Antegrade nailing of humeral head fractures with captured interlocking screws

[Surgical treatment of complex fractures of the upper end of the humerus: a retrospective study of 25 cases]

Les fractures de l’extrémité supérieure de l’humérus posent un problème thérapeutique particulièrement pour les fractures complexes à 3 et 4 fragments. Le but de notre travail est de déterminer l’aspect épidémio-clinique des fractures complexes de l’extrémité supérieure de l’humérus chez l’adulte et d’apprécier les résultats fonctionnels et radiologiques de notre série. Il s’agit d’une série de 25 cas colligés au service d’orthopédie CHU Habib Bourguiba entre 2012 et 2017. Nous avons recensé les données épidémiologiques des patients et les circonstances du traumatisme. Le traitement était de principe chirurgical soit ostéosynthèse par plaque ou clou soit un remplacement prothétique. La réduction a été évaluée sur les radiographies post opératoires. Au recul les résultats fonctionnels ont été évalués par le score de Constant. Notre série comporte 12 hommes et 13 femmes, La moyenne d’âge de nos patients était 55 ans, les accidents de la voie publique étaient notés dans 48%, Les fractures à 4 fragments ont été retrouvées dans 76% des cas. L’ostéosynthèse par plaque vissée a été utilisée dans 40% des cas et l’enclouage antérograde a été réalisé dans 40% des cas. La prothèse a été posée pour 5 patients. Le score de constant moyen était de 65,24 avec des extrêmes allant de 35 à 88. Nous avons noté une consolidation des fractures sans cal vicieux dans 68%. Dans les fractures complexes de l’extrémité supérieure de l’humérus, une ostéosynthèse bien indiquée selon le patient et la fracture et une rééducation post opératoire précoce permettent d’avoir des résultats fonctionnels acceptables.

Displaced humeral surgical neck fractures: classification and results of third-generation percutaneous intramedullary nailing

BACKGROUND

The high rates of complications and reoperations observed with the early designs of first-generation (unlocked) and second-generation (bent design) humeral intramedullary nail (IMNs) have discouraged their use by most surgeons. The purpose of this study was to report the results of a third-generation (straight, locking, low-profile, tuberosity-based fixation) IMN, inserted through a percutaneous approach, for the treatment of displaced 2-part surgical neck fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 41 patients who underwent placement of a third-generation IMN to treat a displaced 2-part surgical neck fracture (AO/OTA type 11A3). The mean age at surgery was 57 years (range, 17-84 years). After percutaneous insertion through the humeral head, the IMN was used as a reduction tool. Static locking fixation was achieved after axial fracture compression ("back-slap" hammering technique). Patients were reviewed and underwent radiography with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up; the mean follow-up period was 26 months (range, 12-53 months).

RESULTS

Preoperatively, 3 types of surgical neck fractures were observed: with valgus head deformity (Type A = 8 cases), shaft translation without head deformity (Type B = 19 cases), or with varus head deformity (Type C = 14 cases). At final follow-up, all fractures went on to union, and the mean humeral neck-shaft angle was 132° ± 5°. We observed 2 malunions and 1 case of partial humeral head avascular necrosis. No cases underwent screw migration or intra-articular penetration. At last review, mean active forward elevation was 146° (range, 90°-180°) and mean external rotation was 50° (range, 20°-80°). The mean Constant-Murley score and Subjective Shoulder Value were 71 (range, 43-95) and 80% (range, 50%-100%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade insertion of a third-generation IMN through a percutaneous approach provides a high rate of fracture healing, excellent clinical outcome scores, and a low rate of complications. No morbidity related to the passage of the nail through the supraspinatus muscle and the cartilage was observed. The proposed A, B, and C classification allows choosing the optimal entry point for intramedullary nailing.

Outcomes of intramedullary nailing for acute proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review

Background

While proximal humerus fractures remain common within the elderly population, the optimal treatment method remains controversial. Intramedullary nailing has been advocated as an effective and less invasive surgical technique. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the demographics, outcomes, and complications of intramedullary nailing for acute, displaced proximal humerus fractures.

Materials and methods

Multiple computerized literature databases were used to perform a systematic review of English-language literature. Studies that met our stated criteria were further assessed for the requisite data, and when possible, similar outcome data were combined to generate frequency-weighted means.

Results

Fourteen studies with 448 patients met our inclusion criteria. The frequency-weighted mean age was 64.3 years, and mean follow-up was 22.6 months. Females accounted for 71 % of the included patients. Three-part fractures (51 %) were most commonly treated. The overall frequency-weighted mean Constant score was 72.8, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 84.3. Frequency-weighted mean forward elevation, abduction, extension, and external rotation were 137.3°, 138.4°, 33.8°, and 43.1°, respectively. The Constant score for two- and three-part fractures was significantly higher than for four-part fractures (p = 0.007 and p = 0.0009, respectively). The reoperation rate for two-, three-, and four-part fractures was 13.6, 17.4, and 63.2 %, respectively.

Conclusions

Intramedullary nailing of acute, displaced two- and three-part proximal humerus fractures yields satisfactory clinical outcomes, although reoperation and complication rates remain high. Use of this implant for four-part fractures cannot be recommended until further clinical studies with larger patient numbers are available.

Level of evidence

Level IV, Systematic review.

Nailing of three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head -- long-term results

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Long term outcome of the treatment of displaced complex fractures of humeral head is rare in the literature especially in greater cohorts. Main purpose of our study was the assessment of long term results of intramedullary nailing of 3-4 part fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

137 patients with 137 three or four-part fractures of the humeral head treated by intramedullary nailing were reassessed after an average follow-up time of 57 (27-93) months. The whole cohort consisted of 85 three-part fractures, 38 four-part fractures and 14 fracture-dislocations. Radiographic and clinical outcome - absolute Constant score (CS(abs)) and relative Constant score (compared to the contralateral side - CS(rel)) were evaluated. The rate of complications was recorded. Analysis of the influence of quality of achieved reduction on final functional result and on the development of complications was performed.

RESULTS

125 fractures healed uneventfully. Mean long term CS(rel) was 81% of the unaffected side. Mean CS(rel) was 85% in 3-part fractures, 73% in four-part fractures, 80% in three-part fracture-dislocations and 70% in four-part fracture-dislocations. 96 (70%) patients achieved excellent or good results (CS(rel) higher than 80%), 17 (12.4%) satisfactory results and 24 (17.5%) poor results (CS(rel) less than 60%). No significant difference was observed in functional results between different age groups. No incidence of non-union was observed, 4 losses of reduction were encountered. We observed 17 cases of complete humeral head necrosis, 14 of them in the group of 4-part fractures. Reduction quality strongly influenced functional result and development of head necrosis. In the group of excellent reduction mean CS(rel) was 88% and the rate of necrosis was 2%. Moderate reduction quality deteriorated CS(rel) to 70% and head necrosis rate rose up to 28%. If reduction was poor, mean CS(rel) was 52% and the rate of complete necrosis rose to 60%.

CONCLUSION

Long term results confirmed nailing as appropriate treatment strategy for all types of humeral head fractures with limitation of excellent reduction in every age group. Moderate or even poor reduction significantly deteriorates functional results and increases rate of complete necrosis of the humeral head. If good reduction cannot be achieved, treatment strategy should be changed.

Minimally Invasive Fixation for Proximal Humeral Fracture: A Review on the use of T2 Proximal Humeral Nail

Objective and methodology

A retrospective review of the outcome of patients who had proximal humeral fracture treated with T2 Proximal Humeral Nail from January 2007 to March 2011 was conducted. The demographics, union rate, and complications were reviewed. The patient outcome was assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Constant-Murley score.

Results

Thirty-two cases of traumatic proximal humeral fractures were included. The average follow-up period was 14.7 months. All fractures healed with an average of 3.97 months. The average forward flexion and lateral abduction of shoulder was 132° and 123°, respectively. The postoperative average Constant-Murley score was 67 (48-80) and ASES score was 82.9 (73-100). There was one case of avascular necrosis of humeral head. Six cases of minor screw complications required removal of screws later. No wound infection or neurovascular injury was found.

Discussion and conclusion

With the proper surgical technique high union rate, good functional recovery, and low complication rate can be achieved by using T2 Proximal Humeral Nail in managing traumatic proximal humeral fracture.

Similar outcomes for nail versus plate fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of consensus regarding optimal surgical management of displaced and unstable three-part proximal humeral fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The objective of this prospective observational study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of plate versus nail fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred eleven patients with unstable three-part proximal humeral fractures were treated with ORIF using plate (PHILOS [proximal humeral interlocking system]/LPHP [locking proximal humerus plate]) or nail (PHN [proximal humeral nail]) osteosynthesis. Outcome measurements included pain, Constant and Murley and Neer scores, and the occurrence of complications at 3, 6, and 12 months postsurgery. Regression analysis and the likelihood ratio test were used to evaluate differences between the cohorts.

RESULTS

Throughout the 1-year followup period the Constant and Murley scores improved significantly for both cohorts; there was no significant difference between the nail group compared with the plate group. Also, 1-year Neer scores were similar between the two cohorts. Patients in the PHN group perceived significantly less pain compared with patients in the plate fixation group at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. We observed 79 local complications in 60 patients with no significant risk difference between the treatment groups; 35 intraoperative complications were directly related to the initial surgical procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The similar 1-year outcomes for nail versus plate fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures suggest that both techniques may be useful for internal fixation of these fractures. Many complications were related to incorrect surgical technique and therefore can be avoided. Advanced surgical skills and experience are considered to be more critical for successful operative treatment of three-part proximal humeral fractures than the selection of the implant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study (prospective comparative study). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Angular-stable locked intramedullary nailing of two-part surgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. A multicenter retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

The ideal fixation technique for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures remains unclear. In the present study, we evaluated the experience of three surgeons with the treatment of two-part surgical neck fractures with angular-stable intramedullary fixation.

METHODS

Forty-eight patients with forty-eight Neer two-part surgical neck proximal humeral fractures were managed with locked angular-stable intramedullary nail fixation by three surgeons. Shoulder pain and outcomes were quantified with Constant scores and standard radiographs.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients (including twenty-eight female patients and ten male patients) with a mean age of sixty-five years were followed for at least twelve months (mean, twenty months; range, twelve to thirty-six months). All fractures healed primarily. The mean follow-up Constant score (and standard deviation) was 71 ± 12 points (range, 37 to 88 points), with a mean age-adjusted Constant score of 97% (range, 58% to 119%). The mean Constant pain score was 13 ± 2.2 (possible range, 0 to 15 points, with 15 points representing no pain). The mean forward flexion was 132° ± 22°. All fractures but one healed with a neck-shaft angle of ≥125°.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who were managed with locked angular-stable intramedullary nailing of two-part surgical neck proximal humeral fractures via an articular entry point had reliable fracture-healing, favorable clinical outcomes, and little residual shoulder pain.

New trends in fixation of proximal humeral fractures: a review

Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures continues to be a challenge especially in osteoporotic patients. Locking plates and intramedullary nails have been used with satisfactory results but the previous reported complications have not been substantially reduced. Most of the existing studies involve a small number of patients followed up for a rather short period of time. Since proximal humeral fractures constitute a heterogenous group of complex fractures in an even more heterogenous population, no single fixation method is a panacea. Choice of implant and method of fixation should be selected according to individual patient and fracture pattern characteristics based on clearly defined indications and contraindications. Based on the findings of the existing clinical studies the authors propose a treatment algorithm.

Functional outcomes after nonoperative management of fractures of the proximal humerus

BACKGROUND

Prospective follow-up data after nonoperative treatment for fractures of the proximal humerus are scarce. We studied functional outcomes and rates of complication and failure after conservative management of these common injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients aged older than 18 years presenting to the emergency department of a large district hospital with an isolated, closed proximal humeral fracture considered suitable for functional treatment by the surgeon on charge were enrolled in a prospective, externally monitored observational study. Surgeons were free to reduce the fracture and to prescribe any type of sling or brace. Active follow-up after 12 weeks, 6, and 12 months included plain radiographs, Constant score, and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.

RESULTS

We enrolled 160 patients (118 women; mean age, 63.3 +/- 14.8 years), and 124 completed 1-year follow-up. There were 85, 71, and 4 AO 11 A, B, and C fractures, and 75 one-part, 60 two-part, 23 three-part, and 2 four-part and head-splitting fractures. After 1 year, the mean difference in Constant scores between the injured and contralateral shoulder was 8.2 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.0-10.4). The mean difference in 1-year DASH scores to baseline assessment was 10.2 points (95% CI 7.3-13.1 points). The risk of delayed and nonunion was 7.0% (95% CI, 3.6%-12.3%). Four patients subsequently underwent surgical fixation, and 5 had arthroscopic subacromial decompression.

CONCLUSION

This study may provide reference values for future investigations and stresses ceiling effects that will make it difficult to demonstrate a significant advantage of surgical over nonoperative treatment in patients with proximal humeral fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4; Prospective case series without a control group.

Telegraph antegrade nailing in the treatment of humeral fractures with rotator interval split technique

Twenty-four proximal humeral fractures were treated by surgical internal fixation with a locked antegrade intramedullary nail. The purpose of this paper was to assess the clinical outcomes of proximal epiphyseal and diaphyseal humeral fractures treated with an antegrade humeral nail implanted after an interval rotator split. We treated six proximal epiphyseal fractures and seven bifocal fractures of the epiphysis and shaft and eleven diaphyseal fractures. The mean follow-up was 23 months (range 12 to 34 months). Twenty patients were available for follow-up. All but two fractures progressed to healing. The Mean Constant score was 80%, Relative Constant score was 95.5%. We divided the clinical outcomes by fracture pattern to define the best surgical indication. There were good clinical outcomes in all three groups, but the clinical score was highest in the shaft fracture group. An intramedullary antegrade nail inserted through the interval rotator without penetrating the rotator cuff had a good clinical outcome and with certain fracture types can be an effective and satisfactory device.

Axillary nerve palsy after retrograde humeral nailing: clinical confirmation of an anatomical fear

INTRODUCTION

Locked antegrade or retrograde nailing of humeral shaft and proximal humerus fractures is a well established treatment option. Anatomic-morphological studies revealed a potential high risk of axillary nerve injury within proximal interlocking screw insertion. However, clinical experiences do not seem to confirm this, as there is a lack of interlocking screw insertion associated axillary lesions in literature.

CASE REPORT

We report about a 69-year-old man with a humeral shaft fracture (AO-type 12-A3) stabilized by a retrograde implanted interlocking nail. Proximal interlocking screw insertion was performed in a posterior-to-anterior direction. The fracture healed uneventfully. In a follow-up examination 2 years later, an atrophy and paralysis of the deltoid muscle were visible. Electrophysiological evaluation confirmed an isolated axillary nerve injury. Nevertheless, the patient showed good functional recovery with almost free range of motion.

CONCLUSION

Even for clinical practise proximal interlocking screw insertion is associated with a substantial risk of axillary nerve injury. Particularly for posterior-to-anterior screw insertion anatomic conditions should be considered. In spite of axillary nerve lesion, recovery of almost full shoulder function is possible by compensating the loss of deltoid function by rotator cuff muscles.

Two-part fractures and fracture dislocations

Proximal humeral fractures are common and are usually osteopenic or osteoporotic and about 85% occur in patients older than 50. Two-part fractures account for approximately 28% of proximal humeral fractures, with most being surgical neck fractures. This article discusses the management of two-part fractures and analyzes the use of nonoperative treatment, conventional plating, locked plating, antegrade intramedullary nailing, retrograde pinning, and Kirschner wires in their treatment. The literature indicates that nonoperative treatment is as effective as conventional plating, antegrade nailing, and Kirschner wiring in treating two-part surgical neck fractures in older patients. The early results of locked plating may be better, but more studies are required to prove this. This article gives the results of nonoperative treatment of all types of two-part fractures and fracture dislocations.

Arthroscopical Findings after Antegrade Nailing of a Proximal Humeral Fracture : Case Report and Review of the Literature

Proximal humeral fractures represent up to five percent of all fractures in adults, commonly found in elderly patients. The final functional results after different operative procedures are among other factors dependent on whether or not a rotator cuff lesion is pre-existent, prior to the fracture, and how its surgical therapy is carried out. However, to what extent prior rotator cuff tears in this special patient group contribute to the functional outcome remains widely unclear. In our institution antegrade intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for proximal humeral fractures. One critical point of this technique is the unavoidable split of the rotator cuff on the approach to the proximal humerus and the insertion of the nail through the incised cuff. We report on a case of an impingement after antegrade intramedullary nailing of a proximal humeral fracture. Diagnostic glenohumeral arthroscopy revealed neither a residual lesion of the former rotator cuff incision nor a chondral lesion at the former insertion site of the nail. In the same session subacromial decompression and a nettoyage of adhesions were performed. We assume that splitting the rotator cuff for the insertion of an antegrade nail in a proximal humeral fracture is less relevant than previously assumed and described.