Dorsal vascularized grafting for scaphoid nonunion: a comparison of two surgical techniques

MRI for Scaphoid Nonunion: Utilization Rates, Factors Associated With Utilization, and Subsequent Vascularized Bone Graft Use

PURPOSE

The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for evaluation of scaphoid nonunion may be an example of low-value imaging for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion. The purpose of this study was to investigate variation in MRI use for scaphoid nonunion, the association of MRI with a vascularized bone graft (VBG) and to develop consensus on MRI use for scaphoid nonunion.

METHODS

We identified patients >18 years of age who underwent scaphoid nonunion surgery between 2010 and 2019 using a claims database. Patients who had, and did not have, an MRI within 90 days prior to their diagnosis of scaphoid nonunion were included and a multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate variation in MRI and VBG use. Subsequently, a literature review was performed, and a preliminary consensus statement was developed pertaining to the routine use of MRI for scaphoid nonunion. A consortium of nine hand surgeons evaluated the importance, feasibility, usability, and scientific acceptability of the statement through a modified RAND Coroporation/University of California, Los Angeles Delphi. Panelists evaluated the statement in two voting rounds with an intervening face-to-face discussion.

RESULTS

We identified 1,324 eligible patients with surgical repair of a scaphoid nonunion. Two hundred and sixty-three (19.9%) underwent an MRI within 90 days prior to surgery. Differences in age, insurance type, and comorbidity burden existed between patients who received MRI and those who did not. The MRI cohort was more likely to receive VBG (10.6%) compared to those without an MRI (4.7%). Panelists agreed on the voting domains of the consensus statement and therefore the statement, "There is no benefit of routine MRI/MRA in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion with or without presumed avascular necrosis," was considered valid.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI use within 90 days of surgical repair of scaphoid nonunion varies, is associated with greater rates of VBG use, and may represent low-value imaging given the lack of sufficient evidence on this topic.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As MRI use for scaphoid nonunion varies and may represent low-value imaging, a validated consensus statement may help guide the evaluation of patients with scaphoid nonunion.

Vascularized Versus Non-vascularized Bone Grafting for Scaphoid Non-union: A Meta-Analysis

Non-union after scaphoid fracture is a common complication. Controversy exists regarding the efficacy of vascularized bone graft (VBG) versus non-vascularized bone graft (NVBG) for scaphoid non-union. In the current meta-analysis, a comprehensive search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library database was done from inception to June 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies that reported outcomes following scaphoid non-union comparing VBG versus NVBG. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Any discrepancy was resolved by consensus and discussion with a third reviewer. We included five RCTs and one prospective comparative study. The combined odds ratio is 1.57 (95% CI: 0.87-2.86), favoring a higher union rate in the experimental group. The overall pooled mean difference of -1.40 (95% CI: -2.03 to -0.77) indicated that the VBG has a significantly shorter time to union compared to the NVBG. In conclusion, our results showed that VBG may be associated with an improved union rate and a decrease in union time, though no significant functional benefits.

Distal Radial Fractures with Scaphoid Fractures

Objective This study evaluated the epidemiological data and functional outcomes from patients with concomitant distal radial and scaphoid fractures treated in a single center specialized in hand surgery. Functional outcomes analysis used validated instruments. Methods  Patients diagnosed with distal radial and scaphoid fractures treated from January 2011 to December 2021 underwent assessments using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, goniometry, radiographic consolidation, and complications six months after surgery. Results  The study included 23 patients, 73.9% men and 26.1% women. Most (56.5%) fractures occurred on the right side, and 43.5% happened on the left side. Treatment of most (56%) distal radial fractures used a locked volar plate. Functional assessment by PRWE resulted in a mean score of 35.9 points (range, 14 to 71 points), while DASH showed a mean score of 37.8 points (range, 12 to 78 points). The mean VAS was 2.33 during activities (range, 0.6 to 6.2). Conclusion  Distal radial fractures associated with scaphoid fractures resulted from high-energy trauma, and most patients were males. There was a low rate of complications with surgical treatment, and the patients had satisfactory functional evolution with a low level of pain.

Long-term clinical and radiological results after scaphoid non-union treatment: a retrospective study about 60 cases

PURPOSE

Scaphoid non-union treatment remains nonconsensual and is based on vascularized or non-vascularized bone grafting. This study aimed to evaluate with a long follow-up the functional, clinical, and radiological outcomes, reported complications and reoperations and studied non-union treatment prognostic factors.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone bone graft surgery for scaphoid non-union were retrospectively reviewed. The evaluated outcomes were pain, qDASH, PRWE and MWS scores, active range of motion, grip strength, union rate, scapholunate angle, carpal height, and presence of arthrosis. Complications and reinterventions were also reported.

RESULTS

This study included 60 scaphoid non-union treatments with a mean follow-up of 7.7 (1.5-20.3) years. Twenty (33.3%) non-unions were located at the proximal pole, including 6 (10%) with preoperative avascular necrosis (AVN). Union occurred in 51 patients (85%). The functional, clinical, and radiological results were good. The complication rate was 21.3% and the reintervention rate was 16.7%. Subgroup union rate analysis found no difference if the non-union is localized in the proximal pole or if there is AVN.

CONCLUSION

With a representative sample of the population and a long follow-up, we have found a good union rate, clinical and functional results regardless of the treatment method chosen. Scaphoid non-union treatment is still controversial and more studies are needed to accurate indications of each graft according to the patient and non-union characteristics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

Retrospective cohort study.

Results of arthroscopic cancellous bone grafting for treatment of scaphoid nonunion in comparison with open cancellous bone grafting

This study primarily aimed to report the outcome of the arthroscopic cancellous bone grafting technique for treating scaphoid nonunion. The secondary aim was to compare the bone union rate and time, and the ability to correct the angulation of the scaphoid, between arthroscopically treated patients (n = 27), and patients treated with open cancellous bone grafting (n = 27). Nine surgeons (two in the arthroscopic and seven in the open group) with Level III experience operated on the patients. The pain score, grip strength and Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score improved significantly after the arthroscopic treatment (p = 0.0001). Arthroscopic cancellous bone grafting achieved union in 25 out of 27 patients. A retrospective comparison with open cancellous bone grafting showed four nonunions. Arthroscopically treated patients healed 5.4 weeks faster compared with the open group (p = 0.033). Patients treated with open grafting had a higher risk of failure (odds ratio = 2.17), although this was not found significant (p = 0.39). The open method corrected the angulation deformity better (dorsal cortical angle correction of 4°) than the arthroscopic method (dorsal cortical angle correction of 1°), but this was not statistically significant neither within the groups (p = 0.55, p = 0.87) nor postoperatively between the groups (p = 0.98). The height-to-length ratio was not different before and after the surgery for the arthroscopic group (p = 0.44) and the open group (p = 0.27), or postoperatively between the groups (p = 0.44).Level of evidence: III.

Scaphoid Nonunion Is a Disabling Problem in a Military Population

BACKGROUND

Scaphoid nonunion can occur in up to 55% of displaced scaphoid fractures. Long-term functional outcomes of this injury are lacking. In addition, no study has published rate of return to active military service after this injury. Our goal was to educate providers and patients on expected functional outcomes and return to duty after treatment of scaphoid nonunion.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent scaphoid nonunion repair at our institution from 2008 to 2017. The primary outcome measures were union rates, return to duty rates, and functional outcome scores obtained by telephone call. A total of 144 patients were included and 40 responded to our call for long-term follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 72% of patients achieved union after surgery, 18% required revision surgery, and 74% of patients were able to return to full duty after surgery. However, this number progressively decreased at 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. At an average of 5.9 years after surgery, the mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (qDASH) score was 23.9. The mean qDASH for patients who achieved union (21.9) was significantly lower than those with persistent nonunion (29.2) (P = .0115).

CONCLUSION

Scaphoid nonunion is a difficult problem in the military. We found a high rate of persistent nonunion often requiring revision to partial or full wrist arthrodesis. In addition, our long-term functional outcome scores demonstrate significant disability after this injury, even when union is achieved. This information can help us better counsel our patients and set expectations after treatment of this injury.

Vascularised versus non-vascularised bone graft for scaphoid nonunion: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and comparative studies

Background

Numerous studies have investigated surgical techniques for vascularised bone graft (VBG) for scaphoid nonunion; however, their efficacies remain unclear. Thus, to estimate the union rate of VBG for scaphoid nonunion, we performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative studies.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The search formula was as follows: ((scaphoid nonunion) OR (scaphoid pseudarthrosis)) AND (bone graft). Only RCTs were used in the primary analysis, and comparative studies, including RCTs, in the secondary analysis. The primary outcome was nonunion rate. We compared the outcome between VBG and non-vascularised bone graft (NVBG), pedicled VBG and NVBG, and free VBG and NVBG.

Results

This study included a total of 4 RCTs (263 patients) and 12 observational studies (1411 patients). In the meta-analyses of both RCTs only and RCTs and other comparative studies, no significant difference in nonunion rate was found between VBG and NVBG (summary odds ratio [OR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19-1.52 and summary OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.45-1.12), respectively. The nonunion rates of pedicled VBG, free VBG, and NVBG were 15.0%, 10.2%, and 17.8%, respectively, and no significant difference was found.

Conclusions

Our results indicated that the postoperative union rate in NVBG is similar to that in VBG; thus, NVBG could be the first choice of treatment for scaphoid nonunion.

Predictors of Failure for Vascularized and Nonvascularized Bone Grafting of Scaphoid Nonunions: A Systematic Review

Objective  This article compares predictors of failure for vascularized (VBG) and nonvascularized bone grafting (NVBG) of scaphoid nonunions. Methods  We conducted a systematic literature review of outcomes after VBG and NVBG of scaphoid nonunion. Fifty-one VBG studies ( N  = 1,419 patients) and 81 NVBG studies ( N  = 3,019 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Data were collected on surgical technique, type of fixation, time from injury to surgery, fracture location, abnormal carpal posture (humpback deformity and/or dorsal intercalated segmental instability [DISI]), radiographic parameters of carpal alignment, prior failed surgery, smoking status, and avascular necrosis (AVN) as defined by punctate bleeding, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with contrast, MRI without contrast, X-ray, and histology. Meta-analysis of proportions was conducted with Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Multilevel mixed-effects analyses were performed with univariable and multivariable Poisson regression to identify confounders and evaluate predictors of failure. Results  The pooled failure incidence effect size was comparable between VBG and NVBG (0.09 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.13] and 0.08 [95% CI 0.06-0.11], respectively). Humpback deformity and/or DISI (incidence-rate radios [IRRs] 1.57, CI: 1.04-2.36) and lateral intrascaphoid angle (IRR 1.21, CI: 1.08-1.37) were significantly associated with an increased VBG failure incidence. Time from injury to surgery (IRR 1.09, CI: 1.06-1.12) and height-to-length (H/L) ratio (IRR 53.98, CI: 1.16-2,504.24) were significantly associated with an increased NVBG failure incidence, though H/L ratio demonstrated a wide CI. Decreased proximal fragment contrast uptake on MRI was a statistically significant predictor of increased failure incidence for both VBG (IRR 2.03 CI: 1.13-3.66) and NVBG (IRR 1.39, CI: 1.16-1.66). Punctate bleeding or radiographic AVN, scapholunate angle, radiolunate angle, and prior failed surgery were not associated with failure incidence for either bone graft type ( p > 0.05). Conclusion  Humpback deformity and/or DISI and increasing lateral intrascaphoid angle may be predictors of VBG failure. Time from injury to surgery may be a predictor of NVBG failure. AVN as defined by decreased contrast uptake on MRI may be a marker of increased failure risk for both bone graft types.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of autologous bone graft versus pronator quadratus pedicled vascularized bone graft in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion

We aimed to compare the union rate and clinical outcome of autologous bone graft versus pronator quadratus vascularized pedicled muscle flap in treatment of scaphoid nonunion. Forty patients with a diagnosis of scaphoid nonunion who underwent unilateral pseudarthrosis surgery were included in this study. Notably, the scaphoid nonunion was unilateral, and the contralateral wrist was asymptomatic with normal function, per the physical and radiological examinations. Pronator quadratus vascularized pedicled muscle flap was used in 16 patients (group 1), and autologous bone graft was used in 24 patients (group 2). Patients were compared used Scapholunate angles, Natrass carpal height ratio and Mayo wrist score pre and postoperatively. Fifteen of the 16 (93.3%) patients in group 1 and 19 of the 24 (79.2%) patients in group 2 achieved bone union. Four of twelve patients in group 2 with avascular necrosis (AVN) and one of eight in group 1 with AVN were not able to achieve union. The group 2 (34%) had higher nonunion rate than group 1 (12%) in AVN patients. The scapholunat angle was significantly decreased and the Natress ratio was significantly increased postoperatively compared to the preoperative measurement in both group. There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative measurement. The postoperative Mayo wrist score showed no statistically significant differences between both groups. The pronator quadratus vascularized pedicled muscle flap was superior to non-vascularized bone grafting in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion with AVN. However, management of the patients without avascular necrosis is not requiring the vascularized pedicled muscle flap technique.

Bone grafting for scaphoid nonunion surgery : a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the rates of union for vascularized versus non-vascularized grafting techniques in the operative management of scaphoid nonunion. Secondary aims were to determine the effect of the fixation techniques used, the source of grafting, as well as the influence of fracture location (proximal pole) and avascular necrosis (AVN).

METHODS

A search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase was performed in June 2021 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement and registered using the PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews. The primary outcome was union rate.

RESULTS

There were 78 studies that met the inclusion criteria with a total of 7,671 patients (87.8% male, 12.2% female). The mean age was 27.9 years (SD 3.8) and the mean follow-up was 30.9 months (SD 25.9). The mean union rate was 88.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 85.0 to 92.5) for non-vascularized grafts versus 87.5% (95% CI 82.8 to 92.2) for vascularized grafts (p = 0.685). Pooled analysis of trial data alone found a mean union rate of 82.4% (95% CI 66.9% to 97.9%) for non-vascularized grafts and 89.4% (95% CI 84.1% to 94.7%) for vascularized grafts (p = 0.780). No significant difference was observed in union rates between any of the fixation techniques used in the studies (p = 0.502). Distal radius and iliac crest graft source had comparable mean union rates (86.9% (95% CI 83.1 to 90.7) vs 87.6% (95% CI 82.2 to 92.9); p = 0.841). Studies that excluded patients with both proximal pole fractures and AVN (n = 14) had a mean union rate of 96.5% (95% CI 94.2 to 98.9) that was significantly greater than the mean union rate of 86.8% (95% CI 83.2 to 90.4) observed in the remaining studies (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests vascularized bone grafting does not yield significantly superior results to non-vascularized grafting in scaphoid nonunion management. However, potential selection bias lessens the certainty of these findings. The fixation type or source of the graft used was not found to influence union rates either. Sufficiently designed and powered prospective randomized controlled trials in this area are needed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(5):549-558.

Bone Morphogenetic Protein in Scaphoid Nonunion: A Systematic Review

Background  Scaphoid nonunion can lead to carpal collapse and osteoarthritis, a painfully debilitating problem. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) has been successfully implemented to augment bone healing in other circumstances, but its use in scaphoid nonunion has yielded conflicting results. Case Description  The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes and complications of scaphoid nonunion treated surgically with BMP. Literature Review  A literature review of all available journal articles citing the use of BMP in scaphoid nonunion surgery from 2002 to 2019 was conducted. We included studies that used BMP as an adjunct to surgical treatment for scaphoid nonunions in both the primary and revision settings with computed tomography determination of union. Demographic information, dose of BMP, tobacco use, outcomes, and complications were recorded. A total of 21 cases were included from four different studies meeting inclusion criteria. Clinical Relevance  The union rates were 90.5% overall, 100% for primary surgeries, and 77.8% for revision surgeries. Five patients (24%) experienced 11 complications, including four cases (19%) of heterotrophic ossification. Use of BMP in scaphoid nonunion surgery resulted in a 90.5% overall union rate but was also associated with complications such as heterotopic ossification. All included studies used BMP to augment bone graft, screw or wire fixation, or a combination of methods. The efficacy of BMP in scaphoid nonunion is unclear, and a sufficiently powered, randomized controlled trial is needed to determine optimal fixation methods, dosing, and morbidity of the use of BMP. Level of Evidence  This is a Level IC, therapeutic interventional study.

Pedicled vascularized versus non-vascularized bone grafts in the treatment of scaphoid non-union: a meta-analysis of comparative studies

BACKGROUND

Whether pedicled vascularized bone grafts (PVBGs) are beneficial over non-vascularized bone grafts (NVBGs) still remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of PVBGs and NVBGs for the treatment of scaphoid non-union.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-analysis of the published studies comparing outcomes of these two different surgical techniques for scaphoid non-union. Outcomes of union rate, time to union, functional results and re-operation rate were analysed.

RESULTS

Seven studies including four randomized controlled studies and three retrospective comparative studies with 413 participants were identified fitting inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that (i) union rate in PVBG groups was 1.13 times of NVBG groups (P = 0.002); (ii) the PVBG groups reached bone union significantly earlier by 1.73 weeks (P < 0.01); (iii) there was no significant difference in functional results, including active range of motion, grip strength, Mayo Wrist Score and excellent and good rate (P > 0.05); and (iv) re-operation rate was similar between the two groups (P = 0.65).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the PVBG technique attains higher union rate and earlier union, this radiological advantage does not bring any functional benefits. In addition, PVBGs are of greater technical difficulty and need more operation requirements. Hence, clinicians should be cautious in electing PVBGs for treating scaphoid non-union.

The use of pedicled vascularized bone grafts in the treatment of scaphoid nonunion: clinical results, graft options and indications

Scaphoid nonunion is a challenging situation for orthopaedic surgeons. Nonunion rate is especially high in proximal pole fractures of the scaphoid due to tenuous retrograde blood supply.The use of pedicled vascularized bone grafts for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion provides both good clinical and radiological outcomes.The preserved vascularity of the graft leads to better bone remodelling, less osteopenia, faster incorporation and better maintenance of bone mass compared to the conventional non-vascularized grafting.Pedicled vascularized bone grafts also allow the correction of the carpal alignment and humpback deformity of the scaphoid.Clinical and radiological results have been satisfactory and promising, making us anticipate that the role of vascularized bone grafting for the treatment of carpal diseases will increase. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:1-8. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190021.

Scaphoid Reconstruction

Surgical strategies for scaphoid nonunions become more complex based on time from injury to treatment. The decision-making process, however, can follow a logical sequence. Scaphoid nonunions less than 1 year after trauma and no carpal malalignment can be treated with percutaneous screw fixation under fluoroscopic and/or arthroscopic guidance. Reinterventions or patients with avascular proximal poles that do not need substantial grafts are reliably treated with pedicle vascularized bone grafts. Resection of the distal pole of the scaphoid is a good option in old nonunions or after a failed scaphoid procedures. When there are radioscaphoid degenerative changes, salvage procedures such as proximal row carpectomy (PRC) should be considered.

The Efficacy of Vascularized Bone Grafts in the Treatment of Scaphoid Nonunions and Kienbock Disease: A Systematic Review in 917 Patients

Background Vascularized bone grafts have become one of the first treatment options for scaphoid nonunions and Kienböck's disease. The aim of this study is to review the current body of the literature regarding the use of four vascularized bone grafts (1,2 ICSRA [1,2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery] graft, 4+5 ECA [4+5 extracompartmental artery] graft, volar radial graft, and free medial femoral condyle graft) in these pathologies. Patients and Methods A search on MEDLINE and Google Scholar was performed. Exclusion criteria included language other than English, studies with no full text available, case reports, letters, editorials, and review articles. The primary outcomes included consolidation rate of the grafts and time to union regarding scaphoid nonunion, as well as the clinical outcomes (pain, grip strength, range of motion), revascularization of the lunate, and progression of the disease regarding Kienböck's disease. Results A total of 37 articles were included in the study enrolling 917 patients. Regarding scaphoid nonunion, the consolidation rate was 86.3% for the 1,2 ICSRA graft, 93.9% for the volar radial bone graft, and 88.8% for the free medial femoral condyle graft. In patients with Kienböck's disease, progression of the disease was observed in 13% of patients, and grip strength and pain were substantially improved whereas range of motion did not demonstrate statistically significant improvement ( p < 0.05). Conclusion Vascularized bone grafts yield successful outcomes in patients with scaphoid nonunions demonstrating a high union rate. In patients with Kienböck's disease, vascularized grafts lead to revascularization of the lunate in most of the cases with concomitant improvement of the clinical parameters.

Clinical and functional outcomes of vascularized bone graft in the treatment of scaphoid non-union

Introduction

Scaphoid non-union is a challenging and complex problem. Various methods have been proposed for the management of patients with scaphoid non-union and to reduce the risk of complications. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of using a vascularized bone graft in the treatment of scaphoid non-union.

Methods

Patients with scaphoid non-union who underwent 1,2 intercompartmental supraretinacular artery pedicled vascularized bone graft between January 2005 and January 2011 were enrolled. The parameters assessed included clinical and functional outcomes, radiological measures, and potential risk factors.

Results

Forty-one patients were finally included. Thirty patients achieved union (73%) and 11 did not. Smoking was a significant risk factor for non-union after the surgery. In patients who achieved union, grip strength and radioulnar abduction were greater in comparison to that in patients who did not achieve union. Functional measures, including the Disabilities of Arm and Shoulder score and the Modified Mayo Wrist Score, improved in patients with scaphoid union. The scaphoid length also improved significantly postoperatively in these patients.

Conclusion

Surgical treatment of scaphoid non-union using vascularized bone graft led to a high union rate with good clinical and functional outcomes. Smoking is a risk factor for non-union, even with the use of a vascularized bone graft. Avascular necrosis was not associated with an increased risk for non-union.

Non-vascularized iliac bone grafting for scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis

We present the surgical outcomes of non-vascularized bone grafting taken from the iliac crest in 24 patients with scaphoid nonunion and avascular necrosis. The Fisk-Fernandez technique was used in 11 patients, and cancellous bone grafting was used in 13 patients. Bony union was achieved in 22 of the 24 patients. Non-vascularized iliac bone grafting can be used for the surgical management of scaphoid nonunion with avascular necrosis. Although revascularization of the proximal fragment after surgery was not evaluated, bony union was confirmed in nearly all patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Comparative meta-analysis on the various vascularized bone flaps used for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion

We did a meta-analysis of the literature in order to clarify which of the vascularized bone flaps (VBF) used for scaphoid non-union treatment has the best outcome with regard to various parameters. We analyzed 54 articles that present nine different types of VBF. The analysis concerned demographical patient information, radiographic parameters, fracture classification, including the presence or non-presence of avascular necrosis of the scaphoid proximal pole (PP AVN), parameters that have to do with the surgery itself and the postoperative protocol, the healing of the nonunion and functional scores. The meta-analysis showed best healing potential for the femoral graft despite the complexity of the operation. On the other hand, the most commonly used 1,2-ICSRA flap makes the procedure more reproducible but showed worse results. The femoral flap was also among the most successful flaps when used for patients with PP AVN. The consolidation rate, in general, was not affected by the time elapsed between the fracture and the operation but by smoking and the presence of PP AVN. The meta-analysis could not reach many significant statistical conclusions because of either the small number of patients in some flap groups or the heterogeneity and lack of documentation in most of the articles. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:1076-1085, 2017.

Treatment of Scaphoid Nonunion: A Systematic Review of the Existing Evidence

PURPOSE

To determine by systematic review the optimal treatment of scaphoid nonunion.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of proportions to investigate the comparative effectiveness of different surgical techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 48 publications (1,602 patients) met the eligibility criteria. Vascularized and nonvascularized bone grafts had an estimated union incidence of 92% and 88%, respectively. Distal radius and iliac crest bone grafts had similar union rates (89% and 87%, respectively) but harvesting of iliac crest bone grafts had more complications. Both screw and K-wire fixation had a higher incidence of union (88% and 91%, respectively) than no fixation (79%). No approach was statistically different. Patients fixed with screws were mobilized earlier than those with K-wire fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence does not demonstrate a significantly superior method for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion. A multicenter randomized trial would be ideal but the large numbers that would be required may make this unrealistic. We recommend the continued reporting of series with specific assessments and outcome measures to optimize future comparisons in an attempt to determine the best management of scaphoid nonunion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of bone grafts and the methods of their fixation for scaphoid nonunion are debated issues in hand and wrist surgery, with multiple methods employed. There is no current consensus on optimal treatment. A meta-analysis of proportions of available data from recent studies was deemed the most appropriate way to assimilate the available evidence with the view to inform surgeons of the optimal treatment according to the evidence base.