A preliminary study of volatile agents or total intravenous anesthesia for neurophysiological monitoring during posterior spinal fusion in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis

Comparison of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring between propofol and remimazolam during total intravenous anesthesia in the cervical spine surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and remifentanil is frequently used to optimize intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM), the exact effect of remimazolam on IONM remains unknown. Here, we compared the effects of propofol and remimazolam along with remifentanil on IONM during TIVA.

METHODS

In this prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, 64 patients requiring IONM during cervical spine surgery were administered either propofol (Group P) or remimazolam (Group R). The preoperative latencies of the somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP; N20 for the median nerve and P37 for the tibial nerve) were measured. SEP latencies and amplitudes and motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes were measured 30 min after anesthetic induction (T1), 30 min after surgical incision (T2), after laminectomy or discectomy (T3), immediately after plate insertion or pedicle screw fixation (T4), and before surgical wound closure (T5). The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the N20 latency changes measured at T1 and preoperatively.

RESULTS

The change in SEP latencies including N20 and P37 at T1 compared with preoperative time was not significantly different between Groups P and R. Except for the amplitude of the right abductor brevis, there was no significant group-by-time interaction effect for intraoperative MEP amplitudes or SEP latencies and amplitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

TIVA with remimazolam and remifentanil for cervical spine surgery yielded stable IONM, comparable to those observed with conventional TIVA with propofol and remifentanil. Further clinical trials are needed in other surgical contexts and with more diverse patient populations to determine the effects of remimazolam on IONM.

Impact of low-dose sevoflurane with propofol-based anesthesia on motor-evoked potentials in infants: a single-arm crossover pilot study

PURPOSE

The influence of anesthetic interactions on motor-evoked potentials in infants has rarely been reported. In infants, adding a small dose of sevoflurane to propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia is reasonable for reducing propofol administration. We collected preliminary data regarding the effect of low-dose sevoflurane in propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on motor-evoked potentials in infants.

METHODS

This pilot interventional study included 10 consecutive infants requiring motor-evoked potentials between January 2023 and March 2024. The motor-evoked potential amplitudes in the upper and lower extremities were recorded twice when general anesthesia was maintained using (1) propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia and (2) 0.1-0.15 age-adjusted minimum alveolar concentration sevoflurane + propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia.

RESULTS

The motor-evoked potential amplitude in the right upper extremity was not significantly different after the addition of a small dose of sevoflurane [192 (75.3-398) μV, 121 (57.7-304) μV, P = 0.19]. All the motor-evoked potential amplitudes in the right lower extremity (quadriceps femoris, anterior tibialis, and gastrocnemius muscles) were significantly attenuated by adding a small dose of sevoflurane (median [interquartile range]: 47.9 [35.4-200] μV, 25.2 [12.4-55.3] μV, P = 0.014; 74.2 [51.9-232] μV, 31.2 [2.7-64] μV, P = 0.0039; 29.8 [20-194] μV, 9.9 [3.8-92.4] μV, P = 0.0039, respectively). Similar results were observed in the left lower extremities.

CONCLUSION

Adding even 0.1-0.15 age-adjusted minimum alveolar concentration sevoflurane to propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia attenuated the motor-evoked potential amplitudes in the lower extremities. A further prospective interventional study with an appropriate sample size is required to investigate the study hypothesis.

Use of a Novel Buffered Hypertonic Saline Solution for Fluid Replacement and Resuscitation During Spinal Surgery in Adolescents

Background

During major orthopedic procedures, such as posterior spinal fusion (PSF), isotonic fluids, colloids, starches, or gelatins are commonly used to replace the preoperative fluid deficit and provide ongoing fluid resuscitation. Given recent concerns regarding the potential adverse physiologic effects of albumin solutions, we have modified our intraoperative practice to include the use of a novel 2% buffered hypertonic saline solution during major orthopedic procedures. We present our preliminary clinical experience with this novel fluid for intraoperative resuscitation and its impact on limiting the use of 5% albumin.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who received 2% buffered hypertonic saline during PSF. The intraoperative course of these patients was compared to case-matched control patients who received standard care with isotonic fluids plus 5% albumin as an adjunct for intravascular resuscitation.

Results

The study cohort included 23 patients who received 2% buffered hypertonic saline and 25 in the case-matched control group. There was no difference in the volume of intraoperative isotonic crystalloid fluids, estimated blood loss, and urine output between the two groups. In the control cohort, 19 of 25 patients (76%) received 5% albumin compared to only six of 23 patients (26%, P = 0.0005) in the 2% buffered hypertonic saline group. The final pH was higher in the patients that received 2% buffered hypertonic saline than in the control group (7.40 ± 0.03 versus 7.36 ± 0.06, P = 0.0131). Additionally, the starting and final serum sodium values were higher in the patients that received 2% buffered hypertonic saline, although no difference was noted in the mean change from the starting value (average increase of 2 mEq/L in both groups).

Conclusion

Use of a novel 2% buffered hypertonic saline solution for intraoperative resuscitation during major orthopedic procedures decreases the need for 5% albumin while avoiding the development of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis which may occur with standard sodium chloride solutions.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in scoliosis surgery: literature review of the last 10 years

INTRODUCTION

Patients with spinal deformities undergoing corrective surgery are at risk for iatrogenic spinal cord injury (SCI) and subsequent neurological deficit. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) allows early detection of SCI which enables early intervention resulting in a better prognosis. The primary aim of this literature review was to search if there are threshold values of TcMEP and SSEP in the literature that are widely accepted as alert during IONM. The secondary aim was to update knowledge concerning IONM during scoliosis surgery.

METHOD

PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane library electronic databases were used to search publication from 2012 to 2022. The following keywords were used: evoked potential, scoliosis, surgery, intraoperative monitoring and neurophysiological. We included all studies dealing with SSEP and TcMEP monitoring during scoliosis surgery. Two authors reviewed all titles and abstracts to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We included 43 papers. Rates of IONM alert and neurological deficit varied from 0.56 to 64% and from 0.15 to 8.3%, respectively. Threshold values varied from a loss of 50 to 90% for TcMEP amplitude, whereas it seems that a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted for SSEP. Causes of IONM changes most frequently reported were surgical maneuver.

CONCLUSION

Concerning SSEP, a loss of 50% in amplitude and/or an increase of 10% of latency is widely accepted as an alert. For TcMEP, it seems that the use of highest threshold values can avoid unnecessary surgical procedure for the patient without increasing risk of neurological deficit.

Low-dose sevoflurane co-administered with propofol-based general anaesthesia obliterates intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring in an infant

The influence of general anaesthetic agents on intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring in neonates and infants has rarely been reported. Propofol-based anaesthesia is recommended to avoid suppression of neurophysiological monitoring. However, the administration of propofol in children undergoing prolonged procedures, especially those younger than six months, should be carefully controlled due to the potential risk of propofol infusion syndrome. Adding a small dose of inhalational anaesthetic can be an option to reduce propofol requirements. Recent guidelines in Japan suggest limiting inhalational anaesthetics to less than 0.5 minimum alveolar concentrations when co-administered with low-dose propofol during intra-operative neuromonitoring. However, there is still insufficient evidence regarding the impact of sevoflurane on neurophysiological monitoring when co-administered with propofol in infants. This report describes a case of a three-month-old infant undergoing spinal lipoma resection in which there was a dramatic suppression of neurophysiological monitoring with the addition of 0.35-0.45% sevoflurane to propofol-based anaesthesia.

Effects of dexmedetomidine on evoked potentials in spinal surgery under combined intravenous inhalation anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the effects of different doses of dexmedetomidine (Dex) on evoked potentials in adult patients undergoing spinal surgery under intravenous anesthesia with low-concentration desflurane.

METHODS

Ninety patients were divided into three groups at random. To maintain anesthesia in the control group (group C), desflurane 0.3 MAC (minimal alveolar concentration), propofol, and remifentanil were administered. Dex (0.5 μg·kg^-1) was injected for 10 min as a loading dose in the low-dose Dex group (group DL), then adjusted to 0.2 μg·kg^-1·h^-1 until the operation was completed. Dex (1 μg·kg^-1) was injected for 10 min as a loading dose in the high-dose Dex group (group DH), then adjusted to 0.7 μg·kg^-1·h^-1 until the operation was completed. The additional medications were similar to those given to group C. The perioperative hemodynamics, body temperature, intraoperative drug dosages, fluid volume, urine volume, blood loss, the latency and amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) at four different time points, the incidence of positive cases of SEPs and transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs), and perioperative adverse reactions were all recorded.

RESULTS

Data from 79 patients were analyzed. The MAP measured at points T2-T4 in group DH was higher than at corresponding points in group C (P < 0.05). The MAP at point T4 in group DL was higher than at corresponding points in group C (P < 0.05). The remifentanil dosage in group DH was significantly lower than in group C (P = 0.015). The fluid volume in group DL was significantly lower than in group C (P = 0.009). There were no significant differences among the three groups in the amplitude and latency of SEP at different time points, nor in the incidence of warning SEP signals. The incidence of positive tcMEP signals did not differ significantly between groups C and DL (P > 0.05), but was significantly higher in group DH than in groups DL (P < 0.05) or C (P < 0.05). The incidence of intraoperative hypertension was significantly higher in group DH than in group C (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose Dex has no effect on the SEPs and tcMEPs monitoring during spinal surgery. High-dose Dex has no effect on SEPs monitoring, but it may increase the rate of false positive tcMEPs signals and the incidence of intraoperative hypertension.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study has completed the registration of the Chinese Clinical Trial Center at 11/09/2020 with the registration number ChiCTR2000038154.

Protocol-driven early tracheal extubation in patients with flaccid neuromuscular scoliosis and pre-existing lung disease

PURPOSE

To review the results of a postoperative respiratory pathway for patients with muscular dystrophy (MD) and spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) undergoing spinal surgery.

METHODS

With IRB approval, a retrospective review was done on all patients with SMA and MD undergoing spinal surgery on a neuromuscular protocol. Baseline demographics, perioperative results, and long-term outcomes were collected. Per the protocol, patients remained intubated after surgery and were transported to the intensive care unit (ICU) for extubation. We present the results of protocol implementation and compare patients with MD to those with SMA.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients were treated using the protocol. Average age was 13.1 years. Severe restrictive lung disease was present in 75% of patients. Nocturnal BiPAP was required in 68% of patients. Average number of instrumented levels was 17. All patients were immediately extubated upon entering the ICU. There were three respiratory complications and only was patient was re-intubated. Average ICU stay was 1.8 days and average hospital length of stay was 6.7 days. No differences in postoperative inspiratory or expiratory positive airway pressures were observed between the MD and SMA groups.

CONCLUSION

Through a multidisciplinary neuromuscular protocol, excellent clinical outcomes were achieved in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis and restrictive lung disease, with complication rates and length of stay significantly lower than previously published data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in paediatric neurosurgery

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is commonly used in various surgical procedures in adults, but with technological and anaesthetic advancements, its use has extended to the paediatric population. The use of IONM in children poses a unique set of challenges considering the anatomical and physiological differences in this group of patients. The use of IONM aids in the localization of neural structures and enables surgeons to preserve the functional neural structures leading to decreased incidence of postoperative neurological deficits and better patient outcomes. In this article, we review the use of IONM in paediatric patients undergoing various spinal and cranial neurosurgical procedures. We discuss the patient characteristics, type of surgeries, and technical and anaesthetic considerations about IONM in this population.

Influence of hemorrhage and subsequent fluid resuscitation on transcranial motor-evoked potentials under desflurane anesthesia in a swine model

PURPOSE

Hemorrhage increases the effect of propofol and could contribute to false-positive transcranial motor-evoked potential (TcMEP) responses under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). We investigated the influence of hemorrhage and subsequent fluid resuscitation on TcMEPs under desflurane anesthesia.

METHODS

Sixteen swine (25.4 ± 0.4 kg) were anesthetized with a 4% end-tidal desflurane concentration (EtDes), which was incrementally increased to 6%, 8%, and 10% and then returned to 4% every 15 min. This procedure was repeated twice (baseline). After baseline measurements, animals were allocated to either the hemorrhage (n = 12) or control (n = 4) group. In the hemorrhage group, 600 ml of blood was removed and the EtDes protocol described above was applied. Hypovolemia was resuscitated using 600 ml of hydroxyethyl starch and the EtDes protocol was applied again. TcMEPs were measured at each EtDes. In the control group, measurements were performed without hemorrhage or fluid infusion.

RESULTS

TcMEP responses were observed in all conditions in all limbs with 4% EtDes (0.4 MAC). TcMEP amplitudes decreased according to the EtDes to a greater degree in the lower limbs compared with the upper limbs. Hemorrhage enhanced the effect of desflurane on TcMEP amplitudes, and decreased TcMEP by 41 ± 12% in upper limbs and 63 ± 17% in lower limbs compared with baseline. Subsequent fluid resuscitation did not reverse TcMEP amplitudes.

CONCLUSIONS

TcMEP amplitudes decrease during hemorrhage under desflurane anesthesia. This phenomenon might result from an enhanced effect of desflurane on the spinal motor pathway without increasing the desflurane concentration.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in idiopathic scoliosis surgery: a retrospective observational study of new neurologic deficits

PURPOSE

Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing corrective surgery are at risk for iatrogenic spinal cord injury and subsequent new neurologic deficits (NNDs). Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) has been used to identify spinal cord injury; however, available data showing that IONM leads to improved clinical outcomes are inconclusive. This exploratory study aimed to examine the incidence of NNDs after idiopathic scoliosis surgery in two pediatric institutions in Canada with a focus on IONM use.

METHODS

Charts of pediatric patients (10-18 yr) with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent scoliosis correction surgery were retrospectively identified from the operating room database. Data regarding incidence and severity (mild [isolated sensory deficit] vs severe [any motor deficit]) of NNDs as well as demographic and clinical characteristics were extracted.

RESULTS

Of 547 patients reviewed, 359 (66%) underwent IONM and 186 (34%) underwent wake-up test. Neuromonitoring data were missing in two patients. Total incidence of NNDs was 4.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1 to 6.8). Compared with the wake-up test, patients undergoing IONM were less likely to develop NNDs (unadjusted odds ratio, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.86; P = 0.02). Nevertheless, subgroup analysis did not reveal a statistical difference in severity of those deficits (mild vs severe) with IONM vs wake-up test. Combined anterior and posterior approach was also significantly associated with increased risk of such deficits.

CONCLUSION

This exploratory study revealed that IONM was associated with a reduced overall incidence of NNDs in idiopathic scoliosis correction; however, its impact on the severity of those deficits is questionable. As we were unable to adjust for confounding variables, further research is needed to determine the impact of IONM on NNDs.

A Retrospective Study of Surgical Correction for Spinal Deformity with and without Osteotomy to Compare Outcome Using Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring with Evoked Potentials

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different combined evoked potentials monitoring modes for non-osteotomy and osteotomy surgery of spinal deformity, and to select individualized modes for various surgeries. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed a total of 188 consecutive cases undergoing spinal deformity correction. All patients were classified into 2 cohorts: non-osteotomy (Group A) and osteotomy (Group B). According to intraoperative evoked potential monitoring mode, Group A was divided into 2 sub-groups: A1 [spinal somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP)/motor evoked potential (MEP), n=67)] and A2 [SSEP/MEP/descending neurogenic evoked potential (DNEP), n=52]. Group B was classified as B1 (SSEP/MEP, n=27) and B2 (SSEP/MEP/DNEP, n=42). The demographics, surgical parameters, and evoked potential events of different combined monitoring modes were analyzed within each group. RESULTS The baselines of SSEP/MEP/DNEP in all cases were elicited successfully. Three cases with evoked potential (EP) events (2 with MEP changes and 1 with SSEP/MEP change) were noted in Group A1 and 1 with SSEP change in Group A2, with no neurological complications. Thirteen cases in Group B1 were positive for MEP intraoperatively, including 16 EP events (13 with MEP change and 3 with both SSEP+MEP changes), with no neural complications. In Group B2, 15 cases had 21 EP events, including 12 with MEP change and 2 with SSEP+MEP changes, with no complications. Postoperative neurological complications were observed in 5 of the 7 cases with SS4EP/DNEP changes. CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative simultaneous SSEP/MEP can effectively reflect neurological function in non-osteotomy spinal surgery patients. Simultaneous SSEP/MEP/DNEP can effectively avoid the unnecessary interference by false-positive results of MEP during osteotomy.

Impact of Intraoperative Fluid Management on Electrolyte and Acid-Base Variables During Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescents

Introduction

Various isotonic fluids may be used to maintain intravascular homeostasis during major surgical procedures. Variations in the electrolyte and buffer concentrations between these solutions may result in differential changes in electrolyte and acid-base status during fluid resuscitation. This study evaluates these changes during posterior spinal fusion in adolescents.

Methods

Patients were randomized to receive lactated Ringers (LR), normal saline (NS) or Normosol-R® (NR) during posterior spinal fusion (N=19, 20, and 20, respectively). The specific fluid was used for maintenance fluids as well as fluid replacement of deficits, third space losses, and blood loss.

Results

Patients who received NS had a greater base deficit (NS: −2.0 ± 2.2 vs NR −0.6 ± 1.8, p=0.031 or LR: −0.2 ± 1.7, p=0.007) and were more likely to have a ≥2 point change in the base deficit (60% with NS compared to 30% with NR and 47% with LR). Patients receiving NS also had a lower pH (NS: 7.37 ± 0.03 vs NR: 7.39 ± 0.04, p=0.013) and a greater change in pH (NS: −0.03 ± 0.04 vs NR: 0.01 ± 0.06).

Conclusion

The use of NS for intraoperative resuscitation during posterior spinal fusion in adolescents resulted in a greater base deficit and a lower pH than the use of LR or NR. Although these changes had limited clinical significance in our patient population, future studies are indicated to further investigate the potential clinical impact of these changes.

Consensus document for multimodal intraoperatory neurophisiological monitoring in neurosurgical procedures. Basic fundamentals

The present work aims to establish a guide to action, agreed by anaesthesiologists and neurophysiologists alike, to perform effective intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for procedures presenting a risk of functional neurological injury, and neurosurgical procedures. The first section discusses the main techniques currently used for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The second exposes the anaesthetic and non-anaesthetic factors that are likely to affect the electrical records of the nervous system structures. This section is followed by an analysis detailing the adverse effects associated with the most common techniques and their use. Finally, the last section describes a series of guidelines to be followed upon the various intraoperative clinical events.

Anesthetic Care During Posterior Spinal Fusion in an Adolescent With Ebstein's Anomaly

Ebstein’s anomaly is a rare form of cyanotic congenital heart disease (CHD) that involves malformation and dysfunction of the tricuspid valve and right ventricle (RV). The severity of the defect impacts clinical presentation, survival, and treatment options. Presentation during the neonatal period with hypoxemia and cyanosis is noted in patients with severe tricuspid valve malformation, a hypoplastic RV, or RV outflow tract obstruction. However, presentation later in infancy is more common when there is a moderate tricuspid valve malformation and no associated RV outflow tract obstruction. Although Ebstein’s anomaly is not generally associated with other congenital defects, patients may occasionally require surgery for other comorbid conditions. We describe the perioperative anesthetic management of an adolescent with Ebstein’s anomaly for posterior spinal fusion. Previous reports of anesthetic care in this clinical scenario are reviewed, anesthetic considerations discussed, and options for intraoperative monitoring and anesthetic care presented.

A practical guide for anesthetic management during intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring

Postoperative motor dysfunction can develop after spinal surgery, neurosurgery and aortic surgery, in which there is a risk of injury of motor pathway. In order to prevent such devastating complication, intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials (MEP) has been conducted. However, to prevent postoperative motor dysfunction, proper understanding of MEP monitoring and proper anesthetic managements are required. Especially, a variety of anesthetics and neuromuscular blocking agent are known to attenuate MEP responses. In addition to the selection of anesthetic regime to record the baseline and control MEP, the measures to keep the level of hypnosis and muscular relaxation at constant are crucial to detect the changes of MEP responses after the surgical manipulation. Once the changes of MEP are observed based on the institutional alarm criteria, multidisciplinary team members should share the results of MEP monitoring and respond to check the status of monitoring and recover the possible motor nerve injury. Prevention of MEP-related adverse effects is also important to be considered. The Working Group of Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) developed this practical guide aimed to help ensure safe and successful surgery through appropriate anesthetic management during intraoperative MEP monitoring.

Comparison between effect of desflurane/remifentanil and propofol/remifentanil anesthesia on somatosensory evoked potential monitoring during scoliosis surgery-A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Drugs used in anesthesia can affect somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring, which is used routinely for intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord integrity during spinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether combined total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) technique with propofol/remifentanil is associated with less SSEP suppression when compared to combined volatile agent desflurane/remifentanil anesthesia during corrective scoliosis surgery at a comparable depth of anesthesia.

DESIGN

It is a randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

The study was conducted at the Single tertiary University Hospital during October 2014 to June 2015.

PATIENTS

Patients who required SSEP and had no neurological deficits, and were of American Society of Anesthesiologist I and II physical status, were included. Patients who had sensory or motor deficits preoperatively and significant cardiovascular and respiratory disease were excluded. A total of 72 patients were screened, and 67 patients were randomized and allocated to two groups: 34 in desflurane/remifentanil group and 33 in TIVA group. Four patients from desflurane/remifentanil group and three from TIVA group were withdrawn due to decrease in SSEP amplitude to <0.3 µV after induction of anesthesia. Thirty patients from each group were analyzed.

INTERVENTIONS

Sixty-seven patients were randomized to receive TIVA or desflurane/remifentanil anesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The measurements taken were the amplitude and latency of SSEP monitoring at five different time points during surgery: before and after the induction of anesthesia, at skin incision, at pedicle screw insertion, and at rod insertion.

RESULTS

Both anesthesia techniques, TIVA and desflurane/remifentanil, resulted in decreased amplitude and increased latencies of both cervical and cortical peaks. The desflurane/remifentanil group had a significantly greater reduction in the amplitude ( p = 0.004) and an increase in latency ( p = 0.002) of P40 compared with the TIVA group. However, there were no differences in both amplitude ( p = 0.214) and latency ( p = 0.16) in cervical SSEP between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TIVA technique, desflurane/remifentanil anesthesia caused more suppression in cortical SSEP, but not in cervical SSEP, at a comparable depth of anesthesia.

Safety and efficacy of propofol anesthesia for pediatric target-controlled infusion in children below 3 years of age: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Although the requirement of propofol in children is increasing, propofol for induction and maintenance of anesthesia below 3 years old has not been approved in Korea. This study can provide a clinical evidence to increase the range of approval.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of patients below 3 years of age who underwent surgery between September 2013 and December 2016. Safety was evaluated on the basis of vital signs, and laboratory findings and efficacy were evaluated on the basis of the bispectral index (BIS). Adverse events were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients anesthetized with propofol (propofol group) were compared with 109 patients with volatile anesthetics (volatile group) after propensity score matching. There was a difference in the proportion of patients showing decreased systolic pressure (P < 0.001) and heart rate (P = 0.03), but there was no difference in diastolic pressure (P = 0.238), mean arterial pressure (P = 0.175) during surgery. After surgery, there was no difference in all vital signs and the proportion patients who experienced adverse events of two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Propofol anesthesia by target-controlled infusion was effective and didn't show serious propofol-related perioperative adverse events.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: utility and anesthetic implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) has been rapidly adopted as a standard monitoring technique for a growing number of surgical procedures. This article offers a basic review of IONM and discusses some of its latest applications and anesthetic techniques that optimize monitoring conditions.

RECENT FINDINGS

IONM has been demonstrated to alert the surgical team to potential injury and can also be used to detect impending positioning injuries. Upper extremity somatosensory evoked potential monitoring is particularly helpful in preventing ulnar neuropathy that is more common in patients who are positioned prone and with severe arm abduction. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring has a high specificity for vascular compromise and neurologic ischemia that may occur during neurovascular procedures. Electroencephalography is also helpful in alerting the surgical and anesthesia teams to an impending ischemic event. Although a total intravenous anesthesia technique offers better monitoring conditions, propofol may prolong emergence.

SUMMARY

IONM is commonly used in a growing number and variety of surgical procedures, and has been shown to improve outcomes. IONM poses challenges for the anesthesiologist, but tailoring the anesthetic to be compatible with the monitoring techniques in use can help to prevent surgical complications.

Neuromonitoring in Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Multimodality Approach

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the available intraoperative monitoring techniques and the evidence around their efficacy in vertebral column resection.

METHODS

The history of neuromonitoring and evolution of the modalities are reviewed and discussed. The authors' specific surgical techniques and preferred methods are outlined in detail. In addition, the authors' experience and the literature regarding vertebral column resection and surgical mitigation of neurologic alarms are discussed at length.

RESULTS

Risk factors for signal changes have been identified, including preoperative neurologic deficit, severe kyphosis, increased curve magnitude, and significant cord shortening. Even though no evidence-based treatment algorithm exist for signal changes, strategies are discussed that can help prevent alarms and address them appropriately.

CONCLUSION

Through implementation of multimodal intraoperative monitoring techniques, potential neurologic injuries are localized and managed in real time. Intraoperative monitoring is a valuable tool for improving the safety and outcome of spinal deformity surgery.

Changes in transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials during the early and reversible stage of permanent spinal cord ischemia predict spinal cord injury in a rabbit animal model

The present study examined changes in the transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials (TceMEP) waveform to predict neurological deficits and histopathological changes during the early and reversible stage of different levels of permanent spinal cord ischemic injury in a rabbit animal model. A total of 24 New Zealand rabbits were randomly divided into four groups of 6 rabbits each. Group 1 underwent a ligation of the lumbar artery at three levels (L1-L3), group 2 underwent a ligation of the lumbar artery at four levels (L1-L4) and group 3 underwent a ligation of the lumbar artery at five levels (L1-L5). The sham group contained 6 rabbits and did not receive ligation. TceMEP was recorded within 5 min of ligation and, 2 days later, motor function was assessed and the spinal cords were removed for histological examination. Following spinal cord injury, the relationship between variations in the TceMEP waveform and motor function and pathological damage was analyzed. It was observed that the amplitude of TceMEP began to decrease within 1 min of lumbar artery ligation and that the amplitude stabilized within 5 min. These amplitude changes that occurred within 5 min of different levels of permanent spinal cord ischemic injury were positively related to changes in motor function following recovery from anesthesia and 2 days after ligation. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.980 and 0.923 for these two time points, respectively (P<0.001). In addition, the amplitude changes were positively related to pathological damage, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.945 (P<0.001). The results of the present study suggested that amplitude changes in TceMEP are particularly sensitive to ischemia. Ischemia may be detected within 1 min and the amplitude changes begin to stabilize within 5 min following ligation of the lumbar artery. The use of intraoperative monitoring of TceMEP allows for the detection of spinal cord ischemic injury with no time delay, which may allow for protective measures to be taken to prevent the occurrence of irreversible spinal cord injury.

Preoperative pregabalin has no effect on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion for spinal deformities: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of preoperative pregabalin on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in adolescents undergoing surgery for spinal deformities.

METHODS

Thirty-one adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion were randomized to receive preoperatively either pregabalin 2 mg/kg twice daily or placebo. The ability to make reliable intraoperative neurophysiological measurements, transcranial motor (MEPs) and sensory evoked potentials (SSEP) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Two patients (pregabalin group) did not fulfil the inclusion criteria and one patient's (placebo group) spinal monitoring was technically incomplete and these were excluded from the final data. In the rest, spinal cord monitoring was successful. Anaesthesia prolonged the latency of MEPs and increased the threshold current of MEP. The current required to elicit MEPs did not differ between the study groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups regarding the latency of bilateral SSEP (N32 and P37) and MEP latencies at any time point.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative pregabalin does not interfere spinal cord monitoring in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Prevention of anesthesia-induced injection pain of propofol in pediatric anesthesia

Objective:

Propofol is a new anesthetic agent in clinical practice, but randomized double-blinded prospective studies on its role in pediatric anesthesia remain limited. We aimed to compare the preventive effects of pre-injected lidocaine or ketamine and its pre-mixture on the anesthesia-induced injection pain of propofol using a randomized double-blinded prospective method, and to compare the outcomes with those of medium-/long-chain propofol (M/LCT).

Methods:

A total of 360 pediatric patients (aged 5-12 years old) who received elective surgery were randomly divided into six groups (n= 60) as follows. S group: control group; L group: lidocaine group; L + P group: lidocaine + propofol group; K group: ketamine group; K + P group: ketamine + propofol group; M group: M/LCT group. After the drug fluid completely entered the cubital vein, the venous access was closed. During propofol injection, the injection pain was scored using the VRS 4-point scale. Meanwhile, the heart rates before and during injection were recorded, the adverse reactions during and after injection were observed, and the incidence rate and degree of pain were evaluated.

Results:

The VRS 4-point scale showed that the incidence rates of injection pain of S group, L group, L + P group, K group, K + P group and M group were 78.3%, 66.67%, 51.66%, 43.33%, 48.33% and 45% respectively. The incidence rates of injection pain of all experimental groups were significantly lower than that of S group (P<0.01). The incidence rates of injection pain of L + P group, K group, K + P group and M group were significantly lower than that of L group (P<0.05). The differences among the other groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusions:

Intravenous pre-injection of lidocaine, ketamine or those mixed with propofol can all significantly reduce the incidence rate of injection pain of propofol.

Neurophysiological monitoring and spinal cord integrity

An integral part of a major spine surgery is the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM). By providing continuous functional assessment of specific anatomic structures, IONM allows the rapid detection of neuronal compromise and the opportunity for corrective action before an insult causes permanent neurological damage. Thus, IONM functions not just as a diagnostic tool but may also improve surgical outcomes. Effective clinical application requires a thorough understanding of the scope and limitations of IONM modalities not only by the monitoring team but also by the surgeon and anesthesiologist. Intraoperatively, collaboration and communication between monitorist, surgeon, and anesthesiologist are critical to the effectiveness of IONM. In this study, we review specific monitoring modalities, focusing on the relevant anatomy, physiology, and mechanisms of neuronal injury during major spine surgery. We discuss how these factors interact with anesthetic and surgical management. This review concludes with the current controversies surrounding the evidence in support of IONM and directions of future research.

A prospective, open-label trial of clevidipine for controlled hypotension during posterior spinal fusion

OBJECTIVES

Controlled hypotension is one means to limit or avoid the need for allogeneic blood products. Clevidipine is a short-acting, intravenous calcium channel antagonist with a half-life of 1 to 3 minutes due to rapid metabolism by non-specific blood and tissue esterases. To date, there are no prospective evaluations with clevidipine in the pediatric population. We prospectively evaluated the dosing requirements, efficacy, and safety of clevidipine for ontrolled hypotension during spinal surgery for neuromuscular scoliosis in the pediatric population.

METHODS

Patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis were eligible for inclusion. The study was an open label, observational study. Maintenance anesthesia included desflurane titrated to maintain a bispectral index at 40 to 60 and a remifentanil infusion. Motor and somatosensory evoked potentials were monitored intraoperatively. When the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was ≥ 65 mmHg despite remifentanil at 0.3 mcg/kg/min, clevidipine was added to maintain the MAP at 55 to 65 mmHg. Clevidipine was initiated at 0.25 to 1 mcg/kg/min and titrated up in increments of 0.25 to 1 mcg/kg/min every 3 to 5 minutes to achieve the desired MAP.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 45 patients. Fifteen patients (33.3%) did not require a clevidipine infusion to maintain the desired MAP range, leaving 30 patients including 13 males and 17 females for analysis. These patients ranged in age from 7.9 to 17.4 years (mean ± SD: 13.7 ± 2.2 years) and in weight from 18.9 to 78.1 kg (mean ± SD: 43.4 ± 14.2 kg). Intraoperatively, the clevidipine infusion was stopped in 6 patients as the surgeon expressed concerns regarding spinal cord perfusion and requested a higher MAP than the study protocol allowed. The data until that point were included for analysis. The target MAP was initially achieved at a mean time of 8.9 minutes. Sixteen of the 30 patients (53.3%) achieved the target MAP within 5 minutes. Heart rate (HR) increased from a baseline of 83 ± 16 to 86 ± 15 beats per minute (mean ± SD) (p=0.04) with the administration of clevidipine. No patient had a HR increase ≥ 20 beats per minute or required the administration of a β-adrenergic antagonist. The duration of the clevidipine administration varied from 8 to 527 minutes (mean ± SD: 160 ± 123 minutes). The maintenance infusion rate of clevidipine varied from 0.25 to 5.0 mcg/kg/min (mean ± SD: 1.4 ± 1.1 mcg/kg/min). Clevidipine was paused a total of 43 times in the 30 cases. In 18 of the 30 patients (60%), the clevidipine infusion was temporarily paused more than once due to a MAP < 55 mmHg. A fluid bolus was administered to only 1 patient to treat the low MAP. No patient required the administration of a vasoactive agent for hypotension. When the clevidipine infusion was discontinued as controlled hypotension was no longer required, the MAP returned to baseline or ≥ 65 mmHg within 10 minutes in 12 of the 30 patients (40%).

CONCLUSIONS

Clevidipine can be used to provide controlled hypotension during posterior spinal fusion. The response of the MAP, both the onset and duration of action, were rapid. Although titration of the infusion with occasional pauses of administration may be needed, excessive hypotension was not noted.