Accuracy of the Gutter Position in Cervical Double-door Laminoplasty Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography Navigation and the Factors Associated With C5 Palsy

An innovative approach to assess spinal canal expansion following French-door cervical laminoplasty by intraoperative ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of applying intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) to evaluate spinal canal expansion in patients undergoing French-door cervical laminoplasty (FDCL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients who underwent FDCL for multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy were prospectively recruited. Formulae describing the relationship between laminoplasty opening angle (LOA) and laminoplasty opening size, the increase in sagittal canal diameter and the spinal canal area were deduced with trigonometric functions. The LOA was measured with IOUS imaging during surgery, and other spinal canal parameters were assessed. Actual spinal canal enlargement was verified on postoperative CT images. Linear correlation analysis and Bland‒Altman analysis were used to evaluate correlation and agreement between the intraoperative and postoperative measurements.

RESULTS

The LOA at C5 measured with IOUS was 27.54 ± 3.12°, and it was 27.23 ± 3.02° on postoperative CT imaging. Linear correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between IOUS and postoperative CT measurements (r = 0.88; p < 0.01). Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between these two methods, with a mean difference of 0.30°. For other spinal canal expansion parameter measurements, correlation analysis showed a moderate to a high degree of correlation (p < 0.01), and Bland-Altman analysis indicated good agreement.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, during the French-door cervical laminoplasty procedure, application of IOUS can accurately evaluate spinal canal expansion. This innovative method may be helpful in improving surgical accuracy by enabling the operator to measure and determine canal enlargement during surgery, leading to ideal clinical outcomes and fewer postoperative complications.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The use of intraoperative ultrasonography to assess spinal canal expansion following French-door cervical laminoplasty may improve outcomes for patients undergoing this procedure by providing more accurate measurements of spinal canal expansion.

KEY POINTS

• Spinal canal expansion after French-door cervical laminoplasty substantially influences operative prognosis; insufficient or excessive lamina opening may result in unexpected outcomes. • Prediction of spinal canal expansion during surgery was previously impracticable, but based on this study, intraoperative ultrasonography offers an innovative approach and strongly agrees with postoperative CT measurement. • Since this is the first research to offer real-time canal expansion guidance for cervical laminoplasty, it may improve the accuracy of the operation and produce ideal clinical outcomes with fewer postoperative complications.

Association between intraoperative computed tomography navigation system and incidence of surgical site infection in patients with spinal surgeries: a retrospective analysis

Purpose

Although the use of intraoperative computed tomography (CT)-based navigation systems is unlikely to cause intraoperative contamination more than the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy, the association between intraoperative CT/navigation and surgical site infections (SSIs) remains unclear. We investigated the incidence of SSIs and the association between intraoperative CT/navigation and SSIs for spinal surgeries.

Methods

Of the 512 patients who underwent spinal surgery between April 2016 and December 2020, 304 underwent C-arm intraoperative fluoroscopy and/or Medtronic O-arm intraoperative CT/navigation system. We investigated the incidence of SSIs in patients with four techniques; no intraoperative imaging C-arm only, O-arm only, and both O- and C-arm used. Multivariate logistic analyses were conducted using the prevalence of SSIs as the dependent variable. The independent variables were age, sex, and potential confounders including preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, use of instrumentation, C-arm, and/or O-arm.

Results

The incidence of the SSIs in patients with no imaging, C-arm only, O-arm only, and both modalities used was 1.9%, 7.3%, 4.7%, and 8.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of SSIs between the four techniques. Multivariate logistic analyses showed a significant correlation between the prevalence of SSI and JOA scores (odds ratio, 0.878; 95% CI 0.759–0.990) and use of instrumentation (odds ratio, 6.241; 95% CI 1.113–34.985), but not use of O-arm.

Conclusions

The incidence of the SSIs in patients with only O-arm used was 4.7%. Preoperative clinical status and use of instrumentation, but not use of the O-arm, were associated with SSIs after spinal surgeries.