A Simplified Lateral Hinge Approach to the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

Proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: current trends and evidence-based practice

Arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) has evolved since its inception over 60 years ago. This review examines the indications for surgery, highlights the differences in current arthroplasty designs, variances in surgical techniques, clinical controversies, current implant outcomes data and salvage options for the failed implant. Overall, PIPJ implant arthroplasty is a good and reliable option for symptomatic PIPJ degenerative, post-traumatic or inflammatory arthritis given the proper clinical setting. If current techniques for implantation and rehabilitation are followed, predictable pain relief and satisfactory function can be anticipated. The purpose of this review article is to examine the current evidence-based indications for PIPJ arthroplasty and examine the reported, implant-specific outcomes of this procedure. Various techniques and rehabilitation strategies will also be outlined.

Shifting the paradigm: ankylosis arthroplasty for the proximal interphalangeal joint with a novel collateral ligament reconstruction

Silicone arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint ankylosis is rarely performed, partly due to the potential for lateral joint instability. We present our experience performing proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty for joint ankylosis, using a novel reinforcement/reconstruction technique for the proper collateral ligament. Cases were prospectively followed-up (median 13.5 months, range 9-24) and collected data included range of motion, intraoperative collateral ligament status and postoperative clinical joint stability; a seven-item Likert scale (1-5) patient-reported outcomes questionnaire was also completed. Twenty-one ankylosed proximal interphalangeal joints were treated with silicone arthroplasty, and 42 collateral ligament reinforcements undertaken in 12 patients. There was improvement in range of motion from 0° in all joints to a mean of 73° (SD 12.3); lateral joint stability was achieved in 40 out of 42 of collateral ligaments. High median patient satisfaction scores (5/5) suggest that silicone arthroplasty with collateral ligament reinforcement/reconstruction should be considered as a treatment option in selected patients with proximal interphalangeal joint ankylosis.Level of evidence: IV.

Rehabilitation after proximal interphalangeal joint replacement: A structured review of the literature

Proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty is an unsolved biomechanical challenge despite advances in materials and new implant designs. This leads to a high rate of complications. Moreover, there is heterogeneity in postoperative management according to the literature. The present structured review examined the therapeutic strategies utilized by physiotherapists to restore a functional finger chain and prevent postoperative complications following PIP joint replacement. Patients undergoing primary total PIP joint arthroplasty of the index, ring, middle or little finger were included. Articles published from 2008 onwards, in French or English, and reporting on PIP joint replacement and postoperative management, were included. Therapeutic strategies were organized according to the surgical approach. Details of splint strategies, mobilization and muscle strengthening and management of postoperative complications were collected. Forty-eight studies, 3 of which provided a description of surgical techniques, were included. In relation to hand function, most authors advocated joint mobilization (n = 45) and some recommended muscle strengthening (n = 4). Static (n = 43) and dynamic splints (n = 14) and buddy taping (n = 12) were frequently recommended to prevent and manage postoperative complications. Few studies (n = 13) reported wound assessment or control of postoperative edema. Precise recommendations concerning therapeutic strategies following PIP joint arthroplasty cannot be made based on available evidence. Specific protocols for rehabilitation following PIP joint replacement need to be clarified in future research.

Comparison of outcomes of three surgical approaches for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty using a surface-replacing implant

The objective was to compare outcomes of the volar, Chamay and tendon splitting approaches for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty using a surface-replacing implant (CapFlex-PIP). One-hundred prospectively documented patients with a 2-year follow-up were included. Range of proximal interphalangeal joint motion, the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and complications were analysed. Between baseline and follow-up, mean proximal interphalangeal joint motion increased for the volar (53° to 54°), Chamay (38° to 53°) and tendon splitting (40° to 61°) approaches. The volar approach yielded the greatest flexion and the highest extension deficit. The mean brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores at baseline and 2 years were 45 and 74 (volar), 45 and 66 (Chamay) and 41 and 75 (tendon splitting). Seven patients in the Chamay group and two in the volar group required a reoperation consisting of teno-/arthrolysis. The tendon splitting approach tended to result in the best outcomes that were associated with fewer complications compared with the volar and Chamay approaches. Level of evidence: IV.

The proximal interphalangeal joint: arthritis and deformity

Finger joints are of the most common site of osteoarthritis and include the DIP, PIP and the thumb saddle joint.

Joint arthroplasty provides the best functional outcome for painful destroyed PIP joints, including the index finger.

Adequate bone stock and functional tendons are required for a successful PIP joint replacement

Fixed swan-neck and boutonnière deformity are better served with PIP arthrodesis rather than arthroplasty.

Silicone implants are the gold standard in terms of implant choice. Newer two-component joints may have potential to correct lateral deformities and improve lateral stability.

Different surgical approaches are used for PIP joint implant arthroplasty according to the needs and the experience of the surgeon.

Post-operative rehabilitation is as critical as the surgical procedure. Early protected motion is a treatment goal.

Revision and exchange PIP arthroplasty may successfully be used to treat chronic pain, but will not correct deformity.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180042