Recent advances in nucleus pulposus replacement technology

The past, present, and the future of disc nucleus replacement. A systematic review of a large diversity of ideas and experiences

Disc nucleus replacement (NR) is a challenging surgical technique used as a medical treatment for early-stage disc herniation to restore disc height and the biomechanical function of a motion segment, which may reduce low back pain. The surgical procedure involves the removal and replacement of the degenerated nucleus pulposus with a substitute by accessing the annulus fibrosos via a created hole. Over the decades, nucleus replacement has been an important issue, leading to the development of different substitute alternatives. The first ideas are dated to the 1950s and since then, more than a hundred nucleus replacement concepts can be identified. There were numerous attempts and several clinical trials; however, after more than 70 years of research, no gold standard for nucleus pulposus replacement has been identified. This review aims to collect the different nucleus replacements reported in the literature, thus understanding what failed, what could be improved and what are the opportunities for the future. A systematic review of the literature was performed using a keyword-based search on PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases to detect all nucleus replacements presented in the past by clinicians and engineers. Several studies were extracted from which the main nucleus replacements over the years were investigated, including the ones that received CE mark, FDA approval, or IDE approval and, also those involved in clinical trials. A total of 116 studies were included in this review. The extracted data concern the nucleus replacements proposed over the years to create a historical background as complete as possible, including their mechanical and biomechanical characterization and the clinical trials conducted over the years. Nucleus disc arthroplasty has been explored for many years. Unfortunately, even today there is still nothing safe and definitive in this surgical practice. This review provides an overview of the nucleus replacement history. A breakthrough could be the improvements in technologies for the annulus fibrous closing or sealing and the tissue engineering and medical regenerative techniques which could certainly ensure a higher NR implantation success rate in the future of this clinical treatment. It is not yet clear what is the future of this clinical practice. Only scientific research can answer the question: is the nucleus replacement still a possible clinical solution?

Injection of human umbilical tissue-derived cells into the nucleus pulposus alters the course of intervertebral disc degeneration in vivo

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Patients often present to spine clinic with evidence of intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). If conservative management fails, a safe and effective injection directly into the disc might be preferable to the risks and morbidity of surgery.

PURPOSE

To determine whether injecting human umbilical tissue-derived cells (hUTC) into the nucleus pulposus (NP) might improve the course of IDD.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, blinded placebo-controlled in vivo study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Skeletally mature New Zealand white rabbits.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Degree of IDD based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), biomechanics, and histology.

METHODS

Thirty skeletally mature New Zealand white rabbits were used in a previously validated rabbit annulotomy model for IDD. Discs L2-L3, L3-L4, and L4-L5 were surgically exposed and punctured to induce degeneration and then 3 weeks later the same discs were injected with hUTC with or without a hydrogel carrier. Serial MRIs obtained at 0, 3, 6, and 12 weeks were analyzed for evidence of degeneration qualitatively and quantitatively via NP area and MRI Index. The rabbits were sacrificed at 12 weeks and discs L4-L5 were analyzed histologically. The L3-L4 discs were fixed to a robotic arm and subjected to uniaxial compression, and viscoelastic displacement curves were generated.

RESULTS

Qualitatively, the MRIs demonstrated no evidence of degeneration in the control group over the course of 12 weeks. The punctured group yielded MRIs with the evidence of disc height loss and darkening, suggestive of degeneration. The three treatment groups (cells alone, carrier alone, or cells+carrier) generated MRIs with less qualitative evidence of degeneration than the punctured group. MRI Index and area for the cell and the cell+carrier groups were significantly distinct from the punctured group at 12 weeks. The carrier group generated MRI data that fell between control and punctured values but failed to reach a statistically significant difference from the punctured values. There were no statistically significant MRI differences among the three treatment groups. The treated groups also demonstrated viscoelastic properties that were distinct from the control and punctured values, with the cell curve more similar to the punctured curve and the carrier curve and carrier+cells curve more similar to the control curve (although no creep differences achieved statistical significance). There was some histological evidence of improved cellularity and disc architecture in the treated discs compared with the punctured discs.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of degenerating rabbit intervertebral discs with hUTC in a hydrogel carrier solution might help restore the MRI, histological, and biomechanical properties toward those of nondegenerated controls. Treatment with cells in saline or a hydrogel carrier devoid of cells also might help restore some imaging, architectural, and physical properties to the degenerating disc. These data support the potential use of therapeutic cells in the treatment of disc degeneration.

Nucleus pulposus replacement and regeneration/repair technologies: present status and future prospects

Degenerative disc disease is implicated in the pathogenesis of many painful conditions of the back, chief among which is low back pain. Acute and/or chronic low back pain (A/CLBP) afflicts a large number of people, thus making it a major healthcare issue with concomitant cost ramifications. When conservative treatments for A/CLBP, such as bed rest, anti-inflammatory medications, and physical therapy, prove to be ineffectual, surgical options are recommended. The most popular of these is discectomy followed by fusion. Although there are many reports of good to excellent outcomes with this method, there are concerns, such as long-term adverse biomechanical consequences to adjacent functional spinal unit(s). A surgical option that has been attracting much attention recently is replacement or regeneration/repair of the nucleus pulposus, an approach that holds the prospect of not compromising either mobility or function and causing no adjacent-level injury. There is a sizeable body of literature highlighting this option, comprising in vitro biomechanical studies, finite element analyses, animal-model studies, and limited clinical evaluations. This work is a review of this body of literature and is organized into four parts, with the focus being on replacement technologies, regeneration/repair technologies, and detailed expositions on 14 areas for future study. This review ends with a summary of the salient points made.