Preclinical models for translational sarcoma research

Preclinical Models of Visceral Sarcomas

Visceral sarcomas are a rare malignant subgroup of soft tissue sarcomas (STSs). STSs, accounting for 1% of all adult tumors, are derived from mesenchymal tissues and exhibit a wide heterogeneity. Their rarity and the high number of histotypes hinder the understanding of tumor development mechanisms and negatively influence clinical outcomes and treatment approaches. Although some STSs (~20%) have identifiable genetic markers, as specific mutations or translocations, most are characterized by complex genomic profiles. Thus, identification of new therapeutic targets and development of personalized therapies are urgent clinical needs. Although cell lines are useful for preclinical investigations, more reliable preclinical models are required to develop and test new potential therapies. Here, we provide an overview of the available in vitro and in vivo models of visceral sarcomas, whose gene signatures are still not well characterized, to highlight current challenges and provide insights for future studies.

Addressing Modern Diagnostic Pathology for Patient-Derived Soft Tissue Sarcosphere Models in the Era of Functional Precision Oncology

Responses to therapy often cannot be exclusively predicted by molecular markers, thus evidencing a critical need to develop tools for better patient selection based on relations between tumor phenotype and genotype. Patient-derived cell models could help to better refine patient stratification procedures and lead to improved clinical management. So far, such ex vivo cell models have been used for addressing basic research questions and in preclinical studies. As they now enter the era of functional precision oncology, it is of utmost importance that they meet quality standards to fully represent the molecular and phenotypical architecture of patients' tumors. Well-characterized ex vivo models are imperative for rare cancer types with high patient heterogeneity and unknown driver mutations. Soft tissue sarcomas account for a very rare, heterogeneous group of malignancies that are challenging from a diagnostic standpoint and difficult to treat in a metastatic setting because of chemotherapy resistance and a lack of targeted treatment options. Functional drug screening in patient-derived cancer cell models is a more recent approach for discovering novel therapeutic candidate drugs. However, because of the rarity and heterogeneity of soft tissue sarcomas, the number of well-established and characterized sarcoma cell models is extremely limited. Within our hospital-based platform we establish high-fidelity patient-derived ex vivo cancer models from solid tumors for enabling functional precision oncology and addressing research questions to overcome this problem. We here present 5 novel, well-characterized, complex-karyotype ex vivo soft tissue sarcosphere models, which are effective tools to study molecular pathogenesis and identify the novel drug sensitivities of these genetically complex diseases. We addressed the quality standards that should be generally considered for the characterization of such ex vivo models. More broadly, we suggest a scalable platform to provide high-fidelity ex vivo models to the scientific community and enable functional precision oncology.

Role of Virus-Directed Therapy in Soft Tissue Sarcoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Bone and soft tissue sarcoma are rare cancers of mesenchymal origin with the characteristics of heterogeneity and diversity that account for less than 1% of solid malignant cancers. Conventional chemotherapy remains standard of care with response rates of 10-15% that are usually dependent on histologic subtype as some subtypes are chemotherapy resistant. There remains a large unmet clinical need for new and novel options promoting the development of promising therapeutic options such as immunotherapy. With more than 80 different subtypes, the heterogeneity of sarcoma requires thoughtful clinical trial design. In the sarcoma field, recent breakthroughs have occurred in the context of histology-specific approach based on underlying tumor biology. To that end, immunotherapy approaches will need to take a similar approach. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) have emerged as a promising treatment for many solid tumors and shown encouraging results in sarcoma. This review mainly focuses on collective clinical data highlighting the role of OVs as immunotherapy being used in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and bone sarcomas. Combining OVs with T cell-activating checkpoint inhibition, adoptive cell therapy or targeted therapies may yield increased potency, improve antitumor efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy, and offer a new prospect for the treatment of sarcoma.

The important role of routine cytopathology in pediatric precision oncology

BACKGROUND

The development of high-throughput drug screening (HTS) using primary cultures provides a promising, clinically translatable approach to tailoring treatment strategies for patients with cancer. However, this has been challenging for solid tumors because of often limited amounts of tissue available. In most cases, in vitro expansion is required before HTS, which may lead to overgrowth and contamination by non-neoplastic cells.

METHODS

In this study, hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical staining were performed on 129 cytopathology cases from 95 patients. These cytopathology cases comprised cell block preparations derived from primary tumor specimens or patient-derived xenografts as part of a pediatric precision oncology trial. Cytopathology cases were compared with the morphology and immunohistochemical staining profile of the original tumor. Cases were reported as tumor cells present, equivocal, or tumor cells absent. The HTS results from cytopathologically validated cultures were incorporated into a multidisciplinary tumor board report issued to the treating clinician to guide clinical decision making.

RESULTS

On cytopathologic examination, tumor cells were present in 77 of 129 cases (60%) and were absent in 38 of 129 cases (29%), whereas 14 of 129 cases (11%) were equivocal. Cultures that contained tumor cells resembled the tumors from which they were derived.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytopathologic examination of tumor cell block preparations is feasible and provides detailed morphologic characterization. Cytopathologic examination is essential for ensuring that samples submitted for HTS contain representative tumor cells and that in vitro drug sensitivity data are clinically translatable.

Not Everyone Fits the Mold: Intratumor and Intertumor Heterogeneity and Innovative Cancer Drug Design and Development

Disruptive innovations in medicine are game-changing in nature and bring about radical shifts in the way we understand human diseases, their treatment, and/or prevention. Yet, disruptive innovations in cancer drug design and development are still limited. Therapies that cure all cancer patients are in short supply or do not exist at all. Chief among the causes of this predicament is drug resistance, a mechanism that is much more dynamic than previously understood. Drug resistance has limited the initial success experienced with biomarker-guided targeted therapies as well. A major contributor to drug resistance is intratumor heterogeneity. For example, within solid tumors, there are distinct subclones of cancer cells, presenting profound complexity to cancer treatment. Well-known contributors to intratumor heterogeneity are genomic instability, the microenvironment, cellular genotype, cell plasticity, and stochastic processes. This expert review explains that for oncology drug design and development to be more innovative, we need to take into account intratumor heterogeneity. Initially thought to be the preserve of cancer cells, recent evidence points to the highly heterogeneous nature and diverse locations of stromal cells, such as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and cancer-associated macrophages (CAMs). Distinct subpopulations of CAFs and CAMs are now known to be located immediately adjacent and distant from cancer cells, with different subpopulations exerting different effects on cancer cells. Disruptive innovation and precision medicine in clinical oncology do not have to be a distant reality, but can potentially be achieved by targeting these spatially separated and exclusive cancer cell subclones and CAF subtypes. Finally, we emphasize that disruptive innovations in drug discovery and development will likely come from drugs whose effect is not necessarily tumor shrinkage.

Addressing the Adult Soft Tissue Sarcoma Microenvironment with Intratumoral Immunotherapy

Sarcoma is comprised of a heterogeneous group of tumors originating from the mesenchyme. Sarcoma is also the first tumor that responded to immunotherapeutic agents often termed as “Coley's toxins.” However, immunotherapy is yet to establish its presence in sarcomas. Complex interactions between tumor and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment play a crucial role in response to immunotherapy. There is a dynamic equilibrium created by the immune cells infiltrating the tumor, and this forms the basis of tumor evasion. Manipulating the intratumoral microenvironment will help overcome tumor evasion.

Management and potentialities of primary cancer cultures in preclinical and translational studies

The use of patient-derived primary cell cultures in cancer preclinical assays has increased in recent years. The management of resected tumor tissue remains complex and a number of parameters must be respected to obtain complete sample digestion and optimal vitality yield. We provide an overview of the benefits of correct primary cell culture management using different preclinical methodologies, and describe the pros and cons of this model with respect to other kinds of samples. One important advantage is that the heterogeneity of the cell populations composing a primary culture partially reproduces the tumor microenvironment and crosstalk between malignant and healthy cells, neither of which is possible with cell lines. Moreover, the use of patient-derived specimens in innovative preclinical technologies, such as 3D systems or bioreactors, represents an important opportunity to improve the translational value of the results obtained. In vivo models could further our understanding of the crosstalk between tumor and other tissues as they enable us to observe the systemic and biological interactions of a complete organism. Although engineered mice are the most common model used in this setting, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) species has recently been recognized as an innovative experimental system. In fact, the transparent body and incomplete immune system of zebrafish embryos are especially useful for evaluating patient-derived tumor tissue interactions in healthy hosts. In conclusion, ex vivo systems represent an important tool for cancer research, but samples require correct manipulation to maximize their translational value.