Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques

A Geometrical Explanation for Change in Pelvic Tilt (or Lack of Change) Following Long Spinal Fusions

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the relationship between compensatory pelvic retroversion, positive sagittal imbalance (measured by C2 tilt), and the C2 pelvic angle (C2PA) in patients before long spinal fusions; and to determine the association between changes in C2PA and pelvic tilt (PT) following long spinal fusions.

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformity surgical goals often include a PT target, yet patients frequently demonstrate persistent compensatory pelvic retroversion following surgery.

METHODS

Adults above 18 years old undergoing long spinal fusions (>4 levels) with standing preoperative and postoperative radiographs were included. To examine drivers of preoperative sagittal balance, regression models were fit to estimate the association between preoperative C2PA and pelvic incidence with preoperative PT and C2 tilt. To predict postoperative change in PT, multivariable regression was used to estimate change in PT, adjusting for change in C2PA and preoperative C2 tilt.

RESULTS

Among the 80 patients identified, the median age was 61 (IQR: 45-72) and 46 (58%) were female. The median number of levels fused was 10 (IQR: 8-13) and 55 (69%) were instrumented to the sacrum/pelvis. Preoperative C2PA had a significant nonlinear association with preoperative PT ( r2 =0.81, P <0.001) and preoperative C2 tilt ( r2 =0.41, P =0.002). Postoperative change in PT was strongly associated with change in C2PA (β=0.81; P <0.001) and preoperative C2 tilt (β=0.55; P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Following long spinal fusions, change in PT (or lack thereof) can be reliably predicted based on change in C2PA and preoperative C2 tilt. In patients with normal preoperative C2 tilt, the change in C2PA is nearly equivalent to the change in PT, but in patients with more positive C2 tilt (sagittal imbalance), a greater change in C2PA will be required to achieve an equivalent change in PT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Risks Associated with Surgical Management of Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae: Systematic Review of Surgical Considerations and Illustrative Case

BACKGROUND

Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) are congenital anomalies of the L5-S1 segments characterized by either sacralization of the most caudal lumbar vertebra or lumbarization of the most cephalad sacral vertebra. This variation in anatomy exposes patients to additional surgical risks.

METHODS

In order to shed light on surgical considerations reported for lumbar spine cases involving LSTV as described in the extant literature, we performed a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We also present a case example in which wrong level surgery was avoided due to anatomical understanding of LSTV.

RESULTS

A 48-year-old female presented with severe back pain after sustaining a fall from ten feet. The patient exhibited full motor function in all extremities but had begun to experience urinary retention. On initial imaging read, the patient was suspected to have an L1 burst fracture. A review of the imaging demonstrated a transitional vertebra. Therefore, based on the last rib corresponding to T12, the fractured level was L2. This case illustrates the risk LSTV carries for wrong site surgery; appropriate levels were then decompressed and instrumented. On systematic review of the literature according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, a three database literature search identified 39 studies describing 885 patients with LSTV and relevant surgical considerations. The primary indications for surgery were for disc herniation (37%), Bertolotti's syndrome (35%), and spinal stenosis (25%). This cohort displayed a mean follow-up time of 23 months. Reherniation occurred in 12 patients (5.5%). Medical management through steroid injection was 24, 72% (n = 80) for the sample. Wrong level surgery occurred in 1.4% (n = 12) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

LSTV represents a constellation of changes in anatomy beyond just a sacralized or lumbarized vertebra. These anatomical differences expose the patient to additional surgical risks. This case and review of the literature highlight avoidable complications and in particular wrong level surgery.

Development of End-to-End Artificial Intelligence Models for Surgical Planning in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is a commonly used technique for treating lumbar degenerative diseases. In this study, we developed a fully computer-supported pipeline to predict both the cage height and the degree of lumbar lordosis subtraction from the pelvic incidence (PI-LL) after TLIF surgery, utilizing preoperative X-ray images. The automated pipeline comprised two primary stages. First, the pretrained BiLuNet deep learning model was employed to extract essential features from X-ray images. Subsequently, five machine learning algorithms were trained using a five-fold cross-validation technique on a dataset of 311 patients to identify the optimal models to predict interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL. LASSO regression and support vector regression demonstrated superior performance in predicting interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL, respectively. For cage height prediction, the root mean square error (RMSE) was calculated as 1.01, and the model achieved the highest accuracy at a height of 12 mm, with exact prediction achieved in 54.43% (43/79) of cases. In most of the remaining cases, the prediction error of the model was within 1 mm. Additionally, the model demonstrated satisfactory performance in predicting PI-LL, with an RMSE of 5.19 and an accuracy of 0.81 for PI-LL stratification. In conclusion, our results indicate that machine learning models can reliably predict interbody cage height and postoperative PI-LL.

How Much Lumbar Lordosis does a Patient Need to Reach their Age-Adjusted Alignment Target? A Formulated Approach Predicting Successful Surgical Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

Identify optimal lumbar lordosis in adult deformity correction to achieve age-adjusted targets and sustained alignment.

METHODS

Surgical adult spinal deformity patients reaching an age-adjusted ideal alignment at one year were identified. Multilinear regression analysis was used to identify the relationship between regional curvatures (LL and TK) that enabled achievement of a given global alignment (T1 pelvic angle, TPA) based on pelvic incidence (PI).

RESULTS

347 patients out of 1048 available reached their age-adjusted TPA within 5° (60-year-old, 72% women, body mass index 29 ± 6.2). They had a significant improvement in all sagittal parameters (except PI) from pre-operative baseline to 1 year following surgery (P < .001). Multilinear regression predicting L1-S1 based on TK, TPA, and PI demonstrated excellent results (R2 = .85). Simplification of the coefficients of prediction combined with a conversion to an age-based formula led to the following: LL = PI - 0.3TK - 0.5Age + 10. Internal validation of the formula led to a mean error of -.4°, and an absolute error of 5.0°. Internal validation on patients with an age-adjusted alignment revealed similar accuracy across the entire age-adjusted TPA spectrum (ranges of LL errors: ME = .2° to 1.7°, AE = 4.0° to 5.3°).

CONCLUSION

This study provides a simple guideline to identify the amount of LL needed to reach a given alignment (i.e., age-adjusted target) based on PI and associated TK. Implementation of this predictive formula during pre-operative surgical planning may help to reduce unexpected sub-optimal post-operative alignment outcomes.

Automatic Spine Segmentation and Parameter Measurement for Radiological Analysis of Whole-Spine Lateral Radiographs Using Deep Learning and Computer Vision

Radiographic examination is essential for diagnosing spinal disorders, and the measurement of spino-pelvic parameters provides important information for the diagnosis and treatment planning of spinal sagittal deformities. While manual measurement methods are the golden standard for measuring parameters, they can be time consuming, inefficient, and rater dependent. Previous studies that have used automatic measurement methods to alleviate the downsides of manual measurements showed low accuracy or could not be applied to general films. We propose a pipeline for automated measurement of spinal parameters by combining a Mask R-CNN model for spine segmentation with computer vision algorithms. This pipeline can be incorporated into clinical workflows to provide clinical utility in diagnosis and treatment planning. A total of 1807 lateral radiographs were used for the training (n = 1607) and validation (n = 200) of the spine segmentation model. An additional 200 radiographs, which were also used for validation, were examined by three surgeons to evaluate the performance of the pipeline. Parameters automatically measured by the algorithm in the test set were statistically compared to parameters measured manually by the three surgeons. The Mask R-CNN model achieved an average precision at 50% intersection over union (AP50) of 96.2% and a Dice score of 92.6% for the spine segmentation task in the test set. The mean absolute error values of the spino-pelvic parameters measurement results were within the range of 0.4° (pelvic tilt) to 3.0° (lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence), and the standard error of estimate was within the range of 0.5° (pelvic tilt) to 4.0° (pelvic incidence). The intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged from 0.86 (sacral slope) to 0.99 (pelvic tilt, sagittal vertical axis).

Clinical Validation of a Novel Musculoskeletal Modeling Framework to Predict Postoperative Sagittal Alignment

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective radiographic and biomechanical analysis of 108 thoracolumbar fusion patients from two clinical centers.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the validity of a computational framework for predicting postoperative patient posture based on preoperative imaging and surgical data in a large clinical sample.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Short-term and long-term studies on thoracolumbar fusion patients have discussed that a preoperative predictive model would benefit surgical planning and improve patient outcomes. Clinical studies have shown that postoperative alignment changes at the pelvis and intact spine levels may negatively affect postural balance and quality of life. However, it remains challenging to predict such changes preoperatively because of confounding surgical and patient factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient-specific musculoskeletal models incorporated weight, height, body mass index, age, pathology-associated muscle strength, preoperative sagittal alignment, and surgical treatment details. The sagittal alignment parameters predicted by the simulations were compared with those observed radiographically at a minimum of three months after surgery.

RESULTS

Pearson correlation coefficients ranged from r=0.86 to 0.95, and mean errors ranged from 4.1° to 5.6°. The predictive accuracies for postoperative spinopelvic malalignment (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis>10°) and sagittal imbalance parameters (TPA>14°, T9PA>7.4°, or LPA>7.2°) were between 81% and 94%. Patients treated with long fusion (greater than five segments) had relatively lower prediction errors for lumbar lordosis and spinopelvic mismatch than those in the local and short groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall model performance with long constructs was superior to those of the local (one to two segments) and short (three to four segments) fusion cases. The clinical framework is a promising tool in development to enhance clinical judgment and to help design treatment strategies for predictable surgical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Validation of Age-adjusted Ideal Sagittal Alignment in Terms of Proximal Junctional Failure and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the age-adjusted ideal sagittal alignment in terms of proximal junctional failure (PJF) and clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND

It is reported that optimal sagittal correction with regard to the age-adjusted ideal sagittal alignment reduces the risk of PJF development. However, few studies have validated this concept. The age-considered optimal correction is likely to be undercorrection in terms of conventional surgical target, such as pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) within ±9°. Therefore, the clinical impact of age-adjusted sagittal alignment should be evaluated along with radiographic effect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult spinal deformity patients, aged 50 years and above, who underwent greater than or equal to four-level fusion to sacrum with a minimum of four years of follow-up data were included in this study. Radiographic risk factors for PJF (including age-adjusted ideal PI-LL) were evaluated with multivariate analyses. Three groups were created based on PI-LL offset between age-adjusted ideal PI-LL and actual actual PI-LL: undercorrection, ideal correction, and overcorrection. Clinical outcomes were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

This study included 194 adult spinal deformity patients. The mean age was 68.5 years and there were 172 females (88.7%). PJF developed in 99 patients (51.0%) at a mean postoperative period of 14.9 months. Multivariate analysis for PJF revealed that only PI-LL offset group had statistical significance. The proportion of patients with PJF was greatest in the overcorrection group followed by the ideal correction and undercorrection groups. Overcorrected patients regard to the age-adjusted ideal alignment showed poorer clinical outcomes than the other patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Overcorrection relative to age-adjusted sagittal alignment increases the risk of PJF development and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Older patients and those with small PI are likely to be overcorrected in terms of the age-adjusted PI-LL target. Therefore, the age-adjusted alignment should be considered more strictly in these patients.

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Injectable Escherichia coli-Derived Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at the Lumbosacral Junction in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Clinical Pilot Study

Objective

To explore the effectiveness and feasibility of injectable Escherichia coli‐derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 (injectable E‐rhBMP‐2, a combination of E. coli‐derived recombinant human bone morphogenic protein‐2 and a hydrogel type beta‐tricalcium phosphate carrier) as a bone substitute for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) of the lumbosacral junction in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.

Methods

A prospective single‐institution therapeutic exploratory trial was conducted. Twenty patients (average age: 69.1 years; 19 female and one male; average fusion level: 7.95) diagnosed with ASD with sagittal imbalance who underwent surgical treatment including ALIF at the lumbosacral junction from December 2017 to January 2019 were evaluated. Injectable E‐rhBMP‐2 was prepared by dissolving 3 mg of E. coli‐derived recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein‐2 in 1.5 ml H₂O and mixing in situ with 9 g hydrogel type beta‐tricalcium phosphate. This bone graft substitute was loaded onto a metal ALIF cage and L₅–S₁ ALIF was performed in routine manner. Then posterior column osteotomy with multilevel oblique lumbar interbody fusion or pedicle subtraction osteotomy with accessory rod technique was performed to restore sagittal balance. Patients were followed up for 12 months. CT‐based fusion rates were examined at 6 and 12 months after surgery. Also, clinical outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Visual Analog Scale [VAS] score of the back and leg) were evaluated at 6 and 12 months after surgery. All postoperative adverse events were evaluated for the association with injectable E.BMP‐2.

Results

Of the 20 patients, loss to follow‐up occurred with one patient at 6 months after surgery and one patient at 12 months after surgery, resulting in a total of 18 patients who were available for follow‐up. Six months after surgery, 68.4% patients achieved solid fusion. Twelve months after surgery, 100% fusion rate was achieved. Compared to baseline values, ODI scores improved to 45.8% and 63.7%, VAS (back) improved to 69.2% and 72.8%, and VAS (leg) improved to 49.2% and 64.8%, respectively, at 6 and 12 months after surgery (p < 0.001 for all). Ten cases of adverse events occurred. But no adverse events were associated with injectable E‐rhBMP‐2.

Conclusion

Injectable E‐rhBMP‐2 will be an effective bone graft substitute when achieving solid interbody fusion in the lumbosacral junction.

Can Machine Learning Accurately Predict Postoperative Compensation for the Uninstrumented Thoracic Spine and Pelvis After Fusion From the Lower Thoracic Spine to the Sacrum?

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutively collected cases.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a machine-learning (ML) program can accurately predict the postoperative thoracic kyphosis through the uninstrumented thoracic spine and pelvic compensation in patients who undergo fusion from the lower thoracic spine (T10 or T11) to the sacrum.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2019, a consecutive series of adult (≥18 years old) patients with adult spinal deformity underwent corrective spinal fusion from the lower thoracic spine (T10 or T11) to the sacrum. Deidentified data was processed by a ML system-based platform to predict the postoperative thoracic kyphosis (TK) and pelvic tilt (PT) for each patient. To validate the ML model, the postoperative TK (T4-T12, instrumented thoracic, and uninstrumented thoracic) and the pelvic tilt were compared against the predicted values.

RESULTS

A total of 20 adult patients with a minimum 6-month follow-up (mean: 22.4 ± 11.3 months) were included in this study. No significant differences were observed for TK (predicted 37.6° vs postoperative 38.3°, P = .847), uninstrumented TK (predicted 33.9° vs postoperative 29.8°, P = .188), and PT (predicted 23.4° vs postoperative 22.7°, P = .754). The predicted PT and the TK of the uninstrumented thoracic spine correlated well with postoperative values (uninstrumented TK: R² = 0.764, P < .001; PT: R² = 0.868, P < .001). The mean error with which kyphosis through the uninstrumented thoracic spine can be measured was 4.8° ± 4.0°. The mean error for predicting PT was 2.5° ± 1.7°.

CONCLUSION

ML algorithms can accurately predict the spinopelvic compensation after spinal fusion from the lower thoracic spine to the sacrum. These findings suggest that surgeons may be able to leverage this technology to reduce the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis in this population.

Metal failure and nonunion at L5-S1 after long instrumented fusion distal to pelvis for adult spinal deformity: Anterior versus transforaminal interbody fusion

PURPOSE

Pseudoarthrosis and metal failure at L5-S1 following long fusion surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD) remain major issues. Few studies report on which anterior column support technique is better in terms of achieving fusion and avoiding metal failures. Our study aimed to evaluate the fusion status and metal failure rate at L5-S1 after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

METHODS

The study population included patients aged >50 years who underwent surgery for ASD. Anterior column supports at L5-S1 using ALIF and TLIF were compared with ≥ 2-year follow-up. Fusion status on 2-year computed tomography (CT) scan, metal failure, visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were evaluated.

RESULTS

98 patients were included in this study (53 ALIF group and 45 TLIF group). We achieved solid fusion on 2-year CT scans in 88.9% and 69.8% patients in the TLIF and ALIF group, respectively. Metal failure developed in nine (17.0%) and six (13.3%) patients in the ALIF and TLIF group, respectively. The most common failure type was unilateral L5-S1 rod fracture (7 and five patients in the ALIF and TLIF group, respectively). Only one patient with bilateral rod fractures in the ALIF group required revision surgery. There were no differences in the VAS and ODI scores at the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

TLIF showed a better fusion rate than ALIF at L5-S1 after long instrumented fusion for ASD. However, the capacity to restore sagittal parameters was greater in the ALIF group. There were no differences between the groups regarding metal failure rate, revision surgery, or clinical outcomes.

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy with patient-specific instruments

Background

Although the utility of patient-specific instruments (PSI) has been well established for complex osteotomies in orthopedic surgery, it is yet to be comparatively analyzed for complex spinal deformity correction, such as pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO).

Methods

Six thoracolumbar human cadavers were used to perform nine PSOs using the free-hand (FH) technique and nine with PSI (in total 18 PSOs). Osteotomy planes were planned on the basis of preoperative computed tomography (CT). A closing-wedge angle of 30° was targeted for each PSO. Postoperative CT scans were obtained to measure segmental lordosis correction and the deviation from the planned 30° correction as well as the osseous gap of posterior elements.

Results

The time required to perform a PSO was 18:22 (range 10:22–26:38) min and 14:14 (range 10:13–22:16) min in the PSI and FH groups, respectively (p = 0.489). The PSI group had a significantly higher lordosis gain (29°, range 23–31° vs. 21°, range 13–34°; p = 0.015). The lordosis gain was significantly more accurate with PSI (deviation angle: 1°; range 0–7°) than with the FH technique (9°; range 4–17°; p = 0.003). PSI achieved a significantly smaller residual osseous gap of the posterior elements (5 mm; range 0–9 mm) than the FH group (11 mm; range 3–27 mm; p = 0.043).

With PSI, an angular difference of 3° (range 1–12°), a translational offset of 1 (range 0–6) mm at the level of the lamina, and a vertebral body entry point deviation of 1 (range 0–4) mm was achieved in the osteotomies.

Conclusions

PSI-guided PSO can be a more feasible and accurate approach in achieving a planned lordosis angle than the traditional FH technique in a cadaver model. This approach further reduced osseous gaps, potentially promoting higher fusion rates in vivo.

Transiency of postoperative cervical kyphosis seen after surgical correction of sagittal malalignment in adult spinal deformity patients

Objective

In this study, we evaluated factors affecting changes in cervical lordosis after deformity correction and during follow-up period in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with severe sagittal imbalance.

Methods

Seventy-nine patients, with an average age of 71.6 years, who underwent long-segment fixation from T10 to S1 with sacropelvic fixation were included. We performed a comparative analysis of the radiographic parameters after surgery (Post) and at the last follow-up (Last). We calculated the Pearson’s correlation coefficient and performed multilinear regression analysis to predict independent parameters for Post and Last cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope (T1S), and thoracic kyphosis (TK).

Results

Hyperlordotic changes of -23.3° in CL before surgery was reduced to -7° after surgery, and Last CL had increased to -15.3°. T1S was reduced from 27° before surgery to 14.4° after surgery and had increased to 18.8° at the last follow-up. Through multilinear regression analysis, we found that Post CL and T1S were more significantly affected by the amount of LL correction (p = .045 and .049). The effect of Last T1S was significantly associated with the Last CL; the effect of Last TK, with the Last T1S; and the effect of Post PI-LL, with the Last TK (p < .05).

Conclusion

The postoperative kyphotic change in CL in ASD patients with preoperative cervical hyperlordosis is not permanent and is affected by drastic LL correction and SVA restoration. To achieve spinopelvic harmony proportional to the difference in LL relative to PI, TK becomes modified over time to increase T1S and CL, in an effort to achieve optimal spine curvature.

Failure Types and Related Factors of Spinopelvic Fixation After Long Construct Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity

BACKGROUND

Rigid internal fixation of the spine is an essential part of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Despite the use of pelvic fixation and anterior column support, spinopelvic fixation failure (SPFF) still remains an issue. Few studies have evaluated the types of such failure or its related factors.

OBJECTIVE

To classify the types of SPFF and investigate its risk factors, including the fusion status at L5-S1 on CT scan.

METHODS

The study cohort consisted of ninety-eight ASD patients who underwent more than 4-level fusions to the sacrum with interbody fusion at L5-S1. Patients with SPFF were divided into the two groups: above-S1 and below-S1 failure groups. The patient, surgical, and radiographic variables in each group were compared to those of the no-failure group. The L5-S1 fusion status was assessed using 2-yr computed tomography (CT) scan. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for each failure group.

RESULTS

The mean age was 68.5 yr. Follow-up duration was 55.7 mo. The SPFF developed in 46 (46.9%) patients at 32.7 mo postoperatively. There were 15 patients in the above-S1 failure group and 31 patients in the below-S1 failure group. Multivariate analysis revealed that nonunion at L5-S1 was a single risk factor for above-S1 failure. In contrast, the risk factors for below-S1 failure included a greater number of fused segments and postoperative less thoracic kyphosis.

CONCLUSION

SPFF develops in different patterns with different risk factors. Above-S1 SPFF was associated with nonunion at L5-S1, while below-S1 SPFF was associated with mechanical stress.

Patient-specific statistical shape modeling for optimal spinal sagittal alignment in lumbar spinal fusion

PURPOSE

The present study compared patients developing ASD after L4/5 spinal fusion with a control group using a patient-specific statistical shape model (SSM) to find alignment-differences between the groups.

METHODS

This study included patients who had undergone spinal fusion at L4/5 and either remained asymptomatic (control group; n = 25, follow-up of > 4 years) or required revision surgery for epifusional ASD (n = 22). Landmarks on preoperative and postoperative lateral radiographs were annotated, and the optimal spinal sagittal alignment was calculated for each patient. The two-dimensional distance from the SSM-calculated optimum to the actual positions before and after fusion surgery was compared.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the additive mean distance from the SSM-calculated optimum was 86.8 mm in the ASD group and 67.7 mm in the control group (p = 0.119). Greater differences were observed between the groups with a larger distance to the ideal in patients with ASD at more cranial levels. Significant difference between the groups was seen postoperatively in the vertical distance of the operated segment L4. The patients with ASD (5.69 ± 3.0 mm) had a significant greater distance from the SSM as the control group (3.58 ± 3.5 mm, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ASD requiring revision after lumbar spinal fusion have greater differences from the optimal spinal sagittal alignment as an asymptomatic control group calculated by patient-specific statistical shape modeling. Further research might help to understand the value of SSM, in conjunction with already established indexes, for preoperative planning with the aim of reducing the risk of ASD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Strategies for prevention of rod fracture in adult spinal deformity: cobalt chrome rod, accessory rod technique, and lateral lumbar interbody fusion

OBJECTIVE

Restoring the proper sagittal alignment in adult spinal deformity (ASD) can improve radiological and clinical outcomes, but pseudarthrosis including rod fracture (RF) is a common problematic complication. The purpose of this study was to analyze the methods for reducing the incidence of RF in deformity correction of ASD.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively selected 178 consecutive patients (mean age 70.8 years) with lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK) who underwent deformity correction with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were classified into the non-RF group (n = 131) and the RF group (n = 47). For predicting the crucial factors of RF, patient factors, radiographic parameters, and surgical factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of RF was 26% (47/178 cases), occurring in 42% (42/100 cases) of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), 7% (5/67 cases) of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with posterior column osteotomy, 18% (23/129 cases) of cobalt chrome rods, 49% (24/49 cases) of titanium alloy rods, 6% (2/36 cases) placed with the accessory rod technique, and 32% (45/142 cases) placed with the 2-rod technique. There were no significant differences in the incidence of RF regarding patient factors between two groups. While both groups showed severe sagittal imbalance before operation, lumbar lordosis (LL) was more kyphotic and pelvic incidence (PI) minus LL (PI-LL) mismatch was greater in the RF group (p < 0.05). Postoperatively, while LL and PI-LL did not show significant differences between the two groups, LL and sagittal vertical axis correction were greater in the RF group (p < 0.05). Nonetheless, at the last follow-up, the two groups did not show significant differences in radiographic parameters except thoracolumbar junctional angles. As for surgical factors, use of the cobalt chrome rod and the accessory rod technique was significantly greater in the non-RF group (p < 0.05). As for the correction method, PSO was associated with more RFs than the other correction methods, including LLIF (p < 0.05). By logistic regression analysis, PSO, preoperative PI-LL mismatch, and the accessory rod technique were crucial factors for RF.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater preoperative sagittal spinopelvic malalignment including preoperative PI-LL mismatch was the crucial risk factor for RF in LDK patients 65 years or older. For restoring and maintaining sagittal alignment, use of the cobalt chrome rod, accessory rod technique, or LLIF was shown to be effective for reducing RF in ASD surgery.

Optimized Surgical Strategy for Adult Spinal Deformity: Quantitative Lordosis Correction versus Lordosis Morphology

BACKGROUND

In surgical correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD), pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) plays a key role to restore normal sagittal alignment. Recently, it has been found that postoperative lordosis morphology act as an important factor in preventing mechanical complications. However, there have been no studies on the effect of postoperative lordosis morphology on the restoration of sagittal alignment. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of postoperative lordosis morphology on achievement of optimal sagittal alignment. The secondary objective was to find out which radiographic or morphologic parameter affects sagittal alignment in surgical correction of ASD.

METHODS

228 consecutive patients with lumbar degenerative kyphosis who underwent deformity correction and long-segment fixation from T10 to S1 with sacropelvic fixation and follow-up over 2 years were enrolled. Patients were divided according to whether optimal alignment was achieved (balanced group) or not (non-balanced group) at last follow-up. We analyzed the differences of postoperative radiographic parameters and morphologic parameters between two groups. Correlation analysis and stepwise multiple linear regression analysis was performed to predict the effect of PI-LL and morphologic parameters on the sagittal vertical axis (SVA).

RESULTS

Of 228 patients, 195 (85.5%) achieved optimal alignment at last follow-up. Two groups significantly differed in postoperative and last follow-up LL (p < 0.001 and p = 0.028, respectively) and postoperative and last follow-up PI-LL (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Morphologic parameters did not significantly differ between the two groups except lower lordosis arc angle (=postoperative sacral slope). In correlation analysis and stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, postoperative PI-LL was the only parameter which had significant association with last follow-up SVA (R² = 0.134, p < 0.001). Morphologic parameters did not have any association with last follow-up SVA.

CONCLUSIONS

When planning spine reconstruction surgery, although considering postoperative lordosis morphology is necessary, it is still very important considering proportional lordosis correction based on individual spinopelvic alignment (PI-LL) to achieve optimal sagittal alignment.

Who Will Require Revision Surgery Among Neurologically Intact Patients with Proximal Junctional Failure After Surgical Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the risk factors for revision surgery among neurologically intact patients with proximal junctional failure (PJF) after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PJF following long fusion for ASD is a well-recognized complication that negatively affects clinical outcomes. However, revision surgery is not required for every patient with PJF especially if the patient does not present with neurologic deficit. Identifying the risk factors of revision surgery is necessary to determine who will need revision surgery as well as when is the right time for the revision surgery.

METHODS

Sixty-nine neurologically intact patients with PJF following ASD surgery were followed up with more than 2 years after PJF development or until undergoing revision surgery. PJF was divided into ligamentous failure (proximal junctional angle [PJA] of more than 20°) and bony failure. According to the conduct of revision surgery, two groups (revision and no revision) were created. Risk factors for revision surgery were analyzed in univariate and multivariate analysis with regard to patient, surgical and radiographic variables.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of PJF development was 70.9 years. There were 45 patients with bony failure and 24 with ligamentous failure. Revision surgery was performed for 23 patients (33.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that bony failure (odds ratio: 10.465) and PJA (odds ratio: 1.131) were significant risk factors. For those with bony failure, the cutoff value of PJA for performing revision surgery was calculated as 22°. The revision rate was significantly highest in patients (63.6%) with bony failure + PJA 22° or higher followed by patients (26.1%) with bony failure + PJA less than 22° and patients (12.5%) with ligamentous failure (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Bony failure with PJA of greater than 22° increased the likelihood for revision surgery. Therefore, early surgical intervention should be considered in these patients.Level of Evidence: 4.

Multicenter assessment of surgical outcomes in adult spinal deformity patients with severe global coronal malalignment: determination of target coronal realignment threshold

OBJECTIVE

The impact of global coronal malalignment (GCM; C7 plumb line-midsacral offset) on adult spinal deformity (ASD) treatment outcomes is unclear. Here, the authors' primary objective was to assess surgical outcomes and complications in patients with severe GCM, with a secondary aim of investigating potential surgical target coronal thresholds for optimal outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective multicenter database. Operative patients with severe GCM (≥ 1 SD above the mean) and a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. Demographic, surgical, radiographic, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and complications data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 691 potentially eligible operative patients (mean GCM 4 ± 3 cm), 80 met the criteria for severe GCM ≥ 7 cm. Of these, 62 (78%; mean age 63.7 ± 10.7 years, 81% women) had a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean follow-up 3.3 ± 1.1 years). The mean ASD-Frailty Index was 3.9 ± 1.5 (frail), 50% had undergone prior fusion, and 81% had concurrent severe sagittal spinopelvic deformity with GCM and C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) positively correlated (r = 0.313, p = 0.015). Surgical characteristics included posterior-only (58%) versus anterior-posterior (42%) approach, mean fusion of 13.2 ± 3.8 levels, iliac fixation (90%), 3-column osteotomy (36%), operative duration of 8.3 ± 3.0 hours, and estimated blood loss of 2.3 ± 1.7 L. Final alignment and HRQOL significantly improved (p < 0.01): GCM, 11 to 4 cm; maximum coronal Cobb angle, 43° to 20°; SVA, 13 to 4 cm; pelvic tilt, 29° to 23°; pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, 31° to 5°; Oswestry Disability Index, 51 to 37; physical component summary of SF-36 (PCS), 29 to 37; 22-Item Scoliosis Research Society Patient Questionnaire (SRS-22r) Total, 2.6 to 3.5; and numeric rating scale score for back and leg pain, 7 to 4 and 5 to 3, respectively. Residual GCM ≥ 3 cm was associated with worse SRS-22r Appearance (p = 0.04) and SRS-22r Satisfaction (p = 0.02). The minimal clinically important difference and/or substantial clinical benefit (MCID/SCB) was met in 43%-83% (highest for SRS-22r Appearance [MCID 83%] and PCS [SCB 53%]). The severity of baseline GCM (≥ 2 SD above the mean) significantly impacted postoperative SRS-22r Satisfaction and MCID/SCB improvement for PCS. No significant partial correlations were demonstrated between GCM or SVA correction and HRQOL improvement. There were 89 total complications (34 minor and 55 major), 45 (73%) patients with ≥ 1 complication (most commonly rod fracture [19%] and proximal junctional kyphosis [PJK; 18%]), and 34 reoperations in 22 (35%) patients (most commonly for rod fracture and PJK).

CONCLUSIONS

Study results demonstrated that ASD surgery in patients with substantial GCM was associated with significant radiographic and HRQOL improvement despite high complication rates. MCID improvement was highest for SRS-22r Appearance/Self-Image. A residual GCM ≥ 3 cm was associated with a worse outcome, suggesting a potential coronal realignment target threshold to assist surgical planning.

Sacral incidence to pubis: a novel and alternative morphologic radiological parameter to pelvic incidence in assessing spinopelvic sagittal alignment

Background

Although pelvic incidence (PI) is a key morphologic parameter in assessing spinopelvic sagittal alignment, accurate measurements of PI become difficult in patients with severe hip dislocation or femoral head deformities. This study aimed to investigate the reliability of our novel morphologic parameters and the correlations with established sagittal spinopelvic parameters.

Methods

One hundred healthy volunteers (25 male and 75 female), with an average age of 38.9 years, were analysed. Whole-body alignment in the standing position was measured using a slot-scanning X-ray imager. We measured the established spinopelvic sagittal parameters and a novel parameter: the sacral incidence to pubis (SIP). The correlation coefficient of each parameter, regression equation of PI using SIP, and regression equation of lumbar lordosis (LL) using PI or SIP were obtained. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated as an evaluation of the measurement reliability.

Results

Reliability analysis showed high intra- and inter-rater agreements in all the spinopelvic parameters, with ICCs > 0.9. The SIP and pelvic inclination angle (PIA) demonstrated strong correlation with PI (R = 0.96) and pelvic tilt (PT) (R = 0.92). PI could be predicted according to the regression equation: PI = − 9.92 + 0.905 * SIP (R = 0.9596, p < 0.0001). The ideal LL could be predicted using the following equation using PI and age: ideal LL = 32.33 + 0.623 * PI – 0.280 * age (R = 0.6033, p < 0.001) and using SIP and age: ideal LL = 24.29 + 0.609 * SIP – 0.309 * age (R = 0.6177, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Both SIP and PIA were reliable parameters for determining the morphology and orientation of the pelvis, respectively. Ideal LL was accurately predicted using the SIP with equal accuracy as the PI. Our findings will assist clinicians in the assessment of spinopelvic sagittal alignment.

Trial registration

This study was retrospectively registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000042979; January 13, 2021).

Adult Spinal Deformity: Current Concepts and Decision-Making Strategies for Management

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is characterized by three-dimensional abnormalities of the thoracic or thoracolumbar spine that exerts significant impacts on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL). With the important effects that deformity of the sagittal plane exerts on the HRQoL, there have been paradigm shifts in ASD evaluation and management. Loss of lumbar lordosis is recognized as a key driver of ASD followed by reducing kyphosis, pelvic retroversion, and knee flexion. The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)– Schwab classification reflects the sagittal spinopelvic parameters that correlate pain and disability in ASD patients. Although the SRS–Schwab classification provides a realignment target framework for surgeons, a structured patient-specific systemic approach is crucial for the process of decision-making. ASD management should be focused on restoring age-specific harmonious alignment and should consider the comorbidities and risk factors of each patient to prevent catastrophic complications and enhance the HRQoL.

Spino-Pelvic Thresholds for Prevention of Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Combined Anterior Column Realignment and Short Posterior Spinal Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Kyphosis

Objective

To analyze ideal indication for combined anterior column realignment (ACR) with short posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and posterior column osteotomy (PCO) for preventing proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients with lower lumbar kyphosis and compensatory thoracolumbar lordosis.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted. This study included 27 ASD patients (average age of 66.6 years; one male and 26 females) with lower lumbar kyphosis and compensated thoracolumbar lordosis who underwent short PSF with PCO following ACR from 2006 to 2010. The minimum follow‐up period was 5 years. The patients were divided into two groups based on the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) of the last follow‐up radiographs, and a comparative analysis was performed evaluating spino‐pelvic parameters and clinical outcomes including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and complications.

Results

The mean follow‐up time of included patients was 109.7 months, and the mean number of fused segments was 3.7. The uppermost instrumented vertebra was L₂ in 18 patients or L₃ in nine patients, and lowermost instrumented vertebra was sacrum in all patients. The mean lumbar lordosis (LL) values in the optimal SVA and suboptimal SVA groups were 4.4° and 4.2° preoperatively (P = 0.639), −48.1° and −35° postoperatively (P = 0.007), and −45.2° and −20.7° at the last follow‐up (P < 0.05). Overcorrection was seen in seven patients in the optimal SVA group, whereas all of the patients of the suboptimal SVA group were in the category of undercorrection (P = 0.021). Pelvic incidence (PI) of optimal SVA group (<50 mm, n = 16) and suboptimal SVA group (≥50 mm, n = 11) was 44.1° and 53.8° (P = 0.009). The prevalence of PJK was significantly higher in the suboptimal SVA group (P = 0.008), and last follow‐up VAS for back pain (P < 0.05), and postoperative and last follow‐up ODI (P = 0.002 and P < 0.05) were statistically larger for the suboptimal group than the optimal group.

Conclusions

Combined ACR with short PSF and PCO could effectively prevent sagittal decompensation of PJK and help achieve sagittal balance in the treatment of ASD patients with lower lumbar kyphosis, compensatory thoracolumbar lordosis, and especially low PI (<50°).

Strategy for obtaining solid fusion at L5-S1 in adult spinal deformity: risk factor analysis for nonunion at L5-S1

OBJECTIVE

Maintaining lumbosacral (LS) arthrodesis and global sagittal balance after long fusion to the sacrum remains an important issue in the surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD). The importance and usefulness of LS fixation have been documented, but the optimal surgical long fusion to the sacrum remains a matter for debate. Therefore, the authors performed a retrospective study to evaluate fusion on CT scans and the risk factors for LS pseudarthrosis (nonunion) after long fusion to the sacrum in ASD.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective study of 59 patients with lumbar degenerative kyphosis (mean age 69.6 years) who underwent surgical correction, including an interbody fusion of the L5-S1, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Achievement of LS fusion was evaluated by analyzing 3D-CT scans at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Patients were classified into a union group (n = 36) and nonunion group (n = 23). Risk factors for nonunion were analyzed, including patient and surgical factors.

RESULTS

The overall fusion rate was 61% (36/59). Regarding radiological factors, optimal sagittal balance at the final follow-up significantly differed between two groups. There were no significant differences in terms of patient factors, and no significant differences with respect to the use of pedicle subtraction osteotomy, the number of fused segments, the proportion of anterior versus posterior interbody fusion, S2 alar iliac fixation versus conventional iliac fixation, or loosening of sacral or iliac screws. However, the proportion of metal cages to polyetheretherketone cages and the proportion of sacropelvic fixation were significantly higher in the union group (p = 0.022 and p < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LS junction fusion is crucial for global sagittal balance, and the use of iliac screws in addition to LS interbody fusion using a metal cage improves the outcomes of long fusion surgery for ASD patients.

Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Degenerative Sagittal Deformity After Under- and Overcorrection of Lumbar Lordosis: Does Overcorrection of Lumbar Lordosis Instigate PJK?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) occurrence and surgical outcomes according to degree of lumbar lordosis (LL) correction relative to pelvic incidence (PI). In addition, risk factors of PJK including LL and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) correction were investigated.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

PJK is a common complication after adult spinal deformity surgery, and many factors are known to be associated with PJK. However, the effect of degree of LL correction on PJK occurrence is not fully understood.

METHODS

Eighty-three degenerative sagittal imbalance patients treated with deformity correction and long instrumented fusion to the sacrum with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were studied. Patients were divided into three groups according to their postoperative LL angle relative to PI using the SRS-Schwab classification: Group A (undercorrection, PI-LL> 10°), Group B (ideal correction, -10°

RESULTS

Overall PJK prevalence was 36.1% (30/83), and ratio of optimal SVA at postoperative and last follow-up were significantly higher in Group C (P < 0.001, P < 0.001). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in PJK prevalence among three groups (40% vs. 37.5% vs. 34.1%; P = 0.907). Group C had better clinical outcomes (last follow-up ODI, VAS of LBP) than Group A (10.0 vs. 18.4; P < 0.001 and 1.5 vs. 4.0; P < 0.001). The increases in LL or SVA correction degree were not associated with PJK occurrence (P = 0.304, P = 0.201).

CONCLUSION

Overcorrection showed good surgical outcomes without increasing PJK prevalence. Degrees of LL and SVA correction do not act as risk factors for PJK. Therefore, in adult spinal deformity patients, LL correction greater than PI may be a good choice that can result in better clinical outcomes without increasing risk of PJK.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Aged
• Animals
• Female
• Humans
• Kyphosis/diagnostic imaging
• Kyphosis/etiology
• Lordosis/diagnostic imaging
• Lordosis/surgery
• Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging
• Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Neurodegenerative Diseases/diagnostic imaging
• Neurodegenerative Diseases/etiology
• Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects
• Neurosurgical Procedures/trends
• Retrospective Studies
• Risk Factors

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Sang-Kyu Im Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
Jung-Hee Lee
Kyung-Chung Kang
Sung Joon Shin
Ki Young Lee
Jong Jun Park
Man Ho Kim

Collapse

C7 sacral tilt (C7ST): a novel spinopelvic parameter reveals the relationship between pelvic parameters and global spinal sagittal balance and converts pelvic parameters into spinal parameters

PURPOSE

The aim is to propose a novel spinopelvic parameter C7 sacral tilt (C7ST), of which its sum with global tilt (GT) is equal to pelvic incidence (PI), from a geometrical point of view.

METHODS

A cohort of 198 patients was recruited and the whole lateral spine and pelvic radiographs were performed. The following sagittal parameters were measured: sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C7 vertical tilt (C7VT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), PI, GT and C7ST. The correlations between them were analyzed using the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient, and simple linear regressions were simultaneously conducted. P < 0.05 was set as the level of significance.

RESULTS

Geometric construction by complementary angles revealed that PI = C7ST + GT, GT = PT + C7VT, and C7ST = SS - C7VT. Both C7ST and GT were moderately correlated with PI (R = 0.52 and 0.596, respectively), strongly correlated with SS and PT, respectively (SS = 0.9 * C7ST + 1.15, R = 0.955; PT = 0.87 * GT + 3.86, R = 0.96). The correlation coefficients of the SVA and C7VT, SVA and SS - C7ST, and SVA and GT - PT were 0.935, 0.925 and 0.863, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The novel proposed spinopelvic parameter C7ST has the advantages of convenient measurement, reduced error, and extrapolation of other parameters. The greatest significance of proposing C7ST is that pelvic parameters (PI, PT and SS) are converted into spinal parameters (C7ST and GT), which is very helpful for a more intuitive understanding of the progression of spinal sagittal imbalance.

INFLUENCE OF THE MISDEF ALGORITHM ON THE THERAPEUTIC DECISION FOR VERTEBRAL DEFORMITY IN THE ADULT

ABSTRACT Objective The therapeutic decision in cases of adult spinal deformity takes numerous factors into account with a consequent variability in treatment options. The objective is to compare the impact of the MISDEF (minimally invasive spine deformity) algorithm on therapeutic decisions in cases of adult spinal deformity. Methods Prospective radiographic analysis of 40 cases of adult deformity. The cases were sent, in two steps, to 20 Latin American surgeons who had to choose among six treatment options with and without the use of the MISDEF. Results For the conducts of decompression, decompression and short fusion, decompression and fusion with interbody device, and osteotomy with extension of fusion to the thoracic spine, no significant differences were found when comparing decisions made with and without MISDEF. For osteotomy, we observed a tendency for the number of surgeons choosing this conduct to increase when the decision is made with MISDEF. We observed that the number of surgeons who decided on conservative treatment decreased with the use of MISDEF (p <0.001). In cases with sagittal vertical axis <6 cm or pelvic tilt <25 ° or PI-LL (pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis) <10 ° or coronal curve <20 °, there was a decrease in the conservative treatment option and an increase in osteotomy with proximal extension of the fusion with the use of MISDEF. Conclusions There is a tendency to increase indications of osteotomy and decrease the conservative treatment option when making a decision with MISDEF. The use of the algorithm showed no significant impact on the therapeutic decision in severe cases of adult deformity. Level of Evidence II; Prospective comparative radiographic analysis.

Sagittal Radiographic Parameters of the Spine in Three Physiological Postures Characterized Using a Slot Scanner and Their Potential Implications on Spinal Weight-Bearing Properties

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective radiographic comparative study.

PURPOSE

To compare and understand the load-bearing properties of each functional spinal unit (FSU) using three commonly assumed, physiological, spinal postures, namely, the flexed (slump sitting), erect (standing) and extended (backward bending) postures.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Sagittal spinal alignment is posture-dependent and influences the load-bearing properties of the spine. The routine placement of intervertebral cages "as anterior as possible" to correct deformity may compromise the load-bearing capabilities of the spine, leading to complications.

METHODS

We recruited young patients with nonspecific low back pain for <3 months, who were otherwise healthy. Each patient had EOS images taken in the flexed, erect and extended positions, in random order, as well as magnetic resonance imaging to assess for disk degeneration. Angular and disk height measurements were performed and compared in all three postures using paired t-tests. Changes in disk height relative to the erect posture were caclulated to determine the alignment-specific load-bearing area of each FSU.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients (415 lumbar intervertebral disks) were studied. Significant alignment changes were found between all three postures at L1/2, and only between erect and flexion at the other FSUs. Disk height measurements showed that the neutral axis of the spine, marked by zones where disk heights did not change, varied between postures and was level specific. The load-bearing areas were also found to be more anterior in flexion and more posterior in extension, with the erect spine resembling the extended spine to a greater extent.

CONCLUSIONS

Load-bearing areas of the lumbar spine are sagittal alignment-specific and level-specific. This may imply that, depending on the surgical realignment strategy, attention should be paid not just to placing an intervertebral cage "as anterior as possible" for generating lordosis, but also on optimizing load-bearing in the lumbar spine.

Surgical Treatment of Flat Back Syndrome With Anterior Hyperlordotic Cages

BACKGROUND

Traditional correction for flat back syndrome is performed with a posterior-based surgery or combined approaches in revision cases.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcome from anterior surgery with the use of hyperlordotic cages (HLCs) in patients with flat back syndrome.

METHODS

All patients operated with or without prior posterior lumbar surgery were studied. Pre- to postoperative sagittal alignment was analyzed. Radiographic parameters were analyzed including T1 pelvic angle (T1PA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and T4-12TK.

RESULTS

All 50 patients (mean age of 58 yr, 72% female with mean body mass index of 28) demonstrated significant radiographic alignment difference in their spinopelvic and global parameters from pre- to postoperative standing: LL (-37.04° vs -59.55°, P < .001), SS (35.12 vs 41.13, P < .001), PI-LL (23.55 vs 6.46), T4-12 TK (30.59 vs 41.67), PT (28.22 vs 22.13), SVA in mm (80.94 vs 37.39), and T1PA (28.70° vs 18.43°, P < .001). Using linear regression analysis, predicted pre- to postoperative change in standing LL corresponded to a pre- to postoperative changes in standing PI-LL mismatch, T1PA, TK, SS, PT, and SVA (R2 = 0.59, 0.38, 0.25, 0.16, 0.12, and 0.17, respectively). Five degrees of pre- to postoperative change in T1PA translates to -4.15° change in LL.

CONCLUSION

Anterior surgery with HLCs followed by posterior instrumentation is an effective technique to treat flat back syndrome. HLCs are effective to maximize LL up to 30°, which is equivalent in magnitude to a pedicle subtraction osteotomy, but associated with less blood loss, quicker recovery, lower complications, and good surgical outcome.

Spinal sagittal alignment goals based on statistical modelling and musculoskeletal simulations

The definition of target alignment for spinal fusion surgery follows anatomical criteria and strongly relies on surgical experience. However, the optimal patient-specific alignment often remains unknown. Statistical models could provide information about physiological alignments, and musculoskeletal models are powerful tools to investigate biomechanics. We aimed to statistically predict alignments and hypothesized they would be biomechanically favorable. A statistical model was trained with 60 annotated radiographs to predict physiological sagittal alignment based on position of femoral heads and sacrum. Predicted alignments for 11 back pain patients were clinically evaluated in terms of balance and compared to Original alignments. The normative ranges for spinal balance parameters were obtained from Surgimap™. Musculoskeletal loads were furthermore simulated in upright standing and 30° forward flexion, using alignment-specific musculoskeletal models. For the majority of Predicted alignments (n = 9) at least two of three investigated balance parameters were within the normative range, as opposed to the minority of the Original alignments (n = 4). Predicted alignments resulted in significantly lowered overall muscle activity and compressive loads (all levels, both postures). Shear force magnitudes in upright standing decreased significantly at levels L1L2 (-68 N) and L2L3 (-69 N) and clearly yet not significantly at L3L4 (-39 N) and L4L5 (-152 N). Shear loads at level L5S1 remained the same. In flexed postures identical trends were observed. The statistical model was able to predict spinal alignments that led to both improved balance and reduced musculoskeletal loads. Further studies are needed to investigate clinical validity of such models.

Review of Radiological Parameters, Imaging Characteristics, and Their Effect on Optimal Treatment Approaches and Surgical Outcomes for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Determining the optimal surgical method for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is challenging. The surgical indication should be made based on not only radiological findings, but also the patient’s age, preoperative neurological findings, social background, activities of daily life, and the presence or absence of comorbid diseases. Anterior resection for OPLL with or without wide corpectomy and fusion, posterior decompression with or without relatively long fusion, or anterior and posterior combined surgery may be considered. When evaluating the clinical condition of patients with cervical OPLL before surgery, various radiological parameters should be carefully considered, including the number of spinal segments involved, the cervical alignment or tilt angle, the relationship between OPLL and the C2–7 line (termed the “K-line”), the occupying ratio of OPLL, and the involvement of dural ossification. The objective of this article is to review the radiological parameters in current use for deciding upon the optimal surgical strategy and for predicting surgical outcomes, focusing on cervical OPLL.

Technical Consideration for TLIF Cage Retrieval and Deformity Correction With Anterior Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Revision Surgeries

INTRODUCTION

Symptomatic pseudoarthrosis after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) could result in sagittal malalignment. Revision posterior surgery with TLIF cage removal poses a challenge intraoperatively. The authors have proposed salvage anterior approach for cage removal and have discussed unique experience with the correction in their deformity patients.

METHODS

All patients with symptoms of clinical deformity or symptomatic pseudoarthrosis operated from January of 2012 to February of 2018 were included in the study. TLIF cage removal followed by anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) surgery was performed in all patients. Radiographic sagittal parameters including thoracic kyphosis (TK; T4-T12), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), lumbar lordosis (LL), the mismatch between pelvic incidence (PI) and LL (PI-LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and PI were analyzed.

RESULTS

6 patients (mean age of 57 years, 83% female) underwent TLIF retrieval through anterior approach and ALIF with hyperlordotic cages (HLCs), followed by posterior spinal fusion surgery. Described technique entails use of tailored instruments with sequential gentle distraction of end plates with TLIF spreader could facilitate in the cage removal. Mean number of interbody levels fused pre as well as post were 1.5. The radiographic sagittal parameters from preoperative versus postoperative standing were as follows: T4-T12 TK, 16° vs. 37.6°; LL, -25° vs. -47.6°; PT, 36° vs. 26°; PI-LL, 35° vs. 12.4°; SVA, 12° vs. 5.6°; and TPA, 44° vs. 25°, with p<.001. Mean number of instrumented level fused were 8.1. Using linear regression analysis, change from pre-to postoperative standing in LL predicted pre-to postoperative change in SVA and TPA for global correction (R= -0.30 and -0.80, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior approach is a suitable technique for TLIF cage removal while preserving the end plates for subsequent optimal interbody fusion at the index level in symptomatic pseudoarthrosis patients or those with clinical deformity. ALIF with HLCs with or without Ponte osteotomy can restore segmental and overall sagittal alignment.

Sacropelvic Fixation: A Comprehensive Review

Sacropelvic fixation is indicated in various clinical settings, most notably long spinal arthrodesis, reduction of high-grade spondylolisthesis, and complex sacral fractures. The sacropelvis is characterized by complex regional anatomy and poor bone quality. These factors make achieving solid fusion across the lumbosacral junction challenging. However, a better understanding of spinal biomechanics at that level has led to much higher fusion rates than those of the past. The newer fixation techniques are biomechanically superior to previous methods mainly because they achieve bony purchase anterior to the pivot point-first described by McCord et al. in 1994. Today, the two most widely used fixation techniques are iliac screws and S2-alar-iliac screws. Although these techniques are associated with very high rates of fusion, instrumentation-related pain and reoperation remain problematic. This review provides an overview of the regional anatomy and biomechanics at the lumbosacral junction, as well as a summary of fixation techniques with an emphasis on the most widely used techniques today. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Anterior lumbar interbody fusions combined with posterior column osteotomy in patients who had sagittal imbalance associated with degenerative lumbar flat-back deformity: a retrospective case series

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) combined with posterior column osteotomy (PCO) may be effective to achieve ideal lumbar curve correction in lumbar flat-back deformity (LFD). We aimed to investigate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with primary degenerative LFD treated with multi-level ALIFs combined with PCOs. Seventy patients with primary degenerative LFD who underwent corrective surgery were divided into three groups according to the 1-month postoperative pelvic incidence/lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) angles (≤ - 10°, from - 9° to 9°, and ≥ 10°). The spinopelvic parameters, including thoracic kyphosis, LL, pelvic tilt, T1 pelvic angle, and sagittal vertical axis, were analyzed at the preoperative, postoperative follow-up periods. The clinical outcomes, including the Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS), and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r, were also evaluated. Further, the paraspinal muscles were qualitatively and quantitatively examined, preoperatively. All spinopelvic parameters were corrected as close to the normal values at the 1-month postoperative period. The spinopelvic parameters in the PI-LL ≤ - 10° group were better corrected and maintained than those in the other groups. The ODI, VAS, and SRS-22r scores improved at the final follow-up in all groups. The PI-LL ≤ - 10° group showed better clinical outcomes than the other groups. In the paraspinal muscle examination, the mean lumbar muscularity value and fatty degeneration ratio were 236.7% and 20.7%, respectively. Multi-level ALIFs with PCOs in patients with LFD are effective in restoring sagittal balance and improving clinical symptoms. In addition, the postoperative LL angles should be larger than PI + 10° to achieve good overall outcomes in patients with severe degenerative back muscle.

Spinal Balance/Alignment - Clinical Relevance and Biomechanics

In the normal spine due to its curvature in various regions, C7 plumb line (C7PL) passes through the sacrum so that the head is centered over the pelvis-ball and socket hip joints and ankle joints. This configuration leads to the least muscular activities to maintain the spinal balance. For any reason like deformity, scoliosis, kyphosis, trauma, and/or surgery this optimal configuration gets disturbed requiring higher muscular activity to maintain the posture and balance. Several parameters like the thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), Hip- and leg position influence the sagittal balance and thus the optimal configuration of spinal alignment. Global sagittal imbalance is energy consuming and often painful compensatory mechanisms are developed, that in turn negatively influence the quality of life. This review looks at the clinical aspects of spinal imbalance, and the biomechanics of spinal balance as dictated by the deformities- ankylosing spondylitis, scoliosis and kyphosis; surgical corrections- pedicle subtraction osteotomies and long segment stabilizations and consequent postural complications like the proximal and distal junctional kyphosis. This review suggests several potential research topics as well.

Measurement of Spinopelvic Angles on Prone Intraoperative Long-Cassette Lateral Radiographs Predicts Postoperative Standing Global Alignment in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review from a single institution.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate intraoperative T1-pelvic angle (TPA), T4PA, and T9PA as predictors of postoperative global alignment after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Malalignment following adult spinal surgery is associated with disability and correlates with health-related quality of life. Preoperative planning and intraoperative verification are crucial for optimal postoperative outcomes. Currently, only pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch has been used to assess intraoperative correction.

METHODS

Patients undergoing ≥4-level spinal fusion with full-length pre-, intra-, and first postoperative calibrated radiographs were included from a single institution. Alignment measurements were obtained for sagittal vertical axis (SVA), PI-LL, TPA, T4PA, and T9PA. The whole cohort was divided into upper thoracic (UT: UIV > T7) and lower thoracic fusions (LT: UIV < T7). Change was assessed between phases, and a subanalysis was included for UT and LT groups to compare alignment changes for differing extent of proximal fusion in the sagittal plane.

RESULTS

Eighty patients (mean 63.4 years, 70% female, mean levels fused 11.9) underwent significant ASD correction (ΔPI-LL = 22.1°; ΔTPA = 13.8°). For all, intraoperative TPA, T4PA, and T9PA correlated with postoperative SVA (range, r = 0.41-0.59), whereas intraoperative PI-LL correlated less (r = 0.38). For UT (n = 49), all spinopelvic angles and LL were similar intraoperative to postoperatively (p > .09). For LT (n = 31), intraoperative and postoperative T9PA and LL were similar (p > .10) but TPA and T4PA differed (p < .02). For UT, all intraoperative and postoperative spinopelvic angles strongly correlated (r = 0.8-0.9). For LT, intraoperative to postoperative T9PA strongly correlated (r = 0.83) and TPA, T4PA, and LL correlated moderately (r = 0.65-0.70). LT trended toward more reciprocal kyphosis postoperatively (8.1° vs. 2.6°; p = .059).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative measurements of TPA, T4PA, and T9PA correlated better with postoperative global alignment than PI-LL, demonstrating their utility in confirming alignment goals. When comparing intraoperative to postoperative films, only T9PA was similar in LT whereas all spinopelvic angles were similar in UT. Reciprocal kyphosis in unfused segments of LT fusions may account for difference in TPA and T4PA from intraoperative to postoperative films.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Neurologic Comorbidities Predict Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case-control matched cohort from a single institution.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the contribution of nonmechanical factors to the incidence of proximal junctional failure (PJF) after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Multiple studies have reported on the prevalence of PJF following surgery for ASD. However, little is known about the contribution of nonmechanical factors to the incidence of PJF.

METHODS

We identified a consecutive series of ASD patients who required revision surgery for PJF between 2013 and 2015. A matched cohort of ASD patients who did not develop PJF after surgical correction was identified based on age, gender, preoperative deformity type, number of fusion levels, and the lower instrumented vertebra level. We compared medical and surgical histories in the matched cohorts, with particular attention to the prevalence of preoperative neurologic comorbidities that might affect standing balance. Preoperative, immediate postoperative, and follow-up radiographs were reviewed to document specific characteristics of mechanical failure that resulted in PJF and required revision surgery.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight cases of PJF requiring revision surgery were identified. The prevalence rates of preoperative neurologic comorbidities in PJF cohort were significantly higher than in non-PJF cohort (75% vs. 32%, p < .001). Neurologic comorbidities included prior stroke (4), metabolic encephalopathy (2), Parkinson disease (1), seizure disorder (1), cervical and thoracic myelopathy (7), diabetic neuropathy (4), and other neuropathy (4). The mean preoperative sagittal vertical axis in PJF cohort was more positive compared with the non-PJF cohort (144 mm vs. 65 mm, p = .009) There were no significant differences in immediate postoperative or follow-up radiographic parameters between cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, risk factors identified for the development of PJF included nonmechanical neurologic comorbidities, emphasizing the need to look beyond radiographic alignment in order to reduce the incidence of PJF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Approach Selection: Multiple Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion to Recreate Lumbar Lordosis Versus Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: When, Why, How?

Restoration of physiologic lumbar lordosis is a fundamental principle of spinal deformity surgery. Techniques using multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion or pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) are described. Multilevel anterior lumbar interbody fusion provides a gradual multilevel correction and avoids the morbidity associated with PSO but necessitates familiarity with the anterior approach or an approach surgeon. PSO provides a large angular correction at a single level, requires only one approach, and allows for simultaneous multiplanar correction and open posterior decompression. This article provides guidance on the appropriate use of each technique for restoration of lumbar lordosis in patients with degenerative lumbar deformity.

Pre-operative planning and rod customization may optimize post-operative alignment and mitigate development of malalignment in multi-segment posterior cervical decompression and fusion patients

Patient-specific rods designed based on a particular pre-operative plan are a recent advancement to help achieve desired operative alignment goals. This study investigated the role of pre-operative planning and patient-specific rods on post-operative alignment and outcomes. Patients were grouped according to use of pre-operative planning and patient-specific, pre-contoured rods (PLAN) or absence of planning/rods (NON). Pre-operative and post-operative alignment were measured: cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical lordosis (CL), T1 Slope minus CL (TS-CL). Alignment differences between the groups were assessed using independent and paired samples t-tests. 34 patients were identified (15 PLAN, 19 NON). Pre- and post-operative CL, cSVA and TS were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05), though pre-operative TS-CL was slightly higher in PLAN patients (28.13° versus 18.42°, p = 0.049). There were no improvement differences pre- to post-operative for CL, cSVA and TS between the groups (p > 0.05). However, PLAN patients exhibited a greater correction of TS-CL, with an average of 5.8° decrease versus a 3.5° increase in TS-CL for NON patients (p = 0.015). PLAN patients did not demonstrate a significant change from pre- to post-operative alignment for cSVA or TS-CL (cSVA: 27.5 mm to 31.1 mm, p = 0.255; TS-CL: 28.1° to 22.3°, p = 0.13), though their TS-CL did trend towards significant post-operative improvement. In contrast, NON patients worsened in cSVA and TS-CL post-operatively (cSVA: 21.8 mm to 30.3 mm, p < 0.001; TS-CL: 18.4° to 22.0°, p = 0.035). Multi-segment posterior decompression and fusion patients have the potential to worsen with regards to post-operative alignment without pre-operative planning. Patients with pre-contoured rods and pre-operative planning exhibited a greater correction of TS-CL after surgery than un-planned cases, though limited by the pre-operative difference in cervical-thoracic mismatch between planned and unplanned cases. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III.

Validation of prone intraoperative measurements of global spinal alignment

OBJECTIVE

Verifying the adequacy of surgical correction of adult spinal sagittal deformity (SSD) leads to improved postoperative alignment and clinical outcomes. Traditionally, surgeons relied on intraoperative measurements of lumbar lordosis (LL) correction. However, T-1 pelvic angle (TPA) and its component angles more reliably predict postoperative alignment. While TPA is readily measured on standing radiographs, intraoperative radiographs offer poor resolution of the bicoxofemoral axis. A method to recreate this radiographic landmark by extrapolating preoperative measurements has been described. The authors aimed to assess the reliability of measurements of global spinal alignment obtained via geometrical reconstitution of the bicoxofemoral axis on prone intraoperative radiographs.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed. Twenty sets of preoperative standing full-length and intraoperative prone 36-inch lateral radiographs were analyzed. Pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral to bicoxofemoral axis distance (SBFD) were recorded on preoperative films. A perpendicular line was drawn on the intraoperative radiograph from the midpoint of the sacral endplate. This was used as one limb of the PI, and the second limb was digitally drawn at an angle that reproduced the preoperatively obtained PI, extending for a distance that matched the preoperative SBFD. This final point marked the obscured bicoxofemoral axis. These landmarks were used to measure the L-1, T-9, T-4, and T-1 pelvic angles (LPA, T9PA, T4PA, and TPA, respectively) and LL. Two spine fellows and 2 attending spine surgeons made independent measurements and repeated the process in 1 month. Mixed-model 2-way intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach’s α values were calculated to assess interobserver, intraobserver, and scale reliability.

RESULTS

Interobserver reliability was excellent for preoperative PI and intraoperative LPA, T9PA, and T4PA (ICC = 0.88, 0.84, 0.84, and 0.93, respectively), good for intraoperative TPA (ICC = 0.68), and fair for preoperative SBFD (ICC = 0.60) and intraoperative LL (ICC = 0.50). Cronbach’s α was ≥ 0.80 for all measurements. Measuring PI on preoperative standing images had excellent intraobserver reliability for all raters (ICC = 0.89, range 0.80–0.93). All raters but one showed excellent reliability for measuring the SBFD. Reliability for measuring prone LL was good for all raters (ICC = 0.71, range 0.64–0.76). The LPA demonstrated good to excellent reliability for each rater (ICC = 0.76, range 0.65–0.81). The thoracic pelvic angles tended to be more reliable at more distal vertebrae (T9PA ICC = 0.71, range 0.49–0.81; T4PA ICC = 0.62, range 0.43–0.83; TPA ICC = 0.56, range 0.31–0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative assessment of global spinal alignment with TPA and component angles is more reliable than intraoperative measurements of LL. Reconstruction of preoperatively measured PI and SBFD on intraoperative radiographs effectively overcomes poor visualization of the bicoxofemoral axis. This method is easily adopted and produces accurate and reliable prone intraoperative measures of global spinal alignment.

The value of sitting radiographs: analysis of spine flexibility and its utility in preoperative planning for adult spinal deformity surgery

Sitting radiographs are a valuable tool to consider the thoracic compensatory mechanism in patients who are candidates for thoracolumbar correction surgery.

Predictors for Postoperative Loss of Lumbar Lordosis After Long Fusions Arthrodesis in Patients with Adult Scoliosis

Background

Loss of lumbar lordosis (LL) is closely related to clinical symptoms and operative complications, however, few studies have identified its predictors. The purpose of our study was to identify the predictors for loss of LL in patients with adult scoliosis and provided evidence for surgical decision-making.

Material/Methods

There were 69 patients with adult scoliosis who underwent long fusions arthrodesis from January 2006 to March 2015 included in this retrospectively study. The patients were divided into two cohorts according the average loss of LL: cohort LL (loss of LL below the average) and cohort GL (loss of LL above the average). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and the receiver operating characteristic curve were used to identify the predictors.

Results

There were statistically significant differences between the two cohorts in preoperative LL (p=0.002), postoperative LL (p=0.036), last follow-up LL (p<0.001), postoperative loss LL (p<0.001), preoperative SVA (p=0.007), last follow-up SVA (p=0.018), and pelvic incidence (p=0.016). Preoperative LL <23.5 (OR=0.920, 95% CI=0.870–0.973, p=0.003) and preoperative sagittal vertical axis >4.28 (OR=1.199, 95% CI=1.007–1.429, p=0.041) had good accuracy to predict postoperative loss of LL.

Conclusions

Loss of LL commonly occurred after long fusions arthrodesis in patients with adult scoliosis. Postoperative deteriorated sagittal balance was more frequently than deteriorated coronal balance. Preoperative LL <23.5 and preoperative SVA >4.28 were the predictors for postoperative greater loss of LL in patients after long fusions arthrodesis. More attention should be paid to how to maintain the LL in patients with preoperative predictors, especially if both the identified predictors are present.

Osteotomies in ankylosing spondylitis: where, how many, and how much?

INTRODUCTION

This article presents the current concepts of correction of spinal deformity in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. Untreated AS can be a debilitating disease. In a few patients, disease progression results in severe spinal deformity affecting not only the thoracolumbar, but also the cervical spine. Surgery for correction in AS patients has a long history. With the advent of modern instrumentation, standardization of surgical and anesthesiologic techniques, surgical safety and corrective results could be improved and experiences from lumbar osteotomies could be transferred to the cervical spine.

METHODS

This article presents the current concepts of correction of spinal deformity in AS patients. In particular, questions regarding the localization and number of osteotomies, the optimal surgical target angle as well as planning and prediction of postoperative alignment are discussed.

RESULTS

Insight into recent technical developments, current challenges with correction and geometric analysis of center of rotation (COR) in cervical 3-column osteotomies (3CO) will be presented.

CONCLUSION

The article should encourage readers to improve surgical correction efficacy and provide a better understanding of correction geometry in 3CO for thoracolumbar and cervical spinal deformities.

Clinical Impact of T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis After Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery: A Minimum 2-Year Follow Up Data

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term relationship between sagittal alignment of the cervical spine and patient-reported health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) scores after multilevel posterior cervical fusion, and to explore whether an analog of T1 slope minus C2-C7 lordosis ('T1S-CL') impacts on patients' clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND

A 6-month follow-up study demonstrated that, similar to the thoracolumbar spine, the severity of disability increases with sagittal malalignment after cervical reconstruction surgery.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2014, 31 consecutive patients having multilevel posterior cervical fusion for cervical stenosis, myelopathy, and deformities met inclusion criteria. To determine the true impact of the alignment on HRQOL, patients who have pseudarthrosis, a misplaced screw, junctional pathologies, or adjacent level disc herniation were excluded. Radiographic measurements included: C0-C2 lordosis, C2-C7 lordosis, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 slope, and T1S-CL. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between pairs of radiographic measures and HRQOL.

RESULTS

C2-C7 SVA positively correlated with neck disability index (NDI) scores (r = 0.550). For significant correlations between C2-C7 SVA and NDI scores, regression models predicted a threshold C2-C7 SVA value of 43.5 mm, beyond which correlations were most significant. The T1S-CL also correlated positively with C2-C7 SVA and NDI scores (r = 0.827 and r = 0.618, respectively). Results of the regression analysis indicated that a C2-C7 SVA value of 43.5 mm corresponded to a T1S-CL value of 22.2°.

CONCLUSION

This minimum 2-year follow-up study showed that disability of the neck increased with cervical sagittal malalignment after surgical reconstruction and a greater T1S-CL mismatch was associated with a greater degree of cervical malalignment. Specifically, a T1S-CL mismatch greater than 22.2° corresponded to severe disability (NDI>25) and positive cervical sagittal malalignment, defined as C2-C7 SVA greater than 43.5 mm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Supra-acetabular line is better than supra-iliac line for coronal balance referencing-a study of perioperative whole spine X-rays in degenerative lumbar scoliosis and ankylosing spondylitis patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The aim of spinal deformity correction is to restore the spine's functional alignment by balancing it in both the sagittal and coronal planes. Regardless of posture, the ideal coronal profile is straight, and therefore readily assessable.

PURPOSE

This study compares two radiological methods to determine which better predicts postoperative standing coronal balance.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

We conducted a single-center, radiographic comparative study between 2011 and 2015.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 199 patients with a mean age of 55.1 years were studied. Ninety patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and 109 ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were treated with posterior surgery during this period.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline clinical and radiographic parameters (sagittal and coronal) were recorded. Comparison was performed between the new supra-acetabular line (central sacral vertical line [CSVL1]) and conventional supra-iliac line (CSVL2) perpendicular methods of coronal balance assessment. These methods were also compared with the gold standard standing C7 plumb line.

METHODS

Each patient underwent standardized operative procedures and had perioperative spine X-rays obtained for assessment of spinal balance. Adjusted multivariate analysis was used to determine predictors of coronal balance.

RESULTS

Significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, gender, and radiographic parameters) were found between patients with DLS and AS. CSVL1, CSVL2, and C7 plumb line differed in all the perioperative measurements. These three radiological methods showed a mean right coronal imbalance for both diagnoses in all pre-, intra-, and postoperative radiographs. The magnitude of imbalance was the greatest for CSVL2 followed by CSVL1 and subsequently the C7 plumb line. A larger discrepancy between CSVL and C7 plumb line measurements intraoperatively than those postoperatively suggests a postural effect on these parameters, which is greater for CSVL2. Multivariate analysis identified that in DLS, the preoperative C7 plumb line was predictive of its postoperative value. CSVL1, but not CSVL2, was predictive of the postoperative C7 plumb line in patients with AS.

CONCLUSIONS

The supra-acetabular line (CSVL1) is better, although not ideal, as compared with the supra-iliac line (CSVL2) in determining coronal balance. Because CSVL1 still cannot be relied on with a high predictive value, it is imperative that future studies continue to identify better intraoperative markers for achieving coronal balance.

Adult Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

Adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis is a 3-dimensional deformity defined as a coronal deviation of greater than 10°. It causes significant pain and disability in the elderly. With the aging of the population, the incidence of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis will continue to increase. During the past decade, advancements in surgical techniques and instrumentation have changed the management of adult spinal deformity and led to improved long-term outcomes. In this article, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of adult degenerative lumbar scoliosis. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e930-e939.].

Extensive Corrective Fixation Surgeries for Adult Spinal Deformity Improve Posture and Lower Extremity Kinematics During Gait

STUDY DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to document changes in posture and lower extremity kinematics during gait in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) after extensive corrective surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Standing radiographic parameters are typically used to evaluate patients with ASD. Previously, preoperative walking and standing posture discrepancy were reported in patients with ASD. We did not include comparison between before and after surgery. Therefore, we thought that pre- and postoperative evaluations for patients with ASD should include gait analysis.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with ASD (5 men, 34 women; mean age, 71.0 ± 6.1) who underwent posterior corrective fixation surgeries from the thoracic spine to the pelvis were included. A 4-m walk was recorded and analyzed. Sagittal balance while walking was calculated as the angle between the plumb line on the side and the line connecting the greater trochanter and pinna while walking (i.e., the gait-trunk tilt angle [GTA]). We measured maximum knee extension angle during one gait cycle, step length (cm), and walking speed (m/min). Radiographic parameters were also measured.

RESULTS

The mean GTA and the mean maximum knee extension angle significantly improved from 13.4° to 6.4°, and -13.3° to -9.4°(P < 0.001 and P = 0.006), respectively. The mean step length improved from 40.4 to 43.1 cm (P = 0.049), but there was no significant change in walking speed (38.4 to 41.5 m/min, P = 0.105). Postoperative GTA, maximum knee extension angle and step length correlated with postoperative pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (r = 0.324, P = 0.044; r = -0.317, P = 0.049; r = -0.416, P = 0.008, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that postoperative posture, maximum knee extension angle, and step length during gait in patients with ASD improved corresponding to how much correction of the sagittal spinal deformity was achieved.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

The impact of spinopelvic morphology on the short-term outcome of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in 104 patients

OBJECTIVE

Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is commonly performed for correction of spinal sagittal plane deformities. The PSO results in complex, multiple changes of the spinopelvic alignment. The influence of the variability of individual pelvic morphology has not been fully analyzed in previous outcome studies of sagittal imbalance. The aim of this study was to define radiological variables affecting the outcome after PSO in adult spinal deformities, with special emphasis on the variability of pelvic morphology.

METHODS

Clinical and radiographic outcomes were analyzed in a retrospective analysis of 104 patients who underwent a PSO at a single center. The radiographic variables studied were sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1SPI (T-1 spinopelvic inclination), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS). To control for the individual variation of pelvic morphology, the LL/PI, PT/PI, and SS/PI ratios were calculated. Clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analog scale for pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and EQ-5D preoperatively and at a minimum 1-year follow-up. Correlation coefficients were calculated between each individual radiographic variable and the outcome measures. The importance of LL mismatch to TK, reflecting the importance of a harmonious spine, was analyzed by comparing the outcome of patients with a TK+LL+PI ≤ 45° to those with a sum > 45°.

RESULTS

SVA and T1SPI demonstrated the strongest correlation with the clinical outcome scores (r = 0.4–0.5, p < 0.001). LL correlated weakly with the clinical outcome (r = 0.2–0.3, p < 0.003). Mismatch of LL to PI, however, did not correlate significantly with the outcome. Similarly, only weak and inconsistent correlation was observed between PT, SS, PT/PI, SS/PI, and functional outcome. Patients with a TK+LL+PI ≤ 45° had a significantly lower ODI score (33 vs 44) and a significantly higher EQ-5D score (0.64 vs 0.40) than patients with a sum > 45° (LL is a negative value).

CONCLUSIONS

PSO resulted in a substantial correction of sagittal imbalance and improved outcome in most patients in this study. Correction of the global sagittal balance appears to be a necessary precondition for a good outcome. A harmonious spine with a TK and an LL of similar magnitude seems to add to a positive outcome.