Predictors of Recovery After Conservative Treatment of AO-Type A Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures Without Neurological Deficit

Surgical Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures in Patients Older than 80 Years

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The global average life expectancy has been increasing steadily as the quality of healthcare continues to improve. However, there is a paucity of data looking at surgical fixation of thoracolumbar spine fractures in patients ≥80 years (super-elderly). Aim of this study is to look at whether there is higher rate of complications from surgical fixation of thoracolumbar fractures in this group of patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent surgical fixation of thoracolumbar spine fractures from 2019 to 2023. Patients were dichotomized into those who were 80 years old and above (super-elderly) and those younger than 80 years (control). Variables include sex, age, Charleston comorbidity index, presence of osteoporosis, length of hospital stay, complications, 6- and 12-months' implant status, and mortality. Incidence of revision surgery, rate of implant loosening, and mortality between the 2 groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

Total of 108 patients were included, 43 patients in the super-elderly group and 65 in the control group. Despite the super-elderly having a higher rate of osteoporosis and higher proportion of patients with severe comorbidities (P < .0001), there was no significant difference in the rate of implant loosening at 12 months' follow-up (P = .467) or all-cause mortality (P = .158). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding revision surgery (P = .923) needed either.

CONCLUSION

The super-elderly had a higher incidence of osteoporosis and worse comorbidities, but there was no significant difference regarding implant complications, revision surgery required, or all-cause mortality. Hence, surgical fixation of thoracolumbar spine fractures in people older than 80 years should be considered despite their advanced age.

A Systematic Review of the Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Versus Non-surgical Management for Types A3 and A4 Thoracolumbar Spinal Fractures With No Neurological Deficits

Thoracolumbar spinal fractures remain a significant concern in the orthopedic and neurosurgical practice and have a risk of neurological deficits in patients. However, in the majority of the cases, the neurological status remains intact. Generally, conservative management is favored for fractures of low severity and the surgical option is reserved for severe fractures. The management of types A3 and A4 thoracolumbar spinal fractures without neurological deficits still remains debatable. This systematic review aims to compare long-term outcomes of surgical versus non-surgical management in the treatment of types A3 and A4 fractures with no neurosurgical deficit. A systematic search was undertaken in various databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies. The inclusion criteria focused on patients with types A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficits. Studies published after 2010 and having a minimum follow-up period of two years were considered for inclusion. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A total of 1,973 potential studies were identified, out of which three studies were included in the systematic review. The mean follow-up duration of the studies was more than 2.5 years. A total of 141 patients were included in the studies, with 65 patients in the conservative and 76 patients in the surgical group. Out of three studies, two studies favored surgical management for better functional outcomes, while one study suggested better long-term outcomes with conservative management. Regarding complications, no significant complications were reported in both groups and there was no significant difference between the groups. The risk of bias was low across most studies. Although two of the three studies included in the systematic review favored the surgical approach in the management of types A3 and A4 fractures, there is still a lack of conclusive evidence that favors either approach.

The AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System and Treatment Algorithm in Decision Making for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Without Neurologic Deficit

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective Observational Study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the alignment of the AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification system and treatment algorithm with contemporary surgical decision making.

METHODS

183 cases of thoracolumbar burst fractures were reviewed by 22 AO Spine Knowledge Forum Trauma experts. These experienced clinicians classified the fracture morphology, integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex and degree of comminution. Management recommendations were collected.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant stepwise increase in rates of operative management with escalating category of injury (P < .001). An excellent correlation existed between recommended expert management and the actual treatment of each injury category: A0/A1/A2 (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.69, P = .71), A3/4 (OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.98-2.66, P = .58) and B1/B2/C (1.00, 95% CI 0.87-1.14, P = .99). Thoracolumbar A4 fractures were more likely to be surgically stabilized than A3 fractures (68.2% vs 30.9%, P < .001). A modifier indicating indeterminate ligamentous injury increased the rate of operative management when comparing type B and C injuries to type A3/A4 injuries (OR 39.19, 95% CI 20.84-73.69, P < .01 vs OR 27.72, 95% CI 14.68-52.33, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The AO Spine Thoracolumbar Injury Classification system introduces fracture morphology in a rational and hierarchical manner of escalating severity. Thoracolumbar A4 complete burst fractures were more likely to be operatively managed than A3 fractures. Flexion-distraction type B injuries and translational type C injuries were much more likely to have surgery recommended than type A fractures regardless of the M1 modifier. A suspected posterior ligamentous injury increased the likelihood of surgeons favoring surgical stabilization.

Comparison Between Surgical and Conservative Treatment for AOSpine Type A3 and A4 Thoracolumbar Fractures without Neurological Deficit: Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Objective  To compare the clinical results between conservative (CS) and surgical treatment (CXS) of A3 and A4 fractures without neurological deficit. Methods  Prospective observational study of patients with thoracolumbar fractures type A3 and A4. These patients were separated between the surgical and conservative groups, and evaluated sequentially through the numeric rating scale (NRS), Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RMDQ), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) quality of life questionnaire, and Denis work scale (DWS) up to 2.5 years of follow-up. Results  Both groups showed significant improvement, with no statistical difference in pain questionnaires (NRS: CXS 2.4 ± 2.6; CS 3.5 ± 2.6; p  > 0.05), functionality (RMDQ: CS 7 ± 6.4; CXS 5.5 ± 5.2; p  > 0.05), quality of life (EQ-5D), and return to work (DWS). Conclusion  Both treatments are viable options with equivalent clinical results. There is a tendency toward better results in the surgical treatment of A4 fractures.

Immediate standing X-ray predicts the final vertebral collapse in elderly patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture

OBJECTIVE

To see if, in elderly patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fracture, standing X-rays with orthoses 24-48h after admission can predict vertebral collapse after consolidation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective cohort study endorsed by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

age >65 years, acute thoracolumbar junction fracture due to fall, hospital admission, treatment with orthesis.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

various levels, suspected malignancy, non-immediate fracture or atraumatic.

VARIABLES

Farcy index (F), regional kyphosis (C: Cobb from cranial to caudal to broken vertebra) - both measured at admission (F0 and C0), at 24-48h in standing position with orthesis (F1 and C1) and 3 months, without brace (F2 and C2), collapse (increase from F0 to F1 -F0F1- and from F1 to F2 -F1F2-; as well as from C0 to C1 -C0C1- and from C1 to C2 -C1C2-), age and gender.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

R package.

RESULTS

Series of 40 patients, with a mean age of 75 years (66-87). Nine men and 31 women. Neither gender nor age were correlated with any variable. Six required surgery at follow-up. There were no differences in F1, C1, F0F1 or C0C1 between the six patients who required surgery and the other 34. Subsequently, data analysis was performed only for those patients who did not require surgery. The values obtained in the Farcy index were 8°+7° (F0), 12°+7° (F1) and 15°+8° (F2) and in kyphosis (three vertebrae, Cobb) they were: C0=8°+13°; C1=11.5°+14° and C2=13°+13°. There was a correlation of F2 with F0 and F1 (p<.001), with F0F1 (p=.038) and F1F2 (p=.007). The most powerful was with F1 (Rho Spearman=.889 (95% CI=.776-.947), with a Linear Regression line: F2=2.61288+F1×1.01237 (R²=.79). C2 was correlated with C0 and C1 (p<.001), especially with C1 (Rho Spearman=.952, 95% CI=.899-.977). Linear regression: C2=2.23371+C1×0.93758 (R²=.927).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate standing collapse predicts alignment at consolidation (3 months). It is therefore advisable to perform that radiography in the follow-up protocol.

[Translated article] Immediate standing X-ray predicts the final vertebral collapse in elderly patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture

OBJECTIVE

To see if, in elderly patients with traumatic thoracolumbar fracture, standing X-rays with orthoses 24-48h after admission can predict vertebral collapse after consolidation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Prospective cohort study endorsed by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

age >65 years, acute thoracolumbar junction fracture due to fall, hospital admission, treatment with orthesis.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

various levels, suspected malignancy, non-immediate fracture or atraumatic.

VARIABLES

Farcy index (F), regional kyphosis (C: Cobb from cranial to caudal to broken vertebra) - both measured at admission (F0 and C0), at 24-48h in standing position with orthesis (F1 and C1) and 3 months, without brace (F2 and C2), collapse (increase from F0 to F1 -F0F1- and from F1 to F2 -F1F2-; as well as from C0 to C1 -C0C1- and from C1 to C2 -C1C2-), age and gender.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

R package.

RESULTS

Series of 40 patients, with a mean age of 75 years (66-87). Nine men and 31 women. Neither gender nor age were correlated with any variable. Six required surgery at follow-up. There were no differences in F1, C1, F0F1 or C0C1 between the six patients who required surgery and the other 34. Subsequently, data analysis was performed only for those patients who did not require surgery. The values obtained in the Farcy index were 8°+7° (F0), 12°+7° (F1) and 15°+8° (F2) and in kyphosis (three vertebrae, Cobb) they were: C0=8°+13°; C1=11.5°+14° and C2=13°+13°. There was a correlation of F2 with F0 and F1 (p<.001), with F0F1 (p=.038) and F1F2 (p=.007). The most powerful was with F1 (Rho Spearman=.889, 95% CI=.776-.947), with a linear regression line: F2=2.61288+F1×1.01237 (R²=.79). C2 was correlated with C0 and C1 (p<.001), especially with C1 (Rho Spearman=.952, 95% CI=.899-.977). Linear regression: C2=2.23371+C1×0.93758 (R²=.927).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate standing collapse predicts alignment at consolidation (3 months). It is therefore advisable to perform that radiography in the follow-up protocol.

Absolute Bed Rest Duration of 3 Days for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Retrospective Study

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE

To reduce unnecessary absolute bed rest (ABR), this study sought to determine the optimal aimed length of ABR in older patients getting conservative treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs).

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

OVFs are quite common in elderly patients. ABR is a vital part of conservative treatment for OVFs, although the length of ABR may increase patient. No recommendations regarding how long ABR should last.

METHODS

This study was conducted in 134 patients with OVFs initially treated conservatively. The patients were split into two groups: 3-day and 7-day ABR. From the time of injury to 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injury, compression rate (CR) and local kyphotic angle (LKA) were assessed and compared between the two groups. Any complications such as pneumonia, deep vein thrombosis, delirium, and urinary tract infection known to be related to ABR were examined based on the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients underwent ABR for 3 days and 90 underwent ABR for 7 days. There was no significant difference in CR and LKA between the two groups at the time of injury versus 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injury. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received a 3-day ABR and those who received a 7-day ABR. CR and LKA were measured and compared between the two groups from the time of damage to 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injury. The ABR-related complication rate was 43.4% in the 7-day ABR group and 22.7% in 3-day ABR group (p=0.02). The duration of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the 3-day ABR group (12.8 days) than in the 7-day group (16 days) (p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering radiological outcomes, prognosis, complications, patient convenience, and economic impact, a 3-day ABR period is appropriate for the conservative treatment of OVFs.

A Comparative Study on the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures With Early Ambulation and at Least 1 Week of Absolute Bed Rest

Objective

This study aimed to determine whether absolute bed rest (ABR) is essential for the conservative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

Methods

This study included 115 patients diagnosed with OVCFs. The patients in group A were allowed to ambulate as soon as possible, while those in group B underwent ABR for at least 1 week. X-ray images at baseline and 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after trauma were obtained from both groups for assessment. In each group, ABR-related complications including constipation, indigestion, Foley catheter insertion, urinary tract infection, cough/sputum, dizziness, and neurasthenia were investigated.

Results

In both groups, the compression rates, Cobb angles, and visual analog scale scores did not differ significantly at baseline and the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth follow-ups. In terms of constipation, indigestion, dizziness, and neurasthenia, group A reported a significantly higher complication rate than group B (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The prognosis did not differ significantly between patients who underwent ABR for at least 1 week and those who started walking as soon as possible. The incidence of complications due to ABRs was lower in the early ambulatory group. Therefore, it may be helpful to start walking as early as possible during the conservative treatment of OVCFs.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of conservative treatment after stable post-traumatic thoracolumbar fractures in elderly: Is it really best option for all elderly patients?

Objective

The purpose of this study was to research the effectiveness of conservative treatment of stable post-traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in elderly patients.

Methods

The study included 21 elderly patients (13 females, 8 males) with post-traumatic thoracolumbar compression fracture who were treated with a brace. Fractures without any trauma history, pathological fractures, patients younger than 60 years old and patients with no malignancy history were excluded from study. Neurological examination and posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) were intact in all patients. Radiological parameters and pain scores were recorded in regular follow-up.

Results

The mean age and follow-up were 71.3 years (range, 60–84 years) and 20.1 months (range, 12–26 months) respectively. During follow-up, 4 patients had significant height loss resulting in kyphotic deformity and intractable pain. There was a significant increase in the local kyphosis angle (p = 0.001) and height loss percentage (p = 0.017). At the final follow-up, the mean Denis Score of pain was 1.62 ± 0.74.

Conclusion

Although there is wide acceptance of conservative treatment of post-traumatic stable thoracolumbar fracture with intact PCL according to the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS), elderly female patients with a post-traumatic compression fracture in the junctional region are at great risk of conservative treatment failure. These patients should be well-informed about the possible complications and poor results of conservative treatment, and surgical treatment should be considered in selective cases with the informed consent of the patients.

•

Brace isn't always best in spine fractures elderly.

•

Conservative treatment has failure risk for female patients and junction fractures.

•

Elderly patients with risk factors should be informed about the possible complications and poor results of conservative treatment.

Comparative study on the period of absolute bed rest of vertebral compression fracture

OBJECTIVE

As a conservative treatment of compression fractures, absolute bed rest (ABR) for a certain period has been recommended, but no guideline on the period has yet been established. Considering that a long ABR period may adversely affect patients, the difference in prognosis according to the ABR period was investigated in this study.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted who were diagnosed with compression fracture. Groups A and B were put on ABR (one week for group A and two weeks for group B). X-ray images at baseline, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks were obtained from both groups, for assessment purposes.

RESULTS

The compression rates of both groups were no significant difference at baseline, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. The conditions of 25.9% and 21.2% of the subjects deteriorated in groups A and B, showing no significant difference. Between the groups of age and bone mineral densities (BMD), no significant difference was observed in the incidence of deterioration. In terms of complications development including constipation and other Gastrointestinal problems, voiding difficulty, etc., group A reported 57.4%, and group B, 84.8%, showing a significant difference (p-value=0.001).

CONCLUSION

No significant difference in the conservative period was observed between the groups. Group B, however, reported a higher complications development rate than group A. Therefore, a short ABR period may be helpful in the early stage of conservative treatment.