Functional outcomes after treatment of aggressive tumors in the distal radius

Evaluating Extended Curettage and Adjuvant Therapy Against Wide Resection and Reconstruction in the Management of Distal Radius Giant Cell Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of distal radius giant cell tumors (GCTs) remains challenging, and the optimal approach is still a matter of debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of extended curettage and wide resection, the mainstays of treatment.

METHODS

Medline (via PubMed), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Embase databases were searched for comparative studies that assessed extended curettage with adjuvant therapy and wide resection with reconstruction in patients with GCTs of the distal radius up to April 2023. Data were collected and analyzed on rates of local recurrence, metastasis, overall complications, and functional outcomes. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to appraise the risk of bias within each study.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (n = 373 patients) were included and analyzed. Patients who underwent curettage were more likely to develop recurrence (risk ratio [RR] = 3.02 [95% confidence interval; CI, 1.87-4.89], P < .01), showed fewer complications (RR = 0.32 [95% CI, 0.21-0.49], P < .01), and showed greater improvement in Visual Analog Scale and lower Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores (P < .00001) than those who underwent wide resection. No significant difference was found regarding metastasis (RR = 1.03 [95% CI, 0.38-2.78], P = .95).

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding the surgical approach to GCT of the distal radius, curettage with adjuvant therapy was associated with a higher likelihood of recurrence compared with wide resection with reconstruction. Nevertheless, the curettage approach resulted in significantly lower rates of operative complications, decreased pain scores, and better functional outcomes in comparison to the resection group.

Giant cell tumour of bone

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive lesion that is difficult to treat as salvaging the joint can be associated with a high rate of local recurrence (LR). We evaluated the risk factors for tumour relapse after treatment of a GCTB of the limbs. A total of 354 consecutive patients with a GCTB underwent joint salvage by curettage and reconstruction with bone graft and/or cement or en bloc resection. Patient, tumour, and treatment factors were analyzed for their impact on LR. Patients treated with denosumab were excluded. There were 53 LRs (15%) at a mean 30.5 months (5 to 116). LR was higher after curettage (18.4%) than after resection (4.6%; p = 0.008). Neither pathological fracture (p = 0.240), Campanacci grade (p = 0.734), soft-tissue extension (p = 0.297), or tumour size (p = 0.872) affected the risk of recurrence. Joint salvage was possible in 74% of patients overall (262/354), and 98% after curettage alone (262/267). Of 49 patients with LR after curettage, 44 (90%) underwent repeated curettage and joint salvage. For patients treated by curettage, only age less than 30 years (p = 0.042) and location in the distal radius (p = 0.043) predicted higher LR. The rate of LR did not differ whether cement or bone graft was used (p = 0.753), but may have been reduced by the use of hydrogen peroxide (p = 0.069). Complications occurred in 15.3% of cases (54/354) and did not differ by treatment. Most patients with a GCTB can undergo successful joint salvage by aggressive curettage, even in the presence of a soft-tissue mass, pathological fracture, or a large lesion, with an 18.4% risk of local recurrence. However, 90% of local relapses after curettage can be treated by repeat joint salvage. Maximizing joint salvage is important to optimize long-term function since most patients with a GCTB are young adults. Younger patients and those with distal radius tumours treated with joint-sparing procedures have a higher rate of local relapse and may require more aggressive treatment and closer follow-up.

Curettage versus wide resection followed by arthrodesis/arthroplasty for distal radius Giant cell tumours: A meta-analysis of treatment and reconstruction methods

Purpose

Primary aim of this review was to compare the two treatment modalities-curettage and wide excision (WE)- of Giant cell tumours of distal radius along with the methods of reconstruction viz. arthrodesis (AD) and arthroplasty (AP), and determine which had a better outcome.

Methods

PubMed and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched using a well-defined search strategy by two independent reviewers. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were predetermined using the PICO format. MINORS tool was used to evaluate study quality. Recurrence rate (RR) was the chief oncological determinant whereas range of motion, grip strength, disability of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) and musculoskeletal tumour society (MSTS) scores and complication rates were the functional outcome measures used.

Results

For the first part, a total of 11 articles (284 patients) were analysed. The second half- AP versus AD-included four studies (71 patients). Quantitative analysis revealed a significantly higher RR (Odds ratio (OR) 8.6 [95% CI, 3.4, 21.75]) with curettage. WE, on the other hand, was associated with a higher complication rate (OR 0.3[ 95% CI, 0.14, 0.62]) and lower grip strength (Standard Mean Difference (SMD) 18.08[95% CI, 13.78, 22.37]). Complication rates were also significantly higher with wrist AP (OR 6.36[ 95% CI, 1.72, 23.52]). Remaining functional parameters failed to show any significant difference between either group.

Conclusion

WE is the preferred surgical strategy in terms of lower RR and functionally equivalent results. In terms of the choice of reconstruction following WE, there is a trend towards higher patient satisfaction after wrist AD.

Treatment of giant cell tumors of the distal radius: A long-term patient-reported outcomes study

INTRODUCTION

The distal radius is a common location for giant cell tumors (GCTs) of bone. Management includes intralesional curettage or wide excision, however, long-term comparisons of treatment options are limited. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate our institutions' outcomes of treatment of these tumors.

METHODS

We reviewed 24 GCT of the distal radius in 23 patients (12 males: 11 females) with a mean age of 42 years at the time of surgery. Functional outcomes were collected including the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score (MSTS), QuickDash, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). The mean follow-up was 13 years.

RESULTS

Tumor grade included Campanacci Grade II (n = 14) and Grade III (n = 10). Treatment included extended intralesional curettage (n = 16) and wide excision (n = 8). Reconstruction mainly included bone grafting/cement (n = 16) or free vascularized fibula radiocarpal arthrodesis (n = 5). At most recent follow-up, there was no difference in MSTS, VAS, and PRWE (p > 0.05) between patients undergoing a joint sparing or arthrodesis. Patients undergoing arthrodesis had a lower QuickDASH score (13.7 vs. 20.8, p = 0.04) CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for GCT of the distal radius is individualized however in the setting of articular surface involvement, arthrodesis can lead to superior functional results at long-term follow-up.

Joint-sparing versus nonjoint-sparing reconstruction of the radius following oncologic resection: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Reconstructions of the distal radius are uncommon procedures. This systematic review compares joints-sparing (JS) versus nonjoint-sparing (NJS) reconstructions following oncologic resection of the distal radius.

METHODS

A search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Collected outcomes included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion and grip strength, and complication and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

A total of 52 nonrandomized cohort studies (n = 715) were included. PROMs were comparable between the cohorts, while the range of flexion-extension was greater in JS reconstructions (78.1° vs. 25.6°) and the range of pronation-supination was greater in NJS reconstructions (133.6° vs. 109.8°). Relative grip strength was greater following JS reconstruction (65.0% vs. 56.4%). About one in sixteen of the JS reconstructions were eventually revised to an NJS construct.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review demonstrates that JS reconstructive techniques can offer satisfying results in patients treated for oncologic distal radius defects. However, about 6% of JS reconstructions are eventually revised to a NJS construct. Further investigation is warranted to identify factors that affect or predict these findings, to aid in future in treatment selection and reduce the common need for reoperations following these procedures.

Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction after distal radius tumor resection: Reoperation and patient reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study are to evaluate the rate of wrist joint preservation, allograft retention, factors associated with reoperation and to report the patient reported outcomes after osteoarticular allograft reconstruction of the distal radius.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified 33 patients who underwent distal radius resection followed by osteoarticular allograft reconstruction, including 27 giant cell tumors and 6 primary malignancies. Ten patients with a preserved wrist joint completed the QuickDASH, PROMIS-CA physical function, and Toronto extremity salvage score (TESS) at a median of 13 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The allograft retention rate was 89%, and an allograft fracture predisposed to conversion to wrist arthrodesis. The reoperation rate was 55% and 36% underwent wrist arthrodesis at a median of 4.2 years following index surgery. The use of locking plate fixation was associated with lower reoperation and allograft fracture rates. Patients reported a median QuickDASH of 10.2 (range: 0-52.3), a mean PROMIS physical function of 57.8 (range: 38.9-64.5) and the median TESS was 95.5 (range: 67.0-98.4).

CONCLUSION

Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction results in acceptable long-term patient reported outcomes, despite a high revision rate. Allograft fixation with locking plates seems to reduce the number of reoperations and allograft fractures, along with reduction in wrist arthrodesis rates.

The role of Denosumab in joint preservation for patients with giant cell tumour of bone

AIMS

Local recurrence remains a challenging and common problem following curettage and joint-sparing surgery for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). We previously reported a 15% local recurrence rate at a median follow-up of 30 months in 20 patients with high-risk GCTB treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab. The aim of this study was to determine if this initial favourable outcome following the use of Denosumab was maintained with longer follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with GCTB of the limb considered high-risk for unsuccessful joint salvage, due to minimal periarticular and subchondral bone, large soft tissue mass, or pathological fracture, were treated with Denosumab followed by extended intralesional curettage with the goal of preserving the joint surface. Patients were followed for local recurrence, metastasis, and secondary sarcoma.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 33.8 years (18 to 67) with high-risk GCTB received median six cycles of Denosumab before surgery. Tumours occurred most commonly around the knee (17/25, 68%). The median follow-up was 57 months (interquartile range (IQR) 13 to 88). The joint was salvaged in 23 patients (92%). Two required knee arthroplasty due to intra-articular fracture and arthritis. Local recurrence developed in 11 patients (44%) at a mean of 32.5 months (3 to 75) following surgery, of whom four underwent repeat curettage and joint salvage. One patient developed secondary osteosarcoma and another benign GCT lung metastases.

CONCLUSION

The use of Denosumab for joint salvage was associated with a higher than expected rate of local recurrence at 44%. Neoadjuvant Denosumab for joint-sparing procedures should be considered with caution in light of these results. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):184-191.

Wrist Arthrodesis and Osteoarticular Reconstruction in Giant Cell Tumor of the Distal Radius

PURPOSE

The aim of this multi-institutional retrospective study was to compare osteoarticular graft reconstruction (OA) and wrist arthrodesis (WA) after distal radius resection for giant cell tumor.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sixty-seven patients affected by giant cell tumor of the distal radius underwent resection and reconstruction with OA (47 patients) or WA (20 patients). The mean age was 40 years (range, 13-74 years). Grafts included fresh-frozen allograft or nonvascularized fibular autograft. Complications requiring surgical revision were recorded. Clinical outcome was assessed with the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Score (MSTS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients developed a local recurrence after a median of 12 months (range, 6-137 months). Sixteen patients required revision surgery for complications. Of these, 10 were graft-related complications (7 in the OA group and 3 in the WA group). Among OA, 2 patients with painful instabilities and 4 with severe arthritis required conversion into WA after a mean of 26 months (range, 13-38 months) At a median follow-up of 105 months (range, 12-395 months), similar functional outcome (MSTS and DASH score) was observed between OA and WA.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results did not show any advantage of OA or WA over the other technique. A patient-by-patient decision should be taken both regarding the type of reconstruction (OA or WA) and the type of graft (allograft or autograft). The reconstructive choice should also consider the patient's functional expectations.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Giant Cell Tumors of the Upper Extremity: Predictors of Recurrence

PURPOSE

Giant cell tumors (GCT) of the distal radius are thought to be more aggressive than in other locations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with recurrence of GCTs in the upper extremity.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 82 patients who underwent primary surgical treatment for an upper extremity GCT. Tumors were located in the radius (n = 47), humerus (n = 17), ulna (n = 9), and hand (n = 9). Treatment consisted of either wide resection or amputation or intralesional resection with or without adjuvants. A multivariable logistic regression was performed including tumor grade, type of surgery, and tumor location, from which the percentage of contribution to the model of each variable was calculated.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate after intralesional resection was 48%; after wide resection or amputation, it was 12%. Two patients developed a pulmonary metastasis (2.4%). In multivariable analysis, intralesional resection was independently associated with recurrence. Intralesional resection had a 77% contribution to predict recurrence and the distal radius location had a 16% contribution in the predictive model.

CONCLUSIONS

As expected, intralesional resection was the strongest independent predictor of recurrence after surgical treatment for GCT. The distal radius location contributed to the prediction of giant cell tumor recurrence to a lesser extent.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Extended intralesional curettage preferred over resection-arthrodesis for giant cell tumour of the distal radius

BACKGROUND

Distal radius giant cell tumour (GCT) is known to be associated with distinct management difficulties, including high rates of local recurrence and lung metastases compared to other anatomic locations. Multiple treatment options exist, each with different outcomes and complications.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

To compare oncological and functional outcomes and complications following treatment of patients with distal radius GCT by extended intralesional curettage (EIC) or resection-arthrodesis.

METHODS

Patients operated on for distal radius GCT were identified from prospectively collected databases at four Canadian musculoskeletal oncology specialty centres. There were 57 patients with a mean age of 35.4 years (range 17-57). Thirteen tumours were Campanacci grade 2, and 40 were Grade 3 (4 unknown). Twenty patients presented with an associated pathologic fracture. There were 34 patients treated by EIC and 23 by en bloc resection and wrist arthrodesis. All resections were performed for grade 3 tumours. The mean follow-up was 86 months (range 1-280).

RESULTS

There were a total of 11 (19%) local recurrences: 10 of 34 (29%) in the EIC group compared to only 1 of 23 (4%) in the resection-arthrodesis group (p = 0.028). For the 10 patients with local recurrence following initial treatment by EIC, 7 underwent repeat EIC, while 3 required resection-arthrodesis. The one local recurrence following initial resection was managed with repeat resection-arthrodesis. Six of the 11 local recurrences followed treatment of Campanacci grade 3 tumours, while 4 were in grade 2 lesions and in one case of recurrence the grade was unknown. There were no post-operative complications after EIC, whereas 7 patients (30%) had post-operative complications following resection-arthrodesis including 4 infections, one malunion, one non-union and one fracture (p = 0.001). The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 33.5 in the curettage group compared to 27 in the resection group (p = 0.001). The mean Toronto Extremity Salvage Score was 98.3% following curettage compared to 91.5% after resection (p = 0.006). No patients experienced lung metastasis or death.

CONCLUSIONS

EIC is an effective alternative to wide resection-arthrodesis following treatment of distal radius GCT, with the advantage of preserving the distal radius and wrist joint function, but with a higher risk of local recurrence. Most local recurrences following initial treatment by EIC could be managed with iterative curettage and joint preservation. Wide excision and arthrodesis were associated with a significantly lower risk of tumour recurrence but was technically challenging and associated with more frequent post-operative complications. EIC was associated with better functional scores. Resection should be reserved for the most severe grade 3 tumours and recurrent and complex cases not amenable to treatment with EIC and joint salvage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative trial.

Functional results of wrist arthrodesis versus arthroplasty with proximal fibula following giant cell tumour excision of the distal radius

Twenty-one patients underwent excision of a Campanacci grade III giant cell tumour of the distal radius and had reconstruction using a proximal fibula autograft. We compared the functional results of wrist arthrodesis versus arthroplasty. All 21 patients healed in an average of 8 months, and all have remained disease free. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores and the grip strength of the operated wrist compared with the contralateral wrist were 93%, 7, and 71% for the arthrodesis group and 83%, 17, and 40% for the arthroplasty group. Arthrodesis of the reconstructed radiocarpal joint provided better grip strength and functional outcomes than arthroplasty. Level of evidence: III.

A modified ulnar translocation reconstruction technique for Campanacci grade 3 giant cell tumors of the distal radius using a clover leaf plate

BACKGROUND

Campanacci grade 3 giant cell tumors of the distal radius are locally aggressive and in close proximity to the median nerve, articular cartilage, flexor and extensor tendons, and the radial artery. Although several reconstructive techniques have been described, it is unclear to what degree these procedures restore function.

DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE

We present a modified ipsilateral ulna translocation technique using a clover leaf plate, for reconstruction of en bloc resected distal radius. This has the theoretical advantage of ensuring a solid, pain-free wrist arthrodesis, while preserving the forearm rotational axis and minimizing functional loss, without the associated donor site morbidity or allograft rejection issues of other reconstructive techniques.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2006 and 2013, 3 patients underwent this procedure for Campanacci grade 3 giant cell tumors. All patients were right hand-dominant females, aged 24, 35, and 46 years, respectively. Two cases involved the right radius. Patients were reviewed retrospectively with clinical examination, functional assessment [the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) for upper limb], and radiographs. The review period was 30, 51, and 41 months, respectively.

RESULTS

The length of distal radius resected was 70, 50, and 35 mm, respectively. All achieved clear margins. There were no complications and there have been no recurrences. All ulnocarpal translocations achieved radiographic fusion. Patient's averaged 80-degree pronation, 70-degree supination, and clinical TESS scores of 86 at most recent follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique achieved a painless and functional wrist arthrodesis with partially restored wrist motion, without complications. This technique has the advantage of negating remote donor site morbidity and/or allograft rejection issues of other techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Is intralesional treatment of giant cell tumor of the distal radius comparable to resection with respect to local control and functional outcome?

BACKGROUND

A giant cell tumor is a benign locally aggressive tumor commonly seen in the distal radius with reported recurrence rates higher than tumors at other sites. The dilemma for the treating surgeon is deciding whether intralesional treatment is adequate compared with resection of the primary tumor for oncologic and functional outcomes. More information would be helpful to guide shared decision-making.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We asked: (1) How will validated functional scores, ROM, and strength differ between resection versus intralesional excision for a giant cell tumor of the distal radius? (2) How will recurrence rate and reoperation differ between these types of treatments? (3) What are the complications resulting in reoperation after intralesional excision and resection procedures? (4) Is there a difference in functional outcome in treating a primary versus recurrent giant cell tumor with a resection arthrodesis?

METHODS

Between 1985 and 2008, 39 patients (39 wrists) were treated for primary giant cell tumor of the distal radius at two academic centers. Twenty patients underwent primary intralesional excision, typically in cases where bony architecture and cortical thickness were preserved, 15 underwent resection with radiocarpal arthrodesis, and four had resection with osteoarticular allograft. Resection regardless of reconstruction type was favored in cases with marked cortical expansion. A specific evaluation for purposes of the study with radiographs, ROM, grip strength, and pain and functional scores was performed at a minimum of 1 year for 21 patients (54%) and an additional 11 patients (28%) were available only by phone. We also assessed reoperations for recurrence and other complications via chart review.

RESULTS

With the numbers available, there were no differences in pain or functional scores or grip strength between groups; however, there was greater supination in the intralesional excision group (p=0.037). Tumors recurred in six of 17 wrists after intralesional excision and none of the 15 after en bloc resection (p=0.030). There was no relationship between tumor grade and recurrence. There were 12 reoperations in eight of 17 patients in the intralesional excision group but only one of 11 patients (p=0.049) who underwent resection arthrodesis with distal radius allograft had a reoperation. There were no differences in functional scores whether resection arthrodesis was performed as the primary procedure or to treat recurrence after intralesional excision.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection for giant cell tumor of the distal radius with distal radius allograft arthrodesis showed a lower recurrence rate, lower reoperation rate, and no apparent differences in functional outcome compared with joint salvage with intralesional excision. Because an arthrodesis for recurrence after intralesional procedures seems to function well, we believe that intralesional excision is reasonable to consider for initial treatment, but the patient should be informed about the relative benefits and risks of both options during the shared decision-making process. Because arthrodesis after recurrence functions similar to the initial resection and arthrodesis, an initial treatment with curettage remains a viable, and likely the standard, mode of treatment for most giant cell tumors of the distal radius unless there is extensive bone loss.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Partial wrist arthrodesis versus arthroplasty for distal radius giant cell tumours

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of using the proximal fibular graft for partial wrist arthrodesis or arthroplasty after the resection of giant cell tumours of the distal radius.

METHODS

Between February 2006 and August 2010, 14 patients (seven males, seven females; average age, 35.7 years) with grade II and III giant cell tumours of the distal radius were treated by tumour resection and autologous proximal fibular grafts to reconstruct the wrist in our hospital. Seven patients each were treated by wrist arthroplasty and partial wrist arthrodesis, and were followed up for 2.2-6.8 years (average, 3.9 years).

RESULTS

All patients achieved primary healing. No tumour recurrence was observed during follow-up in any of the patients. No statistically significant difference in forearm rotation was observed between patients undergoing the two different treatments. However, wrist flexion-extension activities were significantly better and the wrist grip strengths were significantly worse in the arthroplasty group than in the arthrodesis group. The Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score did not significantly differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, joint arthroplasty remains a favourable treatment with regard to the functional outcome for giant cell tumours of the distal radius; however, some of these patients may have a weaker grip strength. In comparison, partial wrist fusion appears to provide a durable and stable wrist with good long-term functional outcome.

Limited arthrodesis of the wrist for treatment of giant cell tumor of the distal radius

PURPOSE

To present the functional results of a technique of radiocarpal arthrodesis and reconstruction with a structural nonvascularized autologous bone graft after en bloc resection of giant cell tumors of the distal radius.

METHODS

A total of 13 patients with a mean age of 37 years with aggressive giant cell tumor (Campanacci grade III) of distal radius were managed with en bloc resection and reconstruction with a structural nonvascularized bone graft. The primary outcome measure was the disability evaluated by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society rating score of limb salvage. Secondary outcomes included survival of the reconstruction measured from the date of the operation to revision procedure for any reason (mechanical, infectious, or oncologic). Other outcomes included active wrist motion and ability to resume work.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up period was 6 years (range, 2-14 y). The median arc of motion at the midcarpal joint was 40°, median wrist flexion was 20°, and median extension was 10°. The median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score based on the analysis of factors pertinent to the patient as a whole (pain, functional activities, and emotional acceptance) and specific to the upper limb (positioning of the hand, manual dexterity, and lifting ability) was 86%. Five patients underwent a second surgical procedure. The cumulative probability of reoperation for mechanical reason was 31% at similar follow-up times at 2, 5, and 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique provided a stable wrist and partially restored wrist motion with limited pain. However, further surgical procedures may be necessary to reach this goal.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Functional results following vascularized versus nonvascularized bone grafts for wrist arthrodesis following excision of giant cell tumors

PURPOSE

Wrist arthrodesis after resection of a giant cell tumor of the distal radius can be performed using a vascularized free fibular transfer (VFFT) or a nonvascularized structural iliac crest transfer (NICT). The purpose of this study was to compare the union times, functional outcomes, and complications after these procedures.

METHODS

We identified 27 patients at 2 centers: 14 underwent VFFT, and 13 NICT. The 2 groups were comparable for age, sex, and tumor grade. We assessed functional outcomes of the wrist with the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score, Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 1987 and 1993 scores, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores.

RESULTS

Two local recurrences occurred in the VFFT group and 1 in the NICT group. The VFFT group had 3 patients who had already undergone or were planning to undergo surgery for improved appearance, hardware removal, or tendon release. In the NICT group, 2 infections required debridement, one of which went on to free fibular transfer, but there were no reoperations for nonunion or donor site morbidity. The surgical time was significantly shorter for NICT. Functional scores showed no differences between groups on any of the parameters studied for the upper limb.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VFFT and NICT were effective surgical techniques for wrist fusion after distal radial resection for giant cell tumor. Vascularized free fibular transfer should be considered when a major skin defect is anticipated, because it allows the inclusion of a vascularized skin paddle, or when the osseous defect is too long (> 10 cm) for NICT. We were unable to demonstrate a difference in upper limb functional scores between VFFT and NICT. Because the surgical time is significantly shorter and the reoperation rate is lower for NICT, we recommend NICT whenever possible.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Surgical technique: Tibia cortical strut autograft interposition arthrodesis after distal radius resection

BACKGROUND

Distal radius reconstruction after en bloc tumor resection remains a surgical challenge. Although several surgical techniques, either reconstructing the wrist or achieving a stable arthrodesis, have been described, it is unclear to what degree these restore function.

DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE

We describe an updated technique making use of a tibia cortical strut autograft (TCSA) to perform a functional arthrodesis from the remaining radius to the first carpal row. This, in theory, could lead to less donor site morbidity while resulting in a stable but functional and pain-free arthrodesis of the wrist.

METHODS

Between 1987 and 2010 we reconstructed the wrists of 17 patients using a TCSA arthrodesis (six primary and three revisions), seven with an osteoarticular allograft, three using an ulnar translocation, and one with a fibula autograft. Median age at diagnosis was 24 years (range, 9-58 years) and minimum followup was 2.7 years (median, 13.8 years; range, 2.7-24.5 years). Patients were evaluated using radiographs and clinical examination. We used Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), and SF-36 questionnaires to assess function and quality of life.

RESULTS

All TCSA reconstructions fused; one patient had a second surgery to expedite union with the carpal row. After osteoarticular allograft, five patients were revised (three to a TCSA) for nonunion, fracture, or joint collapse. ROM and grip strength were comparable in both AO and TCSA, all above 60% of the contralateral side. Median MSTS and DASH scores were 73% and 6, respectively, and did not differ between the groups. The SF-36 scores showed less pain after TCSA; otherwise, all patients presented with comparable function.

CONCLUSIONS

TCSA wrist arthrodesis resulted in a functional and painless wrist reconstruction with a relatively low complication and donor site morbidity rate and comparable functional results as other techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Features of grade 3 giant cell tumors of the distal radius associated with successful intralesional treatment

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to identify radiographic and anatomic features of Campanacci grade 3 distal radius giant cell tumors that are associated with an acceptable rate of local recurrence after intralesional treatment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 15 grade 3 distal radius giant cell tumors treated with intralesional curettage, cryosurgery, and cementation (CCC) (n = 9) or with wide en bloc excision and reconstruction (WEE) (n = 6). Success was defined as local control after CCC without conversion to wide excision, and as a recurrence rate comparable with rates in the scientific literature. Preoperative radiographic evaluation and intraoperative determination of tumor extension guided the choice of treatment. Tumor width on x-rays and tumor volume on magnetic resonance imaging were measured. Outcome was assessed with postoperative motion and grip strength, and the Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm and Hand, the visual analog pain score, and a satisfaction questionnaire.

RESULTS

Local recurrence occurred in 2 of 9 patients after primary CCC, in none with repeat CCC, and in none of the 6 with WEE. No patient treated with secondary CCC had unresectable recurrence requiring conversion to WEE. Patients with a single site of cortical perforation who received CCC treatment achieved local control with intralesional treatment alone. Average tumor volume was 12 cm(3) (range, 9-17 cm(3)) with CCC and 43 cm(3) (range, 29-57 cm(3)) with WEE. Postoperative motion and strength, Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm and Hand score, and visual analog pain scale score were acceptable in all and superior with CCC. All patients were highly satisfied.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor volume measured with magnetic resonance imaging and anatomically defined limits of soft tissue extension may help identify grade 3 lesions that can be treated with with CCC with an acceptable rate of local recurrence. We propose subclassification of Campanacci grade 3 lesions. Under this classification, tumors with extension assessed by preoperative imaging and confirmed by intraoperatively to be limited to a single site of palmar cortical perforation are classified as grade 3(p), where (p) denotes a single site bound by the pronator quadratus.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Resection-reconstruction arthroplasty for giant cell tumor of distal radius

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of the distal radius poses problems for reconstruction after resection. Several reconstructive procedures like vascularized and non-vascularized fibular graft, osteo-articular allograft, ceramic prosthesis and megaprosthesis are in use for substitution of the defect in the distal radius following resection. Most authors advocate wrist arthrodesis following resection of distal radius and non vascularized fibular graft. Here we have analyzed the results of aggressive benign GCTs of the distal radius treated by resection and reconstruction arthroplasty using autogenous non-vascularized fibular graft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four cases of giant cell tumor of the distal radius (mean age 32 years, mean follow-up 6.6 years) treated by en-bloc resection and reconstruction arthroplasty using autogenous non-vascularized ipsilateral fibular graft with a minimum followup of two years have been included in this retrospective study. Nineteen cases were of Campanacci grade III and five were of Grade II recurrence. The mean resected length of the radius was 9.5 (8-12) cm. Routine radiographs and clinical assessments regarding pain, instability, recurrence, hand grip strength and functional status were done at regular intervals and functional results were assessed using (musculoskeletal tumor society) MSTS-87 scoring.

RESULTS

Early radiological union at host-graft junction was achieved at mean 12.5 weeks, (range 12-14 weeks) and solid incorporation with callus formation was observed in mean 29 weeks (range 28-32 weeks) in all the cases. Satisfactory range of motion (mean 63%, range 52-78%) of the wrist was achieved in 18 cases. Grip strength compared to the contralateral hand was found to be 67% (range 58-74%). Functional results were excellent in six cases (25%), good in 14 cases (58.3%) and four (16.7%) cases had fair results. Soft tissue recurrence was seen in one patient. The most commonly encountered complication was fibulo-carpal subluxation (10 cases, 41.7%).

CONCLUSION

Resection of the distal radius and reconstruction arthroplasty with non-vascularized proximal fibular graft is useful in preserving the functional movement and stability of the wrist as well as achieving satisfactory range of movement and grip strength.