The greater trochanter-head contact method: a cadaveric study with a new technique for the intraoperative control of rotation of femoral fractures

The Impact of Rotational Malalignment Following Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Fractures on Patients' Functional Outcomes: A Prospective Study

Background & Aims: Rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures is a relatively common complication that may have a crucial impact on both functional outcome and a fracture's healing properties, ultimately affecting the patient's postoperative morbidity and mortality. Methods: 74 patients treated with intramedullary nailing due to an intertrochanteric fracture underwent a postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan of the hips and knees. The femoral anteversion difference (D angle) between the operated and healthy hip was calculated using the technique described by Jeanmart et al. The patients were divided into two groups according to their D angle values: a D angle less than 15° was considered an acceptable rotational alignment (group A), while a D angle equal to or more than 15° was considered a rotational deformity (group B). Postoperatively, the functional level of each patient was evaluated at the 6-month and 1-year follow-up visits and compared to the pre-fracture status using the modified Harris hip score (mHHS). Also, fracture union, other postoperative complications, and patient mortality were noted. Results: The mean femoral anteversion difference was 12.3° with a standard deviation of 10.3°. Of the 74 patients, 51 (68.9%) were assigned to group A and 23 (31.1%) to group B. At the 6-month postoperative follow-up, 67 (90.5%) patients had survived and 7 (9.5%) were deceased, with our statistical analysis indicating a linear trend (p-value = 0.048) between the presence of rotational malalignment and 6-month mortality. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, 63 (85.1%) patients survived and 11 (14.9%) were deceased, with the statistical analysis indicating a significant relationship (p-value = 0.031) between the presence of rotational malalignment and the 1-year mortality. Regarding the functional outcome six months after the operation, the difference between the pre-fracture and the postoperative mHHS was 8.7/100 with a standard deviation of 6.1 for the 49 patients in group A and 14.5/100 with a standard deviation of 12.4 for the 18 patients in group B, with the statistical analysis indicating a significant difference (t = -2.536, significance < 0.05) in the functional level between the two groups. As for the functional outcome one year after the operation, the difference between the pre-fracture and the postoperative mHHS was 4.9/100 with a standard deviation of 7.8 for the 47 patients in group A and 8.3/100 with a standard deviation of 13 for the 16 patients in group B, with the statistical analysis indicating no significant difference (t = -1.266, significance > 0.05) in the functional level between the two groups. The only postoperative complication noted was fracture non-union, presenting in two patients (3%), with the statistical analysis indicating no significant relationship (p-value = 0.698) between this complication and the presence of rotational malalignment. Conclusions: In this study, rotational malalignment after intertrochanteric fracture intramedullary nailing presents in 31.1% of cases. The correlation between this malalignment and functional outcomes shows a decline in patients' functional abilities during the first six postoperative months, a condition that improves over time, with most patients returning to their preoperative functional status one year after the operation. Furthermore, our results indicate a possible relationship between rotational malalignment and mortality within one year. Future research should focus on creating a more detailed, functional evaluation system for the elderly and applying it to a larger sample to confirm these findings.

The lesser trochanter profile is an accurate and reliable measure of femoral rotation for intramedullary nailing

INTRODUCTION

The lesser trochanter profile (LTP) method is an intraoperative fluoroscopic technique that can assess the femoral version and limit malrotation. The purpose of this study was to directly assess the accuracy and reliability of the LTP method, as well as determine the incidence of malrotation produced by this technique.

METHODS

Three groups of observers (fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons, orthopedic residents, and medical students) utilized the LTP method to replicate pre-imaged rotation angles on a cadaveric femur bone. Recorded outcomes include rotational error and number of attempts. Accuracy and interobserver reliability were assessed by rotational error and the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively.

RESULTS

Accuracy was within 3° for all three groups. ICC between each group was greater than 0.99. There was no statistical difference between the accuracy of fellowship-trained surgeons, orthopedic residents, and medical students. Medical students on average required more attempts to obtain their final image compared to fellowship-trained surgeons. There was no statistical difference in the number of attempts between residents and fellowship-trained surgeons.

CONCLUSION

None of the LTP measurements were greater than 15°, the clinical threshold for malrotation. The average error of the observers was less than 3°, demonstrating that the LTP is an effective method of assessing the femoral version. There was no statistically significant difference between the observers, indicating that this technique is reliable and easy to use. Ultimately, the LTP method is easily reproducible for surgeons to avoid femoral malrotation.

Incidence of Rotational Malalignment after Intertrochanteric Fracture Intramedullary Nailing: A CT-Based Prospective Study

Background and Objectives: Rotational malformation after intramedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures is a relatively common, possibly severe, and difficult-to-detect complication, since intraoperative radiographic imaging allows for the assessment of the quality of reduction in the frontal and sagittal planes, but not in the transverse plane. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rotational malalignment after intramedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures and to investigate a possible connection with specific patients' or fractures' characteristics. Materials and Methods: 74 patients treated with intramedullary nailing due to an intertrochanteric fracture underwent a postoperative CT of the pelvis-hips and knees. The value of the anteversion was measured both in the operated-on (angle 1) and in the healthy hip (angle 2) based on the technique described by Jeanmart et al. and the difference in anteversion (D angle = angle 1 minus angle 2) was calculated. A positive D angle indicated the presence of excessive internal overcorrection of the distal fragment during fracture reduction, while a negative D angle indicated the presence of excessive external overcorrection. The absolute value of the D angle represents the postoperative difference in anteversion between the two hips. The patients were divided into three groups according to this value: group A, with D < 5° (physiological difference); group B, with 5° < D < 15° (acceptable rotational alignment); and group C, with D ≥ 15° (rotational deformity). Results: Group A constitutes 56.8%, group B 12.2%, and group C 31.1% of the study population. Overall, 79.7% of the patients presented a positive angle D, while, for group C, the percentage was even higher at 91.3%. According to the AO/OTA classification system, 37.8% of the cases were stable fractures, 47.3% were unstable fractures, and 14.9% were reverse oblique fractures. Based on our analysis, the type of fracture has a serious impact on the rotational alignment, since the statistical significance of the mean angle D for the three types of fracture is reliable (p = 0.029). Stable fractures present the lowest anteversion difference values, while reverse oblique fractures present the highest difference. Conclusions: Our study reveals that the percentage of rotational malalignment after the intramedullary nailing of intertrochanteric fractures remains high (31.1%), despite the proper use of radiographic imaging during the intraoperative fracture reduction. In most cases (91.3%), this malalignment appears to be a matter of internal overcorrection. A clear correlation between hip's rotational deformity and patients' functional outcome has yet to be proven, and constitutes our objective in the near future.

Acute Correction of Femoral Malrotation After Intramedullary Nailing Using an Intraoperative Digital Protractor

OBJECTIVE

 The goal of the study is to diagnose and accurately correct malrotation of femur fractures after intramedullary (IM) nailing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An institutional review board (IRB) approved prospective study that was performed at a U.S. level 1 trauma center. After IM nailing of comminuted femur fractures, a computed tomography (CT) scanogram was routinely performed to detect the difference in the postoperative femoral version. Patients with malalignment greater than 15 degrees compared to the contralateral side were informed about the discrepancy and offered to have it acutely corrected. A four-pin technique was used: two Schanz pins were used for measuring angles and two different pins were used to turn and correct the malalignment. The pin in the distal fragment is placed directly under the nail to prevent shortening in comminuted fractures. The nail was unlocked either proximally for retrograde nails or distally for antegrade nails. The Bonesetter Angle application was used as a digital protractor to intraoperatively measure the two reference pins and correct the malrotation. Alternate holes were used for relocking the nail. All patients received a CT scanogram after correction.

RESULTS

 19/128 patients with comminuted femoral fractures over five years with malrotations between 18 and 47 degrees were included in the study with an average malrotation of 24.7 + 8 degrees. All patients were corrected to an average of 4.0 +/- 2.1 degrees difference, as compared to the contralateral side (range 0-8). No patients required further surgeries to correct malrotation.

CONCLUSION

 Comminuted fractures with malrotation >15 degrees after femoral nailing have an incidence of 15% at our institution. This technique provides an efficient and accurate correction method with the use of an intraoperative digital protractor, avoiding the need for revision IM nailing or osteotomies.

Custom 3D-Printed Cutting Guides for Femoral Osteotomy in Rotational Malalignment Due to Diaphyseal Fractures: Surgical Technique and Case Series

Femoral shaft fractures are one of the most common injuries in trauma patients. The gold standard treatment consists of closed reduction and intramedullary nailing, providing a high fracture healing rate and allowing early mobilization. However, rotational malalignment is a well-known complication following this procedure, and excessive femoral anteversion or femoral retroversion can trigger functional complaints. In order to achieve the ideal degree of femoral rotation, a 3D planning and printing cutting guides procedure was developed to correct femoral malrotation. A patient series with malalignment after a femoral diaphyseal fracture was operated on with the customized guides and evaluated in this study. Computed tomography scans were performed to accurately determine the number of degrees of malrotation, allowing the design of specific and personalized surgical guides to correct these accurately. Once designed, they were produced by 3D printing. After surgery with the customized guides to correct femoral malrotation, all patients presented a normalized anteversion angle of the femur (average −10.3°, range from −5° to −15°), according to their contralateral limb. These data suggest that the use of customized cutting guides for femoral osteotomy is a safe and reproducible surgical technique that offers precise results when correcting femoral malrotation.

Use of Inherent Anteversion of an Intramedullary Nail to Avoid Malrotation in Comminuted Femur Fractures: A Prospective Case- Control Study

OBJECTIVES

To (1) evaluate using the inherent anteversion of a second or third generation femoral nail to set the version of the femur during locked intramedullary nailing of comminuted femoral shaft fractures (Espinosa Technique [ET]) and compare it with our traditional method (traditional group [TG]) and (2) assess the variation of anteversion because of the inherent play in the nail itself.

DESIGN

A prospective IRB-approved study.

SETTING

Academic US Level 1 Trauma Center.

PATIENTS

Fifty-two consecutive patients with comminuted femur fractures all completed the study.

INTERVENTION

The first 27 patients had the anteversion determined using the patellar shadow and lesser trochanter (TG), and the next 25 patients were treated by ET.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Computed tomography scanogram for femoral anteversion and length in the normal versus operated femur.

RESULTS

A >15 degree difference from native to operated legs was found in 8/27 TG (29%, 95% CI 15.3%-54.2%), with a mean difference of 11.6 ± 10.2 degrees (95% CI 8.8-16.17) verses 1/25 in the ET group (2.5%, 95% CI 0%-15.3%), with a mean difference of 4.8 ± 6.2 degrees (95% CI 1.38-8.9) (P = 0.0068). There was a 5 degree variability in our ability to center the proximal locking screw in the femoral head and 5 degrees variation in distal locking.

CONCLUSIONS

The inherent anteversion of a second generation nail can be used to minimize malrotation of the femur after comminuted fractures during locked intramedullary nailing in patients with normal anteversion and is superior to our present fluoroscopic technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reliable Method for Avoiding Malrotation Deformity After Intramedullary Nailing of Comminuted Femur Fractures: Clinical Validation of a Previously Described Technique

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate a previously described technique using the inherent anteversion of intramedullary nail (IMN) to avoid malrotation in comminuted femur fractures and describe the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an alternative method for assessing postoperative femoral version.

DESIGN

Prospective consecutive cohort study.

SETTING

Level I trauma center.

PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-five consecutive patients with comminuted femur fractures (Winquist III/IV, OTA/AO 32-B/32-C) treated by a single surgeon with IMN between September 1, 2011, and February 28, 2015.

INTERVENTION

IMN on a fracture table with intraoperative femoral version set by the inherent version of the implant. All patients received a postoperative computed tomography (CT) or MRI to assess femoral version.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Mean difference in postoperative femoral anteversion (DFA) between injured limb and uninjured limb as measured by CT or MRI. Mean difference in postoperative femoral version of the injured femur from the inherent version of the implant (12 degrees) was measured with CT or MRI.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative DFA was 9.1 ± 5.6 degrees. Postoperative DFA greater than 15 degrees was found in 2 (8.0%) patients. Mean difference in postoperative version of the injured femur from the inherent 12 degrees of the implant was 7.1 ± 5.4 degrees. Patients tolerated MRI studies well.

CONCLUSIONS

Our previously described technique using the inherent anteversion of an IMN is effective and leads to a very low rate of malrotation, even in highly comminuted fractures. The technique is particularly useful in treating bilateral femur fractures. MRI can be used safely and effectively to assess anteversion after fixation of femur fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Simple Method for Measurement of Femoral Anteversion-Validation and Assessment of Reproducibility

OBJECTIVES

To propose a simple method for measurement of femoral anteversion (AV) with a conventional fluoroscope, to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this method on the basis of human cadaver femurs, and to validate such method on the basis of computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Fourteen human cadavers with 28 intact femurs were included in the study. Three blinded observers measured femoral AV of the specimen with a fluoroscope. The session was repeated 8 weeks later and CT of the femurs were performed. Mean AV values and the difference between single and mean AV values were calculated. Interobserver/intraobserver reliability of the proposed method was assessed. Correlation between AV values measured with fluoroscope and CT was calculated.

RESULTS

Mean AV was 18.1° when measured with fluoroscope and 19.2° when measured with CT. Mean differences between single AV values were 2.2° with fluoroscope and 2.5° with CT. The mean maximum observer variation per specimen was 8.8°. Interobserver reliability was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.853) and intraobserver reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.682). A high correlation was found between AV values measured with fluoroscope and CT (rho = 0.739, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The presented technique allows reliable and simple measurement of femoral AV with a conventional fluoroscope. The mean interobserver variation is comparable to what has been reported for CT. Maximum interobserver variation was <15° in all specimens. A clinical study will be necessary to prove the value of this technique for intraoperative adjustment of femoral AV according to the intact contralateral side.

Torsional malalignment, how much significant in the trochanteric fractures?

OBJECTIVES

The rotational alignment is definitely important in the long bones such as tibias and femurs. We also predict the importance of rotational alignment in the trochanteric fractures. So we measured torsional malalignment in trochanteric fracture and anlaysed their risk factors and their clinical significance.

METHODS

A total of 109 inpatients who had undergone internal fixation following trochanteric fracture and a postoperative pelvic CT scan between 2008 and 2013, with at least one year follow-up, were selected. Factors that affect torsional malalignment, such as age, gender, fracture stability, injured area, operative time, time of surgery after admission, and ASA status, were investigated. Factors that affect the patients' clinical results in malrotation, including ambulation time after surgery, postoperative complication rates, pain assessment of VAS one year postoperatively and Koval score, were also investigated.

RESULTS

Of the 109 subjects, torsional malalignment was observed in 28 (25.7%) subjects with a mean torsional malalignment angle of 20.7° (range: -31.2° to 27.1°). Torsional malalignment risk factors were fracture stability (p=0.021) and operative time (p=0.043). In terms of the time to ambulation after surgery, the postoperative complication rates, and the VAS and Koval scores at one year postoperatively, no statistically significant difference was observed between the torsional malalignment patients and the non-deformity patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, 25.7% of the patients who had undergone internal fixation following trochanteric fracture experienced torsional malalignment. Major factors of the torsional malalignment were an unstable fracture and the consequent delay in the operative time. But the torsional malalignment was deemed to have no effect on clinical results.

Important tips and numbers on using the cortical step and diameter difference sign in assessing femoral rotation--should we abandon the technique?

Rotational malalignment during femoral nailing is common despite having various intraoperative assessment methods. The cortical step sign and diameter difference sign (CSSDDS) is commonly used because of convenience, yet it lack proper scientific scrutiny and is thought to be error prone. Using a software algorithm, cross-sectional dimensions were obtained from CT scans of 22 intact adult femurs at the proximal, mid and distal diaphysis. With multiple simulated scenarios the sensitivity of CSSDDS was comprehensively determined at all possible C-arm positions. At rotation, cortical width changed most significantly around the thick linea aspera and femoral diameter changed most significantly at the sagittal plane. At 15 degrees of rotation and with the linea aspera in view, CSSDDS thresholds of 0.3mm, 0.6mm and 1mm had sensitivities of 98.8%, 93.1% and 73.8%. With the linea aspera masked behind the femur and out of view, the sensitivities significantly deteriorated to 96.4%, 77.1% and 44.1% respectively. CSSDDS is sufficiently sensitive only when strict rules are followed. It is imperative that the operator position the image intensifier in lateral view under proper magnification so that steps of less than 0.6mm around the linea aspera may be appreciated.

Management of distal femur fractures with modern plates and nails: state of the art

Fractures of the distal femur, even those with articular extension, are well suited to surgical fixation with modern precontoured anatomic plates and nails. Numerous adjuvant techniques are available to the treating surgeon to obtain and maintain reduction while preserving fracture biology. Yet despite their proven track record and benefits over older implants, technical errors are common and must be overcome with proper preoperative planning and intraoperative attention to detail. This review summarizes the current state of the art regarding distal femur fractures, with an emphasis on relevant modern plate and nail surgical techniques, tempered by our current understanding of implant biomechanics, fracture healing, and long-term outcomes.

Use of inherent anteversion of an intramedullary nail to avoid malrotation in femur fractures

Rotational malalignment after intramedullary (IM) nailing of femoral fractures remains a significant problem. A technique using intraoperative fluoroscopy and the anteversion inherent to the IM nail for obtaining appropriate femoral rotational alignment is presented. The technique is advocated as a simple alternative to more complex methods for estimation of femoral anteversion during placement of femoral IM nails. This method is simple and requires intraoperative fluoroscopy on the injured extremity alone. It reliably sets the femoral anteversion within a normal physiologic range with minimal additional intraoperative steps and without preoperative measurements.