Therapeutic Facet Joint Interventions in the Lumbar Spine: An Economic Value Perspective

Lumbar Total Disc Replacement Leads to Increased Subsequent Facet Injections Compared to Anterolateral Lumbar Interbody Fusions

Study DesignRetrospective Matched Cohort.ObjectiveDespite known consequences to the facet joints following lumbar total disc replacement (TDR), there is limited data on facet injection usage for persistent postoperative pain. This study uses real-world data to compare the usage of therapeutic lumbar facet injections as a measure of symptomatic facet arthrosis following single-level, stand-alone TDR vs anterolateral lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF/LLIF).MethodsThe PearlDiver database was queried for patients (2010-2021) with lumbar degenerative disc disease who received either a single-level, stand-alone TDR or ALIF/LLIF. All patients were followed for ≥2 years and excluded if they had a history of facet injections or spinal trauma, fracture, infection, or neoplasm. The two cohorts were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, insurance, year of operation, and medical comorbidities. The primary outcome was the use of therapeutic lumbar facet injections at 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included subsequent lumbar surgeries and surgical complications.ResultsAfter 1:1 matching, each cohort had 1203 patients. Lumbar facet injections occurred significantly more frequently in the TDR group at 1-year (6.07% vs 1.66%, P < .0001), 2-year (8.40% vs 3.74%%, P < .0001), and 5-year (11.47% vs 6.40%, P < .0001) follow-up. 5-year injection-free probability curves demonstrated an 87.1% injection-free rate for TDR vs 92.9% for ALIF/LLIF. There was no clinical difference in the incidence of subsequent lumbar surgeries or complications.ConclusionCompared with ALIF/LLIF, patients who underwent TDR received significantly more facet injections, suggesting a greater progression of symptomatic facet arthrosis. TDR was not protective against reoperations compared to ALIF/LLIF.

Influence of weight-bearing on the 3D movement of lumbar facet joints in the sitting position

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the motion characteristics of lumbar facet joints and to observe the effect of weight-bearing on lumbar facet joints in the sitting position.

METHODS

Ten normal subjects (5 males and 5 females) were recruited and scanned by CT, and their lumbar 3D models were reconstructed by software. The images of flexion and extension of lumbar facet joints in the sitting position were collected without weight-bearing and weight-bearing 10 kg, and the 2D model was constructed by software. The 2D-3D model was matched to restore the flexion and extension motion changes of the subjects' lumbar spine in the sitting position. Coordinates were established in the middle of the vertebral body and copied to the facet joints. Measure and record the lumbar facet joint movement distance through coordinate system. The relevant data of facet joints were collected.

RESULTS

In the L3/4 segment, after weight loading, the displacement of the left facet joint in the X axis became larger, while that in the Y axis and Z axis decreased. The displacement of the right facet joint in the X axis and Y axis increased, and the Z axis displacement decreased. The rotation angle of the bilateral facet joints also decreased. In the L4/5 segment, after loading, the displacements of the X, Y, and Z axis displacements of both sides increase, while the rotation angles of α and β increase, while the rotation angle of γ decreases. In the L5/S1 segment, the displacements of the X, Y, and Z axes on the left side decrease. The displacement of the X and Y axes on the right side decreases, while the displacement on the Z axis increases. The rotation angles of α and γ increase, and the rotation angle of the β axis decreases.

CONCLUSION

When sitting, the flexion and extension distance and rotational displacement of lumbar facet joints are not affected by weight-bearing. In addition, there is asymmetry in the movement of the left and right facet joints, and weight bearing has no effect on the asymmetry of the motion.

Effect of radiofrequency denervation on pain severity among patients with cervical, thoracic or lumbar spinal pain: A clinical retrospective study

Background

Low back pain is the leading cause of job-related disabilities. The zygapophyseal (facet) joint has been identified as a cause of spinal pain in 15%–45% of individuals. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to the facet joints of the lumbar, cervical and thoracic regions and discussion of the 2-year follow-up results will provide additional data and contribute to understanding the long-term effectiveness of RFA.

Methods

Patients with cervical, thoracic or low back pain, not accompanied by radicular pain and without primary and/or metastatic disease in the spinal region during radiological evaluation were retrospectively analysed. A total of 1274 patients aged >18 years who had clinical follow-up for at least 1 year and had back pain for >6 months were included in the study. The RFA groups were compared within themselves before and after the application. Moreover, patients who received RFA were compared with those who did not receive RFA (controls). The visual analogue scale and quality-of-life scores of the patients were evaluated. Periodic clinical follow-ups revealed changes in neurological status.

Results

Of the 774 patients who underwent RFA, 156, 184 and 434 patients had pain in the cervical, thoracic and lumbar and lumbosacral regions, respectively. The control groups consisted of 108, 122 and 270 patients, respectively. No significant difference in any of the baseline demographic variables was observed between the groups (p > 0.05). A significant improvement was found in both visual analogue scale and quality-of-life scores when compared before and after RFA application within the groups. In addition, a significant improvement was found in the RFA group compared with the control group.

Conclusions

As far as we know, this is the first comparative study of RFA involving the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spinal regions. RFA made it possible to obtain satisfactory results in all three regions. With its increasing popularity and frequency of use, new indications for RFA may emerge.

•

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) method emerges as a very successful treatment method in patients who do not have an operative pathology but who suffer from chronic pain.

•

Especially, considering the persistent outpatient clinic admissions of patients with persistent low back pain, RFA is a "rescuer" position for most clinicians.

•

The clinical relief of the patients for two years is one of the most critical data clearly demonstrating the long-term success of the procedure.

A New Strategy for Rapid Diagnosis of the Source of Low Back Pain in Patients Scheduled to Undergo Treatment with Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation

Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a new strategy for rapid diagnosis of the source of low back pain (LBP) for treatment with cooled radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Materials: Patients suffering from facet joint (FJ) or sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain for more than 3 months were included. Two methods, Technetium Tc99m methylene diphosphonate single photon emission tomography/computed tomography (^99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT) and a modified Fortin finger test were used to identify the source of LBP for treatment with cooled RFA. The visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were used to assess the patients’ pain levels and disabilities respectively. These two measures were recorded at baseline and 1-week, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month follow-up visits. Results: A total of 40 patients with LBP were included in this study. Our results demonstrated that the patients with LBP identified by our new strategy had significant improvements in VAS or ODI score at 1-week to 6-month follow-up visits (p < 0.001) after receiving cooled RFA. Similar results were also found in patients with FJ pain and those with FJ and SIJ pain respectively. Among all the patients, over 70% had greater than or equal to 50% reduction in VAS and ODI scores. No serious adverse events were observed after treatment. Conclusions: This new strategy could be successfully adopted for rapid diagnosis of the source of comprehensive LBP.