Integral Use of Thromboelastography With Platelet Mapping to Guide Appropriate Treatment, Avoid Complications, and Improve Survival of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019-Related Coagulopathy

Diagnosis and treatment of coagulopathy using thromboelastography with platelet mapping is associated with decreased risk of pulmonary failure in COVID-19 patients

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients may require antithrombotic and/or anti-inflammatory medications. We hypothesized that individualized anticoagulant (AC) management, based on diagnosis of coagulopathy using thromboelastography with platelet mapping (TEG-PM), would decrease the frequency of pulmonary failure (PF) requiring mechanical ventilation (MV), mitigate thrombotic and hemorrhagic events, and, in-turn, reduce mortality.

METHODS

Hospital-admitted COVID-19 patients, age 18 or older, with escalating oxygen requirements were included. Prospective and supplemental retrospective chart reviews were conducted during a 2-month period. Patients were stratified into two groups based on clinician-administered AC treatment: TEG-PM guided vs. non-TEG guided.

RESULTS

Highly-elevated inflammatory markers (D-dimer, C-reactive protein, ferritin) were associated with poor prognosis but did not distinguish coagulopathic from noncoagulopathic patients. TEG-guided AC treatment was used in 145 patients vs. 227 treated without TEG-PM guidance. When managed by TEG-PM, patients had decreased frequency of PF requiring MV (45/145 [31%] vs. 152/227 [66.9%], P  < 0.0001), fewer thrombotic events (2[1.4%] vs. 39[17.2%], P  = 0.0019) and fewer hemorrhagic events (6[4.1%] vs. 24[10.7%], P  = 0.0240), and had markedly reduced mortality (43[29.7%] vs. 142[62.6%], P  < 0.0001). Platelet hyperactivity, indicating the need for antiplatelet medications, was identified in 75% of TEG-PM patients. When adjusted for confounders, empiric, indiscriminate AC treatment (not guided by TEG-PM) was shown to be an associated risk factor for PF requiring MV, while TEG-PM guided management was associated with a protective effect (odds ratio = 0.18, 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Following COVID-19 diagnosis, AC therapies based on diagnosis of coagulopathy using TEG-PM were associated with significantly less respiratory decompensation, fewer thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, and improved likelihood of survival.

Exploring heterogeneity in reported venous thromboembolism risk in COVID-19 and comparison to other viral pneumonias: a systematic review and meta-regression

Background

Sources of heterogeneity in venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in COVID-19 are unclear and comparisons to other viruses are lacking.

Objectives

To describe VTE risk in patients with COVID-19, explore sources of heterogeneity, and make comparisons with other viral pneumonia.

Methods

PubMed and Embase data were searched on March 14, 2021, for studies on VTE in adults hospitalized with viral pneumonia. VTE risk estimates were pooled in a random effects meta-analysis stratified by virus type. Heterogeneity in COVID-19 was explored in multivariable meta-regression.

Results

Seventy studies in COVID-19 (intensive care [ICU] [47] vs ward [23]), 4 studies in seasonal influenza (ICU [3] vs ward [1]), 2 ICU studies in H1N1 and 1 ICU study in SARS-CoV-1 were included. For COVID-19 ICU, pooled VTE risk was 19.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.2%-23.5; I2 = 92.8%) for nonscreening studies and 30.0% (95% CI, 17.9%-45.7%; I2 = 81.9%) for screening studies. For COVID-19 ward, pooled VTE risk was 3.4% (95% CI, 2.4%-4.7%; I2 = 91.3%) and 22.5% (95% CI, 10.2%-42.7%; I2 = 91.6%) for nonscreening and screening studies, respectively. Higher sample size was associated with lower VTE risk. Pooled VTE risk in seasonal influenza and H1N1 at ICU were 9.0% (95% CI, 5.6%-14.2%; I2 = 39.7%) and 29.2% (95% CI, 8.7%-64.2%; I2 = 77.9%), respectively. At ward, VTE risk of seasonal influenza was 2.4% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.7%). In SARS-CoV-1, VTE risk was 47.8% (95% CI, 34.0-62.0).

Conclusion

Pooled risk estimates in COVID-19 should be interpreted cautiously as a high degree of heterogeneity is present, which hinders comparison to other viral pneumonia. The association of VTE risk in COVID-19 to sample size suggests publication bias.

Validity and Utility of Early Parameters in TEG6s Platelet Mapping to Assess the Coagulation Status During Cardiovascular Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Background The aim of this retrospective observational study was to explore the early predictive parameters for maximum amplitudein the kaolin with heparinase (HKH) assay (MA_HKH) of TEG6s Platelet Mapping in cardiovascular surgery including cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) period. The relationship between each parameter of the assay and laboratory data was also assessed. Methods We included the patients who underwent TEG6s Platelet Mapping during cardiovascular surgery under CPB between November 2021 and May 2022. The correlation between MA_HKH and the early parameters was assessed. The association between each parameter of Platelet Mapping and a combination of fibrinogen concentration > 150 mg/dL and platelet count > 100,000µL was also evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results In 23 patients who underwent TEG6s Platelet Mapping during the study period, 62 HKH assay data including 59 pairs of data (HKH assay and laboratory data) were analyzed. K and angle, but not R, were significantly correlated with MA_HKH (r [95% CI]: -0.90 [-0.94, -0.83], p < 0.0001 for K, and 0.87 [0.79, 0.92], p < 0.0001 for angle). Furthermore, ROC curves suggested that these parameters predicted a combination of fibrinogen concentration > 150 mg/dL and platelet count > 100,000/µL with high accuracy. Similar results were confirmed in the heparinized blood samples obtained during CPB. Conclusion These findings suggest that not only MA_KHK but also K and angle, which are early parameters in the HKH assay, provide clinically significant information that will facilitate rapid decision-making regarding coagulation strategies during cardiovascular surgery including the CPB period.

Correction of Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Virus Infection Using a Thrombodynamics Coagulation Assay

BACKGROUND

The average frequency of thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 is still high despite low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) prophylactic. Global hemostasis assays, particularly thrombodynamics (TD), known to be sensitive to both hypercoagulation and heparin effects, could potentially be useful for individual management of anticoagulant therapy.

METHODS

A total of 74 patients with lung involvement >50% were randomized into two groups: Group A (44 patients) received weight-based dosing of LMWH, and Group B (30 patients) received the first LMWH dose by a weight-based dosing protocol and then received an adjusted dose based on TD daily results. The endpoints of the study were thrombosis and bleeding as well as discharge or death of the patient.

RESULTS

The incidence of thrombosis was 3 times lower in Group B under TD control compared to Group A without TD control: 7% versus 23 respectively (p = .05). The relative risk of thrombosis if the average clot growth rate V in TD exceeded the threshold value of 25 μm/min was 14.3 (p = .0005, 95% confidence interval 3.2-63.7). There were no clinically significant bleeding episodes in Group B while there were 7% in unregulated Group A. Mortality in Group B under TD control was lower than that in Group A without control: 27% versus 36%, respectively (p = .13).

CONCLUSIONS

The dosing LMWH under thrombodynamics control in severe patients with COVID-19 allows for a significant reduction in thrombotic complications. Long-term hypercoagulation revealed by thrombodynamics (3 and more days) is a strong predictor of thrombosis (AUC = 0.83).

Modified Thromboelastography for Peri-interventional Assessment of Platelet Function in Cardiology Patients: A Narrative Review

Viscoelastic testing (VET), such as thromboelastography, can measure whole blood coagulation dynamics in real time and is used across a range of clinical settings, including cardiac surgery, liver transplant, and trauma. The use of modified thromboelastography with platelet function assessment (TEG(R) PlateletMapping(R) Assay) can provide an analysis of platelet contribution to hemostasis, including the contribution of the P2Y12 receptor and thromboxane pathway to platelet function. The TEG PlateletMapping Assay has shown high correlation with the current gold standard test of platelet function, light transmission aggregometry, to measure arachidonic acid and adenosine diphosphate agonist-induced platelet activation. Studies have also shown comparable results with other whole blood platelet function tests. In this review, we explore the clinical applications of modified thromboelastography with platelet function assessment. This includes guiding dual antiplatelet therapy in relation to cardiac procedures, such as percutaneous coronary interventions, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and left atrial appendage closure. We also explore the developing use of thromboelastography in the emergency care setting of coronavirus disease 2019, which is commonly associated with a hypercoagulable and hypofibrinolytic state. Despite a general lack of high-quality, grade 1 evidence regarding the use of modified thromboelastography with platelet function assessment in these disease areas, the ability of the TEG PlateletMapping Assay to measure global hemostasis and platelet reactivity rapidly and to view and evaluate results at the point of care makes it a promising area for further study for managing patient treatment and optimizing hemostatic therapy.

Viscoelastic Testing in the Management of Adult Patients on Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices with Focus on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications continue to remain frequent complications that significantly impact the morbidity and mortality of patients implanted with mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSDs). The severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has resulted in a number of COVID-19 patients being supported by MCSDs, specifically extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), which in turn has created a crucial need for rapid assessment of hemostatic status in these patients to avoid bleeding and thrombotic complications. Currently, conventional plasma-based coagulation assays such as prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) are used to assess hemostasis, and the activated clotting time (ACT) and aPTT are the most common tests used to monitor heparin anticoagulation in patients on ECMO. Unfractionated heparin remains the mainstay anticoagulation therapy for patients on ECMO. Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) offers little guidance on the subject but does state that each institution should create its internal anticoagulation protocols. Viscoelastic assays (VEAs) are increasingly recognized by ELSO and ECMO community for their potential to assess hemostatic derangements in patients implanted with MCSDs as well as guidance for appropriate hemostatic therapy. This review focuses on the evidence for the use of viscoelastic assays to assess overall hemostasis and to guide the treatment of adult patients connected to an ECMO circuit. Limitations of the use of conventional assays, ACT, and VEA are also discussed.

Anticoagulation Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit

Patients with critical illness often display variable hypo- and hypercoagulable sequalae requiring intense monitoring and anticoagulation pharmacotherapy to prevent or treat inappropriate clot formation. It is imperative to understand the various stages of the clotting cascade and where each pharmacotherapy agent exerts its therapeutic effect. Common coagulation tests are utilized to monitor the areas of the clotting cascade and the effects that anticoagulant pharmacotherapy exhibits. Many novel coagulation tests are also in development. The purpose of this narrative review is to evaluate commonly utilized coagulation tests that monitor anticoagulation while in the intensive care unit.

Aberrant Fibrin Clot Structure Visualized Ex Vivo in Critically Ill Patients With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection

Disseminated fibrin-rich microthrombi have been reported in patients who died from COVID-19. Our objective is to determine whether the fibrin clot structure and function differ between critically ill patients with or without COVID-19 and to correlate the structure with clinical coagulation biomarkers.

Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays: A Primer on Legacy and New Generation Devices

Viscoelastic hemostatic assay (VHAs) are whole blood point-of-care tests that have become an essential method for assaying hemostatic competence in liver transplantation, cardiac surgery, and most recently, trauma surgery involving hemorrhagic shock. It has taken more than three-quarters of a century of research and clinical application for this technology to become mainstream in these three clinical areas. Within the last decade, the cup and pin legacy devices, such as thromboelastography (TEG^® 5000) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM^® delta), have been supplanted not only by cartridge systems (TEG^® 6S and ROTEM^® sigma), but also by more portable point-of-care bedside testing iterations of these legacy devices (e.g., Sonoclot^®, Quantra^®, and ClotPro^®). Here, the legacy and new generation VHAs are compared on the basis of their unique hemostatic parameters that define contributions of coagulation factors, fibrinogen/fibrin, platelets, and clot lysis as related to the lifespan of a clot. In conclusion, we offer a brief discussion on the meteoric adoption of VHAs across the medical and surgical specialties to address COVID-19-associated coagulopathy.

Antiplatelet Therapy for Atherothrombotic Disease in 2022—From Population to Patient-Centered Approaches

Antiplatelet agents, with aspirin and P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonists as major key molecules, are currently the cornerstone of pharmacological treatment of atherothrombotic events including a variety of cardio- and cerebro-vascular as well as peripheral artery diseases. Over the last decades, significant changes have been made to antiplatelet therapeutic and prophylactic strategies. The shift from a population-based approach to patient-centered precision medicine requires greater awareness of individual risks and benefits associated with the different antiplatelet strategies, so that the right patient gets the right therapy at the right time. In this review, we present the currently available antiplatelet agents, outline different management strategies, particularly in case of bleeding or in perioperative setting, and develop the concept of high on-treatment platelet reactivity and the steps toward person-centered precision medicine aiming to optimize patient care.

Current and novel biomarkers of thrombotic risk in COVID-19: a Consensus Statement from the International COVID-19 Thrombosis Biomarkers Colloquium

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) predisposes patients to thrombotic and thromboembolic events, owing to excessive inflammation, endothelial cell activation and injury, platelet activation and hypercoagulability. Patients with COVID-19 have a prothrombotic or thrombophilic state, with elevations in the levels of several biomarkers of thrombosis, which are associated with disease severity and prognosis. Although some biomarkers of COVID-19-associated coagulopathy, including high levels of fibrinogen and D-dimer, were recognized early during the pandemic, many new biomarkers of thrombotic risk in COVID-19 have emerged. In this Consensus Statement, we delineate the thrombotic signature of COVID-19 and present the latest biomarkers and platforms to assess the risk of thrombosis in these patients, including markers of platelet activation, platelet aggregation, endothelial cell activation or injury, coagulation and fibrinolysis as well as biomarkers of the newly recognized post-vaccine thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome. We then make consensus recommendations for the clinical use of these biomarkers to inform prognosis, assess disease acuity, and predict thrombotic risk and in-hospital mortality. A thorough understanding of these biomarkers might aid risk stratification and prognostication, guide interventions and provide a platform for future research.

Thromboelastography determined dynamics of blood coagulation and its correlation with complications and outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes abnormalities in the hemostatic system, collectively known as COVID-associated coagulopathy. The dynamics of clot formation are best discerned by whole-blood viscoelastic tests, such as thromboelastography (TEG). We aimed to assess the various abnormalities seen on TEG and explored the predictors of outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Thromboelastography was performed for 28 patients with COVID-19 using an automated thromboelastogram. The hemostatic condition was categorized as hypercoagulable in 17 (63%), hypocoagulable in 2 (7%), and normal in 8 (30%) based on TEG variables, such as reaction time , time until clot reaches a fixed strength, alpha angle, maximum amplitude, and clotting index. Laboratory parameters and clinical outcomes were compared between hypercoagulable and normal groups.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with a median age of 50 years (interquartile range, 40-60 years), male-to-female ratio of 0.9:1, median C-reactive protein of 25.7 (10.9-108.8) mg/L, serum ferritin of 693 (317-1031) µg/L, and albumin 2.9 (2.6-3.3) g/dL were included. The median prothrombin time/international normalized ratio and activated partial thromboplastin time were within normal range in the hypercoagulable and normal groups. The severity of COVID-19 was mild in 6 (22.2%), moderate in 2 (7.4%), and severe in 19 (70.4%) patients. Twenty-eight-day mortality among patients with hypocoagulable and hypercoagulable states was higher than normal coagulation status. (log-rank test, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypercoagulable state, together with a severe inflammatory state, is common in patients with COVID-19, despite thromboprophylaxis. TEG assesses coagulation status better than conventional coagulation tests. Coagulation abnormalities are associated with poor outcomes.

Coagulation profiles and viscoelastic testing in multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

OBJECTIVE

To characterize viscoelastic testing profiles of children with multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective review included 30 patients diagnosed with MIS-C from March 1 to September 1, 2020. Thromboelastography (TEG) with platelet mapping was performed in 19 (63%) patients and compared to age- and sex-matched controls prior to cardiac surgery. Relationships between TEG parameters and inflammatory markers were assessed using correlation.

RESULTS

Patients with MIS-C had abnormal TEG results compared to controls, including decreased kinetic (K) time (1.1 vs. 1.7 minutes, p < .01), increased alpha angle (75.0° vs. 65.7°, p < .01), increased maximum amplitude (70.8 vs. 58.3 mm, p < .01), and decreased lysis in 30 minutes (Ly30) (1.1% vs. 3.7%, p = .03); consistent with increased clot formation rate and strength, and reduced fibrinolysis. TEG maximum amplitude was moderately correlated with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (r = 0.60, p = .02), initial platelet count (r = 0.67, p < .01), and peak platelet count (r = 0.51, p = .03). TEG alpha angle was moderately correlated with peak platelet count (r = 0.54, p = .02). Seventeen (57%) patients received aspirin (ASA) and anticoagulation, five (17%) received only ASA, and three (10%) received only anticoagulation. No patients had a symptomatic thrombotic event. Six (20%) patients had a bleeding event, none of which was major.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MIS-C had evidence of hypercoagulability on TEG. Increased ESR and platelets were associated with higher clot strength. Patients were prophylactically treated with ASA or anticoagulation with no symptomatic thrombosis or major bleeding. Further multicenter study is required to characterize the rate of thrombosis and optimal thromboprophylaxis algorithm in this patient population.

TEG®, Microclot and Platelet Mapping for Guiding Early Management of Severe COVID-19 Coagulopathy

An important component of severe COVID-19 disease is virus-induced endothelilitis. This leads to disruption of normal endothelial function, initiating a state of failing normal clotting physiology. Massively increased levels of von Willebrand Factor (VWF) lead to overwhelming platelet activation, as well as activation of the enzymatic (intrinsic) clotting pathway. In addition, there is an impaired fibrinolysis, caused by, amongst others, increased levels of alpha-(2) antiplasmin. The end result is hypercoagulation (proven by thromboelastography^® (TEG^®)) and reduced fibrinolysis, inevitably leading to a difficult-to-overcome hypercoagulated physiological state. Platelets in circulation also plays a significant role in clot formation, but they themselves may also drive hypercoagulation when they are overactivated due to the interactions of their receptors with the endothelium, immune cells or circulating inflammatory molecules. From the literature it is clear that the role of platelets in severely ill COVID-19 patients has been markedly underestimated or even ignored. We here highlight the value of early management of severe COVID-19 coagulopathy as guided by TEG^®, microclot and platelet mapping. We also argue that the failure of clinical trials, where the efficacy of prophylactic versus therapeutic clexane (low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)) were not always successful, which may be because the significant role of platelet activation was not taken into account during the planning of the trial. We conclude that, because of the overwhelming alteration of clotting, the outcome of any trial evaluating an any single anticoagulant, including thrombolytic, would be negative. Here we suggest the use of the degree of platelet dysfunction and presence of microclots in circulation, together with TEG^®, might be used as a guideline for disease severity. A multi-pronged approach, guided by TEG^® and platelet mapping, would be required to maintain normal clotting physiology in severe COVID-19 disease.

The Value of Thromboelastography (TEG) in COVID-19 Critical Illness as Illustrated by a Case Series

Objective

To develop a practical thromboelastograph guided (TEG) anticoagulation protocol to guide the management of COVID-19 critically ill patients.

Design

An inter disciplinary team reviewed the current literature on hypercoagulability in critically ill COVID-19 patients, clinical management practices and challenges with high rates of thrombotic events despite anticoagulant therapies.

Setting

The largest tertiary care hospital within the Northwell Health System in New York.

Patients

COVID-19 invasively mechanically ventilated patients in Medical Intensive Care Unit Settings.

Methods

TEG was monitored in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Patterns were reviewed to guide the development of a treatment protocol leveraging TEG parameters to select anticoagulant therapy. Three patients are reported to highlight TEG profiles that led to the development of the algorithm. Clinical trajectory and treatment decisions were extracted retrospectively from the Electronic Health Record, with input from the intensivists. Anticoagulant use, laboratory and TEG values, and venous/arterial lower extremity (LE) ultrasound results were recorded.

Main Results

These patients demonstrated hypercoagulable TEG results despite prophylactic or therapeutic dosages of unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMHW). TEG surveillance identified functional fibrinogen and maximum amplitude in high-risk patients with hyper inflammatory markers. Anticoagulation assessment, TEG parameters, and LE ultrasound monitoring for venous and arterial thrombus were used to construct an algorithm to guide and escalate anticoagulant therapy.

Conclusions

TEG provides patient-specific evidence for a hypercoagulable state in patients receiving all types of anticoagulant therapy. The proposed TEG algorithm guides anticoagulation management decisions to maintain or escalate anticoagulant dose and/or change choice of anticoagulant. A TEG algorithm may help negotiate the potential harm/benefit balance of full-dose anticoagulation in critically ill COVID-19 patients, by allowing for a more individualized approach that goes beyond the review of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) levels.

The relationship of large city out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and the prevalence of COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Though variable, many major metropolitan cities reported profound and unprecedented increases in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in early 2020. This study examined the relative magnitude of those increases and their relationship to COVID-19 prevalence.

METHODS

EMS (9-1-1 system) medical directors for 50 of the largest U.S. cities agreed to provide the aggregate, de-identified, pre-existing monthly tallies of OHCA among adults (age >18 years) occurring between January and June 2020 within their respective jurisdictions. Identical comparison data were also provided for corresponding time periods in 2018 and 2019.  Equivalent data were obtained from the largest cities in Italy, United Kingdom and France, as well as Perth, Australia and Auckland, New Zealand.

FINDINGS

Significant OHCA escalations generally paralleled local prevalence of COVID-19. During April, most U.S. cities (34/50) had >20% increases in OHCA versus 2018-2019 which reflected high local COVID-19 prevalence. Thirteen observed 1·5-fold increases in OHCA and three COVID-19 epicenters had >100% increases (2·5-fold in New York City). Conversely, cities with lesser COVID-19 impact observed unchanged (or even diminished) OHCA numbers. Altogether (n = 50), on average, OHCA cases/city rose 59% during April (p = 0·03). By June, however, after mitigating COVID-19 spread, cities with the highest OHCA escalations returned to (or approached) pre-COVID OHCA numbers while cities minimally affected by COVID-19 during April (and not experiencing OHCA increases), then had marked OHCA escalations when COVID-19 began to surge locally. European, Australian, and New Zealand cities mirrored the U.S. experience.

INTERPRETATION

Most metropolitan cities experienced profound escalations of OHCA generally paralleling local prevalence of COVID-19.  Most of these patients were pronounced dead without COVID-19 testing.

FUNDING

No funding was involved. Cities provided de-identified aggregate data collected routinely for standard quality assurance functions.

The Year in Coagulation: Selected Highlights from 2020

This is the second annual review in the Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia to cover highlights in coagulation for cardiac surgery. The goal of this article is to provide readers with a focused summary from the literature of the prior year's most important coagulation topics. In 2020, this included a discussion covering allogeneic transfusion, antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy, factor concentrates, coagulation testing, mechanical circulatory support, and the effects of coronavirus disease 2019.

The Role of TEG Analysis in Patients with COVID-19-Associated Coagulopathy: A Systematic Review

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated coagulopathy (CAC), characterized by hypercoagulability and an increased risk of thrombotic complications, is an important consideration in the management of patients with COVID-19. As COVID-19 is a new disease, no standard of care for the diagnosis or management of its associated coagulopathy is yet established. Whole blood viscoelastic tests, such as thromboelastography (TEG^® hemostasis analyzer), analyze whole blood to provide a complete overview of the coagulation status. We conducted a systematic review of thromboelastography for management of patients with COVID-19, using MEDLINE (PubMed) and Cochrane databases. TEG^® parameter measurements and clinical outcomes data were extracted for analysis. Our review found 15 publications, with overall results showing thromboelastography can identify and assess a hypercoagulable state in patients with COVID-19. Furthermore, utilization of thromboelastography in this patient population was shown to predict thrombotic complications. The benefits of thromboelastography presented here, in addition to advantages compared with laboratory coagulation tests, position thromboelastography as an important opportunity for optimizing diagnosis of CAC and improving patient management in COVID-19. Given that the benefits of thromboelastography have already been demonstrated in several other clinical applications, we anticipate that clinical data from future studies in patients with COVID-19 will further elucidate the optimal use of thromboelastography in this patient population.