Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia after burn injury: the impact of multiple-drug resistance

A Pilot Analysis for a Multicentric, Retrospective Study on Biodiversity and Difficult-to-Treat Pathogens in Burn Centers across the United States (MICROBE)

Following burn injury, patients are at increased risk of infection and are often cited as having a high incidence of difficult-to-treat pathogens (DTp). The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of DTp after burn injury, which factors are associated with their development, and subsequent outcomes. This single-center, retrospective study assessed patients with thermal or inhalation injury who had a positive culture resulting in initiation of treatment (i.e., excision, topical, or systemic antimicrobials). Demographic data, pathogen and resistance profiles, and prior exposure to topical and systemic antimicrobials were collected. Pathogens were considered DTp if they were multi-drug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing, AmpC-producing, carbapenem-resistant, difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) Pseudomonas sp., carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), or Stenotrophomonas spp. Sixty-five patients who grew 376 pathogens were included in the final analysis. Two-hundred thirteen (56.7%) pathogens were considered DTp. Prior exposure to 7 of the 11 collected topical antimicrobials and 9 of 11 systemic antimicrobial classes were significantly associated with future development of a DTp. This remained true for six and eight, respectively, after controlling for significant covariates via logistic regression. As there were only four deaths, a Cox-proportional hazard analysis was not feasible. The Kaplan-Meier plot according to DTp revealed a clear divergence in mortality (Log rank p = 0.0583). In this analysis, exposure to topical and systemic antibiotics was associated with the development of DTp. The results from this pilot study will inform the next iteration of multicenter study.

Clinical epidemiology and case fatality due to antimicrobial resistance in Germany: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021

BackgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is of public health concern worldwide.AimWe aimed to summarise the German AMR situation for clinicians and microbiologists.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 60 published studies and data from the German Antibiotic-Resistance-Surveillance (ARS). Primary outcomes were AMR proportions in bacterial isolates from infected patients in Germany (2016-2021) and the case fatality rates (2010-2021). Random and fixed (common) effect models were used to calculate pooled proportions and pooled case fatality odds ratios, respectively.ResultsThe pooled proportion of meticillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus infections (MRSA) was 7.9% with a declining trend between 2014 and 2020 (odds ratio (OR) = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.886-0.891; p < 0.0001), while vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium (VRE) bloodstream infections increased (OR = 1.18; (95% CI: 1.16-1.21); p < 0.0001) with a pooled proportion of 34.9%. Case fatality rates for MRSA and VRE were higher than for their susceptible strains (OR = 2.29; 95% CI: 1.91-2.75 and 1.69; 95% CI: 1.22-2.33, respectively). Carbapenem resistance in Gram-negative pathogens (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter spp. and Escherichia coli) was low to moderate (< 9%), but resistance against third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones was moderate to high (5-25%). Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibited high resistance against carbapenems (17.0%; 95% CI: 11.9-22.8), third-generation cephalosporins (10.1%; 95% CI: 6.6-14.2) and fluoroquinolones (24.9%; 95% CI: 19.3-30.9). Statistical heterogeneity was high (I2 > 70%) across studies reporting resistance proportions.ConclusionContinuous efforts in AMR surveillance and infection prevention and control as well as antibiotic stewardship are needed to limit the spread of AMR in Germany.

Antibacterial Activity of Nanostructured Zinc Oxide Tetrapods

Zinc oxide (ZnO) tetrapods as microparticles with nanostructured surfaces show peculiar physical properties and anti-infective activities. The aim of this study was to investigate the antibacterial and bactericidal properties of ZnO tetrapods in comparison to spherical, unstructured ZnO particles. Additionally, killing rates of either methylene blue-treated or untreated tetrapods and spherical ZnO particles for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria species were determined. ZnO tetrapods showed considerable bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates, including multi-resistant strains, while Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis remained unaffected. Almost complete elimination was reached after 24 h for Staphylococcus aureus at 0.5 mg/mL and Klebsiella pneumoniae at 0.25 mg/mL. Surface modifications of spherical ZnO particles by treatment with methylene blue even improved the antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus. Nanostructured surfaces of ZnO particles provide active and modifiable interfaces for the contact with and killing of bacteria. The application of solid state chemistry, i.e., the direct matter-to-matter interaction between active agent and bacterium, in the form of ZnO tetrapods and non-soluble ZnO particles, can add an additional principle to the spectrum of antibacterial mechanisms, which is, in contrast to soluble antibiotics, depending on the direct local contact with the microorganisms on tissue or material surfaces.

A rapid evidence assessment exploring whether antimicrobial resistance complicates non-infectious health conditions and healthcare services, 2010-20

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the greatest public health threats at this time. While there is a good understanding of the impacts of AMR on infectious diseases, an area of less focus is the effects AMR may be having on non-communicable health conditions (such as cancer) and healthcare services (such as surgery). Therefore, this study aimed to explore what impact AMR is currently having on non-communicable health conditions, or areas of health services, where AMR could be a complicating factor impacting on the ability to treat the condition and/or health outcomes. To do this, a rapid evidence assessment of the literature was conducted, involving a systematic approach to searching and reviewing the evidence. In total, 101 studies were reviewed covering surgery, organ transplants, cancer, ICUs, diabetes, paediatric patients, immunodeficiency conditions, liver and kidney disease, and physical trauma. The results showed limited research in this area and studies often use a selective population, making the results difficult to generalize. However, the evidence showed that for all health conditions and healthcare service areas reviewed, at least one study demonstrated a higher risk of death for patients with resistant infections, compared with no or drug-susceptible infections. Poor health outcomes were also associated with resistant infections in some instances, such as severe sepsis and failure of treatments, as well as a greater need for invasive medical support. While there are gaps in the evidence base requiring further research, efforts are also needed within policy and practice to better understand and overcome these challenges.

Application of Phagotherapy in the Treatment of Burn Patients (Review)

Treatment of patients with a burn injury is a complex process involving multicomponent multidirectional intensive therapy of the majority of organs and systems damaged by thermal effects on the skin, alternating with repeated surgical interventions aimed at removing nonviable tissues with subsequent plastic closure of wound defects. After the recovery from the burn shock, local infectious complications are considered to be the leading problem that decelerates the process of recovery and is the main cause of lethal outcomes. Since the skin integrity is broken, microorganisms penetrate readily into the internal environment of the human organism resulting in a septic state with multiple organ failure. A widespread and often uncontrollable use of antibacterial drugs in medical practice has led to the emergence of multiple drug resistance (MDR) in microorganisms. Introduction of drugs made on the basis of bacteriophages into practice is presently becoming increasingly important. This is confirmed by the growing interest in this field of pharmacology, the development of special programs aimed at studying the processes of phage and bacterial cell interaction. This review presents the main types of bacteria pertaining to MDR pathogens, principles of their classification, and the risk factors for infecting patients. The mechanisms of the selective action of phage particles on a bacterial cell and the possibility of using phage therapy in the treatment of burn injury (experimental and clinical data) based on the analysis of foreign literature are demonstrated as well as new positive properties of phages related to the changes in the macroorganism immune status caused by the interaction with bacteriophage particles.

The Impact of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Infection on Outcomes in Burn Injury Patients at Sanglah General Hospital, Bali

BACKGROUND: Research related to the impact of multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) infection on clinical outcomes in burns is still limited. AIM: This study evaluated the effect of MDRO infection on morbidity and mortality of burn patients. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted on burn patients admitted to the burn unit of Sanglah General Hospital, Bali, between 2018 and 2020. MDRO patients were described as those who had at least one positive MDRO culture. All other patients were included in the non-MDRO group. Measurement and analysis included mortality and five indicators of morbidity: length of stay, duration of antibiotic therapy, sepsis, pneumonia, and acute kidney injury (AKI). RESULTS: Significant associations of MDRO infection were found for duration of antibiotic therapy (0 vs. 7 days), sepsis (odds ratio [OR] 13.90 [95% Confidence interval (CI) 95% 2.88–67.10]), pneumonia (OR 12,67 [95% CI 3.26–49.23]), and mortality (OR 9.75 [95% CI 2.00–47.50]). No significant association was found for the length of stay and the incidence of AKI. Multivariate analysis found that MDRO infection increased risk of sepsis (OR 36.53 [95% CI 2.05–652.45], pneumonia (OR 10.75 [95% CI 1.87–61.86]) and mortality (OR 57.09 [95% CI 1.41–2318.87]). Multivariate analysis of MDRO infection with duration of antibiotic therapy found no independent variables that were significantly related. CONCLUSION: These research findings suggest that MDRO infections are associated with increasing length of antibiotic treatment, sepsis, pneumonia, and mortality in burn patients.

Mortality incidence among critically ill burn patients infected with multidrug-resistant organisms: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Many risk factors have been reported to increase mortality among burn patients. Previously, a higher mortality incidence was reported in acute burn patients infected with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) when compared to patients infected with non-MDROs. However, considering this as an independent risk factor for mortality in acute burn patients is not yet confirmed.

METHODS

We conducted an observational retrospective study in Qatar. We included adult patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2015 and December 2017 with burn injuries involving either at least 15% of the total body surface area (TBSA) or less than 15% with facial involvement. All patients developed infection with a positive culture of either MDRO or non-MDRO. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Other outcomes included days of mechanical ventilation, ICU, length of stay in hospital, and requirement of vasoactive agents.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were included in the final analysis: 33 patients in the MDRO group and 25 patients in the non-MDRO group. Six patients (18.2%) died in the MDRO group versus four patients (16%) in the non-MDRO group (P = 1). No significant difference was observed between the two groups with regard to the ICU length of stay. However, there was a trend towards increased median length of stay in hospital in the MDRO group: 62 days versus 45 days in the non-MDRO group (P = 0.057). No significant differences were observed in the other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In severely burned patients, infection with MDRO was not associated with increased mortality. There was a trend towards increased hospitalisation in MDRO-infected patients. Further studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm these results.

LAY SUMMARY

Many factors affect mortality in burn patients admitted to the intensive care unit, such as age, total body surface area involved in the injury, and others. In this retrospective study, we evaluated whether wound infection with a bacterial organism resistant to multiple classes of antibiotics (multidrug-resistant) is considered an independent risk factor for mortality in critically ill burn patients. We included 58 patients requiring intensive care admission with burn injuries involving 15% or more of the total body surface area or less than 15% but with facial involvement. A total of 33 patients were infected with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and 25 patients with non-MDROs. Six patients (18.2%) from the MDRO group died versus four (16%) in the non-MDRO group. The MDRO group required a longer stay in hospital and an average of one more day on a mechanical ventilator. We concluded that wound infection with MDROs might not increase mortality when compared to wound infection with non-MDROs, although other studies with a larger number of patients involved need to be conducted to validate these results.

Colonization with Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae is Associated with Increased Mortality Following Burn Injury in Sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are an emerging international concern in low- and middle-income countries that threaten recent public health gains. These challenges are exacerbated in immunocompromised hosts, such as those with burn injury. This study sought to describe the epidemiology and associated clinical outcomes of burn wound colonization in a Malawian tertiary burn center.

METHODS

This is a prospective analysis of burn patients presenting to Kamuzu Central Hospital in Lilongwe, Malawi, within 72 h of burn injury. A swab of each patient's primary wound was collected at admission and each subsequent week. The primary exposure was burn wound colonization with MDR bacteria, particularly Enterobacteriaceae. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. A log binomial model estimated the association between the exposure and outcome, adjusted for confounders.

RESULTS

Ninety-nine patients were enrolled with a median age of 4 years (IQR 2-12) and a male preponderance (54%). Median total body surface area burn (TBSA) was 14% (IQR 9-25), and crude in-hospital mortality was 19%. Enterobacteriaceae were the most common MDR bacteria with 36% of patients becoming colonized. Wound colonization with MDR Enterobacteriaceae was associated with increased in-hospital mortality with a risk ratio of 1.86 (95% CI 1.38, 2.50, p < 0.001) adjusted for TBSA, burn type (scald vs. flame), sex, age, length of stay, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization.

CONCLUSION

MDR bacteria, especially Enterobacteriaceae, are common and are associated with worse burn injury outcomes. In resource-poor environments, a greater emphasis on prevention of MDR bacterial colonization, improved isolation precautions, affordable diagnostics, and antibiotic stewardship are imperative.

Estimating the burden of antimicrobial resistance: a systematic literature review

Background

Accurate estimates of the burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) are needed to establish the magnitude of this global threat in terms of both health and cost, and to paramaterise cost-effectiveness evaluations of interventions aiming to tackle the problem. This review aimed to establish the alternative methodologies used in estimating AMR burden in order to appraise the current evidence base.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, EconLit, PubMed and grey literature were searched. English language studies evaluating the impact of AMR (from any microbe) on patient, payer/provider and economic burden published between January 2013 and December 2015 were included. Independent screening of title/abstracts followed by full texts was performed using pre-specified criteria. A study quality score (from zero to one) was derived using Newcastle-Ottawa and Philips checklists. Extracted study data were used to compare study method and resulting burden estimate, according to perspective. Monetary costs were converted into 2013 USD.

Results

Out of 5187 unique retrievals, 214 studies were included. One hundred eighty-seven studies estimated patient health, 75 studies estimated payer/provider and 11 studies estimated economic burden. 64% of included studies were single centre. The majority of studies estimating patient or provider/payer burden used regression techniques. 48% of studies estimating mortality burden found a significant impact from resistance, excess healthcare system costs ranged from non-significance to $1 billion per year, whilst economic burden ranged from $21,832 per case to over $3 trillion in GDP loss. Median quality scores (interquartile range) for patient, payer/provider and economic burden studies were 0.67 (0.56-0.67), 0.56 (0.46-0.67) and 0.53 (0.44-0.60) respectively.

Conclusions

This study highlights what methodological assumptions and biases can occur dependent on chosen outcome and perspective. Currently, there is considerable variability in burden estimates, which can lead in-turn to inaccurate intervention evaluations and poor policy/investment decisions. Future research should utilise the recommendations presented in this review.

Trial registration

This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO (PROSPERO CRD42016037510).

Multiple-Drug Resistance in Burn Patients: A Retrospective Study on the Impact of Antibiotic Resistance on Survival and Length of Stay

Despite improvements in early treatment, survival following burn injury remains challenged by sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Additionally, susceptibility to infections and growing antibiotic resistance places burn patients at increased risk for infections with multiple-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). We therefore aimed to evaluate the impact of MDRO infections on survival and hospital length of stay, as well as examine the role of these organisms in the development of complications, such as acute kidney injury, sepsis, and MODS. To study this, we included all burn patients with infections, admitted between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2013. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with infections caused by MDROs and patients with infections caused by susceptible organisms. Data were collected on all available cultures, as well as demographic, injury, and treatment-related variables from the medical record. The number of operative procedures (median: 2 vs 1, P < .0001), ventilator days (21 vs 0 days, P < .0001), total antibiotic days (21 vs 7days, P < .0001), and length of hospitalization (39 vs 14 days, P < .0001) were significantly different in the MDRO group vs the nonresistant group. While MDRO infection was not associated with patient mortality, univariable logistic regression analyses demonstrated >20% TBSA (odds ratio [OR] = 4.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-16.29, P = .03), acute kidney injury (OR = 10.93, 95% CI: 2.74-43.57, P = .001), sepsis (OR = 19.20, 95% CI: 3.79-97.27, P < .001), and MODS (OR = 85.49, 95% CI: 12.97-563.28, P < .0001) significantly increased the odds of patient mortality. These findings suggest that infections with MDROs are associated with a greater number of surgical procedures, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, more antibiotic days, and longer hospitalization.

Real-Time Prediction for Burn Length of Stay Via Median Residual Hospital Length of Stay Methodology

Hospital length of stay (LOS) after burn injury is commonly estimated as 1 day per percent burn, but LOS often exceeds that estimate. The purpose of this study is to develop a novel method for estimating burn hospital LOS at any time during hospitalization. The authors used the American Burn Association National Burn Repository from 2000 to 2009 to directly estimate the median residual LOS (MRLOS) of patients hospitalized for burn injuries and who survived to discharge. The MRLOS is the median of how many more days a burn patient will be hospitalized given that the person has been in hospital for a specified time period. The authors also estimated the 25th and 75th percentiles of residual life and quantified the relationship between MRLOS and LOS with ordinary least squares for all burn patients, by burn size and by presence of inhalation injury. MRLOS increased with increasing LOS, confirming that discharge estimates change over time. Patients with inhalation injury had longer MRLOS than patients without inhalation injury in the first 100 hospital days. Patients with large burns (>25%) had large MRLOS consistent with prolonged hospitalization, but patients with small burns (<25%) also had steadily increasing MRLOS during hospitalization (ie, the longer the patient was in the hospital, the longer the predicted LOS regardless of initial LOS estimate). Estimating remaining hospital LOS at any time during admission has been problematic; MRLOS can be used to provide an estimate of remaining hospital LOS and resource utilization to families, administrators, and other medical professionals.

Review of burn research for the year 2013

The diverse medical disciplines that are involved in the care of burn patients is reflected in the robust and varied scientific and clinical research of burn injury. In the calendar year of 2013, over 1000 articles were published in peer-reviewed journals in the area of burn injury. This review summarizes select, interesting, and potentially influential articles in areas of critical care, epidemiology, infection, inhalation injury, nutrition and metabolism, pain and pruritus, psychology, reconstruction and rehabilitation, and wounds.