Perioperative Outcome of Severe Idiopathic Scoliosis (Cobb Angle ≥ 90°): Is There Any Difference Between "Daytime" Versus "After-hours" Surgeries?

Diagnostic utility of different types of somatosensory evoked potential changes in pediatric idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring and types of SSEP changes in predicting the risk of postoperative neurological outcomes during correction surgery for idiopathic scoliosis (IS) in the pediatric age group (≤ 21 years).

METHODS

Database review was performed to identify literature on pediatric patients with IS who underwent correction with intraoperative neuromonitoring. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of transient and persistent SSEP changes and complete SSEP loss in predicting postoperative neurological deficits were calculated.

RESULTS

Final analysis included 3778 patients. SSEP changes had a sensitivity of 72.9%, specificity of 96.8%, and DOR of 102.3, while SSEP loss had a sensitivity of 41.8%, specificity of 99.3%, and DOR of 133.2 for predicting new neurologic deficits. Transient and persistent SSEP changes had specificities of 96.8% and 99.1%, and DORs of 16.6 and 59, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative SSEP monitoring can predict perioperative neurological injury and improve surgical outcomes in pediatric scoliosis fusion surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

One stage correction via the Hi-PoAD technique for the management of severe, stiff, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves > 90°

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE

to assess the efficacy and safety of Hi-PoAD technique in patients with a major thoracic curve > 90°, < 25% of flexibility and deformity spread over more than five vertebral levels.

METHODS

retrospective review of AIS patients with a major thoracic curve (Lenke 1-2-3) > 90°, with < 25% of flexibility and deformity spread over more than five vertebral levels. All were treated via the Hi-PoAD technique. Radiographic and clinical score data were collected pre-operatively, operatively, at 1 year, 2 years and at last follow-up (2 years minimum).

RESULTS

19 patients were enrolled. A 65.0% correction rate of the main curve was achieved, from 101.9° to 35.7° (p < 0.001). The AVR reduced from 3.3 to 1.3. The C7PL/CSVL reduced from 1.5 to 0.9 cm (p = 0.013). Trunk Height increased from 31.1 to 37.0 cm (p < 0.001). At the final follow-up no significant changes, except from an improvement in C7PL/CSVL (from 0.9 cm to 0.6 cm; p = 0.017). SRS-22 increased in all patients, from 2.1 to 3.9 at 1 year of follow-up (p < 0.001). 3 patients had a transient drop of MEP and SEP during maneuver and were managed with temporary rods and a second surgery after 5 days. 2 of these 3 cases (66.7%) had a Total-Deformity Angular Ratio (T-DAR) > 25; conversely, among patients who had a one-stage procedure, only 1 (6.2%) had a T-DAR > 25 (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The Hi-PoAD technique proved to be a valid alternative for the treatment of severe, rigid AIS involving more than 5 vertebral bodies.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

A comparison of three- and two-rod constructs in the correction of severe pediatric scoliosis

Purpose

Managing severe scoliosis is challenging and risky with a significant complication rate regardless of treatment strategy. In this retrospective comparative study, we report our results using a three-rod compared to two-rod construct in the surgical treatment of severe spine deformities to investigate which technique is safer, and which provides superior radiological outcomes.

Methods

Forty-six consecutive patients undergoing posterior spine fusion for scoliosis between 2006 and 2017 were identified in our institutional records. Inclusion criteria were minimum coronal deformity of 90°, age < 18 years at the time of surgery and a minimum 2 years of follow-up. Radiographic and clinical parameters, as well as post-operative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were 21 patients in the three-rod group and 25 in the two-rod group. The mean preoperative major coronal deformity was 100°± 9 and 102°± 10 in the three-rod and two-rod, respectively (p = 0.6). The average major curve correction was 51% and 59% in three-rod and two-rod groups, respectively (p = 0.03). The post-operative thoracic kyphosis was 30°± 11 and 21°± 12 in the three-rod and the two-rod groups, respectively (p = 0.01). The surgical time was 476 ± 52 and 387 ± 84 min in three-rod and two-rod, respectively (p < 0.01). One patient in the two-rod cohort showed permanent post-operative sensory deficit. There were three unplanned returns to operating theater in the two-rod group.

Conclusions

Coronal correction was better with two-rod, whereas sagittal balance was superior with three-rod. Both techniques achieved balanced spine treating severe scoliosis. The two-rod technique was associated with a higher likelihood of requiring revision surgery.

Level of evidence

level 3.

The use of three rods in correcting severe scoliosis

PURPOSE

The three-rod technique, utilising a short apical concavity rod is an option to achieve controlled correction in severe scoliosis. We describe this technique, the complications encountered, and the long-term outcomes.

METHOD

All paediatric patients who had at least 2 years follow-up after undergoing corrective surgery for scoliosis ≥ 100° using 3 parallel rods were included. Radiographs were assessed to evaluate the correction and clinical records examined for any loss of correction, complications, revision procedures or neuromonitoring events.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. Four underwent prior anterior fusion to prevent crankshaft phenomenon. The mean angle of the deformity was 112.0° (range 100.3-137.1). Mean maximal kyphosis was 48.8° (range 11.4-78.8°) and mean curve flexibility 4.4% (range 0-37.0%). Intraoperative traction achieved an average of 70.4% (95% CI 56.6-84.1%). Nine patients (39%) showed a reduction in MEPs during definitive surgery. All returned to within 75% of baseline by the end of surgery. All patients had normal postoperative neurology. One patient underwent removal of hardware for late infection. The mean overall Cobb correction was 55.7° (95% CI 50.2-61.2°), equating to 50.2% (95% CI 44.9-55.4%) of the mean initial deformity. Thoracic kyphosis reduced by a mean of 18.2° (95% CI 12.8-23.6°).

CONCLUSION

Our series suggests that three-rod constructs are able to safely and effectively achieve 50% correction of severe scoliosis.

Predictive factors for correction rate in severe idiopathic scoliosis (Cobb angle ≥ 90°): an analysis of 128 patients

PURPOSE

Knowledge on the factors affecting the correction rate (CR) aids in the surgical planning among severe idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients. This study aimed to investigate the independent factors affecting CR among patients with severe IS (Cobb angle ≥ 90°) who underwent single-staged posterior spinal fusion (PSF).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 128 severe IS patients who underwent single-staged PSF. Factors including age, height, weight, body mass index, Risser sign, Lenke subtypes, preoperative major Cobb angle, side bending major Cobb angle, side bending flexibility (SBF), motion segments of the major curve, AR curve, number of levels fused, screw density, operative time and postoperative major Cobb angle were analysed using linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The mean age was 15.5 ± 4.5 years with mean Risser sign of 3.1 ± 1.6. The mean preoperative Cobb, SBF, postoperative Cobb and CR were 102.8 ± 12.3°, 37.5 ± 13.7%, 44.4 ± 13.5° and 57.2 ± 10.8%, respectively. From stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, SBF, Risser sign and AR curve were the independent predictive factors for CR, with R² value of 0.345 (p < 0.001). CR can be predicted using the formula: 47.21 + (0.34 × SBF)-(1.47 × Risser sign) + (3.69 × AR), where AR = 1 and non-AR = 0.

CONCLUSION

The flexibility of the major curve, Risser sign and AR curve were the most important predictors for CR in a single-staged PSF among patients with severe IS.