiple Gestations

Women with twin or higher-order pregnancies will typically have more ultrasound examinations than women with a singleton pregnancy. Most women will have at minimum a first trimester scan, a nuchal translucency evaluation scan, fetal anatomy scan at 18 to 22 weeks, and one or more scans in the third trimester to evaluate growth. Multiple gestations are at higher risk for preterm delivery, congenital anomalies, fetal growth restriction, placenta previa, vasa previa, and velamentous cord insertion. Chorionicity and amnionicity should be determined as early as possible when a twin pregnancy is identified to permit triage of the monochorionic group into a closer surveillance model. Screening for congenital heart disease is warranted in monochorionic twins because they have an increased rate of congenital cardiac anomalies. In addition, monochorionic twins have a higher risk of developing cardiac abnormalities in later gestation related to right ventricular outflow obstruction, in particular the subgroups with twin-twin transfusion syndrome or selective intrauterine growth restriction. Monochorionic twins have unique complications including twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, twin embolization syndrome, and acardius, or twin-reversed arterial perfusion sequence. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Role of ultrasonography in the management of twin gestation

Twins represent 1%-2% of all pregnancies, yet continue to account for a disproportionate share of neonatal adverse events including neonatal intensive care admission, morbidity, and mortality. Ultrasonography is central to the proper diagnosis of the type of twinning. Ideally, ultrasonography is performed before 14 weeks of gestation to determine chorionicity and amnionicity. Correct identification of the chorionicity in a twin pregnancy facilitates proper counseling and management of the gestation, including ultrasonography follow-up. Herein, the different types of twinning are reviewed, together with the implications for ultrasonography monitoring of each specific type of twin gestation.

Anomalies of the placenta and umbilical cord in twin gestations

The frequency of twin gestations has increased over the last few decades, mainly due to maternal age at childbearing, and the use of assisted reproductive technologies. Twins are at higher risk of aneuploidy, structural anomalies, and placental abnormalities. Some of the placental and umbilical cord abnormalities found in twin gestations are nonspecific and can be found in singleton gestations (ie, placenta previa, placental abruption, single umbilical artery, velamentous cord insertion, vasa previa, etc). However, other anomalies are unique to twin gestations, and are mainly associated with monochorionic twins-these include intraplacental anastomosis and cord entanglement. Most of these conditions can be diagnosed with ultrasound. An accurate and early diagnosis is important in the management of twin gestations. Determination of chorionicity, amnionicity, and the identification of placental anomalies are key issues for the adequate management of twin pregnancies. Pathologic placental examination after delivery can help in assessing the presence of placental and umbilical cord abnormalities, as well as providing information about chorionicity and gaining insight into the potential mechanisms of disease affecting twin gestations.

The impact of chorionicity on maternal pregnancy outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs.

RESULTS

Of 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58-4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins (P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins (P = .01).

CONCLUSION

There are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays.