Reoperation rate after internal fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures with the percutaneous compression plate: what are the risk factors?

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Robot-Assisted vs. Freehand Screw Placement in Femoral Neck Fractures: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Femoral neck fractures pose significant surgical challenges with high morbidity and mortality. Traditional freehand screw placement often yields variable outcomes. Recent robotic advancements offer a promising alternative with enhanced precision. Methods: This systematic review compares the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted versus freehand techniques. A comprehensive literature search across multiple databases up to July 2024 included studies comparing both techniques. Primary outcomes were the union rate and time, functional outcomes, operative time, intraoperative parameters, and complication rates. Meta-regression analyses identified treatment response determinants. Results: Twenty-four studies (1437 patients) were included. Robot-assisted screw placement significantly improved the union rate, reduced the union time, and showed superior functional outcomes. Additionally, it resulted in shorter operative times, less intraoperative blood loss, and fewer instances of fluoroscopy and guide pin insertion. The risk of femoral neck necrosis was notably lower with robotic assistance. Meta-regression highlighted the robot type, patient age, and sample size as significant factors. Conclusions: Despite the promise of robot-assisted screw placement, limitations exist. The evidence being mainly from China raises concerns about generalizability. The lack of long-term follow-up data hinders assessment of technique durability. Unreported surgeon expertise levels and learning curves affect result validity. High initial costs and steep learning curves of robotic systems also present barriers to widespread adoption.

Comparison of cutout risk factors between single- and doublescrew proximal nails in intertrochanteric femur fractures - a multicentric study

Aim Significant risk factors for femoral nail cutout are well-documented, primarily in the context of single-screw proximal nails. However, it remains uncertain whether those same risk factors are applicable when considering different implant devices. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to compare cutout risk factors between single- versus double-screw proximal femoral nails. Methods Patients over the age of 75 with intertrochanteric femur fractures (AO Classification 31-A1 or 31-A2) were included in the multicentre study. A study group was treated with a double-screw nail, while a control group received single-screw device. Demographic data, surgical time (min), fracture pattern, distal locking, reduction quality, comorbidities, tip-apex distance (TAD) and 12-month functional scores was collected. Results Two hundred patients were enrolled, 100 for each group. Nine patients experienced a cutout complication, five in the study and four in the control group. The main differences were in distal locking configurations (p<0.05) and in TAD values (p<0.05). The TAD value was higher in the study than in the control group (30.40±0.89 versus 26.79±1.79). No differences at 12-month follow up were reported according to functional scores. Conclusion This study provides insights into the choice of nail systems for intertrochanteric femur fractures, highlighting the importance of distal locking configurations and TAD values. The double screw nail exhibits quite a tolerance by having a higher average TAD value. These findings may guide clinical decisionmaking in the treatment of this challenging fracture type.

The Effect of Surgeon Experience on Short- to Medium-Term Complication Rate Following Operative Fixation of Acetabular Fractures

OBJECTIVES

Operative management of acetabular fractures is technically challenging, but there is little data regarding how surgeon experience affects outcomes. Previous efforts have focused only on reduction quality in a single surgeon series. We hypothesized that increasing surgeon experience would be associated with improved acetabular surgical outcomes in general.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Urban academic level-I trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Seven hundred ninety-five patients who underwent an open reduction internal fixation for an acetabular fracture.

RESULTS

There was a significant association between surgeon experience and certain outcomes, specifically reoperation rate (16.9% overall), readmission rate (13.9% overall), and reduction quality. Deep infection rate (9.7% overall) and secondary displacement rate (3.7% overall) were not found to have a significant association with surgeon experience. For reoperation rate, the time until 50% peak performance was 2.4 years in practice.

CONCLUSION

Surgeon experience had a significant association with reoperation rate, quality of reduction, and readmission rate after open reduction internal fixation of acetabular fractures. Other patient outcomes were not found to be associated with surgeon experience.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The case for decreased surgeon-reported complications due to surgical volume and fellowship status in the treatment of geriatric hip fracture: An analysis of the ABOS database

Introduction

American orthopaedists are increasingly seeking fellowship sub-specialization. One proposed benefit of fellowship training is decrease in complications, however, few studies have investigated the rates of medical and surgical complications for hip fracture patients between orthopedists from different fellowship backgrounds. This study aims to investigate the effect of fellowship training and case volume on medical and surgical outcomes of patient following hip fracture surgical intervention.

Methods

1999–2016 American Board of Orthopedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Examination Case List data were used to assess patients treated by trauma or adult reconstruction fellowship-trained orthopedists versus all-other orthopaedists. Rates of surgeon-reported medical and surgical adverse events were compared between the three surgeon cohorts. Using binary multivariate logistic regression to control of demographic factors, independent factors were evaluated for their effect on surgical complications.

Results

Data from 73,427 patients were assessed. An increasing number of hip fractures are being treated by trauma fellowship trained surgeons (9.43% in 1999–2004 to 60.92% in 2011–2016). In multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in type of fellowship, however, surgeons with increased case volume saw significantly decreased odds of complications (16–30 cases: OR = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85–0.97; p = 0.003; 31+ cases: OR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.61–0.76; p<0.001). Femoral neck hip fractures were associated with increased odds of surgical complications.

Discussion

Despite minor differences in incidence of surgical complications between different fellowship trained orthopaedists, there is no major difference in overall risk of surgical complications for hip fracture patients based on fellowship status of early orthopaedic surgeons. However, case volume does significantly decrease the risk of surgical complications among these patients and may stand as a proxy for fellowship training. Fellows required to take hip fracture call as part of their training regardless of fellowship status exhibited decreased complication risk for hip fracture patients, thus highlighting the importance of additional training.

Screw-blade fixation systems for implant anchorage in the femoral head: Horizontal blade orientation provides superior stability

OBJECTIVES

Despite continual improvement in the methods and devices used for treatment of proximal femoral fractures, unacceptably high failure rates remain. Novel screw-blade implant systems, combining a lag screw with a blade - the latter adding rotational stability to the femoral head - offer improvement of osseous purchase, especially in osteoporotic bone. The aim of this study was to compare biomechanically the head element (HE) anchorage of two screw-blade implant systems differing in blade orientation in the femoral head - vertical versus horizontal.

METHODS

Twenty paired human cadaveric femoral heads were assigned to four groups (n = 10), implanted with either Rotationally Stable Screw-Anchor HE (RoSA-HE, vertical blade orientation) or Gamma3 Rotation Control Lag Screw (Gamma-RC, horizontal blade orientation) in center or off-center position, and biomechanically tested until failure under progressively increasing cyclic loading at 2 Hz.

RESULTS

Cycles to failure and failure load were significantly higher for Gamma-RC versus RoSA-HE in center position and not significantly different between them in off-center position, p = 0.03 and p = 0.22, respectively. In center position, the progression of both rotation around implant axis and varus deformation over time demonstrated superiority of the implant with horizontal versus vertical blade orientation. Compared with center positioning, off-center implant placement led to a significant decrease in stiffness, cycles to failure and failure load for Gamma-RC, but not for RoSA-HE, p < 0.01 and p = 0.99, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Horizontal blade orientation of screw-blade implant systems demonstrates better anchorage in the femoral head versus vertical blade orientation in center position. As the stability of the implant system with horizontal blade orientation drops sharply in off-center position, central insertion is its placement of choice.

Locking compression plate fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in patients with preexisting proximal femoral deformity: a retrospective study

Background

To investigate the clinical efficacy of locking compression plate fixation for the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in patients with preexisting proximal femoral deformity.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 37 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures combined with preexisting proximal femoral deformity between January 2013 and July 2019. The patients included 24 males and 13 females aged from 23 to 69 years old, with an average age of 47.5 years. The preexisting proximal femoral deformities resulted from poliomyelitis sequela, proximal femoral fibrous dysplasia, malunion and implant failure combined with coxa vara after intramedullary nailing fixation. There were 6 cases of 31-A2.1, 6 cases of 31-A2.2, 20 cases of 31-A3.1, and 5 cases of 31-A3.2, determined based on the AO classification of intertrochanteric fractures. All fractures were managed through open reduction and locking plate fixation. The hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS) was used to assess hip function before injury and at the last postoperative follow-up. The short form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey Questionnaire was used to assess quality of life.

Results

Thirty-seven patients were followed up for 12 to 27 months (average, 20.7 months). All patients achieved bone healing within 5.1 months on average (range, 3 to 6 months). Postoperative complications included deep vein thrombosis in three patients, bedsores in one and delayed union in one patient. No other complications, such as surgical site infection, fat embolism, nonunion and re-fracture, were presented. There was no significant difference in the HOOS scores and the SF-36 Health Questionnaire outcomes at pre-injury and at the last postoperative follow-up (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

It is difficult to perform intramedullary fixation of femoral intertrochanteric fractures in patients with preexisting proximal femoral deformity, while locking compression plate fixation is a simple and effective method of treatment.

Reporting on quality of reduction and fixation of intertrochanteric fractures-A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patient outcomes after intertrochanteric fracture fixation is the subject of a large body of published and ongoing clinical research. Fracture reduction and stable fixation are a pre-requisite for achieving optimal results. However, reporting on the quality of postoperative reduction and fixation, has been inconsistent in the literature on intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study was to examine the quality and consistency of reporting of immediate postoperative reduction and fixation in clinical outcome studies of intertrochanteric fracture fixation.

METHODS

Outcome studies of intertrochanteric fractures, published between 2001 and 2019, were identified using a PubMed. Six journals were identified as having a high impact on intertrochanteric fracture research by either having an impact factor greater than 3.0 or more than 30 published studies fulfilling inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers reviewed each article for its reporting on immediate post-operative radiographic findings and whether an attempt was made to correlate these findings to outcomes. Quality and consistency of reduction reporting were assessed by recording the type and number of uniquely reported reduction metrics in all of the included studies.

RESULTS

The reviewers identified 134 papers for the study, of which 110 (82%) reported on immediate postoperative radiographic findings. Of the papers reporting these findings, 84 (76%) reported quantitative measurements. Quantitative reporting changed from 79% in papers published between 2001-2014 to 86% in papers published between 2015-2019. Sixty-one (46%) papers reported Tip-Apex Distance, 56 (42%) reported degree of varus (compared to non-injured side), 42 (31%) reported Neck-Shaft Angle restoration, 31(23%) reported leg-length discrepancy, 18 (13%) reported rotation, 15(11%) reported on the status of the lateral wall, and 6 (4%) reported on calcar (medial buttress) reduction. Sixty-eight (51%) papers that measured reduction found an association between better immediate post-operative reduction and improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite its recognized influence on outcomes of intertrochanteric fractures, leading peer-reviewed journals do not uniformly report on the immediate postoperative assessment of the quality of reduction and fixation. However, reporting has improved over the past five years. Standardized quantitative metrics will need to be reported in the future to allow meaningful comparisons between studies and accurate assessment of intertrochanteric fracture outcome.

The Experiential Benefit of an Orthopedic Trauma Fellowship: An Analysis of ACGME Case Log Data From 2006 to 2017

OBJECTIVE

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) has published orthopedic case log data since the 2006/2007 academic year. Here, we use this data to analyze the variability in orthopedic trauma case experience reported by orthopedic trainees and to better understand the impact of an orthopedic trauma fellowship on orthopedic surgical training.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Data were gathered from ACGME case log reports for orthopedic residents (reporting the cumulative case experience of graduating residents) and orthopedic trauma fellows (reporting the case experience of their fellowship year only) for all available years.

RESULTS

The average orthopedic trauma fellow reported significantly more trauma cases in multiple body regions ("Pelvis/Hip", "Femur/Knee", and "Foot/Toes") and "Open Complex" reductions (as defined by the ACGME) in their 1 year of fellowship than the average resident reported in their 5 years of residency.

CONCLUSION

On average, orthopedic trauma fellowships substantially increase the trauma case volumes of orthopedic trainees, especially with respect to lower extremity trauma.

Greater rate of cephalic screw mobilisation following proximal femoral nailing in hip fractures with a tip-apex distance (TAD) and a calcar referenced TAD greater than 25 mm

Background

To ascertain whether the tip–apex distance (TAD), calcar referenced TAD (CalTAD), and the sum of both (TADcalTAD) are predictive measurements of mobilisation of the cephalic screw in patients with trochanteric hip fractures.

Methods

Between 2014 and 2015, 68 patients (mean age 86 years, 45 females, 23 males) with a trochanteric hip fracture underwent intramedullary nailing. The TAD and CalTAD were measured, and for each parameter, we calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

Results

There is evidence of a statistically significant association between a TAD and CalTAD greater than 25 mm and a TADcalTAD greater than 50 mm and mobilisation of the cephalic screw. All measurements have similar sensitivity, but the TAD presents the highest specificity (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

To avoid the risk of mobilisation of the cephalic screw and possible subsequent failure of the construct, surgeons should strive for a TAD and CalTAD less than 25 mm and a TADcalTAD less than 50 mm when using intramedullary fixation.

Risk factors for cut-out of double lag screw fixation in proximal femoral fractures

OBJECTIVE

We assessed factors associated with cut-out after internal fixation of proximal femoral fractures using double lag screw nails.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A university hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with non-pathological intertrochanteric femur fractures and a minumum 90days follow-up who underwent internal fixation with dual lag screw nails were included. Potential risk factors for lag screw cut-out investigated by our study were: age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classification), type of fracture (AO/OTA classification), fracture stability, side, operation time, implant length, reduction quality, tip-apex distance (TAD), and lag screw configuration. Logistic regression was used to investigate potential predictors of screw cut-out.

RESULTS

Eighty-five of the 118 patients with hip fractures treated between February 2010 and November 2013 at our institution met the inclusion criteria for the study. Fifty-eight patients were female (68.2%), mean age was 77.4 (range: 50-95 years), mean follow up was 380days (range: 150days-2.5 years), and cut of was observed in 9 patients (10.5%). The following variables identified through univariate analysis with p<0.2 were included in multivariant logistic regression model: age, side, reduction quality, implant length, TAD and ASA score. Only TAD (p=0.003) was found to be significant in the multivariant model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed that risk factors for cut-out with single-lag screw devices are also applicable to dual-lag screw implants. We found that TAD was a significant factor for cut-out in dual-lag screw implants. Thus, screw cut-out can be minimized by optimizing screw position.

Failure of fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone

This manuscript will provide an overview of how the age and osteoporosis related changes in mechanical properties of bone affect the stability of osteosynthesis constructs, both from a mechanical as well as from a clinical perspective. The manuscript will also address some of the principles of fracture fixation for osteoporotic fractures and discuss applications of osteoporotic fracture fixation at sites typically affected by fragility fractures, namely the distal radius, the proximal humerus, the femur and the spine. The primary aim of operative treatment in elderly individuals is the avoidance of immobilization of the patient. In selected cases conservative treatment might be required. Generally, choice of treatment should be individualized and based on the evaluation of patient-specific, fracture-specific and surgeon-specific aspects. The orthopaedic surgeon plays an essential role in enabling functional recovery by providing good surgery but a multidisciplinary approach is essential in order to support the patient to regain his/her quality of life after fragility fracture. Overall, the therapy of fractures in osteoporotic bone in the elderly requires a multidisciplinary therapeutic acute care concept including treatment of co-morbidities and correct choice of timing, and technique of the operative intervention.

Proximal femoral nails anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screws for treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: an outcome analyses with a minimum 4 years of follow-up

BACKGROUND

Dynamic hip screws (DHSs) and proximal femoral nails anti-rotation (PFNAs) are well-documented implants for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures(IFFs); however, there is no consensus regarding which type of implant is the better option for stable IFFs. This study aimed to compare DHSs with PFNAs in the management of stable intertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in our institution. Between June, 2005 and November, 2015, 267 patients (267 hips) with stable IFFs (AO/OTA Type 3.1A1) were treated with a DHS or a PFNA. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to focus on isolated stable IFFs in ambulatory patients. Follow-up was undertaken at 1, 3, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 postoperative months, and at final follow-up. Radiograph outcomes were obtained at all visits. The primary outcome measure was re-operation rate. The secondary outcome was patient function, evaluated using Harris hip score (HHS). Tertiary outcomes included: intra- and post-operative orthopaedic complications.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty two patients (110 in the PFNA group and 112 in the DHS group) were evaluated with a mean follow-up period of 53 months (range, 48-60 months). There was an increased risk of reoperation after DHS in one-year follow-up: 0 % and 5.4 % for PFNA and DHS, respectively (P = 0.029). The difference persisted with time: 6.4 % and 13.4 % at last follow-up (P < 0.05). There are statistical differences in postoperative HHS at 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 months postoperatively and at final follow-up. No statistical differences in medical complications was observed between the two groups. The orthopaedic complications were more in the DHS group (n = 42) compared with the PFNA group (n = 18) (P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with PFNA device, DHS device might not be the preferred implant for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures.

Mid-term results after treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures with percutaneous compression plate (PCCP)

BACKGROUND

With the ageing of the population, intertrochanteric femoral fracture is associated with increased morbidity. There is continuing controversy over the best treatment for the injury, and the choice of internal fixation method has been a focus of dispute. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of these fractures being treated with the percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) technique.

METHODS

From March 2009 to May 2012, 154 patients with intertrochanteric femoral fractures were treated using the PCCP method. Forty-one patients were excluded from the study. According to the AO classification, the remaining 113 fractures were classified as 35 cases of 31A1 fractures, 59 cases of 31A2 fractures, and 19 cases of 31A3 fractures. The clinical data and imaging results were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

The mean operation time was 42.0 (range, 25-82) min, the mean intraoperative blood loss was 40.5 (range, 10-100) ml, and the mean hospital stay was 8.6 (range, 3-18) days. One patient died of renal failure in the perioperative period. Twelve patients died during the 12 months after surgery. The remaining 100 patients were followed-up for 12-36 months and healed their fractures except one, whose neck screw cut out from the femoral neck after 1 postoperative month and resulting in a revision to a hemiarthroplasty. The mean time to bone healing was 12.6 (range, 6-23) weeks. Sixteen patients had pain. There were 13 major device-related complications, including 5 cases of coxa vara, 4 cases of fracture collapse, 2 cases of head penetration, and 2 cases of fracture collapse combined with head penetration. At the time of the last follow-up, 81 patients had regained a pre-injury level of function. The median Harris hip score was 89 points. The median Parker-Palmer score was 7 points. Patients with poor quality of reduction and bad positioning of neck screw were more likely to suffer complications (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the PCCP is an effective and safe method in the treatment of all types of intertrochanteric femoral fractures, but good fracture reduction and ideal positioning of the neck screw are prerequisites for the success of the device.

Accuracy of the lesser trochanter for guiding lag screw insertion in hip fracture management

The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the lesser trochanter for entry of lag screw placement in the fixation of hip fractures. Radiographs of the pelvis with both hips in 50 Chinese patients were analyzed to determine the accuracy of using the lesser trochanter as a reference landmark for inserting lag screws. The femoral neck was divided into 4 parts, and the second distal part was classified as the safe zone. Cobb angles of 125° and 130° were used as representative lag screw insertion angles, referencing the lateral cortex of the lesser trochanter for measurement, and insertion tracks were drawn on the neck of the femur. The accuracy of lag screw placement in the defined safe zone was evaluated. Accuracy of placement in the safe zone for entry points at the superior tip, apex, and inferior tip of the lesser trochanter were 78%, 39%, and 0%, respectively, for the 125° Cobb angle. Rates for the superior tip, apex, and inferior tip of the lesser trochanter were 31%, 74%, and 6%, respectively, for the 130° Cobb angle. The entry point at the level of the inferior tip of the lesser trochanter had incidence rates of 95% and 71% for cutout for 125° and 130° screws, respectively. The authors found that the superior tip of the lesser trochanter was a good reference point for 125° lag screw insertion and that the apex of the lesser trochanter was a good reference point for 130° lag screw insertion. Entry at the level of the inferior tip of the lesser trochanter has a very high rate of cutout and should be avoided.

Early surgical education of residents is safe for microscopic lumbar disc surgery

INTRODUCTION

It is a well-established dogma that many surgeons do not reach a quintessential level of their technical operative skills until successful completion of their training program. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that early introduction of supervised residents to non-complex spinal surgical procedures within a structured and supervised educational program does not harm the patient in terms of higher complication rates or worse pain- and health-related quality of life (HrQOL) outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective study on 102 patients undergoing surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) was performed. The procedures were dichotomized into two groups according to the surgeon's level of experience: teaching cases (neurosurgical residents in the 1st to 4th year of training) and non-teaching cases (experienced board-certified faculty neurosurgeons). Pain levels (VAS) and the HrQOL using the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) were measured at baseline, at 4 weeks and as a survey at 1 year postoperatively. In addition, data concerning the operation and the postoperative course including common complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Intraoperative blood loss, length of surgery, as well as intra- and postoperative complications were similar between the study groups. Patients in both groups achieved equal results in terms of pain reduction after 4 weeks [mean VAS change -3.8 (teaching cases) vs. -3.1 (non-teaching cases), p = 0.25] and 1 year postoperatively [mean change in VAS -3.5 (teaching cases) vs. -3.37 (non-teaching cases), p = 0.84]. Teaching cases were 100 % (odds ratio of 1.00) as likely as non-teaching cases to achieve a favorable HrQOL response to surgery (p = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Early introduction of resident surgeons to lumbar microdiscectomy can be conducted safely within a structured and supervised educational program as it neither harms the patient nor leads to worse 1-year results. Surgical resident education may thus be implemented safely in times of rigorous working laws. However, a structured education program in which the senior surgeon gives advice, guidance and communicates cautions during each resident surgery is of paramount importance to provide high-quality patient care.

Percutaneous compression plate versus dynamic hip screw for treatment of intertrochanteric Hip fractures: a meta-analyse of five randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) has been advocated to reduce blood loss, relieve pain, and lead to faster rehabilitation for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to estimate the outcomes and complications of the PCCP versus dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation for intertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

All randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared PCCP with DHS in treating adult patients with intertrochanteric fractures were included. Main outcomes were collected and analysed using the RevMan 5.1 version.

RESULTS

Five trials met the inclusion criteria. Compared with DHS, PCCP had similar operation time (95% CI: -26.01~4.05, P = 0.15), length of hospitalization (95% CI: -1.79~1.25, P = 0.73), mortality (95% CI: 0.37~1.02, P = 0.06), incidence of implant-related complications (95% CI: 0.29~1.82, P = 0.49), and reoperation rate (95% CI: 0.41~3.05, P = 0.83). But blood loss (95% CI: -173.84~-4.81, P = 0.04) and transfusion need (95% CI: -0.53~-0.07, P = 0.01) significantly favored the PCCP.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCCP was associated with reduced blood loss and less transfusion need, but similar to DHS in other respects. Owing to the limitations of this systematic review, more high-quality RCTs are still needed to assess the clinical efficiency of PCCP.

Unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures: is there a consensus on definition and treatment in Germany?

BACKGROUND

Extramedullary and intramedullary implants have improved in recent years, although consensus is lacking concerning the definition and classification of unstable intertrochanteric fractures, with uncertainties regarding treatment.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We conducted a national survey of practicing chairpersons of German institutions to determine current perspectives and perceptions of practice in the diagnosis, management, and surgical treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

Between January and February 2010, we emailed 575 German chairpersons of trauma and/or orthopaedic departments, asking them to complete a 26-question web-based survey regarding three broad domains: fracture classification and instability criteria, implants and surgical treatment algorithms, and timing of operations. Response rate was 42%.

RESULTS

There was a clear preference for use of the AO/OTA fracture classification with geographic variations. Absence of medial support was considered the main criterion for fracture instability (84%), whereas a broken lateral wall and detached greater trochanter were considered by 4% and 5% of the respondents, respectively, to determine instability. Two percent routinely fixed unstable intertrochanteric fractures with extramedullary devices. Ninety-eight percent of German hospitals reportedly perform surgery within 24 hours after admission. Time to surgery was dependent on hospital level, with more direct surgeries in Level I hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite varying opinions in the literature in recent years, we found some instability criteria (lateral wall breach, a detached greater trochanter) played a minor role in defining an unstable intertrochanteric fracture pattern. Despite recent meta-analyses suggesting clinical equivalence of intra- and extramedullary implants, few respondents routinely treat unstable intertrochanteric fractures with extramedullary plates. Additional studies are required to specify the influence of fracture characteristics on complication rate and function and to establish a classification system with clear treatment recommendations for unstable intertrochanteric fractures.