Updating Evidence for Using Therapeutic Hypothermia in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Outcomes and prognostic factors of pediatric patients with a Glasgow Coma Score of 3 after blunt head trauma

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess outcomes of pediatric patients with blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI) with a presenting Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 3.

METHODS

After local institutional review board approval, we identified patients ages 0 to15 years with blunt TBI and a reported GCS of 3 between 2007 and 2017 from a pediatric level 1 trauma center prospective registry. Exclusion criteria were cardiac death on arrival and penetrating injury. We recorded clinical variables from patients with a non-pharmacologic GCS of 3 and pupillary exam documented by a neurosurgical attending or resident. The original Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) was used to compare with other studies. Importance of variables to survival was calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 88 patients (mean age 6.9 years) were included with a mortality rate of 68%. Twelve percent had a poor long-term outcome (GOS 2 or 3) while 20% had a good long-term outcome (GOS 4 or 5). Median follow-up was 1.8 years. Initial group comparison revealed patients in group 1 (survivors) had less hypotension on arrival (14% SBP < 90 mmHg vs. 66%, p < 0.0001), higher temperatures on arrival (36.3 °C vs 34.9 °C, p = 0.0002), lower ISS (29.7 vs 39.5, p = 0.003), less serious injury to other major organs (34% vs 61%, p = 0.02), more epidural hematomas (24% vs 7%, p = 0.04), and less evidence of brain ischemia on CT (7% vs 39%, p = 0.002) or brainstem infarct, hemorrhage, or herniation (0% vs 27%, p = 0.002). Differences between the 2 groups in age, sex, race, MOI, AIS score, presence of midline shift > 5 mm, or time from injury to hospital arrival or time to surgery were not statistically significant. Classification tree analysis showed that the most important variable for survival was pupillary exam; mortality was 92% in presence of bilateral, fixed dilated pupils. The relative importance of initial temperature, MOI, and hypotension to survivability was 0.79, 0.75, and 0.47, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Twenty percent of our pediatric non-pharmacologic GCS 3 cohort had a good functional outcome. Lack of bilaterally fixed and dilated pupils was the most important factor for survival. Temperature, MOI, and hypotension also correlated with survival. The data support selective aggressive management for these patients.

Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, Executive Summary

The purpose of this work is to identify and synthesize research produced since the second edition of these Guidelines was published and incorporate new results into revised evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients. This document provides an overview of our process, lists the new research added, and includes the revised recommendations. Recommendations are only provided when there is supporting evidence. This update includes 22 recommendations, 9 are new or revised from previous editions. New recommendations on neuroimaging, hyperosmolar therapy, analgesics and sedatives, seizure prophylaxis, temperature control/hypothermia, and nutrition are provided. None are level I, 3 are level II, and 19 are level III. The Clinical Investigators responsible for these Guidelines also created a companion algorithm that supplements the recommendations with expert consensus where evidence is not available and organizes possible interventions into first and second tier utilization. The complete guideline document and supplemental appendices are available electronically (https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001735). The online documents contain summaries and evaluations of all the studies considered, including those from prior editions, and more detailed information on our methodology. New level II and level III evidence-based recommendations and an algorithm provide additional guidance for the development of local protocols to treat pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Our intention is to identify and institute a sustainable process to update these Guidelines as new evidence becomes available.

Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines, Executive Summary

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this work is to identify and synthesize research produced since the second edition of these Guidelines was published and incorporate new results into revised evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury in pediatric patients.

METHODS AND MAIN RESULTS

This document provides an overview of our process, lists the new research added, and includes the revised recommendations. Recommendations are only provided when there is supporting evidence. This update includes 22 recommendations, nine are new or revised from previous editions. New recommendations on neuroimaging, hyperosmolar therapy, analgesics and sedatives, seizure prophylaxis, temperature control/hypothermia, and nutrition are provided. None are level I, three are level II, and 19 are level III. The Clinical Investigators responsible for these Guidelines also created a companion algorithm that supplements the recommendations with expert consensus where evidence is not available and organizes possible interventions into first and second tier utilization. The purpose of publishing the algorithm as a separate document is to provide guidance for clinicians while maintaining a clear distinction between what is evidence based and what is consensus based. This approach allows, and is intended to encourage, continued creativity in treatment and research where evidence is lacking. Additionally, it allows for the use of the evidence-based recommendations as the foundation for other pathways, protocols, or algorithms specific to different organizations or environments. The complete guideline document and supplemental appendices are available electronically from this journal. These documents contain summaries and evaluations of all the studies considered, including those from prior editions, and more detailed information on our methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

New level II and level III evidence-based recommendations and an algorithm provide additional guidance for the development of local protocols to treat pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Our intention is to identify and institute a sustainable process to update these Guidelines as new evidence becomes available.