Concurrent Use of Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Lumbar Hybrid Procedure for the Treatment of Multilevel Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease: A Prospective Study

Clinical Outcome of Lumbar Hybrid Surgery in a Consecutive Series of Patients With Long-term Follow-up

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study combined with attempted prospective patient contact to collect current data.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing lumbar hybrid surgery (total disk replacement (TDR) at one level and fusion at an adjacent level.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Many patients with symptomatic lumbar disk degeneration are affected at more than one level. Lumbar TDR was introduced as a fusion alternative; however, some disk levels are not amenable to TDR, and fusion is preferable at such levels. Hybrid surgery was introduced as an option to fusing multiple levels.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 305 patients undergoing lumbar hybrid surgery was identified, beginning with the first case experience in 2005. Operative and clinical outcome data, including visual analog scales (VAS) assessing back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and reoperations, were collected. The mean follow-up duration was 67.1 months.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant improvements ( P <0.01) in the mean values of all three clinical outcome measures: VAS back pain scores improved from 6.7 to 3.3; leg pain improved from 4.3 to 2.0; and ODI scores improved from 45.5 to 24.6. There were no significant differences in pain and function scores for patients with a minimum 10-year follow-up versus those with a shorter follow-up duration. Re-operation occurred in 16.1% of patients, many of which involved removal of posterior instrumentation at the fusion level (6.2% of the study group, 38.8% of re-operations). Reoperation involving the TDR level occurred in 9 patients (2.9%), only 3 of which (1.0%) involved TDR removal/revision.

CONCLUSION

This study supports that for many patients with multilevel symptomatic disk degeneration, hybrid surgery is a viable surgical option. Significant improvements were demonstrated in pain and function scores, with no diminished improvement in scores among patients with more than 10-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Characterization of pain-related behaviors in a rat model of acute-to-chronic low back pain: single vs. multi-level disc injury

Introduction

Low back pain is the most common type of chronic pain. We examined pain-related behaviors across 18 weeks in rats that received injury to one or two lumbar intervertebral discs (IVD) to determine if multi-level disc injuries enhance/prolong pain.

Methods

Twenty-three Sprague-Dawley adult female rats were used: 8 received disc puncture (DP) of one lumbar IVD (L5/6, DP-1); 8 received DP of two lumbar IVDs (L4/5 & L5/6, DP-2); 8 underwent sham surgery.

Results

DP-2 rats showed local (low back) sensitivity to pressure at 6- and 12-weeks post-injury, and remote sensitivity to pressure (upper thighs) at 12- and 18-weeks and touch (hind paws) at 6, 12 and 18-weeks. DP-1 rats showed local and remote pressure sensitivity at 12-weeks only (and no tactile sensitivity), relative to Sham DP rats. Both DP groups showed reduced distance traveled during gait testing over multiple weeks, compared to pre-injury; only DP-2 rats showed reduced distance relative to Sham DP rats at 12-weeks. DP-2 rats displayed reduced positive interactions with a novel adult female rat at 3-weeks and hesitation and freezing during gait assays from 6-weeks onwards. At study end (18-weeks), radiological and histological analyses revealed reduced disc height and degeneration of punctured IVDs. Serum BDNF and TNFα levels were higher at 18-weeks in DP-2 rats, relative to Sham DP rats, and levels correlated positively with remote sensitivity in hind paws (tactile) and thighs (pressure).

Discussion

Thus, multi-level disc injuries resulted in earlier, prolonged and greater discomfort locally and remotely, than single-level disc injury. BDNF and TNFα may have contributing roles.

Single-Level Total Disc Replacement: Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Total disc replacement (TDR) has been shown to be effective for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD) in carefully selected patients. Previous studies have demonstrated high rates of patient satisfaction and improvement in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) compared with preoperative status but most have short-term follow-up or small cohort sizes only.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to report mid- to long-term PROMs from the treatment of symptomatic single-level lumbar DDD with TDR.

METHODS

Data collected prospectively concerning single-level TDR performed via an anterior approach were included for analysis. A preoperative assessment was obtained followed by postoperative follow-up assessments at 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly follow-up thereafter. PROMs included patient satisfaction, visual analog score back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 211 patients (118 men, 93 women) operated on between June 1997 and July 2015 were included in this study. Minimum follow-up was 4 years. The average age was 42.2 (range 24-87) years and median follow-up 96 interquartile range 72-132, range 48-120) months. The operative levels were L5-S1 (160, 75.8%) and L4-L5 (61, 24.2%). Both statistically and clinically significant improvements observed postoperatively were maintained at 10 years. In addition, 92% of patients reported either good (n = 29) or excellent satisfaction (n = 155) with treatment at final review.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that single-level lumbar TDR used appropriately in selected patient results in clinically significant improvements in pain and function, well above the minimum clinically important difference, and good to excellent satisfaction in most patients. Further study to define long-term outcomes and survivorship is required.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements can be achieved by single-level lumbar TDR, in the treatment of single-level discogenic axial low back pain, with or without radiculopathy. These outcomes are sustained in the mid- to long-term followup periods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Comparison of Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of Patient-reported Outcomes Measures After Single-level Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty, Multi-level Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty, and the Lumbar Hybrid Procedure for the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to compare the mid- to long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between single-level total disc arthroplasty (TDA), multi-level TDA, and hybrid constructs (combination of TDA and anterior lumbar interbody fusion [ALIF] across multiple levels) for symptomatic degenerative disc disease (DDD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The treatment of single-level DDD is well documented using TDA. However, there is still a paucity of published evidence regarding long-term outcomes on multi-level TDA and hybrid constructs for the treatment of multi-level DDD, as well as lack of long-term comparisons regarding treatment of single-level DDD and multi-level DDD.

METHODS

A total of 950 patients underwent surgery for single-level or multi-level DDD between July 1998 and February 2012 with single-level TDA (n = 211), multi-level TDA (n = 122), or hybrid construct (n = 617). Visual Analog Score for the back (VAS-B) and leg (VAS-L) were recorded, along with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ).

RESULTS

All PROMs in all groups showed statistically and clinically significant improvements (P < 0.005) in pain and function that is well above the corresponding minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and exceeds literature thresholds for substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Unadjusted analyses show that there were no statistically significant differences in the change scores between the surgery groups for VAS back and leg pain, and RMDQ up to 8 years' follow-up. Adjusted analyses showed the ODI improvement score for the single group was 2.2 points better (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.6-3.9, P = 0.009) than in the hybrid group. The RMDQ change score was better in the hybrid group than in the multi-level group by 1.1 points (95% CI: 0.4-1.9, P = 0.003) at 6 months and a further 0.4 point at 2 years (95% CI: 0.1-0.8, P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of meticulous preoperative evaluation in establishing a precision diagnosis, clinically and statistically equivalent results can be achieved when treating symptomatic DDD through single-level TDA, multi-level TDA, and hybrid constructs. These results are sustained at mid- to long-term follow-up.Level of Evidence: 3.

Investigational Research: Timeline, Trials, and Future Directions of Spinal Disc Arthroplasty

Spinal disc arthroplasty (SDA) has been a rising alternative to fusion for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD). This review aims to provide an overview of the timeline, approvals, and limitations of SDA through analysis of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved trials. Clinical studies have shown more successful outcomes when comparing cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with anterior cervical decompression and fusion, with the key benefits of decreased risk of nerve root compression and adjacent disc disease. CDA is currently approved by the FDA for one- and two-level disc pathologies. However, there are no approved trials for three-level or more cervical pathologies. The FDA approved its usage for the treatment of one-level lumbar disc pathologies in 2007 and recently approved two-level disc pathologies in 2020. Thoracic SDA has not been approved by the FDA, and there are no currently occurring clinical trials. While multilevel SDA has been approved in the cervical and lumbar spine, it has not been approved in more than two adjacent vertebral levels. Based on these clinical studies, future research is needed to compare the success of SDA for three-level or more disc pathologies. There have been recent publications showing promising results, though no FDA-approved clinical trials exist. Furthermore, a hybrid construct has been a recent surgical method to treat multilevel DDD. In this approach, arthroplasty and fusion techniques are combined in alternating fashion at adjacent levels to treat two- and three-level disc disease. Hybrid arthroplasty compared with SDA is currently being studied in clinical trials. As such, long-term research with FDA-approved clinical trials is needed to understand the benefits and limitations of different approaches in the treatment of DDD.

The Role of 3D Exoscope Systems in Neurosurgery: An Optical Innovation

The development of the three-dimensional (3D) exoscope is a marvel of technological innovation in modern surgical practice. While its predecessor, the operating microscope (OM), has long been the gold-standard surgical visualization modality, its particular limitations in terms of accessibility and ergonomic demand have led to the development of a more sophisticated, 3D model. Specifically, the 3D exoscope allows for an enhanced image quality of the surgical field, while also being more ergonomically favorable. Moreover, this device's ability to handle delicate microsensitve procedures, along with its alleviation of surgeon fatigue, indicates great potential for neurosurgical application. For this narrative review, the authors queried PubMed database using the keyword "exoscope" to identify relevant studies involving the specialty of neurosurgery that were published in English language full text. The search yielded full-text English language-related articles regarding neurosurgical exoscope, its applications and limitations. The 3D exoscope uniquely allows for enhanced surgeon comfort and superior imaging of the patient's real-time anatomy. However, the OM was described to having a slight image favorability with fusion and decompression surgery. Cost analysis is highlighted for its potential disparity. 3D exoscopes will potentially be incorporated with intelligent carriers and robotic surgical systems. Ultimately, with further studies highlighting its use, the 3D exoscope is expected to continue to imprint its status as one of the most efficient technological visualization tools in the future of neurosurgical practice.

Novel bone grafting technique in stand-alone ALIF procedure combining allograft and autograft ('Northumbria Technique')-Fusion rate and functional outcomes in 100 consecutive patients

INTRODUCTION

Successful ALIF surgery depends upon achieving solid fusion, whilst avoiding significant complications. Herein, we present the 'Northumbria Technique' of combining allograft with autograft in order to achieve solid interbody fusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-surgeon series of 100 consecutive patients undergoing stand-alone ALIF from 2016 to 2019 was studied. All had percutaneously harvested iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) dowels inserted into blocks of fresh frozen femoral head (FFFH) allograft, which were then inserted into the ALIF cages. Patients had dynamic radiographs at 4 months, CT at 6 months, and patient reported outcome measure scores (PROMS) throughout.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (average age 44.8 years) were followed-up for an average of 29.1 months. Ninety-four (94%) patients were assessed as having fused on both CT and radiographs by an independent Radiologist. Three (3%) patients had abolition of movement on radiographs, but either lacked a CT scan or failed to meet Williams criteria for fusion. Two patients failed to attend for any imaging, so were considered not fused, and one patient had no evidence of fusion in either modality. There was a significant improvement in all PROMS. There were no intra-operative complications, and one patient had transient donor-site pain.

CONCLUSIONS

The newly described 'Northumbria Technique' utilises the osteoconductive characteristics of the FFFH allograft, as well as the osteoinductive and osteogenic properties of the ICBG autograft. It gives high fusion rates (94-97%) and statistically significant improvements in PROMS, whilst avoiding the complications of harvesting a large amount of autograft and the huge costs of using synthetic agents.

Technique for Exposing Lumbar Discs in Anterior Approach Using Steinmann Wires: Arthroplasties or Arthrodesis

BACKGROUND

Due to increasing longevity, the incidence of degenerative lumbar disc diseases has increased, and surgical treatment is often necessary. In this context, the anterior approach becomes an important technique. However, one of the main limitations of this method is the need for dedicated retractors, which requires larger incisions for its positioning and increases the cost of the procedure. The objective of the present study was to describe a technique for retracting abdominal structures by anterior approaches to the lumbar spine using Steinmann wires.

METHODS

This manuscript consists of a technique description of anterior approach for lumbar spine.

RESULTS

Surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar spine disease is often necessary when the patients have symptoms refractory to conservative treatments. Many of them will be candidates for surgical treatment with anterior approach, either for arthrodesis/anterior lumbar interbody fusion or arthroplasty. Small incisions are performed for positioning the modified Langenbeck retractors and the Steinmann wires. These retractors are easily positioned and provide good exposure of the lumbar discs making it possible to implant appropriate cages for restoring the necessary height, lordosis, and sagittal balance.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique described is safe, inexpensive, and reproducible. Simple and easily accessible instruments are required in most hospital complexes.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Multilevel Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Multilevel Degenerative Disc Disease

STUDY DESIGN

Case series OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to assess the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient satisfaction of multilevel lumbar total disc arthroplasty (TDA) for symptomatic multilevel degenerative disc disease (MLDDD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

TDA has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of symptomatic single level degenerative disc disease. There is minimal PROMs data on the mid- to long-term outcomes of multilevel TDA constructs.

METHODS

Prospectively collected PROMs were analyzed from patients receiving multilevel TDA for symptomatic MLDDD. Data were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months, then yearly. PROMs included patient satisfaction, Visual Analog Score back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients (77 men, 45 women) who had preoperative and at least 24-month follow-up data were included. The average age was 42 ± 8.2 years (range 21-61) and mean follow-up 7.8 years (range 2-10). The majority received two-level TDA, except two patients (1.6%) who received three-level TDA. The two- to three-level TDA's were at the levels L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1, whereas most two levels (n = 110, 90.2%) were at L4-5 and L5-S1; the remainder (n = 10, 8.2%) being at L3-4 and L4-5. Implants used were Charité (DePuy Spine, Raynham, MA) in 119 patients (240 levels) and InMotion (DePuy Spine) in 3 patients (6 levels). Improvement in pain and disability scores were both clinically and statistically significant (P < 0.001), and this improvement was sustained in those patients over the course of their follow-up. Ninety-two percent of patients reported good or excellent satisfaction with treatment at final review.

CONCLUSION

Multilevel TDA constructs for MLDDD demonstrate favorable and sustained clinical outcomes at mid- to long-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Artificial disc replacement in spine surgery

Total disc replacement (TDR) is an innovative procedure that has gained traction in spine surgery. A large amount of data in the literature report on the short-term outcomes of TDR surgery favorably. However, surgeons remain reluctant to opt for TDR surgery due to uncertainty of long-term outcomes. Recently, long term data regarding TDR surgery has become available, with some studies showing superior outcomes to fusion surgery. The goal of this review is to synthesize and clinically contextualize the recent literature on TDR surgery. This article also provides brief discussion of the biggest challenges currently facing disc arthroplasties and the ways in which they are being tackled.

Multiple-Level Lumbar Total Disk Replacement: A Prospective Clinical and Radiographic Analysis of Motion Preservation at 24-72 Months

BACKGROUND

Recent studies demonstrate the efficacy of lumbar arthroplasty using the ProDisc-L. Patients frequently present with multilevel pathology and may be candidates for multilevel disk replacement.

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical outcomes and sagittal range of motion of operated levels and adjacent lumbar motion segments in multiple-level ProDisc-L constructs after 2-6 years follow-up.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 159 patients underwent adjacent 2-level (n=114), 3-level (n=41), or 4-level (n=4) lumbar total disk replacement (TDR).

STUDY-DESIGN

This is a prospective cohort.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical measures: Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Score of patient satisfaction (VAS-S) and pain (VAS-P) data were collected. Radiographic measures: sagittal motion on preoperative and postoperative lumbar radiographs at each operative segment and adjacent segment.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated with radiographic and clinical outcomes measures preoperatively, at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and annually for 24-72 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Radiographic: at the motion segment adjacent to the TDR, mean preoperative range of motion (ROM) was 8.20±2.88 degrees, compared with 8.40±2.4 degrees postoperatively at last follow-up (P>0.05). Between the 3 TDR groups, there were no significant differences in ROM at any time point except at L5-S1. Across both groups for TDR motion segments, the mean preoperative ROM was 10.15±2.71 versus 12.30±2.25 degrees postoperatively (P=0.011) at last follow-up. At L5-S1 mean preoperative motion was 7.60±3.90 versus 5.81±3.1 degrees postoperatively (P=0.60). Clinical: at 24-72 months postoperatively, all patients had significant reductions in Oswestry Disability Index, VAS-P, and VAS-S scores (P<0.05). At up to 72 months of follow-up, no patient underwent adjacent-level surgery but there were 3 cases of index-level revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Multilevel TDR preserves ROM at the individual TDR levels. Most significantly, the nonoperative adjacent level maintains its preoperative ROM at 2-6 years postoperatively. At up to 6 years of follow-up, there has been no need for revision or adjacent-segment surgery. Patients also demonstrate significant improvement in pain and disability at latest follow-up.

Combined Aorto-Iliac and Anterior Lumbar Spine Reconstruction: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for aortic-iliac pathology may include endovascular repair and open surgical repair. Treatment options for degenerative disc disease (DDD) are varied but commonly include anterior reconstruction. When both the aortic-iliac and spinal pathologies are significant and surgical intervention is indicated for each pathology, the opportunity exists for concurrent treatment of both the aortic-iliac pathology and DDD in the same operation. The purpose of this case series was to document the safety and feasibility of a surgical strategy whereby a combined elective reconstructive procedure was performed for aortic and anterior lumbar spinal pathologies.

METHODS

The case histories of 5 patients who were treated for both spinal and vascular pathology are presented. Surgical outcome measures included operative time, blood loss, length of stay, and complications. Spine-specific outcome measures included Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, and visual analogue scores (back and leg).

RESULTS

The spinal reconstructions performed included 1 L4-5 total disc replacement (TDR), 1 L4-5, L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), 1 L5-S1 ALIF, and 2 hybrid procedures (L4-5 TDR with L5-S1 ALIF). Vascular reconstructions included 4 aorto-bi-iliac bypass grafts and 1 aortic tube graft. The average operative time was 365 minutes (ranging between 330 and 510 minutes), the average blood loss was 1699 mL (range between 1160 and 2960 mL), and the average length of hospital stay was 14 days (range from 8 to 22 days). There were no in-hospital complications, and all patients experienced significant improvement in both back and leg pain. One patient developed kinking of the iliac limbs of the vascular graft 1 year postoperatively, which was managed with endovascular stenting of the graft.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic-iliac pathology and DDD are significant pathologies often treated in isolation. This study illustrates that, despite its complexity, highly trained individuals in a specialized setting can perform combined surgery to achieve a satisfactory outcome for the patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV evidence.

We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement

BACKGROUND

Replacement of a diseased lumbar intervertebral disc with an artificial device, a procedure known as lumbar total disc replacement (LTDR), has been practiced since the 1980s.

METHODS

Comprehensive review of published literature germane to LTDR, but comment is restricted to high-quality evidence reporting implantation of lumbar artificial discs that have been commercially available for at least 15 years at the time of writing and which continue to be commercially available.

RESULTS

LTDR is shown to be a noninferior (and sometimes superior) alternative to lumbar fusion in patients with discogenic low back pain and/or radicular pain attributable to lumbar disc degenerative disease (LDDD). Further, LTDR is a motion-preserving procedure, and evidence is emerging that it may also result in risk reduction for subsequent development and/or progression of adjacent segment disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the substantial logistical challenges to the safe introduction of LTDR to a health care facility, the procedure continues to gain acceptance, albeit slowly.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Patients with LDDD who are considering an offer of spinal surgery can only provide valid and informed consent if they have been made aware of all reasonable surgical and nonsurgical options that may benefit them. Accordingly, and in those cases in which LTDR may have a role to play, patients under consideration for other forms of spinal surgery should be informed that this valid procedure exists.