Predictive Value of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score for Survival and Ambulatory Function After Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression in 110 Patients with Prostate Cancer

Predictors of ambulation recovery after surgery in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression who lost walking ability for more than 48 h

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify predictors of ambulation recovery in patients who lost their ability to walk for more than 48 h due to metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 121 patients with MSCC who underwent surgery. The primary outcome variable was postoperative ambulatory status. The secondary outcome variable was postoperative survival in relation to restored ambulation. Age, primary tumor grade, MSCC anatomical location, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), Charlson comorbidity index, neurological deterioration speed, MSCC grade according to the epidural spinal cord compression scale, anal sphincter tonus and hip flexion strength before surgery, and postoperative complications were analyzed as predictive variables.

RESULTS

One month after surgery, ambulation was restored in 61 of the 111 patients (55%), 10 patients died within one month after surgery. Primary tumor grade (p = 0.03), hip flexion strength before surgery (p < 0.001), and postoperative complications (p = 0.001) were associated with ambulation recovery. The accuracy of hip flexion strength as a predictor was analyzed with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with an area under the curve of 0.74 (p < 0.001). The median postoperative survival of patients who regained ambulation was 16 months, whereas that of patients who lost walking ability was 5 months (p = 0.004). According to the multiple Cox regression model, KPS (p < 0.001) and ambulation after surgery (p = 0.027) were predictors of postoperative survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary tumor grade, hip flexion strength before surgery, and surgical complications affect neurological recovery in MSCC patients who had lost their ability to walk for more than 48 h.

What is the Optimal Management of Metastatic Spine Patients With Intermediate Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scores: To Operate or Not to Operate?

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVE

In patients with extradural metastatic spine disease, we sought to systematically review the outcomes and complications of patients with intermediate Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) lesions undergoing radiation therapy, percutaneous interventions, minimally invasive surgeries, or open spinal surgeries.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials were queried for studies that reported on SINS intermediate patients who underwent: 1) radiotherapy, 2) percutaneous intervention, 3) minimally invasive, or 4) open surgery. Dates of publication were between 2013-22. Patients with low- or high-grade SINS were excluded. Outcome measures were pain score, functional status, neurological outcome, ambulation, survival, and perioperative complications.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies (n = 4554) were included that analyzed outcomes in the SINS intermediate cohort. Radiotherapy appeared to provide temporary improvement in pain score; however, recurrent pain led to surgery in 15%-20% of patients. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation provided improvement in pain. Minimally invasive surgery and open surgery offered improvement in pain, quality of life, neurological, and ambulatory outcomes. Open surgery may be associated with more complications. There was limited evidence for radiofrequency ablation.

CONCLUSION

In the SINS intermediate group, radiotherapy was associated with temporary improvement of pain but may require subsequent surgery. Both minimally invasive surgery and open spinal surgery achieved improvements in pain, quality of life, and neurological outcomes for patients with spine metastases. Open surgery may be associated with more complications.

The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score correlates with epidural spinal cord compression -a retrospective cohort of 256 surgically treated patients with spinal metastases

BACKGROUND

Bone metastases can compromise the integrity of the spinal canal and cause epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC). The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) was developed in order to evaluate spinal instability due to a neoplastic process. The SINS has reached wide acceptance among clinicans but its prognostic value is still controversial. The aim was to investigate the correlation between the SINS and ESCC and the association between SINS and ambulation before and survival after surgery.

METHODS

Correlations were assessed between SINS and grades of ESCC in patients who underwent spine surgery for spinal metastases. CT and MRI were used to calculate SINS and the grades of ESCC respectively. Correlations were analyzed with the Spearman's correlation test. Postoperative survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and survival curves were compared with the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the effect of prognostic variables including age, ambulation before surgery, SINS, and the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) as covariates.

RESULTS

The study included 256 patients (196 men and 60 women) with a median age of 70 (24-88) years. The mean SINS was 10. One hundred fifty-two patients (59%) had lost ambulation before surgery. One hundred and one patients had grades 0-2 and 155 patients had grade 3 according to the ESCC-scale. SINS correlated with the grades of ESCC (p = 0.001). The SINS score was not associated with ambulation before surgery (p = 0.63). The median postoperative survival was 10 months, and there was no difference in postoperative survival between the SINS categories (p = 0.25). The ability to walk before surgery and a high KPS were associated with longer postoperative survival.

CONCLUSION

SINS correlated with grades of ESCC, which implies that higher SINS may be considered as an indicator of risk for developing ESCC. The SINS was not associated with ambulation before or survival after surgery.

Intraoperative radiotherapy combined with spinal stabilization surgery-a novel treatment strategy for spinal metastases based on a first single-center experiences

INTRODUCTION

Current treatment of spinal metastases (SM) aims on preserving spinal stability, neurological status, and functional status as well as achieving local control. It consists of spinal surgery followed by radiotherapy and/or systemic treatment. Adjuvant therapy usually starts with a delay of a few weeks to prevent wound healing issues. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) has previously been successfully applied during brain tumor, breast and colorectal carcinoma surgery but not in SM, including unstable one, to date. In our case series, we describe the feasibility, morbidity and mortality of a novel treatment protocol for SM combining stabilization surgery with IORT.

METHODS

Single center case series on patients with SM. Single session stabilization by navigated open or percutaneous procedure using a carbon screw-rod system followed by concurrent 50 kV photon-IORT (ZEISS Intrabeam). The IORT probe is placed via a guide canula using navigation, positioning is controlled by IOCT or 3D-fluroscopy enabling RT isodose planning in the OR.

RESULTS

15 (8 female) patients (71 ± 10y) received this treatment between 07/22 and 09/23. Median Spinal Neoplastic Instability Score was 8 [7-10] IQR. Most metastasis were located in the thoracic (n = 11, 73.3%) and the rest in the lumbar (n = 4, 26.7%) spine. 9 (60%) patients received open, 5 (33%) percutaneous stabilization and 1 (7%) decompression only. Mean length of surgery was 157 ± 45 min. Eleven patients had 8 and 3 had 4 screws placed. In 2 patients radiotherapy was not completed due to bending of the guide canula with consecutive abortion of IORT. All other patients received 8 Gy isodoses at mdn. 1.5 cm [1.1-1.9, IQR] depth during 2-6 min. The patients had Epidural Spinal Cord Compression score 1a-3. Seven patients (46.7%) experienced adverse events including 2 surgical site infection (one 65 days after surgery).

CONCLUSION

50 kV photon IORT for SM and consecutive unstable spine needing surgical intervention is safe and feasible and can be a promising technique in selected cases.

Predictors of Survival After Emergent Surgical Decompression for Acutely Presenting Spinal Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Metastatic spinal tumors represent 90% of spinal masses and present variably with slow progression and/or rapid symptomatic worsening. Several prognostic scoring systems have been proposed. However, patients presenting acutely and requiring emergent surgery represent a unique subset of patients with different prognostic indicators.

METHODS

All cases of symptomatic spinal metastases requiring emergent surgery between 2010 and 2021 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. Survival time from date of surgery to death or last follow-up was calculated. Patients were stratified on the basis of survival for more or less than 6 months after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop a model predicting probability of mortality at 6 months.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients satisfied inclusion criteria. Mean age at presentation was 60.4 ± 11.8 years with a median survival time of 6.5 [1.9-19.5 interquartile range] months. On univariate analysis, higher Tokuhashi score, Karnofksy performance scale (KPS), and lower modified McCormick scale were significantly associated with 6-month survival (P = 0.018, P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Preoperative American Spinal Injury Association grade and Spine Instability Neoplastic Score scores were not associated with survival. Multivariate analysis found KPS significantly correlated with survival (0.91 odds ratio, 0.85-0.98, 95% confidence interval, P = 0.011) at 6 months and that a stepwise regression model derived from KPS and Tokuhashi score demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for 6-month survival (area under the curve = 0.843, Akaike information criterion = 37.1, P = 0.0039).

CONCLUSIONS

KPS and Tokuhashi scores most strongly correlated with 6-month survival in patients presenting with acutely symptomatic spinal metastases. These findings underscore the importance of baseline functional status and overall tumor burden on survival and may be useful in preoperative evaluation and surgical decision making for acutely presenting spinal metastases.

Utility of the Spinal Instability Score in Patients with Spinal Metastases and the Impact on Clinical Outcome.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3207361/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0]

Objective Spinal metastases may cause spinal instability. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) was developed to assess spinal neoplastic-related instability. Aim of this study was to determine the utility of SINS in predicting progression of a pathologic fracture due to spinal metastases. Methods A retrospective analysis of patients with a pathologic fracture due to a spinal metastases between January 2018 and December 2018 was performed. We selected patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months and analysed them according to the SINS criteria. The primary endpoint was the progression of vertebral body fracture following radiotherapy. Results 332 Patients were identified. Median age was 68 SD +/- 10,3. 38% were Female. Median follow-up was 26 months (range 12–29). 30, 283 and 19 Patients presented with low (0–6), moderate (7–12) and high (13–18) SINS, respectively. Fracture progression following radiotherapy was seen in 9 (30%), 84 (30%) and 8 (42%) in cases with low, moderate, or high SINS (P = 0.522), respectively. During follow-up, 25% of patients with low SINS showed a progression to moderate SINS without neurological deficits. In the originally moderate group, 17% had progression with neurological deficits needing surgery. None had functional recovery postoperatively. 83% of the progression cases in the moderate group did not develop neurological deficits and 4 underwent surgery for pain management. 63% of all progressions in the high group developed neurological deficits, however none of them recover postoperatively (P < 0.001). Conclusion SINS is a very useful tool for assess stability of a pathologic fracture due to spinal metastases after radiotherapy for spinal metastases. Moderate or high SINS are associated with a high risk of fracture progression as well as risk for neurological deterioration, therefore surgical instrumentation in these groups may be advised prior to radiotherapy.

A Novel Radiographic Pattern Related to Poor Prognosis in Patients with Prostate Cancer with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

Background

Prostate cancer spinal bone metastases can have a radiographic profile that mimics multiple myeloma.

Objective

To analyse the presence and prognostic value of myeloma-like prostate cancer bone metastases and its relation to known clinical, molecular, and morphological prognostic markers.

Design setting and participants

A cohort of 110 patients with prostate cancer who underwent surgery for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) was analysed. Spinal bone metastases were classified as myeloma like (n = 20) or non-myeloma like (n = 90) based on magnetic resonance imaging prior to surgery. An immunohistochemical analysis of metastasis samples was performed to assess tumour cell proliferation (percentage of Ki67-positive cells) and the expression levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and androgen receptor (AR). The metastasis subtypes MetA, MetB, and MetC were determined from transcriptomic profiling.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Survival curves were compared with the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the effects of prognostic variables. Groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables.

Results and limitations

Patients with the myeloma-like metastatic pattern had median survival after surgery for MSCC of 1.7 (range 0.1-33) mo, while the median survival period of those with the non-myeloma-like pattern was 13 (range 0-140) mo (p < 0.001). The myeloma-like appearance had an independent prognostic value for the risk of death after MSCC surgery (adjusted hazard ratio 2.4, p = 0.012). Postoperative neurological function was significantly reduced in the myeloma-like group. No association was found between the myeloma-like pattern and morphological markers of known relevance for this patient group: the transcriptomic subtypes MetA, MetB, and MetC; tumour cell proliferation; and AR and PSA expression.

Conclusions

A myeloma-like metastatic pattern identifies an important subtype of metastatic prostate cancer associated with poor survival and neurological outcomes after surgery for MSCC.

Patient summary

This study describes a novel radiographic pattern of prostate cancer bone metastases and its relation to poor patient prognosis.

Factors affecting the prognosis of recovery of motor power and ambulatory function after surgery for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression

OBJECTIVE

Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) causes neurological deficits that may hinder ambulation. Understanding the prognostic factors associated with increased neurological recovery and regaining ambulatory functions is important for surgical planning in MESCC patients with neurological deficits. The present study was conducted to elucidate prognostic factors of neurological recovery in MESCC patients.

METHODS

A total of 192 patients who had surgery for MESCC due to preoperative neurological deficits were reviewed. A motor recovery rate ≥ 50% and ambulatory function restoration were defined as the primary favorable endpoints. Factors associated with a motor recovery rate ≥ 50%, regaining ambulatory function, and patient survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

About one-half (48.4%) of the patients had a motor recovery rate ≥ 50%, and 24.4% of patients who were not able to walk due to MESCC before the surgery were able to walk after the operation. The factors "involvement of the thoracic spine" (p = 0.015) and "delayed operation" (p = 0.041) were associated with poor neurological recovery. Low preoperative muscle function grade was associated with a low likelihood of regaining ambulatory functions (p = 0.002). Furthermore, performing the operation ≥ 72 hours after the onset of the neurological deficit significantly decreased the likelihood of regaining ambulatory functions (p = 0.020). Postoperative ambulatory function significantly improved patient survival (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed operation and the involvement of the thoracic spine were poor prognostic factors for neurological recovery after MESCC surgery. Furthermore, a more severe preoperative neurological deficit was associated with a lesser likelihood of regaining ambulatory functions postoperatively. Earlier detection of motor weaknesses and expeditious surgical interventions are necessary, not only to improve patient functional status and quality of life but also to enhance survival.

Palliative radiotherapy of bone metastases in octogenarians: How do the oldest olds respond? Results from a tertiary cancer center with 288 treated patients

BACKGROUND

Accompanied by the demographic change, the number of octogenarian cancer patients with bone metastases will increase in the future. Palliative radiotherapy constitutes an effective analgesic treatment; however, as pain perception and bone metabolism change with increasing age, the analgesic efficacy of radiotherapy may be altered in elderly patients. We therefore investigated the treatment outcomes of palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases in octogenarians.

METHODS

Patients between 80 and 89 years undergoing radiotherapy for bone metastases between 2009 and 2019 at a tertiary cancer center were analyzed for patterns-of-care, pain response and overall survival (OS). Logistic regression analyses were carried out to examine parameters associated with pain response, and Cox analyses were conducted to reveal prognostic parameters for OS.

RESULTS

A total of 288 patients with 516 irradiated lesions were included in the analysis. The majority (n = 249, 86%) completed all courses of radiotherapy. Radiotherapy led to pain reduction in 176 patients (61%) at the end of treatment. Complete pain relief at the first follow-up was achieved in 84 patients (29%). Bisphosphonate administration was significantly associated with higher rates of pain response at the first follow-up (p < 0.05). Median OS amounted to 9 months, and 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS were 43%, 28% and 17%. In the multivariate analysis, ECOG (p < 0.001), Mizumoto score (p < 0.01) and Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) (p < 0.001) were independent prognosticators for OS.

CONCLUSION

Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases constitutes a feasible and effective analgesic treatment in octogenarian patients. ECOG, Mizumoto score and SINS are prognosic variables for survival and may aid treatment decisions regarding radiotherapy fractionation in this patient group. Single-fraction radiotherapy with 8 Gy should be applied for patients with uncomplicated bone metastases and poor prognosis. Prospective trials focusing on quality of life of these very old cancer patients with bone metastases are warranted to reveal the optimal radiotherapeutic management for this vulnerable population.

A New Clinical Instrument for Estimating the Ambulatory Status after Irradiation for Malignant Spinal Cord Compression

Simple Summary

Since 2005, upfront surgery has been increasingly used in addition to radiotherapy for patients with malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC). As spinal surgery includes significant risks, careful patient selection is crucial. Individual risks and benefits should be considered when choosing an optimal treatment strategy. Benefits include preserving or regaining a patient’s ambulatory function. To facilitate the decision pro or contra upfront surgery, a new prognostic score was developed to predict ambulatory status after radiotherapy alone. This clinical score was created from data of patients previously treated in prospective trials. It includes three prognostic groups (17–21, 22–31, and 32–37 points) with post-radiotherapy ambulatory rates of 10%, 65%, and 97%, respectively. Patients of the 32–37 points group may not require upfront surgery. The new instrument achieved very high accuracy in predicting post-radiotherapy ambulatory and non-ambulatory status and was more precise than a previous prognostic score in predicting non-ambulatory status.

Abstract

Estimating post-treatment ambulatory status can improve treatment personalization of patients irradiated for malignant spinal cord compression (MSCC). A new clinical score was developed from data of 283 patients treated with radiotherapy alone in prospective trials. Radiotherapy regimen, age, gender, tumor type, interval from tumor diagnosis to MSCC, number of affected vertebrae, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, time developing motor deficits, ambulatory status, performance score, sensory deficits, and sphincter dysfunction were evaluated. For factors with prognostic relevance in the multivariable logistic regression model after backward stepwise variable selection, scoring points were calculated (post-radiotherapy ambulatory rate in % divided by 10) and added for each patient. Four factors (primary tumor type, sensory deficits, sphincter dysfunction, ambulatory status) were used for the instrument that includes three prognostic groups (17–21, 22–31, and 32–37 points). Post-radiotherapy ambulatory rates were 10%, 65%, and 97%, respectively, and 2-year local control rates were 100%, 75%, and 88%, respectively. Positive predictive values to predict ambulatory and non-ambulatory status were 97% and 90% using the new score, and 98% and 79% using the previous instrument. The new score appeared more precise in predicting non-ambulatory status. Since patients with 32–37 points had high post-radiotherapy ambulatory and local control rates, they may not require surgery.