Anemia in the critically ill: do we need to live with it?*

Restrictive Transfusion Practice in Adults Receiving Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Single-Center Experience

Objectives:

Restrictive transfusion policies have been adopted in critical care, although these have not included patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. We aimed to assess survival outcomes, adverse events related to RBC transfusion, and cost implications following a change from a “liberal” to a “restrictive” RBC transfusion practice in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Design:

Retrospective observational study.

Setting:

Single high-volume tertiary critical care department at a university hospital.

Patients:

Patients 16 years old or greater receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between 2011 and 2017 for more than 24 hours.

Interventions:

None.

Measurements and Main Results:

Clinical diagnoses, complications, outcomes, median hemoglobin, and hematocrit levels were obtained from patients’ electronic records. All laboratory results for hemoglobin and hematocrit were included. RBC transfusions were obtained from prescription charts. We included 402 patients: 99 during a “liberal” transfusion practice (2011–2014)—when the target hemoglobin level was greater than 100 g/L; and 303 treated during a “restrictive” transfusion practice (2014–2017) when the target hemoglobin level was greater than 80 g/L. We found that survival outcomes did not change following the implementation of a “restrictive” transfusion policy. There was also a decrease in the extracorporeal blood flow rates with restrictive transfusion of 0.5 L/min. Nonsurvivors of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation had higher usage of RBC units following a change in transfusion practice. The restrictive strategy allowed a cost saving of £454 per patient.

Conclusions:

These results suggest that the adoption of a more restrictive approach to RBC transfusion during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is more cost-effective and associated with similar survival outcomes, than when compared with a more liberal approach.

Is there an indication to utilize intravenous iron in acute trauma patients? Why, how, and when

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traumatic injury has been described as a growing pandemic which has significant implications for global health. In the trauma setting, anemia is a common occurrence and is frequently inadequately addressed. It is associated with significant morbidity and incurs great cost - both to the patient and to the health system. The cause is multifactorial, and the pathophysiology is incompletely understood. Appropriate care of the trauma patient is a multidisciplinary responsibility and a focused approach to anemia is vital. The recommendation for restrictive transfusion strategies and the potential benefit of intravenous iron (IVI) in the perioperative setting, make the intervention an attractive proposition in the anemic trauma patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

In an era where the importance of patient blood management is recognized, there is significant attention being given to both the implications and the appropriate management of anemia, in various settings. Advances have been made in the understanding of the mechanisms underlying the anemia associated with traumatic injury and the efficacy of current interventions is being explored. This increased understanding of the pathophysiology behind the condition has also facilitated the postulation of potential therapeutic targets for the future.

SUMMARY

Suboptimally managed anemia impacts on clinical outcome and contributes to the burden of costs associated with trauma. The cause of the anemia associated with trauma is multifactorial and should be addressed at several levels. The role of IVI in this setting is yet to be clearly defined.

Anemia and Red Blood Cell Transfusion: Advances in Critical Care

Anemia is common in the intensive care unit (ICU), resulting in frequent administration of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Significant advances have been made in understanding the pathophysiology of anemia in the ICU, which is anemia of inflammation. This anemia is related to high hepcidin concentrations resulting in iron-restricted erythropoiesis, and decreased erythropoietin concentrations. A new hormone (erythroferrone) has been identified, which mediates hepcidin suppression to allow increased iron absorption and mobilization from iron stores. RBC transfusions are most commonly administered to ICU patients for treatment of anemia. All strategies to reduce anemia in the ICU should be implemented.