APC Injuries With Symphyseal Fixation: What Affects Outcome?

The clinical relevance of fixation failure after pubic symphysis plating for anterior pelvic ring injuries: an observational cohort study with long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Open reduction and plate fixation is a standard procedure for treating traumatic symphyseal disruptions, but has a high incidence of implant failure. Several studies have attempted to identify predictors for implant failure and discussed its impact on functional outcome presenting conflicting results. Therefore, this study aimed to identify predictors of implant failure and to investigate the impact of implant failure on pain and functional outcome.

METHODS

In a single-center, retrospective, observational non-controlled cohort study in a level-1 trauma center from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2017, 42 patients with a plate fixation of a traumatic symphyseal disruption aged ≥ 18 years with a minimum follow-up of 12 months were included. The following parameters were examined in terms of effect on occurrence of implant failure: age, body mass index (BMI), injury severity score (ISS), polytrauma, time to definitive treatment, postoperative weight-bearing, the occurrence of a surgical site infection, fracture severity, type of posterior injury, anterior and posterior fixation. A total of 25/42 patients consented to attend the follow- up examination, where pain was assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale and functional outcome using the Majeed Pelvic Score.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients had an anterior implant failure (16/42; 37%). None of the parameters studied were predictive for implant failure. The median follow-up time was six years and 8/25 patients had implant failure. There was no difference in the Numerical Rating Scale, but the work-adjusted Majeed Pelvic Score showed a better outcome for patients with implant failure.

CONCLUSION

implant failure after symphyseal disruptions is not predictable, but appears to be clinically irrelevant. Therefore, an additional sacroiliac screw to prevent implant failure should be critically discussed and plate removal should be avoided in asymptomatic patients.

Do we fix front and back of every APC pelvic injury?

HISTORY-A 47-year-old male was on a cliff when he jumped into the water below. He jumped about 50 feet. Upon landing in the water, he felt his legs separate and abduct violently. He was taken to the Emergency unit of the nearest trauma center and was found to have no injuries except to his pelvis. He could not weight bear because of pelvic pain but had normal distal sensory and motor exam and rectal exam. His-pelvis was painful to examination anteriorly with minor left-sided posterior SI pain, and he had no blood at his meatus. X-rays and CT were done, (Figures 1-5).

The radiographic outcome after plating for pubic symphysis diastasis: does it matter clinically?

INTRODUCTION

Open reduction and internal fixation with plates is the most widespread surgery in traumatic pubic symphysis diastasis. However, implant failure or recurrent diastasis was commonly observed during follow-up. The aim of our study was to evaluate the radiologic findings and clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-five patients with traumatic pubic symphysis diastasis treated with plating between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The exclusion criteria were a history of malignancy and age under 20 years. Radiographic outcomes were determined by radiograph findings, including pubic symphysis distance (PSD) and implant failure. Clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Majeed score at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were finally included. Nine patients (32%) experienced implant failure, including four (14%) with screw loosening and five (18%) with plate breakage. Only one patient underwent revision surgery. Postoperatively, a significant increase in PSD was observed at 3 months and 6 months. Postoperative PSD was not significantly different between patients with single plating and double plating, but it was significantly greater in the implant-failure group than in the non-failure group. The Majeed score was similar between patients with single plating and double plating or between the implant-failure group and the non-failure group. Body mass index, number of plates, age, and initial injured PSD were not significantly different between the implant-failure group and the non-failure group. Only a significant male predominance was observed in the implant-failure group.

CONCLUSION

A gradual increase in the symphysis distance and a high possibility of implant failure may be the distinguishing features of traumatic pubic symphysis diastasis fixation. The postoperative symphyseal distance achieved stability after 6 months, even after implant failure. Radiographic outcomes, such as increased symphysis distance, screw loosening, and plate breakage, did not affect clinical functional outcomes.

Development and preclinical evaluation of a cable-clamp fixation device for a disrupted pubic symphysis

BACKGROUND

Traumatic separation of the pubic symphysis can destabilize the pelvis and require surgical fixation to reduce symphyseal gapping. The traditional approach involves open reduction and the implantation of a steel symphyseal plate (SP) on the pubic bone to hold the reposition. Despite its widespread use, SP-fixation is often associated with implant failure caused by screw loosening or breakage.

METHODS

To address the need for a more reliable surgical intervention, we developed and tested two titanium cable-clamp implants. The cable served as tensioning device while the clamp secured the cable to the bone. The first implant design included a steel cable anterior to the pubic symphysis to simplify its placement outside the pelvis, and the second design included a cable encircling the pubic symphysis to stabilize the anterior pelvic ring. Using highly reproducible synthetic bone models and a limited number of cadaver specimens, we performed a comprehensive biomechanical study of implant stability and evaluated surgical feasibility.

RESULTS

We were able to demonstrate that the cable-clamp implants provide stability equivalent to that of a traditional SP-fixation but without the same risks of implant failure. We also provide detailed ex vivo evaluations of the safety and feasibility of a trans-obturator surgical approach required for those kind of fixation.

CONCLUSION

We propose that the developed cable-clamp fixation devices may be of clinical value in treating pubic symphysis separation.

Percutaneous two unilateral iliosacral S1 screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries: a retrospective review of 38 patients

Purpose

Percutaneous iliosacral (IS) screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries is a minimally invasive technique that reduces the amount of blood loss and shortens the procedure time. Moreover, two unilateral IS S1 screws exhibit superior stability to a single IS screw and are also safer for neurological injuries than an S2 screw. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate fixation using percutaneous two unilateral IS S1 screws for pelvic ring injuries and its subsequent clinical outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 38 patients who underwent percutaneous two unilateral IS S1 screw fixation for pelvic ring injuries. The procedure time, blood loss, achievement of bone union, radiological outcomes (Matta and Tornetta grade), and postoperative complications were evaluated.

Results

The mean procedure time, hemoglobin loss, bone union rate, and time to union were 40.1 minutes (range, 18-102 minutes), 0.6 g/dL (range, 0.3-1.0 g/dL), 100%, and 153.2 days (range, 61-327 days), respectively. The Matta and Tornetta grades were excellent, good, and fair in 24 (63.1%), 11 (28.9%), and three patients (7.9%), respectively, and the postoperative complications were S1 screw loosening, widening of the symphysis pubis (2.3 and 2.5 mm), lumbosacral plexopathy, and S1 radiculopathy in one (2.6%), two (5.3%), one (2.6%), and one patient (2.6%), respectively. However, all neurological complications recovered spontaneously.

Conclusions

Percutaneous two unilateral IS S1 screw fixation was useful for treating pelvic ring injuries. In particular, it involved a short procedure time with little blood loss and also led to 100% bone union and good radiological outcomes.

Percutaneous screw fixation of pubic symphysis disruption: A preliminary report

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous techniques are commonly used to treat pelvic ring disruptions but are not mainstream for fixation of pubic symphysis disruption worldwide. Potential advantages include less blood loss and lower risk of surgical site infection, especially in the morbidly obese or multiply injured patient. This study was performed to describe the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients after percutaneous reduction and screw fixation of pubic symphysis disruption and to evaluate the preliminary safety and efficacy of this technique and its appropriateness for further study as an alternative method of fixation.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent percutaneous fixation of pubic symphysis disruption by two surgeons at an academic Level I trauma center over a 3-year period. Patients underwent percutaneous reduction and fixation of the pubic symphysis using 1 or 2 fully or partially threaded 5.5, 6.5, or 7.3 mm cannulated screws in a transverse or oblique configuration. Associated posterior ring injuries were fixed with trans-sacral and/or iliosacral screws. The primary outcome of interest was loss of reduction, defined as symphysis distance greater than 15 mm measured on final AP pelvis radiograph. Secondary outcomes collected by chart review were operative time, blood loss, vascular or urologic injury, sexual dysfunction, infection, implant loosening or breakage, and revision surgery.

RESULTS

Twelve patients met criteria and primary and secondary outcomes were collected. Mean clinical and radiographic follow-up were 15 months each. One patient lost reduction. Mean operative time and blood loss were 124 min and 29 cc, respectively. No vascular or urologic injuries occurred. Two patients reported sexual dysfunction. No patients became infected or required revision surgery. Four patients underwent implant removal. Seventeen additional patients were excluded due to short follow-up and limited outcomes were collected. Two of these patients lost reduction. Three underwent implant removal.

CONCLUSION

These data support percutaneous reduction and screw fixation of pubic symphysis disruption as a potentially safe and effective method of treatment that warrants further investigation.

Danger zone - The spermatic cord during anterior plating of the symphysis pubis

BACKGROUND

Distances between anatomic landmarks and anatomic structures at risk are often underestimated by surgeons.

PURPOSE

The goal of the study was to evaluate the distances between anatomic landmarks and the spermatic cord in case of anterior plating of the symphysis.

METHODS

A total of 25 pelves (50 hemipelves) of male embalmed cadavers were dissected. A 5-hole 3.5mm locking compression plate (Synthes GmbH) was fixed from directly anterior on the symphysis. Measurements were taken 1) distance between the tips of both pubic tubercles, 2) horizontal interval between the lateral border of the plate and the medial margin of the SC (bilateral), 3) distances between the medial border of the SC and the tip of the pubic tubercle (bilateral), 4) distances between the medial border of the SC and the lateral basis of the pubic tubercle (bilateral).

RESULTS

The distance between the pubic tubercles was 60.3mm in average (SD: 5.7). The interval between the lateral border of the plate and the medial margin of the SC was on average 4.5mm (SD: 1.9) on the right and 4.7mm (SD: 2.6) on the left side. The distance between the tip of the pubic tubercle and the medial border of the SC was in average 11.2mm (SD: 2.7) on the right, and 11.0mm (SD: 2.7) on the left side. The average distance between the medial border of the SC and the lateral basis of the pubic tubercle was 8.1mm (SD: 2.4) on the right and 8.2 mm (SD: 2.4) on the left side.

CONCLUSION

The SC is at risk not only during dissection but also during anterior plating of the symphysis, because of its close relation to the SC.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Average distances between the palpable pubic tubercle and the SC are below one finger breadth (as reference).

The role of anterior supra-acetabular external fixator as definitive treatment for anterior ring fixation in unstable pelvic fractures

PURPOSE

Management of anterior ring injuries is still a matter of discussion, and there are only few studies reporting anterior external fixator as definitive treatment for unstable pelvic injuries. This study aimed to describe the clinical and radiological outcomes of a consecutive series of mechanically unstable pelvic injuries that were treated with definitive anterior supra-acetabular external fixator for the anterior ring, and to identify risk factors for failure.

METHODS

We included a consecutive series of patients with unstable pelvic ring fractures who underwent anterior supra-acetabular external fixation for definitive treatment, between January 2012 and January 2020. All demographics, associated injuries and procedures, injury mechanism, and complications were analysed. Pelvic fracture was classified based on Orthopaedic Trauma Association/Tile AO (OTA/AO) and Young-Burgess classifications. Complications associated with the external fixator were revised. All patients were functionally evaluated at final follow-up and asked to report their clinical outcomes using the Majeed score.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients were included, of which 25 were females. The median age was 44 years (interquartile range 23-59). Median follow-up duration was 14 months (interquartile range 6-31). The most frequent aetiology was motor vehicle accident (35), followed by fall from height (8). All fractures required posterior pelvic ring fixation. The median time during which patients had external fixation in situ was 11 weeks (interquartile range 9-13). All patients achieved healing of pelvic fracture at median time of 10 weeks (interquartile range 8-12). At final follow-up, the median displacement of the anterior pelvis was 6 mm (interquartile range 0-11). Superficial infection was the most common complication (n = 7). No washout procedures were needed. No major complication was reported. No patient required reoperation for anterior ring fracture. The median Majeed score was 88 points (range 60-95; interquartile range 80-90) at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the use of supra-acetabular external fixator is safe and effective for definitive treatment of the anterior ring in unstable pelvic fractures. It is a method with high proportion of excellent results, regardless of the type of fracture. The rate of complications is low, and it does not compromise functional results.

Patient-reported physical functioning and quality of life after pelvic ring injury: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Pelvic ring injuries are one of the most serious traumatic injuries with large consequences for the patients' daily life. During recent years, the importance of the patients' perception of their functioning and quality of life following injury has increasingly received attention. This systematic review reports on self-reported physical functioning and quality of life after all types of pelvic ring injuries.

METHODS

The online databases MEDLINE-PubMed and Ovid-EMBASE were searched for studies published between 2008 and 2019 to identify published evidence of patient-reported physical functioning and quality of life after which they were assessed for their methodological quality.

RESULTS

Of the 2577 articles, 46 were reviewed in full-text, including 3049 patients. Most studies were heterogeneous, with small cohorts of patients, a variety of injury types, treatment methods and use of different, often non-validated, outcome measures. The overall methodological quality was moderate to poor. Nine different PROMs were used, of which the Majeed Pelvic Score (MPS), SF-36 and EQ-5D were the most widely used. Mean scores respectively ranged from 75-95 (MPS), 53-69 (SF-36, physical functioning) and 0.63-0.80 (EQ-5D).

CONCLUSIONS

Physical functioning and quality of life following pelvic ring injuries seem fair and tend to improve during follow-up. However, differences in patient numbers, injury definition, treatment strategy, follow-up duration and type of PROMs used between studies hampers to elucidate the actual effects of pelvic ring injuries on a patient's life.

IMPLICATIONS OF KEY FINDINGS

Physicians and researchers should use valid and reliable patient-reported outcome instruments on large cohorts of patients with properly defined injuries to truly evaluate physical functioning and quality of life after pelvic ring injuries.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews; registration number CRD42019129176.

Inaccuracies in the Use of the Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score: A Systematic Literature Review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the accuracy with which the Majeed Pelvic Score has been reported in the English literature.

DATA SOURCES

Databases used to search for literature were PubMed, Embase, and Ovid, restricted to English language from inception to October 2, 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Search words used were: Majeed, pelvis, and outcome.

DATA EXTRACTION

Articles were assessed for descriptions of scoring and proper reporting of Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Descriptive statistics were used to report the outcome of our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Ninty-two English articles were identified. Twenty-four (26%) articles were identified as including methodology related to the use and scoring of the Majeed Pelvic score. The remaining 68 presented mean Majeed scores with no methodological information. None (0/92) discussed how the range of possible scores for the most severe function was applied. Six (7%) reported adjusted scores for patients not working. Three (3%) included a discussion of the scores as adjusted for patients working before injury compared with those not working. Ten (11%) addressed the categorization of scores by excellent to poor describing what raw scores defined those categories. We observed poor accuracy and notable inconsistency in the use and reporting of the Majeed Pelvic Outcome Score in the literature. These data demonstrate that interpretation and comparison of research reporting this score should be done cautiously. Future studies should include specific information as to how the Majeed instrument calculated to allow for verification of the presented scores and subsequent conclusions.

Fixation of Anterior Pelvic Ring Injuries

Treatment of anterior pelvic ring injuries involves both acute stabilization during the initial resuscitation and definitive fixation. Definitive management has evolved substantially over the past 40 years with improved patient mobilization and long-term outcomes. Although its use has recently declined, external fixation remains a favorable option in certain situations. Symphyseal plating is the preferred technique for stabilization of symphyseal diastasis because of superior stability and low morbidity. Ramus screws can be effective for simple ramus fractures but require a careful technique because of the proximity of neurovascular structures. The subcutaneous internal fixator provides a good option for obese patients in whom external fixation would be poorly tolerated. Regardless of fixation strategy, posterior ring reduction and stabilization is crucial.