Multi-institutional phase II trial of S-1 in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma

Antitumor effects of bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine drugs on human oral squamous cell carcinoma

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) serves an important role in new blood vessel formation or angiogenesis, which is a critical event in tumor growth and metastasis. Bevacizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody against VEGF-A, whereas S-1 is a fluoropyrimidine antineoplastic agent that induces apoptosis in various types of cancer cells. The present study evaluated the antitumor effects of bevacizumab in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or S-1 against oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in vitro and in vivo. Two human OSCC cell lines were used, namely the high VEGF-A-expressing HSC-2 cells and the low VEGF-A-expressing SAS cells. MTT assay was used to evaluate the effect of bevacizumab and/or 5-FU against HSC-2 and SAS cell proliferation. Additionally, the antitumor effect of bevacizumab was evaluated alone and in combination with S-1 against HSC-2 tumors in nude mice. S-1 (6.9 mg/kg/day) was administered orally every day for 3 weeks, and bevacizumab (5 ml/kg/day) was injected intraperitoneally twice per week for 3 weeks. Apoptotic cells in mouse tumors were detected using the TUNEL method, and cell proliferation and microvessel density (MVD) were determined by immunohistochemical staining of Ki-67 and CD31, respectively. Bevacizumab alone did not inhibit OSCC cell proliferation in vitro, and did not exhibit any synergistic inhibitory effect in combination with 5-FU in vitro. However, combined bevacizumab and S-1 therapy exerted synergistic and significant antitumor effects in vivo on HSC-2 tumor xenografts, and induced apoptosis in tumor cells. Furthermore, this combination therapy led to decreased MVD and cell proliferative abilities, as well as increased apoptosis in residual tumors. The present findings suggested that the bevacizumab plus S-1 combination therapy may exert antitumor effects in high VEGF-A-expressing OSCC cells.

Gimeracil enhances the antitumor effect of cisplatin in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo

Gimeracil or 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (CDHP) enhances the antitumor effects of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by inhibiting dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), which is involved in the degradation of 5-FU. CDHP, as part of a combination therapy, was also reported to exert a radiosensitizing effect. Therefore, CDHP may have underlying mechanisms of action other than DPD inhibition. The focus of the present study was to investigate the antitumor effects of CDHP and cisplatin (CDDP) combination treatment in vitro and in vivo against oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) tumors. The inhibitory growth effects of CDHP and/or CDDP treatment on SAS and HSC2 cells were examined using an MTT assay. The expression levels of DNA double strand break repair proteins, including Ku70, DNA-dependent-protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs), Rad50 and Rad51 in CDHP and/or CDDP-treated cells were detected using western blotting. Nude mice with SAS or HSC2 tumors were treated with CDHP (administered orally 7 times/week) and/or CDDP (administered by intraperitoneal injection once/week) for 2 weeks. Combined treatment of CDHP and CDDP significantly suppressed the growth of SAS and HSC2 cells in vitro and that of tumors in vivo compared with the effects caused by single drug only or control treatments. Western blotting demonstrated that the expression levels of Ku70, DNA-PKcs, Rad50 and Rad51 were downregulated in cells treated with CDHP and CDDP combination treatment. Immunohistochemistry also identified that the expression of DNA double strand break repair proteins was downregulated in tumors treated with CDHP and CDDP combination treatment compared with that of tumors treated with CDDP alone or control. The results of the current study suggest that CDHP may be responsible for enhancing the antitumor effects of CDDP by suppressing the DNA double strand break repair system. Therefore, the combination of CDHP and CDDP may be a potential effective option for OSCC treatment.

Effects of a concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for locally advanced oral cancer

A number of regimens composed of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) have been attempted as radical or adjuvant therapies for locally advanced oral cancer. CCRT with S-1 is considered promising due to its efficacy and simplicity of application. Patients (n=16) with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity were enrolled. Chemotherapy consisted of oral administration of S-1 (65 mg/m(2)) for 14 consecutive days followed by a 1-week rest. Radiation treatment at a dose of 30 Gy in 15 fractions was administered concomitantly with S-1. A course schedule of 3 weeks of treatment was applied twice. The overall response rate was 87.5%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 6.3 and 42.5 months, respectively. Although no grade 4 adverse events were observed, grade 3 adverse events, such as anemia (12.5%), stomatitis (25%) and anorexia (18.8%) were present. Thus, CCRT with S-1 is an effective modality that can be safely conducted with minimal burden on patients.

Gimeracil sensitizes cells to radiation via inhibition of homologous recombination

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

5-Chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (Gimeracil) is a component of an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative S-1. Gimeracil is originally added to S-1 to yield prolonged 5-FU concentrations in tumor tissues by inhibiting dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, which degrades 5-FU. We found that Gimeracil by itself had the radiosensitizing effect.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used various cell lines deficient in non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR) as well as DLD-1 and HeLa in clonogenic assay. gamma-H2AX focus formation and SCneo assay was performed to examine the effects of Gimeracil on DNA double strand break (DSB) repair mechanisms.

RESULTS

Results of gamma-H2AX focus assay indicated that Gimeracil inhibited DNA DSB repair. It did not sensitize cells deficient in HR but sensitized those deficient in NHEJ. In SCneo assay, Gimeracil reduced the frequency of neo-positive clones. Additionally, it sensitized the cells in S-phase more than in G0/G1.

CONCLUSIONS

Gimeracil inhibits HR. Because HR plays key roles in the repair of DSBH caused by radiotherapy, Gimeracil may enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy through the suppression of HR-mediated DNA repair pathways.

Association of CYP2A6 polymorphisms with S-1 plus docetaxel therapy outcomes in metastatic gastric cancer

AIMS

S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, contains tegafur, which is converted to 5-fluorouracil mainly by CYP2A6. We evaluated the association between CYP2A6 polymorphisms and treatment outcome in metastatic gastric cancer patients treated with S-1 plus docetaxel.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Chemonaive patients received S-1 40 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 and docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. We analyzed the wild-type (W) allele (CYP2A6*1) and four variant (V) alleles that abolish or reduce enzyme activity (CYP2A6*4, *7, *9 and *10). A total of 50 patients were enrolled.

RESULTS

The genotype frequencies were as follows: W/W (n=14, 28%), W/V (n=26, 52%) and V/V (n=0, 20%). Patients having fewer variant alleles had significantly better response rates (W/W vs W/V vs V/V=79 vs 65 vs 30%; p=0.04) and median progression-free survival (W/W vs W/V vs V/V=8.1 vs 6.9 vs 3.1 months; p=0.0009).

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that the CYP2A6 genotype correlated with the treatment efficacy of S-1-based chemotherapy in previously untreated metastatic gastric cancer patients.

Current concepts for the management of head and neck cancer: chemotherapy

Chemotherapy can be administered in patients with locoregionally advanced (LA) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) either concurrently with irradiation or as induction chemotherapy prior to local treatment or as palliative therapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic disease. Cisplatin-based chemoradiation is still the standard for LA-SCCHN. TPF has emerged as the new standard regimen when induction chemotherapy is indicated. Areas of active investigation in LA-SCCHN are the sequential administration of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation and the integration of targeted therapies. None of the combination chemotherapy regimens demonstrated an overall survival benefit when compared to single agent methotrexate, cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil in recurrent/metastatic disease. Combination chemotherapy in this setting is preferably used in younger patients with a good performance status and with symptomatic disease who require prompt symptom relief. However, a survival benefit was observed when cetuximab was combined with platinum-5-fluorouracil.