Treatment Fidelity in 94 Randomized Controlled Trials of Physical Rehabilitation in the ICU: A Scoping Review

Australian clinical practice guideline for physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in adult intensive care units

BACKGROUND

The evidence base for research on physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in the intensive care unit has led to uncertainty about best practice.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this guideline was to develop evidence-based recommendations to support clinical decision-making for physical rehabilitation management of adults undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation in Australian intensive care units.

METHODS

The guideline development group, comprising national representation of clinical experts, methodologists, and consumers, followed a rigorous process, adhering to Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for Guidelines, to create the recommendations. The guideline development group determined the scope of the guideline and defined the key clinical question. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate all available evidence based on the predefined outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed using a restricted maximum likelihood approach, and results were summarised in an evidence profile. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was applied to evaluate the certainty of evidence, and the GRADE Evidence to Decision framework was used to formulate recommendations.

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the evidence profile and GRADE Evidence to Decision framework, the group developed three conditional recommendations and 14 Good Clinical Practice statements to guide practice. The guideline provides conditional recommendations in favour of undertaking physical rehabilitation and mobilisation in adults receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit whilst acknowledging the uncertainty of evidence. It was endorsed by four key professional organisations.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations within this guideline were developed following best methodological practice. Despite the overall low certainty of evidence, the resulting guideline provides support to clinical decision-making, facilitates the translation of research into practice, and enhances the reach and impact of clinical research. Additionally, the guideline development group identified evidence gaps that could be addressed by future research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Behavioral Intervention for Increasing Physical Activity in Multiple Sclerosis Project: Fidelity Monitoring and Outcomes

Treatment fidelity is a key component for assessing the reliability and validity of clinical trials in behavioral medicine. This manuscript reports on the outcomes of a pre-planned fidelity monitoring protocol for a Phase-III clinical trial, project Behavioral Intervention for Physical Activity in Multiple Sclerosis (BIPAMS). The fidelity monitoring protocol included the five areas of the National Institutes of Health Behavior Change Consortium with primary data sources including: coaching call checklists, coaching logs, auditing of coaching calls by experts, behavioral resource bank within the treatment group, review of participant website log-ins, review of participant self-monitoring, and team meetings for discussing participant progress and protocol adherence. The fidelity monitoring protocol was implemented across six waves of participants, and a final sample of 269 participants (i.e., n = 135 in BIPAMS intervention and n = 134 in WellMS control) completed the 24-week study. Ten coaches were comprehensively trained to implement the study protocol, which included an orientation call and one-on-one behavioral coaching calls. Among BIPAMS participants, an average of 11.81/13 scheduled calls were completed, and 96 (62% of planned) were audited by an expert. Among WellMS participants, an average of 8.19/9 calls were completed, and 54 (55% of planned) audits were completed. Unplanned protocol deviations included inability to complete live call audits during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown and changes in coaching criteria to accommodate unanticipated medical conditions and graduations. This manuscript provides an example and insights for demystifying treatment fidelity monitoring to help facilitate wide-spread use of standard protocols.