Shoulder arthroplasty for traumatic avascular necrosis: predictors of outcome

Humeral Head Avascular Necrosis: Pathophysiology, Work-up, and Treatment Options

» Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is the result of ischemic injury to the epiphyseal bone leading to humeral head collapse and arthritis.» Common causes include trauma, chronic corticosteroid use, or systemic disease processes, such as sickle cell disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, or alcohol abuse.» Nonoperative treatment consists of risk factor management, physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, and activity modification.» Surgical treatment options include arthroscopic debridement, core decompression, vascularized bone grafts, and shoulder arthroplasty.

[Post-traumatic necrosis of the humeral head-Endoprosthesis or joint preservation]

BACKGROUND

Humerus fractures play a major role in daily clinical routine, and subsequent osteonecrosis is common after osteosyntheses.

OBJECTIVES

The current paper highlights the incidence and cause of osteonecrosis after proximal humerus fractures, with respect to presentation of anatomy and risk factors.

METHODS

Display of the literature and therapy options for humerus fracture and subsequent necrosis.

RESULTS

Humerus fractures are the seventh most frequent fractures in humans. The complication rate is 40%, and the described rate of necrosis is up to 34%. Accordingly, the surgical revision rate is at 19% according to recent literature.

CONCLUSION

The treatment of humerus head fracture must consider numerous variables. The individual type of fracture and the current individual situation of the patient must be included in the process of choosing the right treatment. Modern implants with screw locking features should be used, and for certain circumstances the direct implantation of a prosthesis should be considered. Thereby the expectations of the patient with respect to the postoperative activity level play a major role.

Treatment of avascular necrosis of the humeral head - Postoperative results and a proposed modification of the classification

BACKGROUND

Avascular necrosis of the humeral head after proximal humeral fracture i.e. type 1 fracture sequelae (FS) according to the Boileau classification is a rare, often painful condition and treatment still remains a challenge. This study evaluates the treatment of FS type 1 with anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty and a new subclassification is proposed.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective, comparative study, included all consecutive patients with a proximal humeral FS type 1 treated surgically in a four-year period. All patients were classified according to the proposed 3 different subtypes. Constant score (CS), Quick DASH score, subjective shoulder value (SSV) as well as revision and complication rate were analyzed. In the preoperative radiographs the acromio-humeral interval (AHI) and greater tuberosity resorption were examined.

RESULTS

Of 27 with a FS type 1, 17 patients (63%) with a mean age of 64 ± 11 years were available for follow-up at 24 ± 10 months. 7 patients were treated with anatomic and 10 with reverse shoulder arthroplasty. CS improved significantly from 16 ± 7 points to 61 ± 19 points (p < 0.0001). At final follow-up the mean Quick DASH Score was 21 ± 21 and the mean SSV was 73 ± 21 points. The mean preoperative AHI was 9 ± 3 mm, however, 8 cases presented an AHI < 7 mm. 4 cases had complete greater tuberosity resorption. The complication and revision rate was 19%; implant survival was 88%.

CONCLUSION

By using the adequate surgical technique good clinical short-term results with a relatively low complication rate can be achieved in FS type 1. The Boileau classification should be extended for fracture sequelae type 1 and the general recommendation for treatment with hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty has to be relativized. Special attention should be paid to a decreased AHI and/or resorption of the greater tuberosity as indirect signs for dysfunction of the rotator cuff. To facilitate the choice of the adequate prosthetic treatment method the suggested subclassification system should be applied.

Rate of avascular necrosis and time to surgery in proximal humerus fractures

PURPOSE

Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head is a devastating complication of proximal humeral fracture (PHF) that often results in long-term morbidity for the patient. Rates of AVN depend on the number of fracture fragments and are highly variable. The literature suggests that timely stable and anatomic reduction may decrease the rate at which AVN develops after PHF. To our knowledge, there is no literature published investigating a temporal relationship between the timing of PHF fixation and rates of AVN.

METHODS

Operative records of one orthopedic trauma surgeon were used to identify patients that underwent open reduction internal fixation for PHF at our institution between 2007 and 2012. Radiographs at presentation were reviewed and used to classify the fractures into two, three or four parts. Date and time of the initial radiograph were recorded as were the date and time of available intra-operative fluoroscopic images. The time from presentation radiograph to operative fixation was calculated (hours). Available follow-up plain films were then reviewed and evaluated for the presence or absence of humeral head AVN.

RESULTS

Time to surgery (less than or greater than 72 h) and patient age did not correlate with development of AVN after PHF (p > 0.26). Notably, the number of fracture fragments did influence the rate of AVN identified in patients with PHF (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Early operative intervention does not appear to decrease the rate of development of avascular necrosis after PHF.

[Intramedullary nailing vs. locking plate osteosynthesis in proximal humeral fractures: Long-term outcome]

BACKGROUND

For the treatment of proximal humeral fractures two major therapeutic principles can be employed: intramedullary nailing (PHN) or locking plate osteosynthesis. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical and radiological long-term outcome of proximal humeral fracture stabilization using PHN or angular stable plating.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective study between March 2009 and March 2010, we analyzed 72 out of 118 patients with unified proximal humeral fracture who had been treated at least 3 years previously using PHN (44 patients) or angular stable plating (28 patients) in a level 1 trauma center. Functional and radiological outcomes were assessed at least 3 years after trauma using the Constant and Murley score and SF-36 score.

RESULTS

According to the Neer classification, there were 31 3-part fractures (PHN: 23; plate: 8) and 41 4-part fractures (PHN: 21; plate: 20), respectively. No clinical symptoms after 3 years were observed in 42 patients, whereas in 30 patients clinical symptoms were evaluated related to pain and/or loss of function. Functional outcome using the Constant and Murley score demonstrated a total score of 73 points (ipsilateral side) vs. 88 points (contralateral side) in all evaluated patients, on average.

CONCLUSION

Both PHN and angular stable plating are adequate treatment options for proximal humeral fractures. Both systems require precise preoperative planning and advanced surgical experience. No significant differences in long-term clinical and radiological outcome between implants regarding fracture classification, age of patient, and choice of implant were found.

Post-traumatic osteonecrosis of the proximal humerus

Post-traumatic osteonecrosis of the proximal humerus represents a challenging problem to the surgeon. It is commonly seen following multi-fragmentary fractures of the proximal humerus which may affect the long-term functional recovery after such injuries. This review summarises the current evidence on risk factors, reasons why estimating its epidemiology is difficult, the vascular supply of the humeral head, classification, and management options.

Midterm results of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the functional and radiologic results of shoulder arthroplasty using a single type of stemless humeral head implant with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

METHODS

Stemless shoulder arthroplasties in 78 patients at a mean age of 58 years were prospectively evaluated at a mean clinical and radiologic follow-up of 72 months. Functional results were documented using the age- and sex-adjusted Constant score with standardized radiographic examination.

RESULTS

The Constant score improved significantly from 38.1% to 75.3% (P < .0001). Active range of motion improved significantly for flexion (from 114° to 141°), abduction (from 74° to 130°), and external rotation (from 25° to 44°; P < .0001). Bone mineral density was reduced in 34.9% of the older population, without an influence on shoulder function (Constant score without lowering of bone density; 73%; Constant score with lowering of bone density 80%; P = .404). The overall complication rate was 12.8%, with an overall revision rate of 9%. None of the stemless implants were revised for loosening.

CONCLUSION

The functional and radiologic results of the stemless shoulder arthroplasty are comparable to the third and fourth generation of standard stem arthroplasty.

Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humerus malunions

BACKGROUND

Malunion of proximal humeral fractures complicated by damage to the glenohumeral cartilage and injury to the joint capsule and rotator cuff can include treatment requiring anatomic shoulder arthroplasty. This study defines results and complications of this procedure and identifies factors associated with success or failure.

METHODS

From 1976 to 2007, 109 patients underwent shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus malunions. Ninety-five met the criteria for analysis with a mean follow-up period of 9.2 years. Fracture types according to the Neer classification were two part in 20, three part in 37, four part in 31, and head splitting in 2, with 16 fracture-dislocations. Hemiarthroplasty was performed in 45 patients, with 50 undergoing total arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Pain scores improved from 7.8 to 3.1 (P < .001). The mean active elevation and external rotation improved from 69° to 109° and from 8° and 39°, respectively (P = .001). Of 31 patients with available radiographs, 20 had healed tuberosity osteotomies. Sixteen complications required 10 reoperations, including 6 of 9 patients with severe postoperative instability. There were 57 excellent or satisfactory results by use of the Neer rating. No patient, injury pattern, previous treatment, surgical, or radiologic variation was significantly associated with an increased risk of an unsatisfactory result, except for severe postoperative instability. Kaplan-Meier survivorship for reoperation, in 109 shoulders, was 94.8% (95% confidence interval, 90.5%-99.4%) at 5 years and 90.1% (95% confidence interval, 83.6%-97.1%) at 10 and 15 years.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty improves pain and motion. Surgery is complex. Tuberosity osteotomies often heal. Postoperative instability is the most common complication leading to reoperation and is usually associated with rotator cuff and shoulder capsule injury.

Prognostic factors and limitations of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of posttraumatic cephalic collapse or necrosis (type-1 proximal humeral fracture sequelae)

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and limitations of anatomic unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty, performed without tuberosity osteotomy, for the treatment of secondary glenohumeral arthritis following posttraumatic cephalic collapse or necrosis of the humeral head, defined as type-1 fracture sequelae.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients with type-1 fracture sequelae treated with anatomic shoulder arthroplasty were included in this retrospective single-center cohort study. All anatomic humeral prostheses were implanted without performing a greater tuberosity osteotomy. Glenoid resurfacing was performed in forty-four patients (80%). Clinical and radiographic analysis was performed at a mean of fifty-two months (range, twenty-four to 180 months) postoperatively.

RESULTS

Four reoperations (7%) were performed, including two revisions in patients who required glenoid resurfacing because of glenoid erosion after hemiarthroplasty. At the time of the latest follow-up, 93% of patients were satisfied or very satisfied, and the mean Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) was 81%. There were significant improvements in the mean Constant score (from 32 to 69 points), active anterior elevation (from 88° to 141°), external rotation (from 6° to 34°), and internal rotation (from the buttock to L3). Significantly poorer results were associated with proximal humeral deformity in varus and with fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles. Patients with proximal humeral deformity, specifically varus or valgus malunion of the greater tuberosity, had a mean Constant score that was 10 points lower and active elevation that was almost 20° less than patients with no such deformity. The poorest results were observed in patients with varus malunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed that the outcomes of anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of type-1 fracture sequelae are good and predictable when deformation of the proximal humerus is acceptable(i.e., when no greater tuberosity osteotomy is necessary). The results were negatively affected by proximal humeral varus deformity and by fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff on imaging studies. In such cases, reverse shoulder arthroplasty may be more appropriate, especially in elderly patients.

Humeral head necrosis rate at mid-term follow-up after open reduction and angular stable plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures

INTRODUCTION

Short-term follow-up of angular stable fixation for proximal humeral fractures has been well documented in the literature. Longer follow-up series are difficult to find. However, especially regarding the risk of avascular humeral head necrosis longer follow-up series are high of clinical relevance.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with a mean age of 66 years and treated with open reduction and angular stable internal fixation for proximal humeral fractures were followed up for a mean of 45 months. The clinical and radiographic follow-up (Constant Score (CS), age and gender related Constant Score (agCS), Constant Score in comparison to the contralateral side (%CS) and shoulder anterior-posterior and lateral view and axial view X-rays) was performed postoperatively.

RESULTS

Clinical results after 45 months showed a mean CS of 66.2+/-15.4 points with a mean agCS of 90.0+/-23.1%. Evaluation of the %CS showed 77.7+/-17.8%. %CS results showed no significant differences after 45 months in comparison to those obtained after 12 months. However, incidence of avascular necrosis of the humeral head doubled over the follow-up period from 4 cases at 12 months follow-up to 9 cases at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Results of open reduction and internal fixation with angular stable implants for proximal humeral fractures are reliable, however long-term complications such as avascular necrosis of the humeral head need to be evaluated further on since its incidence increases over the time.

Treatment of osteonecrosis of the humeral head with cementless surface replacement arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Osteonecrosis of the humeral head is a disabling condition that can lead to joint destruction with persistent pain and dysfunction. The aim of the present study was to examine cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty as a treatment option for posttraumatic and nontraumatic osteonecrosis.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2005, seventeen shoulders with posttraumatic (n = 8) or nontraumatic (n = 9) osteonecrosis of the humeral head were treated with cementless humeral replacement arthroplasty. The mean proportion of the humeral head that was occupied by necrotic bone was 18.6% (range, 8.9% to 30.9%). The mean duration of follow-up was three years. Constant scores, patient satisfaction, and complications were recorded. Volumetric measurements of the necrotic areas and signs of implant loosening were analyzed with use of standardized radiographs.

RESULTS

The mean Constant score for the entire cohort improved significantly from 31 to 62 points (34% to 75% when adjusted by age and sex) (p < 0.0001). There were also significant improvements in mean shoulder flexion (from 87 degrees to 139 degrees), abduction (from 64 degrees to 120 degrees), and external rotation (from 2 degrees to 27 degrees). The final values for the Constant score, abduction, and power were significantly higher for the nontraumatic group than for the posttraumatic group. Fourteen patients (fifteen shoulders) were very satisfied (eleven shoulders) or satisfied (four shoulders), and two patients (two shoulders) were somewhat disappointed with the postoperative result. Signs of implant loosening were not observed. One patient had a wound infection that required surgical débridement and antibiotic therapy. To date, no implant revisions have been necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless humeral surface replacement arthroplasty is a potentially bone-preserving option for patients with posttraumatic and nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the humeral head. Even in the presence of bone loss of as much as 31% of the humeral head, implant loosening was not observed. Good functional results and relief of pain in combination with a low complication rate can be achieved in the short term.