Brain Biopsy for Neurological Diseases of Unknown Etiology in Critically Ill Patients: Feasibility, Safety, and Diagnostic Yield

Diagnostic yield of postmortem brain examination following premortem brain biopsy for neoplastic and nonneoplastic disease

Medical autopsies have decreased in frequency due in part to advances in radiological techniques and increased availability of molecular and other ancillary testing. However, premortem diagnosis of CNS disease remains challenging; while ∼90% of brain tumor biopsies are diagnostic, only 20%-70% of biopsies for presumed nonneoplastic disease result in a specific diagnosis. The added benefits of performing an autopsy following surgical brain biopsy are not well defined. A retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent brain biopsy and autopsy at Brigham and Women's Hospital from 2003 to 2022. A total of 135 cases were identified, including 95 (70%) patients with primary CNS neoplasms, 16 (12%) with metastatic tumors, and 24 (18%) with nonneoplastic neurological disease. Diagnostic concordance between biopsy and autopsy diagnosis was excellent both for primary CNS neoplasms (98%) and metastatic tumors (94%). Conversely, patients with nonneoplastic disease received definitive premortem diagnoses in 7/24 (29%) cases. Five (21%) additional patients received conclusive diagnoses following autopsy; 8 (33%) received a more specific differential diagnosis compared to the biopsy. Overall, autopsy confirmed premortem diagnoses or provided new diagnostic information in 131/135 (97%) cases, highlighting the value in performing postmortem brain examination in patients with both neoplastic and nonneoplastic diseases.

Advances, technological innovations, and future prospects in stereotactic brain biopsies

Stereotactic brain biopsy is one of the most frequently performed brain surgeries. This review aimed to expose the latest cutting-edge and updated technologies and innovations available to neurosurgeons to safely perform stereotactic brain biopsy by minimizing the risks of complications and ensuring that the procedure is successful, leading to a histological diagnosis. We also examined methods for improving preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative workflows. We performed a comprehensive state-of-the-art literature review. Intraoperative histology, fluorescence, and imaging techniques appear as smart tools to improve the diagnostic yield of biopsy. Constant innovations such as optical methods and augmented reality are also being made to increase patient safety. Robotics and integrated imaging techniques provide an enhanced intraoperative workflow. Patients' management algorithms based on early discharge after biopsy optimize the patient's personal experience and make the most efficient possible use of the available hospital resources. Many new trends are emerging, constantly improving patient care and safety, as well as surgical workflow. A parameter that must be considered is the cost-effectiveness of these devices and the possibility of using them on a daily basis. The decision to implement a new instrument in the surgical workflow should also be dependent on the number of procedures per year, the existing stereotactic equipment, and the experience of each center. Research on patients' postbiopsy management is another mandatory approach to enhance the safety profile of stereotactic brain biopsy and patient satisfaction, as well as to reduce healthcare costs.

Roles and outcomes of stereotactic biopsy for adult patients with brainstem lesion

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the benefit-risk ratio by determining diagnostic yield and safety of brainstem biopsies in adult patients. The secondary objectives were (i) to compare brainstem biopsy safety and postbiopsy patients' outcomes and survival with those of patients biopsied for a brain or cerebellar lesion, and (ii) to assess the impact of brainstem biopsy on final diagnosis and further therapeutic management.

METHODS

Among 1784 stereotactic biopsies performed in adult patients at a tertiary center between April 2009 and October 2020, we retrospectively examined 50 consecutive brainstem biopsies. We compared variables regarding diagnostic yield, safety and post-biopsy outcomes between brainstem biopsy patients and brain/cerebellum biopsy patients.

RESULTS

Brainstem biopsy led to a diagnosis in 86% of patients (94.6% in patients with suspected tumor). Lesion contrast enhancement on imaging was the sole predictor of obtaining a diagnosis. Rates of symptomatic complications and mortality were significantly higher in brainstem biopsy patients compared to brain/cerebellum biopsy patients (20% vs 0%; p < 0.001 and 6% vs 0%; p = 0.01, respectively). Transfrontal trajectory and prebiopsy swallowing disorders were predictors of brainstem biopsy-related symptomatic complications. Brainstem biopsy findings led to diagnostic change in 22% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Stereotactic biopsy in adult patients with brainstem lesion has a high diagnostic yield. Although stereotactic brainstem biopsy is associated with more functional and fatal complications than biopsies targeting the brain/cerebellum, its safety profile appears acceptable. Thus, the benefit-risk ratio of stereotactic biopsy in patients with brainstem lesion is favorable but should nevertheless be carefully weighted on a case-by-case basis.