A New Solution to an Old Problem: Ultrasound-guided Cervical Retrolaminar Injection for Acute Cervical Radicular Pain: Prospective Clinical Pilot Study and Cadaveric Study

Effectiveness of ultrasonography-guided caudal epidural steroid injection compared to the fluoroscopic application

BACKGROUND

Caudal epidural steroid injection (CESI) has been increasingly used for treating lower back pain. However, there is still significant controversy about the efficacy and safety of different imaging techniques used to guide CESI. In this context, the objective of this study is to compare the efficacies of fluoroscopy- and ultrasonography-guided CESI in patients with chronic lower back pain.

METHODS

The population of this retrospective, observational study consisted of all consecutive patients who underwent CESI for lower back pain between 2018 and 2020. Of the 371 patients included in the study sample, 192 had undergone fluoroscopyguided CESI (Group F) and 179 ultrasonography-guided CESI (Group U). Patients' pain and functional statuses were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) immediately before (baseline) and after the procedure (postintervention day 0-D0), during the second week (D15), the first month (D30), and the third month (D90) after the procedure.

RESULTS

The mean age of Group F was significantly higher than that of Group U (p < 0.001). The number of patients with lumbar dischernia was significantly higher in Group U, whereas the number of patients with spinal stenosis and lumbar disc hernia + spinal/lumbar stenosis was significantly higher in Group F (p = 0.001). The baseline and D0 ODI scores were significantly lower in Group U than in Group F (p = 0.006 and p = 0.017, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in other VAS and ODI scores (p > 0.05). Intragroup analyses revealed significant reductions in VAS and ODI scores over the follow-up period till D30 compared to the baseline scores in each group (p < 0.001). The decrease recorded in the ODI score between the D15 and baseline measurements was significantly higher in Group F than in Group U (p = 0.006).

DISCUSSION

The study findings indicated that ultrasound-guided CESI was as effective as fluoroscopy-guided CESI in treating chroniclower back pain.

Ultrasound-Guided Blocks for Spine Surgery: Part 1-Cervix

Postoperative pain is common following spine surgery, particularly complex procedures. The main anesthetic efforts are focused on applying multimodal analgesia beforehand, and regional anesthesia is a critical component of it. The purpose of this study is to examine the existing techniques for regional anesthesia in cervical spine surgery and to determine their effect and safety on pain reduction and postoperative patient's recovery. The electronic databases were searched for all literature pertaining to cervical nerve block procedures. The following peripheral, cervical nerve blocks were selected and described: paravertebral block, cervical plexus clock, paraspinal interfascial plane blocks such as multifidus cervicis, retrolaminar, inter-semispinal and interfacial, as well as erector spinae plane block and stellate ganglion block. Clinicians should choose more superficial techniques in the cervical region, as they have been shown to be comparably effective and less hazardous compared to paravertebral blocks.

Ultrasound-guided Cervical Retro-laminar Block for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Comparative Analysis

STUDY DESIGN AND OBJECTIVE

Cervical radiculopathy is a common clinical condition, often treated with cervical epidural steroid injections (ESI). Retro-laminar cervical blocks (RLCB) may be considered safer than ESI as they do not require entering the neuroaxis.In this study, we evaluated the outcome of RLCB in patients with cervical radiculopathy who had failed conservative treatment and were candidates for cervical spine decompression surgery.

BACKGROUND DATA

Recently, we reported a clinical pilot study investigating the treatment of cervical radiculopathy with an ultrasound-guided RLCB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective, comparative analysis of prospectively collected data was carried out on the medical records of all patients who underwent RLCB for cervical radicular pain, between August 2019 and March 2021.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were included in the analysis, with a total of 139 procedures.A significant pain reduction was achieved for most patients immediately after the procedure and at the final follow up (16.9±13.4 wk). The mean numerical rating scale for the whole cohort changed from 7.21±2.51 to 4.04±2.51 ( P -value <0.01) at the time of discharge, with similar patterns at the subgroup level. A functional evaluation was carried out by a questionnaire (Neck Disability Index-NDI). Overall, 83% of patients had a lower postprocedural NDI than preprocedural NDI. For 80% of patients, the improvement of NDI surpassed the minimal clinically important change at the final assessment. Most patients (61%) were discharged after just one RLCB. Eight patients (8%) eventually underwent surgery. The most frequent complaint was injection site soreness; however, there were no major adverse events reported.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that RLCB can be performed as an alternative to cervical ESI and decompressive surgery in patients with cervical radicular pain that's refractory to noninvasive treatment. More comparative and prospective studies are needed to confirm our results.

Efficacy of superficial cervical plexus block versus cervical retrolaminar block both combined with auriculotemporal nerve block in parotid surgeries

Background

Regional techniques in parotid surgeries include superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) and auriculotemporal nerve (ATN) block, which can be used as an anesthetic technique for awake parotidectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cervical retrolaminar block (RLB) as an alternative to SCPB both, used in combination with auriculotemporal nerve (ATN) block, in parotid surgery.

Material and methods

A total of 40 patients undergoing parotid surgery were prospectively randomized into either the SCPB group (n = 20) or the cervical RLB group (n = 20) using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine plus 5 mcg\mL epinephrine. Both were combined with ATN block using 5 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine plus 5 mcg\mL epinephrine.

Results

The time to first request for analgesia was longer in the RLB group than the SCPB group. Total intra operative fentanyl consumption and post-operative pethidine consumption in the first 24h were lower in group RLB. All patients (n = 20) in the SCPB group required rescue analgesia using pethidine, while only 40% of patients required pethidine in the RLB group. Visual analog scale was lower in the RLB group from 2 to 24-h post-operatively, but it was associated with hypotension and longer block technique time occurred with RLB than SCPB. There was no significant difference in side effects except for 20% Horner's syndrome in the SCPB group.

Conclusion

Cervical RLB is more effective analgesic technique than SCPB, as the cervical RLB showed longer time to first analgesic request, lower intraoperative anesthetic consumption, lower total post-operative pethidine consumption and lower VAS.

•

A study on 40 patient undergoing elective parotid surgery of 2 groups; Cervical retrolaminar block or SCPB.

•

Cervical retrolaminar block more effective than SCBP.

•

Cervical retrolaminar block is alternative Technique to paravertebral block.

•

No significant difference between the two study groups according to complications.

New ultrasound-guided techniques in chronic pain management: an update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The introduction of ultrasound guidance in interventional pain management leads to the development of new interventional pain management techniques. Ultrasound-guided (UG) interventional pain management is rapidly developing and increasingly more commonly used, due to its many advantages over traditional radiologic imaging modalities. This review will summarize recent literature around novel interventional pain techniques with ultrasound guidance published over the last 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many new interventional pain management methods have been described in the last few years in the literature. The use of ultrasonography in interventional pain management played a crucial role in these developments. This review includes newly described interventional methods in the literature. The review particularly focussed on the methods that are used to treat the pain in the hip, shoulder, knee, and lumbar area. These new techniques hold promise for significant improvements in the efficacy and safety of interventional pain management.

SUMMARY

There have been many innovations in UG interventional procedures, however, some of them require more rigorous validation before their widespread use.