Clinical trials roundup in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of infliximab in refractory polymyositis and dermatomyositis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate in a pilot study the safety and efficacy of infliximab in patients with refractory dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM).

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial including subjects with active DM or PM. Participants had stable doses of immunosuppressive medication and prednisone (≤0.5mg/kg/day), and exhibited clinical signs of muscle weakness for at least 4 weeks prior to study entry. Participants received infusions of either placebo or infliximab 5mg/kg at 0, 2, 6, and 14 weeks in blinded manner. The primary outcome was a ≥15% manual muscle strength (MMT) improvement at week 16 compared to week 0. The secondary outcome measures were improvement defined by the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group (IMACS) criteria. At week 16, responders in each arm had the option of either continuing the same treatment or changing to the non-responder treatment for that study arm. Non-responders in the 5mg/kg infliximab arm were increased to infliximab 7.5mg/kg for weeks 22, 30, and 38. Non-responders in the placebo arm at week 16 received infliximab 5mg/kg at weeks 16, 18, 22, 30, and 38. Outcomes were reassessed at week 40.

RESULTS

Twelve subjects completed the study to week 16. Six of the 12 subjects received infliximab treatment at the dose of 5mg/kg with only one subject meeting the responder criteria at that dose. Of the remaining five subjects on infliximab, three crossed over to the infliximab 7.5mg/kg dose. One of those three subjects responded. All six patients in the placebo arm crossed over to the 5mg/kg dosing regimen after week 16, and two of those responded to infliximab.

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab therapy for patients with refractory PM and DM was well tolerated and may benefit a subset of patients.

Intravenous immunoglobulin in critically ill adults: When and what is the evidence?

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) use is growing dramatically internationally due to the increasing numbers of acute and chronic conditions that may benefit from IVIg. Patients with conditions that may benefit from IVIg might require intensive care unit (ICU) admission, supporting the need to review IVIg use in the critical care setting. The most common clinical indications for IVIg in adults that may require ICU admission and are commonly supported under clinical practice guidelines are Guillain-Barré syndrome, myasthenia gravis and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, inflammatory myopathies, and primary or secondary immunodeficiency diseases complicated by severe bacterial sepsis. Other emerging indications include necrotizing fasciitis, toxic epidermal necrolysis/Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic shock syndrome. The evidence for IVIg use in sepsis and septic shock remains controversial and insufficient to recommend its routine use. Intravenous immunoglobulin is expensive and also carries risks of adverse effects, including common and benign infusion-related reactions, as well as relatively rare and more serious problems, such as thromboembolic events, renal failure, and aseptic meningitis. In this article, we review the literature on conditions requiring ICU admission and IVIg, and we classify them as supported, emerging, or unsupported indications based on the available evidence and guidelines for clinical use of IVIg.

[Biological therapy in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies]

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are systemic, immune-mediated diseases characterized by proximal, symmetrical, progressive muscle weakness. The aim of this work is to give an overview of the biological therapy used in the treatment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. The authors also focus on novel results in the therapy directed against the B- and T-cells. They emphasize the importance of new trials in these diseases which may lead to the introduction of novel therapeutic options in these disorders.