1
|
Wu JY, Tang M, Touponse G, Theologitis M, Williamson T, Zygourakis CC. Socioeconomic disparities in lumbar fusion rates were exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2024; 18:100321. [PMID: 38741936 PMCID: PMC11089397 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Background The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare access and utilization throughout the US, with variable impact on patients of different socioeconomic status (SES) and race. We characterize pre-pandemic and pandemic demographic and SES trends of lumbar fusion patients in the US. Methods Adults undergoing first-time lumbar fusion 1/1/2004-3/31/2021 were assessed in Clinformatics® Data Mart for patient age, geographical location, gender, race, education level, net worth, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Multivariable regression models were used to evaluate the significance of trends over time, with a focus on pandemic trends 2020-2021 versus previous trends 2004-2019. Results The total 217,204 patients underwent lumbar fusions, 1/1/2004-3/31/2021. The numbers and per capita rates of lumbar fusions increased 2004-2019 and decreased in 2020 (first year of COVID-19 pandemic), with large variation in geographic distribution. There was overall a significant decrease in proportion of White patients undergoing lumbar fusion over time (OR=0.997, p<.001), though they were more likely to undergo surgery during the pandemic (OR=1.016, p<.001). From 2004-2021, patients were more likely to be educated beyond high school. Additionally, patients in the highest (>$500k) and lowest (<$25k) net worth categories had significantly more fusions over time (p<.001). During the pandemic (2020-2021), patients in higher net worth groups were more likely to undergo lumbar fusions ($150k-249k & $250k-499k: p<.001) whereas patients in the lowest net worth group had decreased rate of surgeries (p<.001). Lastly, patients' CCI increased significantly from 2004 to 2021 (coefficient=0.124, p<.001), and this trend held true during the pandemic (coefficient=0.179, p<.001). Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, our work represents the most comprehensive and recent characterization of SES variables in lumbar fusion rates. Unsurprisingly, lumbar fusions decreased overall with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, disparities in fusion patients across patient race and wealth widened during the pandemic, reversing years of progress, a lesson we can learn for future public health emergencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Y. Wu
- School of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Megan Tang
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L Levy Pl, New York, NY 10029, United States
| | - Gavin Touponse
- School of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, 291 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
| | - Marinos Theologitis
- School of Medicine, University of Crete, Voutes Campus, P.O. Box 2208, 71003 Heraklion, Crete, Greece
| | - Theresa Williamson
- Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Corinna C. Zygourakis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center, 453 Quarry Road Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dengler J, Gheewala H, Kraft CN, Hegewald AA, Dörre R, Heese O, Gerlach R, Rosahl S, Maier B, Burger R, Wutzler S, Carl B, Ryang YM, Hau KT, Stein G, Gulow J, Allam A, Abduljawwad N, Rico Gonzalez G, Kuhlen R, Hohenstein S, Bollmann A, Stoffel M. Changes in frailty among patients hospitalized for spine pathologies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany-a nationwide observational study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:19-30. [PMID: 37971536 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-08014-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In spine care, frailty is associated with poor outcomes. The aim of this study was to describe changes in frailty in spine care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and their relation to surgical management and outcomes. METHODS Patients hospitalized for spine pathologies between January 1, 2019, and May 17, 2022, within a nationwide network of 76 hospitals in Germany were retrospectively included. Patient frailty, types of surgery, and in-hospital mortality rates were compared between pandemic and pre-pandemic periods. RESULTS Of the 223,418 included patients with spine pathologies, 151,766 were admitted during the pandemic and 71,652 during corresponding pre-pandemic periods in 2019. During the pandemic, the proportion of high-frailty patients increased from a range of 5.1-6.1% to 6.5-8.8% (p < 0.01), while the proportion of low frailty patients decreased from a range of 70.5-71.4% to 65.5-70.1% (p < 0.01). In most phases of the pandemic, the Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI) showed larger increases among high compared to low frailty patients (by 0.2-1.8 vs. 0.2-0.8 [p < 0.01]). Changes in rates of spine surgery were associated with frailty, most clearly in rates of spine fusion, showing consistent increases among low frailty patients (by 2.2-2.5%) versus decreases (by 0.3-0.8%) among high-frailty patients (p < 0.02). Changes in rates of in-hospital mortality were not associated with frailty. CONCLUSIONS During the COVID-19 pandemic, the proportion of high-frailty patients increased among those hospitalized for spine pathologies in Germany. Low frailty was associated with a rise in rates of spine surgery and high frailty with comparably larger increases in rates of comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius Dengler
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Campus Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany.
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany.
| | - Hussain Gheewala
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Campus Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Clayton N Kraft
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Hand Unit, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Aldemar A Hegewald
- Department of Neurosurgery, VAMED Ostsee Hospital Damp, Ostseebad Damp, Germany
| | - Ralf Dörre
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital St. Marienberg, Helmstedt, Germany
| | - Oliver Heese
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spinal Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Schwerin - University Campus of MSH Medical School Hamburg, Schwerin, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Gerlach
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Steffen Rosahl
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Bernd Maier
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Pforzheim, Pforzheim, Germany
| | - Ralf Burger
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Uelzen, Uelzen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Wutzler
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Orthopedic Surgery, HELIOS Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Barbara Carl
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
- Marburg Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (MCMBB), Marburg, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Yu-Mi Ryang
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Center, HELIOS Hospital Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Khanh Toan Hau
- Department of Spine Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Gregor Stein
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Spine Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany
| | - Jens Gulow
- Department of Spine Surgery, HELIOS Park-Klinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ali Allam
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Campus Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, HELIOS Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Nehad Abduljawwad
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Campus Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Gerardo Rico Gonzalez
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Campus Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | | | - Sven Hohenstein
- Real World Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, Helios Health Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Bollmann
- Real World Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, Helios Health Institute, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Michael Stoffel
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Idrizi A, Gordon AM, Lam A, Conway C, Saleh A. The Effect of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic on Elective Cervical Spine Surgery Utilization and Complications in the United States: A Nationwide Temporal Trends Analysis. World Neurosurg 2023; 170:e1-e8. [PMID: 35917922 PMCID: PMC9338825 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES As a result of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, elective surgeries nationwide were suspended. The objective was to compare temporal trends in patient demographics, case volumes, and postoperative complications of patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery from pre-COVID-19 (2019-2020 Q1) to post-COVID-19 (2020 Q2-Q4). METHODS The 2019 to 2020 American College of Surgeon's National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database was queried for common elective cervical spine surgeries. Patients pre-COVID-19 (2019-2020 Q1) were compared with those undergoing surgery during post-COVID-19 (2020 Q2-Q4) protocols. Procedural use, patient demographics, and complications were compared. Linear regression was used to evaluate case volume changes over time. P values less than 0.05 were significant. RESULTS In total, 31,013 patients underwent elective cervical spine surgery in 2019 (N = 16,316) and 2020 (N = 14,697); an overall 10% decline. Compared with the calendar year 2019 through 2020 Q1 mean, elective surgery volume decreased by 21.6% in 2020 Q2 and never returned to prepandemic baseline. The percentage decline in case volume from 2019 to 2020 Q1 to 2020 Q2 was greatest for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (23.3%), followed by cervical decompression (23.4%), posterior cervical fusion (15.0%), and cervical disc arthroplasty and vertebral corpectomy (13.7%). Patients undergoing surgery in 2020 Q2-Q4 had overall greater comorbidity burden (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 3 and 4) (P < 0.001). From 2019-2020 Q1 versus 2020 Q2-Q4, there was a significant increase in total complication (5.5% vs. 6.8%, P < 0.001), reoperation (1.9% vs. 2.2%, P = 0.048), and mortality (0.25% vs. 0.37%, P = 0.049) rates. CONCLUSIONS Elective surgery declined drastically during the second quarter of 2020. Patients undergoing surgery during the pandemic had an overall greater comorbidity burden, resulting in increased total complication and mortality rates over the study period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adem Idrizi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA,SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, College of Medicine, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Adam M. Gordon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA,To whom correspondence should be addressed: Adam M. Gordon, M.D
| | - Aaron Lam
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Charles Conway
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| | - Ahmed Saleh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abduljawwad N, Pamnani S, Stoffel M, Kraft CN, Hegewald AA, Dörre R, Heese O, Gerlach R, Rosahl S, Maier B, Burger R, Wutzler S, Carl B, Ryang YM, Hau KT, Stein G, Gulow J, Kuhlen R, Hohenstein S, Bollmann A, Dengler J. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Spinal Fusion Procedures for Spinal Infections in a Nationwide Hospital Network in Germany. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2023; 84:58-64. [PMID: 35760290 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical spine care is difficult to assess due to a lack in nationwide evidence from more recent phases of the pandemic. We aimed to describe changes in in-hospital processes associated with spinal fusion procedures in the treatment of spinal infections (SI) during different phases of the pandemic. METHODS In this retrospective observational study, we examined the in-hospital prevalence and outcomes of spinal fusion procedures for SI (along with patient characteristics, rates of transfer to intensive care units, and mortality rates) during the first four waves of the pandemic compared with the corresponding prepandemic periods in 2019. We used administrative data from a nationwide network of 76 hospitals managing 7% of all in-hospital cases in Germany. RESULTS We observed no significant change in the prevalence of SI fusion procedures during the pandemic, neither in total numbers (349 vs. 373) nor for each wave separately. On a patient level, we found no differences in age, sex, and the prevalence of paresis, and no relevant differences in associated comorbidities. The rate of mechanical ventilation did not change during any of the examined pandemic waves: it ranged between 9.5 and 18.6% during the pandemic and 3.1 and 16.0% during the corresponding prepandemic control periods. The rate of transfer to intensive care changed only during wave 4 (from 70.4 to 54.8%; p = 0.046) but not in any other pandemic phases. We observed no changes in in-hospital mortality rates (range: 2.9-9.7% vs. 6.2-11.3%) or in duration of hospital stay (range: 26.2-30.8 days vs. 20.8-29.2 days). CONCLUSIONS The main finding of our study is that within this nationwide network of spine care centers in Germany, the delivery of surgical treatment of SI by means of spinal fusion procedures was maintained throughout the first four waves of the pandemic. Furthermore, there were no relevant changes in patient demographics, in-hospital processes, and mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nehad Abduljawwad
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Bad Saarow, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Sunisha Pamnani
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Bad Saarow, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| | - Michael Stoffel
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Clayton N Kraft
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Hand Unit, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Aldemar A Hegewald
- Department of Neurosurgery, VAMED Ostsee Hospital Damp, Ostseebad Damp, Germany
| | - Ralf Dörre
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital St. Marienberg, Helmstedt, Germany
| | - Oliver Heese
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spinal Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Schwerin - University Campus of MSH Medical School Hamburg, Schwerin, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Gerlach
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Steffen Rosahl
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Bernd Maier
- Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Pforzheim, Pforzheim, Germany
| | - Ralf Burger
- Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Uelzen, Uelzen, Germany
| | - Sebastian Wutzler
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Orthopedic Surgery, HELIOS Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Barbara Carl
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.,Marburg Center for Mind, Brain and Behavior (MCMBB), Marburg, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Yu-Mi Ryang
- Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Center, HELIOS Hospital Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Khanh Toan Hau
- Department of Spine Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Duisburg, Duisburg, Germany
| | - Gregor Stein
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma and Spine Surgery, HELIOS Hospital Siegburg, Siegburg, Germany
| | - Jens Gulow
- Department of Spine Surgery, HELIOS Park-Klinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Andreas Bollmann
- Helios Health Institute, Leipzig, Germany.,Department of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at Leipzig University, Germany
| | - Julius Dengler
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Bad Saarow, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, HELIOS Hospital Bad Saarow, Bad Saarow, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Trager RJ, Daniels CJ, Perez JA, Casselberry RM, Dusek JA. Association between chiropractic spinal manipulation and lumbar discectomy in adults with lumbar disc herniation and radiculopathy: retrospective cohort study using United States' data. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e068262. [PMID: 36526306 PMCID: PMC9764600 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT) and lumbar discectomy are both used for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and lumbosacral radiculopathy (LSR); however, limited research has examined the relationship between these therapies. We hypothesised that adults receiving CSMT for newly diagnosed LDH or LSR would have reduced odds of lumbar discectomy over 1-year and 2-year follow-up compared with those receiving other care. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING 101 million patient US health records network (TriNetX), queried on 24 October 2022, yielding data from 2012 query. PARTICIPANTS Adults age 18-49 with newly diagnosed LDH/LSR (first date of diagnosis) were included. Exclusions were prior lumbar surgery, absolute indications for surgery, trauma, spondylolisthesis and scoliosis. Propensity score matching controlled for variables associated with the likelihood of discectomy (eg, demographics, medications). INTERVENTIONS Patients were divided into cohorts according to receipt of CSMT. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES ORs for lumbar discectomy; calculated by dividing odds in the CSMT cohort by odds in the cohort receiving other care. RESULTS After matching, there were 5785 patients per cohort (mean age 36.9±8.2). The ORs (95% CI) for discectomy were significantly reduced in the CSMT cohort compared with the cohort receiving other care over 1-year (0.69 (0.52 to 0.90), p=0.006) and 2-year follow-up (0.77 (0.60 to 0.99), p=0.040). E-value sensitivity analysis estimated the strength in terms of risk ratio an unmeasured confounding variable would need to account for study results, yielding point estimates for each follow-up (1 year: 2.26; 2 years: 1.92), which no variables in the literature reached. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest receiving CSMT compared with other care for newly diagnosed LDH/LSR is associated with significantly reduced odds of discectomy over 2-year follow-up. Given socioeconomic variables were unavailable and an observational design precludes inferring causality, the efficacy of CSMT for LDH/LSR should be examined via randomised controlled trial to eliminate residual confounding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert James Trager
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- College of Chiropractic, Logan University, Chesterfield, Missouri, USA
| | - Clinton J Daniels
- Rehabilitation Care Services, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Tacoma, Washington, USA
| | - Jaime A Perez
- Clinical Research Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Regina M Casselberry
- Clinical Research Center, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jeffery A Dusek
- Connor Whole Health, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Impact on neurosurgical management in a Level 1 trauma center post COVID-19 shelter-in-place restrictions. J Clin Neurosci 2022; 101:131-136. [PMID: 35597060 PMCID: PMC9057977 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The stringent restrictions from shelter-in-place (SIP) policies placed on hospital operations during the COVID-19 pandemic led to a sharp decrease in planned surgical procedures. This study quantifies the surgical rebound experienced across a neurosurgical service post SIP restrictions in order to guide future hospital programs with resource management. We conducted a retrospective review of all neurosurgical procedures at a public Level 1 trauma center between February 15th to August 30th for the years spanning 2018-2020. We categorized patient procedures into four comparative one-month periods: pre-SIP; SIP; post-SIP; and late recovery. Patient procedures were designated as either cranial; spinal; and other; as well as Elective or Add-on (Urgent/Emergent). Categorical variables were analyzed using χ2 tests and Fisher's exact tests. A total of 347 cases were reviewed across the four comparative periods and three years studied; with 174 and 152 spinal and cranial procedures; respectively. There was a proportional increase; relative to historical controls; in total spinal procedures (p-value < 0.001) and elective spinal procedures (p-value < 0.001) in the 2020 SIP to Post-SIP. The doubling of elective spinal cases in the Post-SIP period returned to historical baseline levels in three months after SIP restrictions were lifted. Total cranial procedures were proportionally increased during the SIP period relative to historical controls (p-value = 0.005). We provide a census on the post-pandemic neurosurgical operative demands at a major public Level 1 trauma hospital, which can potentially be applied for resource allocations in other disaster scenarios.
Collapse
|