State-of-the-Art Evaluation of Acute Adult Disorders of Consciousness for the General Intensivist

Disorders of Lymphatic Architecture and Flow in Critical Illness

OBJECTIVES

To provide a narrative review of disordered lymphatic dynamics and its impact on critical care relevant condition management.

DATA SOURCES

Detailed search strategy using PubMed and Ovid Medline for English language articles (2013-2023) describing congenital or acquired lymphatic abnormalities including lymphatic duct absence, injury, leak, or obstruction and their associated clinical conditions that might be managed by a critical care medicine practitioner.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that specifically addressed abnormalities of lymphatic flow and their management were selected. The search strategy time frame was limited to the last 10 years to enhance relevance to current practice.

DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant descriptions or studies were reviewed, and abstracted data were parsed into structural or functional etiologies, congenital or acquired conditions, and their management within critical care spaces in an acute care facility.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Abnormal lymph flow may be identified stemming from congenital lymphatic anomalies including lymphatic structure absence as well as acquired obstruction or increased flow from clinical entities or acute therapy. Macro- and microsurgical as well as interventional radiological techniques may address excess, inadequate, or obstructed lymph flow. Patients with deranged lymph flow often require critical care, and those who require critical care may concomitantly demonstrate deranged lymph flow that adversely impacts care.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical care clinicians ideally demonstrate functional knowledge of conditions that are directly related to, or are accompanied by, deranged lymphatic dynamics to direct timely diagnostic and therapeutic interventions during a patient's ICU care episode.

Medicolegal issues and disorders of consciousness

BACKGROUND

The tasks and responsibilities that come with clinician involvement in medicolegal proceedings can be daunting and particularly so in challenging areas such as provision of medicolegal opinions in cases involving disorders of consciousness (DoC).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this narrative review was to provide education and advice to healthcare practitioners who by choice or circumstance are asked and/or required to provide medicolegal opinions in cases involving patients with DoC.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed Central and MedlinePlus for articles dealing with clinician involvement in medicolegal cases involving persons with DoC. The information provided also integrates the authors' nearly 40 years of clinical experience, brain injury medicine practice and "trials and tribulations" associated with medicolegal involvement in such cases.

RESULTS

The literature was found to be replete with articles on brain death and withdrawal/withholding of care (which are not the focus of this review). The extant medical literature in brain injury medicine on the other hand is currently lacking in practical information for clinicians working "in the trenches" regarding the challenges and caveats of medicolegal involvement in such cases.

CONCLUSION

This review provides the reader with a big picture overview of the most pertinent medicolegal topics inherent in clinical work with patients with DOC including pertinent nomenclature, caveats regarding forensic consultation including independent medical examinations, testimony tips, discussion of life expectancy/median survival concepts, prognostication in a medicolegal context, documentation and record keeping as well as some of the specific challenges pertinent to these types of brain injury cases that are not per se relevant in less severe injuries.