Predictors of appointment adherence following operative treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures: which patients are not following up?

Language of Caregiver and Pediatric Day-of-Surgery Cancellations

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationship between language used by a caregiver and day-of-surgery cancellations, and to distinguish whether neighborhood opportunity influences this relationship.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective study of 173 533 children <18 years of age at a single institution who were scheduled for ambulatory surgery from 2017 through 2022. We estimated the odds of day-of-surgery cancellation by caregiver language, stratifying by neighborhood opportunity. We then determined the relative excess risk due to interaction of language other than English (LOE) with neighborhood opportunity.

RESULTS

Day-of-surgery cancellation occurred in 3.7% and 5.2% of children with caregivers using English and LOE, respectively (P < .001). Children from disadvantaged neighborhoods with caregivers using English had 23% lower odds of cancellation than those using LOE for care (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.71-0.85; P < .001). Children from advantaged neighborhoods with caregivers using English had 38% lower odds of cancellation than those using LOE for care (OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.52-0.72; P < .001). The interaction between language and neighborhood advantage was not significant, indicating that neighborhood advantage does not appear to buffer those using LOE from cancellations (relative excess risk due to interaction: -0.06, 95%CI -0.21 to 0.08; P = .40).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with caregivers using LOE for care experience higher odds of day-of-surgery cancellation than children with caregivers using English, regardless of neighborhood opportunity. Decreasing language barriers is key to equitable surgery access.

Insurance Payor Status and Outcomes in Pediatric Sports-Related Injuries: A Rapid Review

Introduction: The rise in youth sports participation has led to an increase in pediatric sports-related injuries in the United States, contributing to growing healthcare costs and exacerbating socioeconomic disparities. Insurance payor status is a critical factor influencing access to care, treatment delays, and health outcomes. This study examines the association between insurance payor status and outcomes in pediatric sports-related injuries. Methods: A systematic review of the Medline database was conducted. Included studies reported insurance payor status and pediatric sports orthopedic patient outcomes following surgery. Outcomes included time to be seen by a provider, treatment access, complication and revision rates, postoperative Emergency Department (ED)/Urgent Care utilization, readmission rates, hospital length of stay, pain, functional scores, discharge destinations, return to activity, and follow-up. Results: A total of 35 studies comprising 535,891 pediatric patients were included. Publicly insured or uninsured patients consistently experienced significant delays in accessing care, with average wait times for clinic visits, imaging, and surgery up to six times longer compared to privately insured patients. These delays were associated with worsened injury severity, higher rates of postoperative complications, and poorer functional outcomes. Publicly insured patients were less likely to receive advanced treatments such as bracing or physical therapy, further compounding disparities. Minority groups faced delays even when controlling for insurance status. Conclusions: Public and uninsured pediatric patients face systemic barriers to timely and equitable care, resulting in worse outcomes following sports-related injuries. Future research should explore targeted solutions to ensure equitable care for this vulnerable population.

Is Limited English Proficiency Associated With Differences in Care Processes and Treatment Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Orthopaedic Surgery? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Approximately 25 million people in the United States have limited English proficiency. Current developments in orthopaedic surgery, such as the expansion of preoperative education classes or patient-reported outcome collection in response to bundled payment models, may exacerbate language-related barriers. Currently, there are mixed findings of the associations between limited English proficiency and care processes and outcomes, warranting a cross-study synthesis to identify patterns of associations.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review, we asked: Is limited English proficiency associated with (1) differences in clinical care processes, (2) differences in care processes related to patient engagement, and (3) poorer treatment outcomes in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery in English-speaking countries?

METHODS

On June 9, 2023, a systematic search of four databases from inception through the search date (PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) was performed by a medical librarian. Potentially eligible articles were observational studies that examined the association between limited English proficiency and the prespecified categories of outcomes among pediatric and adult patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery or receiving care in an orthopaedic surgery setting. We identified 10,563 records, of which we screened 6966 titles and abstracts after removing duplicates. We reviewed 56 full-text articles and included 29 peer-reviewed studies (outcome categories: eight for clinical care processes, 10 for care processes related to patient engagement, and 15 for treatment outcomes), with a total of 362,746 patients or encounters. We extracted data elements including study characteristics, definition of language exposure, specific outcomes, and study results. The quality of each study was evaluated using adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scales for cohort or cross-sectional studies. Most studies had a low (48%) or moderate (45%) risk of bias, but two cross-sectional studies had a high risk of bias. To answer our questions, we synthesized associations and no-difference findings, further stratified by adjusted versus unadjusted estimates, for each category of outcomes. No meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

There were mixed findings regarding whether limited English proficiency is associated with differences in clinical care processes, with the strongest adjusted associations between non-English versus English as the preferred language and delayed ACL reconstruction surgery and receipt of neuraxial versus general anesthesia for other non-Spanish versus English primary language in patients undergoing THA or TKA. Limited English proficiency was also associated with increased hospitalization costs for THA or TKA but not opioid prescribing in pediatric patients undergoing surgery for fractures. For care processes related to patient engagement, limited English proficiency was consistently associated with decreased patient portal use and decreased completion of patient-reported outcome measures per adjusted estimates. The exposure was also associated with decreased virtual visit completion for other non-Spanish versus English language and decreased postoperative opioid refill requests after TKA but not differences in attendance-related outcomes. For treatment outcomes, limited English proficiency was consistently associated with increased hospital length of stay and nonhome discharge per adjusted estimates, but not hospital returns. There were mixed findings regarding associations with increased complications and worse postoperative patient-reported outcome measure scores.

CONCLUSION

Findings specifically suggest the need to remove language-based barriers for patients to engage in care, including for patient portal use and patient-reported outcome measure completion, and to identify mechanisms and solutions for increased postoperative healthcare use. However, interpretations are limited by the heterogeneity of study parameters, including the language exposure. Future research should include more-precise and transparent definitions of limited English proficiency and contextual details on available language-based resources to support quantitative syntheses.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Factors Influencing Compliance to Follow-up Visits in Orthopaedic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Orthopaedic procedures require postoperative follow-up to maximize recovery. Missed appointments and noncompliance can result in complications and increased healthcare costs. This study investigates the relationship between patient postoperative visit attendance and the distance traveled to receive care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all surgeries performed by a single orthopaedic surgeon in 2019 at level 1 trauma center in a midsized city serving a largely rural population was completed. We excluded patients who underwent another subsequent procedure. Distance to care and time traveled were determined by the patient's address and the clinic address using Google Maps Application Programming Interface. Other variables that may affect attendance at follow-up visits were also collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was done with purposeful selection.

RESULTS

We identified 518 patients of whom 32 (6%) did not attend their first scheduled follow-up appointment. An additional 47 (10%) did not attend their second follow-up. In total, 79 patients (15%) did not attend one of their appointments. Younger age, male sex, Black or African American race, self-pay, Medicaid insurance, accident insurance, and increased distance were individual predictors of missing an appointment. In the final multivariate logistic regression model, male sex (OR 1.74), Black or African American race (OR 2.78), self-pay (OR 3.12), Medicaid (OR 3.05), and traveling more than 70 miles to clinic (OR 2.02) markedly predicted missing an appointment, while workers' compensation (OR 0.23) predicted attendance.

DISCUSSION

Several nonmodifiable patient factors predict patient noncompliance in attending orthopaedic postoperative visits. When patients are considered at high risk of being lost to follow-up, there may be an opportunity to implement interventions to improve follow-up rate and patient outcomes, minimize patient costs, and maximize profitability for the hospital.