The effect of femoral orientation on the measurement of the head shaft angle: an ex-vivo study

Neck-shaft angle measurement in children: accuracy of the conventional radiography-based (2D) methods compared to 3D reconstructions

Aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of widely used conventional radiography-based (2D) neck-shaft angle measurements compared to 3D reconstruction. In our retrospective study, EOS 2D/3D images of 156 patients (312 limbs) were selected from our database (4-16 years old: 6 girls and 6 boys/year), where no pathology was revealed. Using the 2D modality of the EOS method neck-shaft angle was measured using the "biggest diameter" and "circle fitting" techniques to define the femoral neck axis and 1/3, 1/2 and full femur to determine the femoral shaft axis. EOS 3D reconstructions of same images were also performed and a comparison of 2D and 3D results was made. We did not find any significant difference between accuracy of the four examined 2D methods, although the deviation between 2 and 3D results was considerable (average difference: 5.11-5.58°, p < 0,001). In 31% of the cases, difference was more than 10°. Only femoral torsion showed significant influence on the difference (correlation coefficient: 0.380, p < 0.001). We did not find a clinically significant difference between the examined 2D methods, although their accuracy was highly questionable compared to 3D results. We suggest using any 3D imaging method for surgical planning and in uncertain cases.

Effect of positioning error on the Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angle and the head-shaft angle compared to the femoral neck-shaft angle in children with cerebral palsy

Children with cerebral palsy (CP) often have changes in proximal femoral geometry. Neck-shaft angle (NSA), Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angle (HEA) and head-shaft angle (HSA) are used to measure these changes. The impact of femoral rotation on HEA/HSA and of ab/adduction on HEA/HSA/NSA is not well known. This study aimed to determine and compare the effect of rotation, ab/adduction and flexion/extension on HEA/HSA/NSA. Radiographic measurements from 384 patients with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels I-V were utilized. NSA/HSA for affected hips were used with femoral anteversion averages to create three-dimensional models of 694 hips in children with CP. Each hip was rotated, ab/adducted and flexed/extended to simulate malpositioning. HEA/HSA/NSA of each model were measured in each joint position, and differences from correct positioning were determined. Mean HEA error at 20° of internal/external rotations were -0.60°/3.17°, respectively, with the NSA error of -6.56°/9.94° and the HSA error of -3.69°/1.21°. Each degree of ab/adduction added 1° of the HEA error, with no NSA/HSA error. NSA was most sensitive to flexion. Error for all measures increased with increasing GMFCS level. HEA/HSA were minimally impacted by rotation. NSA error was much higher than HEA/HSA in internal rotation and flexion whereas HEA was sensitive to changes in ab/adduction. Given abduction is more easily detectable on imaging than rotation, HEA may be less affected by positioning errors that are common with children with CP than NSA. HSA was least affected by position changes. HEA/HSA could be robust, complementary measures of hip deformities in children with CP.