Treatment of Spinal Tumors in a High Volume Center has Direct Impact on Local Recurrence, Morbidity, and Mortality

Long-term Outcomes Following Proton-based Radiation Therapy for Pediatric Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas of the Mobile Spine and the Sacrum

PURPOSE

To report the first cohort of children with spinal and sacrococcygeal chordomas (CH) and chondrosarcomas (CHS) treated with proton-based radiation therapy (PRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1989 and 2019, 52 pediatric patients ≤22 years old with spinal CH (n = 43) or CHS (n = 9) were treated with PRT at a single institution. The primary tumor originated in the C-spine (n = 37, 71%), T-spine (n = 6, 12%), L-spine (n = 7, 14%), or sacrum (n = 2, 3%). The CH group included 33 conventional and 10 atypical/poorly differentiated CH. The CHS group included 5 conventional and 4 mesenchymal CHS. Pre-RT chemotherapy was administered to 13 (25%) patients. Salvage radiation was delivered to 13 (25%) patients with progressive disease. The median total dose was 74.5 Gy (RBE) [IQR, 69.8-76 Gy (RBE)], delivered in 1.8 to 2.5 Gy (RBE) daily fractions. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and progression-free survival (PFS). A univariate and multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic and predictive factors.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 11.4 years (IQR, 5.7-19.8) from the date of diagnosis, 17 (32.7%) patients recurred (8 local, 7 distant, and 2 iatrogenic). Fifteen of these patients died of disease. The 5-, 10-, and 20-year OS were 82.7%, 72.3% and 72.3%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 20-year DSS were 86.1%, 77.5%, and 77.5%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, and 20-year PFS were 72.3%, 70.1% and 70.1%, respectively. The 20-year OS, DSS, and PFS for conventional CH were 93.9%, 97%, and 87.9%, respectively. Factors significantly associated with worse outcomes were poorly differentiated CH subtype, pre-RT chemo, and low KPS (P < .05). Pre-RT tumor progression was found to be a significant prognostic factor for PFS (P = .02). Two patients developed late grade 3 toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study of pediatric spinal and sacrococcygeal CH/CHS to date. High-dose PRT following surgical resection offers high disease control rates for conventional CH/CHS.

Frontline Voice: AO Spine Member Survey Regarding Spine Oncology Knowledge Generation and Translation Needs

STUDY DESIGN

cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate AO Spine members' practices and comfort in managing metastatic and primary spine tumors, explore the use of decision-support and patient assessment tools, and identify knowledge gaps and future needs in spine oncology.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to AO Spine members to query comfort levels with key decisions in spinal oncology management, utilization of decision frameworks and spine oncology-specific instruments, and educational material preferences.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 381 members across 82 countries. Most respondents were orthopedic spine surgeons (62%) or neurosurgeons (36%), with 42% performing 100-200 spine surgeries per year. Extradural primary and metastatic tumors were managed by 84% and 95% of respondents, respectively, with survival and frailty assessment tools used for both. While most surgeons felt comfortable determining when emergency surgery was needed (81% for primary and 82% for metastatic tumors), nuanced decisions about surgical timing were more challenging. Surgeons also noted challenges in tailoring the oncologic surgical plan to what the patient could safely tolerate. There was a strong desire for guidelines on tumor-related spinal pain (85%), treatment timing (85%), stabilization (85%), and glucocorticoid use for symptomatic extradural metastatic tumors (77%). Interest was high for classification systems for spine tumor pain (65%) and stabilization decisions (80%).

CONCLUSIONS

Additional support is needed in decision-making regarding surgical timing, patient selection, and tailoring treatment invasiveness to life expectancy and frailty. Surgeons seek further guidance to prevent neurologic deterioration and optimize recovery. Guidelines and classification systems were highly coveted for daily practice.

[Minimally invasive surgical treatment of extramedullary tumors at the level of craniovertebral junction: experience of the Burdenko Neurosurgical Center]

OBJECTIVE

To describe own experience of treating patients with extramedullary tumors at the level of craniovertebral junction using minimally invasive surgical approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 29 patients who underwent minimally invasive microsurgical resection of extramedullary tumors at the level of craniovertebral junction. We analyzed the main clinical and surgical parameters.

RESULTS

Gross total resection was achieved in most patients with high degree of safety. Two patients required redo surgery due to CSF leakage and soft tissue cyst. Mean length of hospital-stay was 7 days. VAS score of pain syndrome at discharge was 2 points and 0 points after 3 months. No significant differences in neurophysiological monitoring indicators were observed (p=0.76).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive posterior approaches to extramedullary tumors at the level of craniovertebral junction can significantly reduce surgical trauma with equal extent of resection.

Spinal Tumors: Diagnosis and Treatment

Tumors that present in or around the spine can be challenging to diagnose and treat. A proper workup involves a complete history and physical examination, appropriate staging studies, appropriate imaging of the entire spine, and a tissue biopsy. The biopsy defines the lesion and guides treatment, but in some rare instances, rapid neurological decline may lead to urgent or emergent surgery before it can be analyzed. "Enneking-appropriate" margins should remain the goal for primary tumors while adequate debulking/separation/stabilization are often the goals in metastatic disease. Primary tumors of the spine are rare and often complex tumors to operate on-achieving Enneking-appropriate margins provides the greatest chance of survival while decreasing the chance of local recurrence. Metastatic tumors of the spine are increasingly more common, and timing of surgery must be considered within the greater framework of the patient and the patient's disease, deficits, stability, and other treatments available. The specific tumor type will dictate what other multidisciplinary approaches are available, allowing for chemotherapy and radiation as needed.

[Benign extramedullary spinal cord tumors at the level of craniovertebral junction: a systematic review]

Extramedullary spinal cord tumors at the level of craniovertebral junction are a rare group of neoplasms with their own characteristics. Taking into account the peculiarities of clinical course and complex anatomy of craniovertebral complex, these tumors present a complex diagnostic and surgical problem. A systematic review of literature data on epidemiology, clinical picture, diagnostic methods and dorsal minimally invasive methods of surgical treatment of patients with extramedullary spinal cord tumors of craniovertebral junction was performed.

Strategy for the Practice of Spine Oncological Surgery During the Covid-19 Pandemic

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

OBJECTIVE

For each of the most frequent clinical scenarios, the authors reached a consensus on how should be timing and indications be optimized to reduce risk while maintaining the expected outcomes under the Covid-19 pandemics.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The organization of health care has been changed by the Covid-19 pandemic with a direct impact on Spine Oncology Surgery. Emergency surgery is still a priority, but in case of spinal tumors it should be better defined which conditions require emergency treatment.

METHODS

An expert panel with general spine surgeons, oncological spine surgeons, and radiation oncologists was formed to analyze the most frequent scenarios in spinal musculoskeletal oncology during Covid-19 pandemics.

RESULTS

Spine metastases can be found incidentally during follow-up or can clinically occur by increasing pain, pathologic fracture, and/or neurological symptoms. Primary spine tumors are much more rare and very rarely present with acute onset. The first step is to suspect this rare condition, to avoid to treat a primary tumor as it were a metastasis. Most complex surgery, like en bloc resection, associated with high morbidity and mortality rate for the treatment of low grade malignancy like chordoma or chondrosarcomas, if intensive care unit availability is reduced, can be best delayed some weeks, as not impacting on prognosis, due to the slow growth rate of these conditions. The currently accepted protocols for Ewing sarcoma (ES) and osteogenic sarcoma must be performed for local and systemic disease control. For ES, after the first courses of chemotherapy, radiotherapy can be selected instead of surgery, during Covid-19, to the end of the full course of chemotherapy. In immunocompromised patients, (treated by chemotherapy), it is necessary to avoid contact with affected or exposed people.

CONCLUSION

Even more than during normal times, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory to share the decision to modify a treatment strategy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.

Does facility volume influence survival in patients with primary malignant bone tumors of the vertebral column? A comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Facility volume has been correlated with survival in many cancers. This relationship has not been established in primary malignant bone tumors of the vertebral column (BTVC).

PURPOSE

To investigate whether facility patient volume is associated with overall survival in patients with primary malignant BTVCs.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative cohort.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Adult patients with chordomas, chondrosarcomas, or osteosarcomas of the mobile spine.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Five-year survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 733 patients with primary malignant BTVCs in the national cancer database from 2004 through 2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to correlate specific outcome measures with facility volume. Volume was stratified based on cumulative martingale residuals to determine the inflection point of negative to positive impact on survival based on the patient cohort. Long-term survival was compared between patients treated at high and low volume using the Kaplan-Meier method. Only patients with malignant primary tumors were considered eligible for inclusion; patients with incomplete treatment data or benign tumors were excluded.

RESULTS

Patients treated at high-volume centers (HVCs) were younger (p=.0003) and more likely to be insured (p<.0001). There were no significant differences in tumor characteristics. Patients treated at high-volume facilities had improved 5-year survival of 71% versus 58% at low-volume centers (p<.0001). Patients treated at HVCs were more likely to receive surgical treatment (91% vs. 80%, p<.0001); if surgery was performed, they were more likely to undergo an en bloc resection (48% vs. 30%, p<.0001). However, there were no differences in margin status or utilization of radiotherapy or chemotherapy between HVCs and low-volume centers. In a multivariate analysis, facility volume was independently associated with improved survival overall (HR 0.75 [0.58-0.97], p=.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary malignant BTVCs are rare, even for HVCs. Despite this, patient survival was significantly improved when treatment was performed at HVCs.

The Role of Radiotherapy for Chordoma Patients Managed With Surgery: Analysis of the National Cancer Database

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) following surgical resection of chordomas.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The role of RT for the treatment of chordomas remains incompletely described. Previous studies have not found adjuvant RT to improve OS, but these studies did not group patients based on surgical margin status or radiation dose or modality. We used the National Cancer Database to investigate the role of RT in chordomas following surgical resection.

METHODS

Patients were stratified based on surgical margin status (positive vs. negative). Utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method, OS was compared between treatment modalities (surgical resection alone, therapeutic RT alone, and surgical resection plus therapeutic RT). OS was subsequently compared between patients treated with palliative dose (<40 Gy), low dose (40-65 Gy), and high dose (>65 Gy) RT. Similarly, OS was compared between advanced RT modalities including proton beam therapy (PBT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). A multivariable model was used to determine adjusted variables predictive of mortality.

RESULTS

One thousand four hundred seventy eight chordoma patients were identified; skull base (n = 567), sacral (n = 551), and mobile spine (n = 360). Surgical resection and therapeutic adjuvant RT improved 5-year survival in patients with positive surgical margins (82% vs. 71%, P = 0.03). No clear survival benefit was observed with the addition of adjuvant RT in patients with negative surgical margins. High dose RT was associated with improved OS compared with palliative and low dose RT (P < 0.001). Advanced RT techniques and SRS were associated with improved OS compared with EBRT. In the multivariate analysis high dose advanced RT (>65 Gy) was superior to EBRT.

CONCLUSION

Patients with positive surgical margins benefit from adjuvant RT. Optimal OS is associated with adjuvant RT administered with advanced techniques and cumulative dose more than 65 Gy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

[Use of the Multidisciplinary Specialised Case Conference at the Freiburg Orbital Centre]

BACKGROUND

The treatment of tumors increasingly takes place in specialised interdisciplinary centres. Therapeutic decisions are usually made at case conferences. Ophthalmologists, oromaximillofacial surgeons, ENT physicians, neurosurgeons, as well as pediatricians, radiotherapists and radiologists are all involved in the treatment of orbital diseases. The aim of this article is to present the concept of a multidisciplinary case conference for orbital diseases and to analyse case numbers, indications, and the influence on the patient's therapy.

METHODS

We analysed an anonymized data set of patients who presented in the case conference of the University Hospital Freiburg from 2008 to 2018 with regard to clinical diagnosis, histological diagnoses, number of surgical interventions, and number of interdisciplinary therapy decisions.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2018, 545 patients were presented in a weekly conference. Of these, 453 were available for anonymous evaluation. The median age was 56 years (quartiles 41; 69). The most frequent indication was an orbital tumour of unclear malignancy (n = 52; 11%). Further indications included Grave's orbitopathy (n = 39; 9%), orbital pseudotumour (n = 36; 8%), cranial nerve palsy (n = 22; 5%), and orbital lymphoma (n = 22; 5%). The most frequent histological diagnoses were B-cell lymphoma (n = 10; 2%), venous malformation (cavernoma, n = 8; 2%), marginal zone lymphoma (n = 8; 2%), and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 6; 1%). An interdisciplinary therapeutic approach was defined for 174 patients.

CONCLUSION

A high demand for the interdisciplinary case conference was demonstrated. The high rate of primary or secondary interdisciplinary decisions indicates the value of such a conference. Hence, the patient is spared multiple examinations in the individual specialist areas and quick and effective therapy decisions can be achieved.

Current surgical strategies for treating spinal tumors: Results of a questionnaire survey among members of the German Spine Society (DWG)

PURPOSE

Questionnaire survey among the members of the German Spine Society (Deutsche Wirbelsäulen-Gesellschaft, DWG) to objectify oncological infrastructure and current standard of care in spinal tumor treatment in Germany.

METHODS

All DWG-members were contacted via the society's e-mail and asked to respond in anonymized form to a related questionnaire. Questions were asked regarding surgical specialty, type of institution involved, numbers of spinal procedures, as well as questions on treatment for primary tumors, whether the respondent belonged to a tumor center, decision-making procedures for surgery, and the type of procedure.

RESULTS

84 centers providing surgical treatment for spinal tumors in their departments were identified. 52.6% were carrying out more than 500 spinal procedures per year. There was a significant association (P ≤ 0.05) between the numbers of spinal surgeries, the number of treated tumor patients per year, the organisation in a tumor center and the treatment of primary tumors. 76% are part of a local tumor center for interdisciplinary decision making (i.e.surgical treatment and adjuvant therapy). 74% of the institutions stated that conventional postoperative radiotherapy is standardly administered in the case of secondary lesions, with 24% of them referring patients to external services for radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

In spite of often large numbers of spinal operations, the centers perform relatively small numbers of tumor operations, particularly for primary tumors. A nearly three-quarter majority of the departments are integrated into interdisciplinary tumor care. However, there is a marked number that do not belong to an interdisciplinary organisation. Further advances in multidisciplinarity and oncology training are a continuous issue to increase treatment quality in spinal tumor patients.

Systematic review on the utility of magnetic resonance imaging for operative management and follow-up for primary sarcoma-lessons from extremity sarcomas

Primary sarcomas of the vertebral column affect roughly 5 in every million persons annually, of which half to one-third are malignant. Treatment of these lesions requires multimodal management, often employing attempts at en bloc resection of the lesion with negative margins. This may be facilitated using magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative margin planning, but current literature is lacking regarding the use of such imaging to accurately predict planned surgical margins. Here we review prior studies describing the use of magnetic resonance imaging for en bloc resection of sarcomas of the extremities to identify learning points for application to the treatment of spinal neoplasms. We conducted a systematic review of the PubMed and EMBASE literature. Included studies described the accuracy of MRI for preoperative evaluation of tumor margins, intraoperative guidance for en bloc resection, or post-operative evaluation of residual or recurrent disease. All included studies described patients treated for osseous or soft tissue sarcoma of the limbs. We found 1,705 unique references of which 27 met criteria for inclusion. Seven studies reported MR had an overall diagnostic accuracy of 93.6-96% for preoperative margin evaluation with non-contrast T1 most accurately reflecting true margins. In the nine articles reporting results of MR-guided resection, negative margins were achieved in 88.8-100% of cases with a closest margin of 2-4 mm. Eleven articles combined reported the accuracy of MR for residual disease or local recurrence, with a mean sensitivity and specificity of 71.7% and 79.3%, respectively for residual disease and 87.9% and 85.9%, respectively for local recurrence. The current literature for appendicular musculoskeletal sarcoma suggests that MR is highly accurate for defining tumor margins preoperatively, guiding osteotomy cuts intraoperatively, and documenting recurrence or residual disease. Further evidence is necessary to evaluate the degree to which it can accurately guide osteotomy planning for en bloc resection of vertebral primaries.

Evolution in Surgical Approach, Complications, and Outcomes in an Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Multicenter Study Group Patient Population

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected multicenter database.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the evolution of surgical treatment strategies, complications, and patient-reported outcomes for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ASD surgery is associated with high complication rates. Evolving treatment strategies may reduce these risks.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing ASD surgery from 2009 to 2016 were analyzed (n = 905). Preoperative and surgical parameters were compared across years. Subgroup analysis of 436 patients with minimum two-year follow-up was also performed.

RESULTS

From 2009 to 2016, there was a significant increase in the mean preoperative age (52 to 63.1, p < .001), body mass index (26.3 to 32.2, p = .003), Charlson Comorbidity index (1.4 to 2.2, p < .001), rate of previous spine surgery (39.8% to 53.1%, p = .01), and baseline disability (visual analog scale [VAS] back and leg pain) scores (p < .01), Oswestry Disability Index, and 22-item Scoliosis Research Society Questionnaire scores (p < .001). Preoperative Schwab sagittal alignment modifiers and overall surgical invasiveness index were similar across time. Three-column osteotomy utilization decreased from 36% in 2011 to 16.7% in 2016. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion increased from 6.4% to 24.1% (p = .004), anterior lumbar interbody fusion decreased from 22.9% to 16.7% (p = .043), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion/posterior lumbar interbody fusion utilization remained similar (p = .448). Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in 2012 was 84.6%, declined to 58% in 2013, and rebounded to 76.3% in 2016 (p = .006). Tranexamic acid use increased rapidly from 2009 to 2016 (13.3% to 48.6%, p < .001). Two-year follow-up sagittal vertical axis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, and maximum Cobb angles were similar across years. Intraoperative complications decreased from 33% in 2010 to 9.3% in 2016 (p < .001). Perioperative (<30 days, <90 days) complications peaked in 2010 (42.7%, 46%) and decreased by 2016 (24.1%, p < .001; 29.6%, p = .007). The overall complication rate decreased from 73.2% in 2008-2014 patients to 62.6% in 2015-2016 patients (p = .03). Two-year health-related quality of life outcomes did not significantly differ across the years (p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

From 2009 to 2016, despite an increasingly elderly, medically compromised, and obese patient population, complication rates decreased. Evolving strategies may result in improved treatment of ASD patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Rare case of a recurrent juvenile ossifying fibroma of the lumbosacral spine

Juvenile ossifying fibroma (JOF) is a rare benign bone tumor that occurs most frequently in the craniofacial bones of children and young adults. There are few case reports that describe its involvement outside the craniofacial skeleton, especially within the spinal column. While JOF is classified as a benign lesion, it may be locally aggressive and demonstrate a high propensity for recurrence, even after resection. Definitive surgical management may be challenging in naive cases, but it is particularly challenging in recurrent cases and when extensive spinal reconstruction is warranted. In this report, the authors describe the diagnosis and surgical management of a 29-year-old man who presented with a large recurrent sacral trabecular-subtype JOF. A review of literature regarding JOFs, management of recurrent primary spinal tumors, and sacral reconstruction are discussed.

Surgical management of spinal metastases

INTRODUCTION

Metastatic spinal disease is a source of significant morbidity in patients with cancer. Recent advancements in adjuvant oncologic therapy has led to increased survival for many patients who harbor neoplastic disease. As a result of this, the chance of developing metastatic spinal disease over the course of a cancer patient's lifespan has increased. Symptomatic metastatic spinal disease can cause significant morbidity including severe pain, neurologic deficit, and loss of ambulation. Current treatment of these patients typically involves the use of multiple modalities, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Areas covered: An extensive literature review was performed to support the author's opinion on the matter of surgical management of spinal metastatic disease. Pubmed was utilized as a primary search engine. Expert commentary: Despite advances in chemotherapy and radiation therapy, surgery remains a mainstay in many of these patients, particularly with those with either significant metastatic spinal epidural compression or spinal instability. This review discusses the surgical management of metastatic spinal disease including a framework for decision making and technical considerations when deciding to operate on these patients.