Ulnar head implant arthroplasty: an intermediate term review of 1 surgeon's experience

Long-term survivorship of the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Distal Radioulnar Joint Osteoarthritis: An Update on Treatment Options

The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ), the articulation between the sigmoid notch of the radius and the distal ulna, plays a pivotal role in stability and load bearing and allows for pronation and supination of the forearm. Osteoarthritis (OA) of the DRUJ commonly occurs due to distal radius trauma but may also be the result of conditions such as joint instability, septic arthritis, or primary OA. It is initially managed with conservative therapy, but surgery is often considered when nonoperative methods fail. The surgical approaches available to treat this pathology have grown over the years. The procedures have generally favorable outcomes, each with their own unique complications and considerations. This paper comprises a review of the outcomes and complications for the different procedures commonly used to surgically treat DRUJ OA.

Twenty-Year Experience With Primary Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty From a Single Institution

PURPOSE

The use of implant arthroplasty in the distal radioulnar joint is increasing. Two main types of implants are commonly used, ulnar head prosthesis (UHP) and hemi or semi-constrained total distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty. The literature consists mainly of small patient series. The purpose of this study was to examine our long-term outcomes of distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patient data were collected in a patient registry from 2000 to 2019. The follow-up included radiographic examination, physical examination, Mayo Wrist Scores, pain level, range of motion, and grip strength. Reoperations were recorded. The implants were a semi-constrained prosthesis and a metallic UHP. The mean age at surgery was 50 years. Patient demographics were similar, but the semi-constrained group had a higher preoperative percentage of instability (85 vs 52 percent). The median follow-up time was 30 months for the semi-constrained implants group and 102 months for the UHP group.

RESULTS

A total of 53 primary semi-constrained total joint arthroplasties and 102 UHPs were included. The grip strength and Mayo Wrist Score improved for both the implant groups. Pain reduced in 76% of the patients. Supination improved for the semi-constrained total joint arthroplasty group. Lifting capacity was better in the semi-constrained total joint arthroplasty patients. The unadjusted reoperation rate was 23% for the semi-constrained implants group and 34% for the UHP group. Twenty-two implants were bilateral; these had comparable results to unilateral implants. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated 94% survival rate for the semi-constrained implants group and 87% survival for the UHP group after 5 years. The risk factors associated with reoperation for the combined implant group included younger age at surgery, previous wrist surgery, ulnar shortening, and wrist fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty improved functional outcomes in both the implant groups, but reoperations were frequent. The semi-constrained implants group had better lifting capacity. The bilateral implants had comparable outcomes to the unilateral implants.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Clinical outcome and survival rate of the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis for reconstruction of the distal radioulnar joint depending on co-morbidity and different indications

INTRODUCTION

Ulnar head prostheses have been developed to restore the integrity of the DRUJ and relieve pain. This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcome of the clinical and radiographic results as well as the survival rate of the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis (UHP) depending on co-morbidity and different indications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Herbert ulnar head prosthesis was implanted in 62 patients. In the majority of the patients, the indication was given due to pain during forearm rotation. This was on account of painful instability of the distal ulna following Bowers (59.7%) or Kapandji procedure (16.1%), Darrach procedure (8.1%) or painful post-traumatic (12.9%) or primary osteoarthritis (3.2%). Of the 62 patients, 34 were men and 28 women. The mean age at the time of operation was 49 years (range 18-84 years). A clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed including pain scale, range of motion, grip strength and the DASH and modified Mayo wrist scores.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 84.5 months (range 8-206 months), and statistically significant reduction of pain was observed (p < 0.05). The range of motion of pro- and supination improved slightly, but not significantly, whereas the DASH score improved significantly from 56 to 43 (p < 0.05). Patients without an arthrodesis achieved better results in the DASH and in the modified Mayo wrist score. In 39 cases, a small amount of bone resorption was seen at the collar of the prosthesis in the follow-up radiographs. A revision surgery was necessary in 14 patients. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate after 15 years was 90.3%.

CONCLUSION

The long-term results of the UHP are encouraging regardless of different indications with a survival rate of more than 90% 7 years following surgery, high patient satisfaction and good clinical and radiographic results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Solutions for the Unstable and Arthritic Distal Radioulnar Joint

An unstable and osteoarthritic distal radioulnar joint presents with considerable functional impairment, pain, and weakness in gripping manipulation of objects. A wide variety of surgical alternatives have been described to address these concerns. Resection arthroplasties include different types of distal ulna resection and soft tissue procedures; good overall results have been described for these types of procedures, although they have shown limitations in achieving and maintaining pain relief and stability, especially in more active patients. Since the late 1980s, partial and total joint arthroplasties have emerged as good alternatives for treatment in young and more active patients.

Ulnar Head or Total Distal Radioulnar Joint Replacement, Isolated and Combined with Total Wrist Arthroplasty: Midterm Results

Purpose  Various implants have been described for ulnar head replacement (UHR) or for total replacement of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). Many series are small and few reports on mid- or long-term results. This study is primarily aimed to report on the midterm results after ulnar head only and total DRUJ replacement using the uHead in the treatment of painful disorders of the DRUJ. The secondary aim of the study was to eventually assess the combination of UHR and total wrist arthroplasty (TWA). Materials and Methods  We included 20 consecutive patients in whom an UHR with the uHead was performed at our institution between February 2005 and March 2017. There were 6 men and 14 women with mean age of 59 years (range: 36-80 years). The mean follow-up time was 5 years (range: 2-15 years). Data were recorded prospectively before operation and at follow-up examinations and entered in a registry. The patients were followed-up at 3 and 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and thereafter annually. In five cases, the uHead was implanted simultaneously with a Remotion TWA. In four cases, a Remotion TWA had been implanted previously. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to estimate the cumulative probability of remaining free of revision. A nonparametric Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used for comparing data not normally distributed (qDASH [quick disabilities of the hand, shoulder, and arm] scores), and the paired parametric Student's t -test was used for normally distributed data (pain and visual analogue scale [VAS] scores, range of motion, and grip strength). Significance was set at a p -value of less than 0.05. Results  Pain, grip strength, and the function improved significantly. Pain after surgery decreased with 50 points on the VAS score scale of 100, from 66 (mean), preoperatively (range: 16-97) to 16 (mean; range: 0-51), postoperatively, while grip strength nearly doubled from 12 KgF (mean; range: 4-22), before to 21 KgF (mean; range: 6-36), after the surgery. Patients function measured with qDASH scores improved from 56 (mean; range: 36-75), preoperatively to 19 (mean; range: 4-47), postoperatively. Wrist extension, flexion, and ulnar and radial deviation did not change to a clinically or statistically significant extend, neither did supination nor pronation improved after surgery. While three UHRs were revised early because of pain problems and/or unsatisfactory forearm rotation in two cases and infection in one, 17 had an uncomplicated postoperative course and these patients were satisfied with the results of the surgery at all the follow-ups. Due to limited number of cases, the calculation of significance in comparing combined cases with UHR only cases was abandoned. Conclusion  Ulnar head arthroplasty (uHead) showed significant improvement in pain, grip strength, and the function of the patients with a painful disability of the DRUJ, without impairment on mobility on the midterm follow-up. The overall implant survival over the time and the complication rate was acceptable.

Ulnar head arthroplasty with posterior interosseous nerve neurectomy: A case report

BACKGROUND

Distal Radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthropathy can occur as a consequence of multiple mechanisms, including trauma, inflammatory or degenerative arthritis or even congenital anomalies. Ulnar head arthroplasty has been proposed as a viable therapeutic option, potentially restoring wrist function and improving pain control. This can also be achieved by complete wrist neurectomy but it has several risks associated with the procedure. A selective neurectomy may be more effective.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the case of a 51-year-old man, Tool-Colector, who suffered from constant diffuse left wrist pain aggravated with activities and had a swollen and tender wrist at physical examination with limited range of motion on prono-supination. Radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging showed degenerative changes in the radiocarpal joint and distal radioulnar joint. In order to preserve the remaining mobility and reduce the wrist pain we proceeded with an ulnar head arthroplasty and a posterior interosseous nerve neurectomy, through a single skin incision in the dorso-ulnar side of the wrist. Afterwards, the patient followed a strict rehabilitation program with a hand therapist. Six months later he returned to his previous job with no limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulnar head arthroplasty seems to be a very good option in the treatment of severe DRUJ arthrosis. It significantly improves pain control while maintains or even improves range of motion. Posterior interosseous nerve neurectomy is a simple technique and highly effective.

Unipolar ulnar head replacement for treatment of post-Darrach procedure instability

The aim of this study was to assess distal radioulnar joint stability after unipolar ulnar head replacement for post-Darrach instability. All the patients who underwent ulnar head replacement between1999 and 2015 for post-Darrach procedure instability at our clinic were reviewed. Seven Hebert-type and two uHead (SBI/Stryker) prostheses were implanted. None of the implants were cemented. We assessed stability, pain, range of motion and strength pre- and postoperatively. The changes in the radiographic appearance between immediate postoperative and the last follow-up were determined. All patients (8 patients and 9 joint replacements) had a stable distal ulnar stump at the mean follow-up of 69 months. No complications occurred and no revisions were needed. Pain on a visual analog scale (VAS) was 0 at rest and 6 during maximum effort at the last follow-up; it was 1.5 at rest and 8.5 during effort preoperatively. Wrist flexion and extension, supination and grip strength were unchanged. Pronation increased from 45° to 70°. An area of bone resorption proximal to the ulnar head implant was found in 5 cases but no secondary displacement of the implant or increased pain was reported. Ulnar head replacement stabilizes the ulnar stump. The implant acts as a spacer to place the soft tissues under tension. Distal ulnar stump instability after the Darrach procedure can be solved by a unipolar ulnar head replacement procedure.

Distal radio-ulnar implant arthroplasty: a systematic review

The use of implant arthroplasty in the hand and wrist is increasing, often with little evidence of outcomes in the literature. We therefore undertook a systematic review of the outcomes of distal radio-ulnar joint arthroplasties following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Papers were assessed for outcomes, implant survival and methodological quality. Fourteen papers assessed ulna head replacements. The implant survival rate was 93% at a mean follow-up of 45 months. One paper assessed a partial ulna head replacement. Fourteen papers assessed total distal radio-ulnar joint replacements; all but two used the Aptis prosthesis. These implants had a survival rate of 97% at a mean of 56 months. Complications rates were 28% in both groups, and many were major. Although these data are impressive, worldwide there are many more implants placed and not followed up. All studies were level IV and V studies with low Coleman scores. This systematic review demonstrates that implant arthroplasty for the distal radio-ulnar joint has produced acceptable results in small numbers of patients. Whilst these short term outcomes are encouraging, the indications should be carefully considered and there should be proper consideration of the potential for later failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The ulnar side of the wrist: Clinically relevant anatomy and biomechanics

BACKGROUND

In the hectic environment of a hand therapy clinic, the opportunity to carefully consider the relationships among pathology, pathomechanics, surgical repair techniques, tissue healing, postoperative management, and rehabilitation program development and progression is limited. Clinicians often default to seeking a protocol, a recipe to follow.

OBJECTIVES

Using the ulnar side of the wrist as an example, relevant anatomy and biomechanics are directly related to several commonly seen pathologies, including fractures, ligament injuries, and instability.

CONCLUSION

Armed with knowledge of anatomy, biomechanics, and surgical procedures, the need for a protocol disappears. Each patient can be individually managed according to his or her unique set of variables and responses to injury, repair, healing, and recovery of function.

Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty with implants: a systematic review

A severely painful, dysfunctional, or destroyed distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) can be reconstructed by fusion, interposition of soft tissue, or by arthroplasty using prostheses.

The objective of this study was to review the literature on implants and evaluate their effectiveness in terms of pain relief, range of motion and longevity.

A search was carried out using protocols and well-defined criteria in PubMed, the Cochrane Library and by screening reference lists. The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines.

Of the 27 publications reporting on nine different implants, we excluded reports with less than five cases and silastic replacements of the ulna head. Eighteen publications describing a total of five implants were selected for analysis. Nine of the publications were useful for the evaluation of implant longevity. Despite methodological shortcomings in many of the source documents, a summary estimate was possible.

It seems that DRUJ implants have good potential to improve function through pain reduction; an improvement was observed in 17 series, although it was significant in only seven series.

Instability is not uncommon with ulna head-only implants, but they cause fewer clinical problems and re-interventions than might be expected.

The risk of deep infection is small with the available implants.

Overall implant survival in papers with at least five years’ follow-up is 95%, with a slightly better longevity of 98% for the constrained implants.

Periprosthetic osteolysis/radiolucency is frequently reported. Its causes and consequences are not clarified.

Cite this article: Calcagni M, Giesen T. Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty with implants: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:191-196. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160008.

Osseous Anatomy of the Distal Radioulnar Joint: An Assessment Using 3-Dimensional Modeling and Clinical Implications

PURPOSE

Using a novel technique, we assess and describe the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) anatomy. The purpose of this study was to provide the anatomic dimensions of the DRUJ and to evaluate contralateral symmetry.

METHODS

Computed tomography images of 100 cadaveric forearms were obtained. Three-dimensional models of the radius and ulna were generated and evaluated using 3-dimensional modeling software. Measurements of the radius of curvature of the sigmoid notch (SN) and ulnar head (UH), as well as the length of the SN and volar and dorsal lips were performed in the axial and coronal sequences. In addition, mid-coronal angular measurements were made of the SN and UH to quantify the obliquity of the DRUJ. All coronal measurements were performed with the forearm set to neutral rotation.

RESULTS

The average ulnar variance was -0.9 ± 1.8 mm. The radius of curvature of the UH (8.2 ± 1.3 mm) was markedly smaller than that of the SN (18.2 ± 8.5 mm). The length of the SN in coronal sequences increased from volar to dorsal by 65%. The mid-coronal angle (DRUJ obliquity) of the SN and UH measured 6.0 ± 9.9° and 18.0 ± 9.9°, respectively. A direct inverse correlation was demonstrated in the obliquity of the DRUJ and ulnar variance. All anatomic measurements were similar when comparing bilateral specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

The SN length tends to increase in size from volar to dorsal. Bilateral specimens from the same individual demonstrate similarities and can be cautiously used for comparison.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The relationships and measurements demonstrated in this study can be a guide when considering reconstructive procedures or dealing with complex fractures involving the DRUJ.

Intermediate term evaluation of the Eclypse distal radio-ulnar prosthesis for rheumatoid arthritis. A report of five cases

HYPOTHESIS

Early medical management of rheumatoid arthritis with biotherapy has changed the traditional musculoskeletal damage from this disease. When the distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) is involved, classic procedures may be inappropriate. We chose a hemi-arthroplasty of the DRUJ joint (Eclypse™) in patients with persistent synovitis and chondrolysis with a stable joint. The aim of this study was to assess the intermediate term results of this approach in these specific cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report a retrospective study of 5 Eclypse arthropasties implanted between March 2005 and March 2011. There were 4 women and 1 man, mean age: 58.4years old (54-62) with RA that had been present for 21.6years (15-33). This hemi-arthroplasty replaced the ulnar head with a pyrocarbon component. Patients were evaluated by an independent observer for pain by VAS, range of motion, grip strength in the neutral position by Jamar dynamometer, pronation and supination strengths with a pronosupinator, DASH score and wrist X-rays.

RESULTS

One patient was lost to follow-up and the 4 others underwent a follow-up evaluation at 64 months (43-90). There were no intra-operative or postoperative complications. The pain score at the final follow-up was 1.5/10 (0-4), pronation was 70° (60-80) and supination was 80° (80-80). Grip strength was 148% compared to the contralateral side (73-200%). Pronation and supination strengths were 1.7kg (1.5-2) and 2.1kg (2-2.5) respectively. The DASH score was 55.9 points (42.6 to 79.3). X-rays did not show any changes in the ulnar notch.

CONCLUSION

This distal radio-ulnar arthroplasty is less invasive and preserves the bone and ligaments. Clinical results are rapid, remain stable over time and are well tolerated. This arthroplasty, which was initially developed for osteoarthritis and traumatic lesions of the DRUJ, is promising for specific cases of rheumatoid arthritis.

Arthroplasty of the distal ulna distal in managing patients with post-traumatic disorders of the distal radioulnar joint: measurement of quality of life

Objective

To measure the quality of life and clinical–functional results from patients diagnosed with osteoarthrosis of the distal radioulnar joint who underwent surgical treatment using the technique of total arthroplasty of the ulna, with a total or partial Ascension^® prosthesis of the distal ulna.

Methods

Ten patients were evaluated after 12 months of follow-up subsequent to total or partial arthroplasty of the distal ulna. All of them presented post-traumatic osteoarthrosis and/or chronic symptomatic instability of the distal radioulnar joint. The study was prospective. Seven patients had previously undergone wrist procedures (two cases with Darrach, three with Sauvé–Kapandji and two with ligament reconstruction of the fibrocartilage complex) and three presented fractures of the distal ulna that evolved with pain, instability and osteoarthrosis of the distal radioulnar joint. The following were assessed: quality of life (DASH scale); percentage degree of palm grip strength (kgf) and pronosupination range of motion in relation to the unaffected side; pain (VAS); return to work; subjective evaluation of radiography; and complications.

Results

The patients presented a mean range of motion of 174.5° (normal side: 180°). Quality of life was analyzed by applying the DASH questionnaire and the mean value found was 5.9. The mean pain score using the VAS was 2.3. The mean degree of palm grip strength (kgf) was 50.7, which represented 90.7% of the strength on the unaffected side. The complication rate was 10%: this patient presented slight dorsal instability of the ulna and persistent pain, and did not return to work. This patient is still being followed up in the outpatient clinic and occupational therapy sector, with little improvement. He does not wish to undergo a new procedure. The mean length of follow-up was 16.8 months, with a minimum of 10 and maximum of 36 months.

Conclusion

This concept is subject to the test of time. Implantation of a prosthesis is a very interesting addition to the surgical arsenal for those who are specialists in hand surgery. Arthroplasty of the distal ulna is a safe and effective method with clinical–functional and quality-of-life improvements for patients and presents a low complication rate.

Distal ulna leiomyosarcoma treated with custom polymethylmethacrylate prosthesis with a 4-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Intraosseous leiomyosarcoma is a rare neoplasm having an aggressive biologic behavior. The distal end of the ulna is a very uncommon site for this type of primary bone tumor frequently mistaken for benign lesions. En bloc resection of the distal ulna with reconstruction is a valid option as a limb salvage procedure for the treatment of this difficult problem, minimizing local recurrence while preserving hand function.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We present an unusual case of a 63-year-old woman with a primary leiomyosarcoma arising from the distal end of the ulna treated successfully with a wide excision and custom distal ulna, with 4-year follow-up and no recurrence.

LITERATURE REVIEW

Tumors to develop at the distal end of the ulna have been reported as part of large series such as Dahlin and few case reports. According to Cooney, Exner, and Mankin, reconstruction for distal ulnar neoplasms is not necessary to maintain function. However, Noble and Laurentin-Perez disagree because stabilization of the distal ulna following large resection, as in our case, can be a significant problem with associated pain and weakness due to a decreased interosseous space with ulnar stump impingement on the radial metaphysis and ulnar translation of the carpus.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Custom methacrylate in situ radioulnar joint prosthesis for reconstruction of a large segment of the distal ulna can be a valid option to reestablish the mechanical continuity of the forearm, reducing pain and improving strength and function.

Periprosthetic fracture of the ulna-a case report

After resection of the radial head, the load transmission through the forearm is changed dramatically. Most of the axial load is transmitted to the ulna. This can happen through the interosseous membrane, if intact, thus preventing proximal migration of theradius. However, radial head resection entails some slacking of the interosseous membrane, thereby reducing its ability to transmit load. In traumatic lesions of the interosseous membrane there is no limit to the proximal migration of the radius until the ulnar head abuts on the carpus. In both cases the load transmitted by the ulna increases dramatically and can promote fractures thereof. A 52-year-old, right-handed male patient presented with a periprosthetic fracture of the right ulna 6 weeks after implantation of an ulna head prosthesis. He had previously undergone radial head excision for malunion of the radial head and secondary humeroradial osteoarthritis. This operation had reduced pain and improved the range of motion at the elbow but entailed degenerative arthritis and related symptoms at the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). From the spectrum of possible treatment options, ulnar head resurfacing/hemiprosthesis was elected and performed without intraoperative or postoperative irregularities. However, 6 weeks postoperatively, as he was lifting a heavy object, a periprosthetic fracture of the ulna occurred, which ultimately was treated successfully by open reduction and plate fixation. Plate fixation of periprosthetic fractures is an established treatment concept after excluding implant loosening. Periprosthetic fracture of the ulna seems to be a rare complication but can be treated similarly.

Management of complications of distal radioulnar joint

The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is a complex structure that participates in forearm rotation and weight-bearing. Myriad disorders affect the DRUJ and present diagnostic and management challenges. Degenerative and posttraumatic arthritis and pain at the DRUJ have been traditionally treated with resection of 1 of the 2 arthritic surfaces. Although the procedure often relieves pain associated with incongruence, it creates a different problem by changing the overall dynamics of the forearm rotation and weight-bearing, resulting in radioulnar convergence and ulnar translation of the carpus. This article focuses on the management of painful radioulnar convergence after distal ulnar resections.

Update on the surgical treatment for rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist and hand

Surgical procedures for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis are aimed at restoring function and decreasing pain. Over the past four decades multiple procedures have been described in the management of early and late disease. This article will review the most common forms of surgery used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Intermediate outcomes of ulnar head arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To determine the survivorship and clinical outcomes of ulnar head arthroplasty.

METHODS

The study design included a review of medical records and clinical assessment of all patients who had an ulnar head arthroplasty more than 2 years previously. Survivorship of 79 implants in 74 patients was determined. Forty-seven of these patients participated in a clinical review using the Patient Examination Measure, Patient-Related Wrist Examination, Wrightington Wrist Score, and EQ5D to measure outcomes. Analysis of outcomes was performed for diagnostic subgroups (inflammatory arthritis, posttraumatic, osteoarthritis/impingement, and other), primary versus revision surgery, and whether the procedure was performed for ulnar stump instability (related to either a previous Darrach or Sauvé-Kapandji procedure).

RESULTS

The 5- and 15-year survival of the implants was 90% for both, with mean follow-up of 7 ± 4 years. Mean age at surgery was 50 ± 13 years (range, 24-76). Mean range of motion was within the functional range and grip strength was 67% that of the contralateral side. Patient satisfaction was generally high, but outcomes scores indicated substantial residual disability. Overall scores were 41 for the Patient Examination Measure, 52 for the Patient-Related Wrist Examination, and 70 for the WWS. Patients in the "other" category had the worst scores for all measures. Patients with prior wrist surgery had poorer outcomes than those for whom the arthroplasty was a primary procedure. Patients with posttraumatic diagnoses had worse EQ5D scores and were less likely to recommend the procedure to others.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulnar head arthroplasty had good long-term survival and acceptable patient satisfaction. Substantial disability remained in all groups, with the posttraumatic, "other", and revision groups faring worse. Patients should be counseled about the expected outcomes of this specialized procedure as they pertain to the patient's specific situation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Instability of the distal radioulnar joint

The distal radioulnar joint is a complex structure necessary for forearm motion and force transmission across the wrist. Anatomic and biomechanical advances have revealed broad contributions to distal radioulnar joint stability and refined our understanding of the forces acting across it. Instability often co-occurs with other modes of pathology, such as arthrosis or malunion; and appropriate diagnosis and treatment require a comprehensive understanding of all contributing factors. Distal radioulnar joint instability can be broadly categorized as primary, post-traumatic or post-surgical. Treatment strategies include percutaneous, arthroscopic, soft-tissue, osteotomy and arthroplasty techniques. The purpose of this article is to review distal radioulnar joint instability and its management.

The biomechanical stability of salvage procedures for distal radioulnar joint arthritis

PURPOSE

To test distal forearm stability after 3 surgical procedures for distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis.

METHODS

We tested 11 cadaver limbs with the DRUJ intact, after distal ulna-matched hemiresection, after Darrach distal ulna resection, and after unlinked total DRUJ arthroplasty. We evaluated distal forearm stability in neutral rotation, full pronation, and full supination in unweighted and 1-kg-weighted conditions. We measured dorsal/palmar translation and convergence/divergence of the distal radius relative to the ulna.

RESULTS

Under neutral rotation, whether weighted or unweighted, matched hemiresection and Darrach specimens demonstrated significant radioulnar convergence relative to intact specimens. Weighted and unweighted, DRUJ arthroplasty demonstrated similar radioulnar convergence to intact. Weighted and unweighted, only Darrach specimens showed significant radius-palmar translation compared with intact, hemiresected, and DRUJ arthroplasty. In pronation, no testing scenario, either weighted or unweighted, demonstrated statistically significant radioulnar convergence relative to intact state. In unweighted pronation, palmar translation of the radius was significantly different from the intact state for all surgical scenarios and the Darrach was significantly worse than the other procedures. In weighted pronation, palmar translation of the radius was significantly different from the intact state for all surgical scenarios and the matched hemiresection was significantly better than the other procedures. In supination, weighted and unweighted, Darrach specimens had significant radioulnar convergence relative to intact. Either weighted or unweighted, the hemiresection and arthroplasty groups demonstrated similar radioulnar convergence relative to intact. Unweighted, all scenarios demonstrated similar dorsal translation of the radius. Weighted, the Darrach group showed significant radius-dorsal translation relative to intact specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

For tested procedures, DRUJ arthroplasty overall was biomechanically superior to the other conditions except that we found greater stability in the hemiresected group in weighted pronation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Knowledge of baseline biomechanical characteristics of DRUJ arthritis procedures will aid surgical decision-making and patient counseling.

Indications and early to mid-term results of ulnar head replacement

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to explore the indications and show the early to mid-term results of ulnar head replacement for the treatment of pathological conditions of the distal radioulnar joint.

METHODS

Our study group comprised 52 patients with a mean age of 64 years who had 56 ulnar head replacements. Seven were implanted to salvage an unstable deletive procedure; the rest were for primary treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and trauma. Concomitant procedures along with the ulnar head replacement included wrist arthrodesis, joint replacement and tendon transfers.

RESULTS

The follow-up duration ranged from 1 year to 11 years (mean: 60 months, median: 60 months). In almost all of the patients, pain improved with a median visual analogue scale score of 2 (mean: 2.2, range: 0-8) and a median DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score of 12.5 (mean: 17.9, range: 0-56). Of the 52 patients, 47 reported they would have the same procedure again.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulnar head replacement appears to be a reliable and effective procedure solving several pathological problems of the distal radioulnar joint. We present a large patient group with a short to medium-term follow-up duration.

Implant arthroplasty for treatment of ulnar head resection-related instability

Resection of the ulnar head in cases of debilitating pain owing to arthrosis of the distal radioulnar joint can provide satisfying relief. However, there is mounting evidence that pain with heavier use, instability, and torque-generating weakness in more active individuals may result in less satisfying outcomes. Implant arthroplasty can provide a means to stabilize the radius to the ulna after ulnar head resection, but it requires significant attention to requisite soft tissue stabilization and alignment of the distal radius to the implant to be successful.

Ulnar head replacement and related biomechanics

A stable distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is mandatory for the function and load transmission in the wrist and forearm. Resectional salvage procedures such as the Darrach procedure, Bowers arthroplasty, and Sauvé-Kapandji procedure include the potential risk of radioulnar instability and impingement, which can lead to pain and weakness. Soft tissue stabilizing techniques have only limited success rates in solving these problems. In an attempt to stabilize the distal forearm mechanically following ulnar head resection, various endoprostheses have been developed to replace the ulnar head. The prostheses can be used for secondary treatment of failed ulnar head resection, but they can also achieve good results in the primary treatment of osteoarthritis of the DRUJ. Our experience consists of twenty-five patients (follow-up 30 months) with DRUJ osteoarthritis who were treated with an ulnar head prosthesis, with improvement in pain, range of motion, and grip strength. An ulnar head prosthesis should be considered as a treatment option for a painful DRUJ.

Distal ulna arthroplasties

The distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is the distal link between the radius and the ulna, and forms a pivot for forearm pronation and supination. As well as being susceptible to idiopathic arthritis, any injury or deformity of the DRUJ involving the radius or ulna can alter the function of this joint. Treatment options for irreparable destruction of this joint have ranged from fusion of the DRUJ joint to a variety of excision techniques with soft-tissue reconstructions, and are ever evolving. Understanding the distal ulnar anatomy is key to success.

Salvage of failed resection arthroplasties of the distal radioulnar joint using an ulnar head prosthesis: long-term results

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis for painful instability of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) following resection of the ulnar head.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients were treated with a Herbert ulnar head prosthesis in 3 international hand centers. One patient was excluded from the study because a septic prosthesis had to be removed after 3 months. Sixteen of the remaining 22 patients could be assessed at 2 follow-up times, 28 months (range, 10-43 mo) and 11 years and 2 months (range, 97-158 mo) after surgery, for DRUJ stability, forearm rotation, grip strength, pain level (0-10), and satisfaction (0-10). Standardized radiographs of the wrist were evaluated for displacement of the ulnar head and loosening or bony reactions at the sigmoid notch or the ulna shaft.

RESULTS

All patients demonstrated a clinically stable DRUJ at the latest examination, and no patient required further surgery at the DRUJ since the short-term evaluation in 1999. Average pain measured 3.7 before surgery, 1.7 at the short-term follow-up, and 1.7 at the long-term follow-up; patients' satisfaction, 2.2, 8.2, and 8.9; pronation, 73°, 86°, and 83°; supination, 52°, 77°, and 81°; and grip strength, 42%, 72%, and 81% of the unaffected side. All clinical parameters improved significantly from before surgery to the short-term follow-up, with no further statistically significant change between the short-term and long-term follow-up. Radiographs demonstrated no signs of stem loosening or incongruity of the DRUJ.

CONCLUSIONS

The previously reported short-term results with the Herbert prosthesis did not deteriorate in the long term. Reconstruction of the DRUJ with this prosthesis in painful radioulnar impingement following ulnar head resection is a reliable and reproducible procedure with lasting results.

Allograft tendon interposition and brachioradialis tendon stability augmentation in revision surgery for failed Darrach distal ulna resections

Achilles allograft interposition is one treatment alternative for failed Darrach distal ulna resections, good results have been reported with its use but concern remains with the stability of the distal ulnar stump. The use of brachioradialis tendon passed through the radius and then divided in to 2 branches to pass over the volar and dorsal aspect of the ulnar stump with the Achilles tendon interposition, seems to represent a more reliable, secure, and biological way of restoring palmar and dorsal stability to the distal ulnar stump; while it allows a better control of the tension given to the Achilles allograft interposed than that achieved when using only suture anchors as described in the original technique.

Periprosthetic bone resorption and sigmoid notch erosion around ulnar head implants: a concern?

Metallic ulnar head implants have been proposed not only to solve symptomatic radioulnar impingement after Darrach or Sauvé-Kapandji procedures, but also to prevent such an impingement when treating arthritic distal radioulnar joint. This article prospectively analyzes a series of ulnar head implants with special reference to bone resorption at the prosthesis collar and erosion of the sigmoid notch of the distal radius at an average follow-up of 32 months (minimum 24 months).