Use of Patella Allograft for Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion

Using a developed co-culture device to evaluate the proliferation of bone marrow stem cells by stimulation with platelet-rich plasma and electromagnetic field

BACKGROUNDS

Bone marrow stem cell can differentiate to osteoblast by growth factors, pulsed low-intensity ultrasound and electric magnetic field. In the research, bone marrow stem cells were cultured; bone marrow stem cells in culture can be stimulated by platelet-rich plasma and electric field.

METHODS

The culture well of the co-cultivation device has a radius of 7.5 mm and a depth of 7 mm. It is divided into two sub-chambers separated by a 3 mm high and 1 mm wide barrier. The bone marrow stem cells were seeded at a density of 2 × 104 cells and the medium volume was 120μl. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or platelet-poor plasma (PPP) was added to the other sub-chamber at a volume of 10μl. The bone marrow stem cells were subjected to different electric fields (0 ~ 1 V/cm) at a frequency of 70 kHz for 60 min.

RESULTS

The highest osteogenic capacity of bone marrow stem cells was achieved by addition of PRP to electric field stimulation (0.25 V/cm) resulted in a proliferation rate of 599.78%. In electric field stimulation (0.75 V/cm) with PPP, the proliferation rate was only 10.46%.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone marrow stem cell with PRP in the co-culture device combined with electric field at 0.25 V/cm strength significantly promoted the growth of bone marrow stem cells.

Comparative Evaluation of Mineralized Bone Allografts for Spinal Fusion Surgery

The primary objective of this review is to evaluate whether the degree of processing and the clinical utility of commercially available mineralized bone allografts for spine surgery meet the 2020 US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) guideline definitions for minimal manipulation and homologous use, respectively. We also assessed the consistency of performance of these products by examining the comparative postoperative radiographic fusion rates following spine surgery. Based on the FDA's criteria for determining whether a structural allograft averts regulatory oversight and classification as a drug/device/biologic, mineralized bone allografts were judged to meet the Agency's definitional descriptions for minimal manipulation and homologous use when complying with the American Association of Tissue Banks' (AATB) accredited guidelines for bone allograft harvesting, processing, storing and transplanting. Thus, these products do not require FDA medical device clearance. Radiographic fusion rates achieved with mineralized bone allografts were uniformly high (>85%) across three published systematic reviews. Little variation was found in the fusion rates irrespective of anatomical location, allograft geometry, dimensions or indication, and in most cases, the rates were similar to those for autologous bone alone. Continued utilization of mineralized bone allografts should be encouraged across all spine surgery applications where supplemental grafts and/or segmental stability are required to support mechanically solid arthrodeses.

Complications of anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature

The anterior approach to the cervical spine is commonly utilized for a variety of degenerative, traumatic, neoplastic, and infectious indications. While many potential complications overlap with those of the posterior approach, the distinct anatomy of the anterior neck also presents a unique set of hazards. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the etiology, presentation, natural history, and management of these complications. Following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a PubMed search was conducted to evaluate clinical studies and case reports of patients who suffered a complication of anterior cervical spine surgery. The search specifically included articles concerning adult human subjects, written in the English language, and published from 1989 to 2019. The PubMed search yielded 240 articles meeting our criteria. The overall rates of complications were as follows: dysphagia 5.3%, esophageal perforation 0.2%, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy 1.3%, infection 1.2%, adjacent segment disease 8.1%, pseudarthrosis 2.0%, graft or hardware failure 2.1%, cerebrospinal fluid leak 0.5%, hematoma 1.0%, Horner syndrome 0.4%, C5 palsy 3.0%, vertebral artery injury 0.4%, and new or worsening neurological deficit 0.5%. Morbidity rates in anterior cervical spine surgery are low. Nevertheless, the unique anatomy of the anterior neck presents a wide variety of potential complications involving vascular, aerodigestive, neural, and osseous structures.

The Cost Effectiveness of Polyetheretheketone (PEEK) Cages for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model with inputs from published literature.

OBJECTIVE

To learn which graft or hardware option used in a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is most beneficial in terms of cost, quality of life, and overall cost effectiveness. Options studied were autograft, allograft, and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages for cervical fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ACDF is commonly used to treat cervical myelopathy and/or radiculopathy. No study has compared the cost effectiveness of autograft, allograft, and PEEK in 1-level ACDF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review provided inputs into a Markov decision model to determine the most effective graft or hardware option for 1-level ACDF. Data regarding rate of complications, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, and cost for each procedure type was collected. The Markov model was first run in a base case, using all currently available data. The model was then tested using 1-way and 2-way sensitivity analyses to determine the validity of the model's conclusions if specific aspects of model were changed. This model was run for 10 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The cost per QALY for each option in the base case analysis was $3328/QALY for PEEK, $2492/QALY for autograft, and $2492/QALY for allograft. All graft/hardware options are cost effective ways to improve outcomes for patients living with chronic neck pain. For graft/hardware options the most cost-effective option was allograft. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for PEEK compared with autograft or allograft was >$100,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Allograft is the most cost-effective graft/hardware option for ACDF. Compared with living with cervical myelopathy and/or radiculopathy, ACDF using any graft or hardware option is a cost-effective method of improving the quality of life of patients. PEEK is not a cost-effective option compared with allograft or autograft for use in ACDF.

Reoperation rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy: a propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) are both used to surgically treat patients with cervical radiculopathy and have been shown to have similar outcomes. Nonetheless, ACDF has become increasingly more commonplace compared with PCF, in part because of a pervasive belief that PCF has a higher incidence of required reoperations.

PURPOSE

To determine the reoperation rate at the index level of ACDF versus PCF 2 years postoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control.

PATIENT SAMPLE

All patients that underwent ACDF and PCF for radiculopathy (excluding myelopathy indications) between January 2005 and December 2011.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Revision surgery within 2 years, at the index level, was recorded.

METHODS

Propensity score analysis between the ACDF and PCF groups was done, matching for age, gender, race, body mass index, tobacco use, median income and insurance status, primary surgeon, level of surgery, surgery duration, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Seven hundred ninety patients met the inclusion/exclusion criteria, including 627 ACDF and 163 PCF. Before propensity matching, the PCF group was found to be significantly older and more likely to be male. After matching, there were no significant differences between groups for any baseline characteristics. Reoperation rate at the index level was 4.8% for the ACDF group and 6.4% for the PCF group (p=.7) within 2 years of the initial surgery. Using equivalence testing, based on an a priori null hypothesis that a clinically meaningful difference between the two groups would be ≥5%, we found that the absolute difference of 1.6% was significantly (p=.01) less than our hypothesized difference.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that even after accounting for patient demographics, operative characteristics, and primary surgeon, there are no significant differences in 2-year reoperation rates at the index level between ACDF and PCF. The reoperation rates are statistically equivalent. Thus, spine surgeons can operate via the posterior approach without putting patients at increased risk for revision surgery at the index level.

Rates of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion after initial posterior cervical foraminotomy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In select patients, posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) result in similar clinical outcomes when used to treat cervical radiculopathy. Nonetheless, ACDF is performed more frequently, in part because of surgeon perception that PCF requires operative revisions more frequently. The present study investigates the rate of ACDF reoperation at the index level after initial PCF.

PURPOSE

To determine the rate of ACDF after initial PCF and to further describe any patient characteristics or preoperative or operative data that increase the rate of reoperation after PCF.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Demographic, operative, and reoperation information was collected from the electronic medical records for all patients who underwent PCF at one institution between 2004 and 2011. All patients were subsequently contacted by telephone to identify postoperative complications and more conclusively determine whether any revision operation was performed at the index level.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-eight patients who underwent a PCF were reviewed, with an average follow-up of 31.7 months. Nine (5%) patients underwent an ACDF revision operation at the index level. The reason for reoperation in these patients included cervical radiculopathy, foraminal stenosis, disc herniation, and cervical spondylosis. Patients who subsequently underwent ACDF at the index level were significantly younger (25 vs. 35 years, p=.03), had lower body mass index (25 vs. 29, p=.01), and more likely to take anxiolytic (56% vs. 22%, p=.04) or antidepressant medication (67% vs. 27%, p=.02), compared with those that did not have a revision operation.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to determine conversion to ACDF after PCF. The present study demonstrates that PCF is associated with a low reoperation rate, similar to the historical reoperation for ACDF. Accordingly, spine surgeons can operate via a PCF approach without a significant increased risk for ACDF revision surgery at the index level.

Autologous clavicle bone graft for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with titanium interbody cage

A variety of donor-site complications have been reported for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using autologous iliac bone graft. To minimize such morbidities and to obtain optimal bony fusion at the ACDF surgery, a novel technique was used to harvest cancellous bone from the autologous clavicle instead of the popular iliac crest graft. After a routine cervical discectomy of the affected level, a 1.5-cm linear skin incision was made over the clavicle within 2.5 cm of the sternoclavicular joint on the medial one-third portion. This portion is known as an anatomically safe zone, with no subcutaneous distribution of the supraclavicular nerve. Then, cancellous bone was harvested through a small cortical window developed on the clavicle. Care was taken not to injure the subclavian major vessels and the lung below the clavicle. A box-type titanium cage was packed with the harvested cancellous bone and then inserted into the discectomy-treated space for cervical interbody fusion. From 2009 to 2013, 16 patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy underwent single-level ACDF with this method. All but 1 patient experienced significant improvement of clinical symptoms after the surgery and showed radiographic evidence of solid bony fusion and spinal stabilization within 6 months. Further, no peri- and postoperative complications at the clavicular donor site were noted. The mean visual analog scale pain score (range 0 [no pain to 10 [maximum pain]) at 1 year after the surgery was 0.1, and 13 of 14 patients with data at 1-year follow-up were highly satisfied with their donor-site cosmetic outcome. The clavicle is a safe, reliable, and technically easy source of autologous bone graft that yields optimal fusion rates and patient satisfaction with ACDF surgery.

An early comparative analysis of the use of autograft versus allograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Objective

The purpose of this study is to verify the usefulness of autograft versus allograft in the radiographic and clinical outcome in early period after the surgery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 38 patients who had undergone one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with rigid anterior plate fixation from March 2006 to May 2009. Interbody graft materials were iliac autograft (n=17) or with allograft (n=21). Fusion rate and graft collapse rate were assessed by radiographic analysis and clinical outcome was based on Odom's criteria.

Results

In autograft group, 13 patients achieved successful bone fusion (65%), whereas 7 patients (31.8%) in allograft group. There was statistically significant between two groups (p<0.05). Comparing immediate postoperative radiograph with last follow-up, the mean graft collapse was noted 1.3mm(15.5% change) in autograft group, whereas 2.0mm(24.7% change) in allograft group. There was no statistically significant collapse rate in autograft group (p>0.05), but statistically significant in allograft group (p<0.05). Clinical outcome was excellent or good in 94.1% in autograft group, and 90.5% in allograft group.

Conclusion

In study, anterior cervical interbody fusion with an allograft got a result of lower fusion rate and higher collapse rate compared with autograft in early period after surgery, and clinical outcome showed similar results in both groups.

Feasibility of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as an outpatient procedure

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures are increasingly being managed on an outpatient basis. Currently there are no definitive guidelines within the literature that delineate which patient population can safely be managed as such. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that ACDF procedures, within a selective patient population at our institution, can be safely performed on an outpatient basis.

METHODS

This is a retrospective chart review within one physician's practice of patients undergoing instrumented ACDF procedures using allograft. This sample included 117 patients who underwent one- and two-level ACDF procedures from November 2005 to April 2009. Hospital length of stay and hospital readmissions were noted. Complication rates in the outpatient population were assessed to determine the feasibility of outpatient management for selective patients undergoing ACDF procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 59 patients (50%) were treated on an outpatient basis. Sixty-eight patients underwent single level ACDF procedures, 38 patients (56%) of which were discharged on the same day. Forty-nine patients underwent two-level ACDF procedures, 21 patients (43%) of which were discharged on the same day. There was one complication (1.4%) in patients who were discharged on the same day. That patient required readmission for 23-hour observation secondary to neck swelling.

CONCLUSIONS

ACDF procedures involving single and two-level fusions can safely be performed on an outpatient basis. Complication rates associated with this procedure are low, with critical postoperative complications involving respiratory compromise occurring very infrequently and in the immediate postoperative period.