The Thoracic Lordosis Correction Improves Sacral Slope and Walking Ability in Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Intraoperative traction in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery improves major curve correction when fusing to L5

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative traction has shown improved curve correction in neuromuscular scoliosis surgery. It is found to be superior to anterior release in terms of correction of both main curve and pelvic obliquity. No previous study has examined the effect of intraoperative traction in patients without pelvic fixation.

METHOD

This retrospective study included 40 non-ambulatory (GMFCS 4 or above) patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing surgery with bilateral segmental pedicle screw instrumentation to L5. Twenty-two consecutive patients had intraoperative Gardner-Wells tongs and skin traction (traction group), while the remaining did not (non-traction group). Inclusion criteria were minimum 2-year follow-up, complete medical records and radiographs. Main curve (MC), pelvic obliquity (POB), T1 tilt, kyphosis, rotation, coronal and sagittal balance and preoperative bending radiographs were measured and analyzed in all patients.

RESULTS

Both groups demonstrated roughly 60% MC correction. Preoperative MC was larger in the traction group [97° (49-126) vs. 83° (40-134); P = 0.03]. The measured correction index was almost twice as large in the traction group (1.9 vs. 1.1; P = 0.001). Mean [IQR] 2-year POB was 14° [7-40] in the traction group compared to 16° [4-60] in the non-traction group (P = 0.59). Eleven patients (50%) in the traction group compared to only four (22%) in the non-traction group had a POB within 10° at 2-year follow up (RR: 2.1; 95% CI 0.8-5.2). We found no difference in kyphosis or remaining radiographic parameters. No traction-related complications were recorded.

CONCLUSION

In patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergoing instrumented fusion to the L5, we found that intraoperative traction increased the degree of MC correction and patients were more likely to achieve POB below 10° without any effects on sagittal parameters or without any detectable significant reduction on rotation.

Spinal sagittal alignment and head control in patients with cerebral palsy

PURPOSE

Spinal sagittal alignment restoration has been associated with improved functional outcomes and with reduced complications rates. Several limitations exist for radiological analysis in cerebral palsy (CP) patients. The goal of this study was to summarize the existing literature and report the important considerations to evaluate in a CP patient undergoing spinal surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective radiological analysis was performed, including non-ambulant CP children with progressive scoliosis. Full-spine sitting radiographs performed pre-and postoperatively were required to measure spino-pelvic sagittal parameters.

RESULT

A total of 23 non-ambulating CP patients were included, mean age 16.0 years (standard error of the mean 0.5). Two distinct groups of patients were identified. Group 1 (61%) were patients with less trunk control (lumbar lordosis (LL) < 50°), retroverted and vertical pelvis (mean sacral slope (SS) 11.4° and pelvic tilt (PT) 38.1°) and anterior imbalance (mean sagittal vertical axis (SVA) 5.9 cm) and Group 2 (39%) were patients with better trunk control (LL > 60°, anteverted and horizontal pelvis (mean SS 49.3°, PT 9.7°) and posterior imbalance (mean SVA 5.8 cm). Postoperative measures showed significant impact of surgery with a PT reduction of 19° (p = 0.007), a mean SS increase of 15° (p = 0.04) and a LL gained of 10° (p = 0.2).

CONCLUSION

Sagittal spino-pelvic alignment in non-ambulating CP patients remains difficult to assess. The current literature is poor but our radiological study was able to define two distinct groups among Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level V patients, based on the quality of their trunk control. All possible factors that may influence head and trunk posture should be systematically considered and optimized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Correction of Poliomyelitis-Related Spinal Deformities: A Comparison Among Three Types of Pelvic Instrumentations

BACKGROUND

We compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes of corrective surgery in patients with poliomyelitis-related spinal deformity (PSD) using 3 types of pelvic fixation and investigated the incidence and risk factors for complications.

METHODS

We reviewed the data from 42 patients with PSD who had undergone spinopelvic reconstruction at a single institution from 2000 to 2016. Of the 42 patients, 15 had been treated with the Galveston technique, 13 with iliac screw fixation, and 14 with S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw fixation. Demographic data, radiographic parameters, and complications were analyzed. Health-related quality of life was determined using Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22-item questionnaires and the Oswestry Disability Index scores.

RESULTS

After surgery, the correction rate of the main curve was 51.7%, 57.8%, and 52.1% in the 3 groups, with significant improvement in regional kyphosis, coronal balance, and pelvic obliquity (PO) (P < 0.05). The correction of PO was similar among the 3 types of pelvic fixation; however, the patients treated with S2AI fixation required significantly less operative time (P < 0.05) and blood loss (P < 0.006). The overall complication rate was 40.5%, with a major complication rate of 23.8%. Age at surgery (P = 0.006) and grade >2 SRS-Schwab osteotomy (P = 0.036) were significant risk factors for complications. Significant improvement was found in the SRS-22 and Oswestry Disability Index scores at the final follow-up examination in the 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed satisfactory correction of spinopelvic deformity for 42 patients with PSD. Compared with the Galveston technique and iliac screw fixation, the use of S2AI significantly decrease the operative time and estimated blood loss and obtained similar correction of PO. Patient age at surgery and grade >2 SRS-Schwab osteotomy were significant risk factors for complications.