Surgery of non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly

Lung Resections for Elderly Patients with Lung Metastases: A Comparative Study of the Postoperative Complications and Overall Survival

Background: Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) is an established treatment option for selected patients with stage IV solid tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of and survival rate in PM for elderly patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed all of the patients who underwent PM with curative intention at our institution. The patients were categorized into two groups: the elderly group (≥70 years old) and the non-elderly group (<70 years old). Results: The elderly group consisted of 222 patients versus 538 patients in the non-elderly group. The median number of resected metastases was 2 ± 3 in the elderly group and 4 ± 5 in the non-elderly group (p < 0.01). No difference in the rate of postoperative complications was observed between the two groups (p = 0.3). The median length of hospital stay in each group was comparable (10 ± 5 vs. 10 ± 4.3 days, p = 0.3). The 5-year survival rate was 67% in the elderly group and 78% in the non-elderly group (p = 0.117). In the univariate analysis, COPD was associated with poor survival in the elderly group (p = 0.002). Conclusion: The resection of pulmonary metastases in elderly patients is safe, is not associated with increased risks of postoperative complication, and the survival benefit is not reduced in selected patients.

Lung stereotactic body radiation therapy for elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with pathologically proven early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an established therapy for medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many elderly patients are medically inoperable owing to comorbidities. Therefore, SBRT may be a useful therapy for elderly patients. However, the application of SBRT for patients aged ≥ 80 years has not been completely elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the clinical utility of SBRT for elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with pathologically proven early-stage NSCLC.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated the data of patients aged ≥ 80 years with pathologically proven primary NSCLC who underwent SBRT at our institution between January 2009 and March 2020. Treatment outcomes and toxicities were analyzed. We used the Kaplan–Meier method to estimate survival curves and the log-rank test to compare the survival curves. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. p-values < 0.05 were regarded significant.

Results

Sixty-four patients (65 lesions) were included, and the median follow-up period was 38.7 (range 3.5–95.7) months. The median age was 82.9 (range 80.0–94.8) years. Sixteen patients were medically operable, and 48 patients were medically inoperable. The prescribed dose of SBRT was either 48 Gy in four fractions or 60 Gy in 10 fractions. The median survival time was 60.0 months (95% confidence interval, 43.5–71.1). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local control, cancer-specific survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 98.4%, 98.4%, 81.0%, and 88.9%; 90.1%, 93.7%, 58.9%, and 68.3%; and 87.4%, 83.5%, 38.2%, and 47.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that inoperability and solid nodules were the predictors of poor overall survival after SBRT in elderly patients. Two patients (3.1%) had grade 3 radiation pneumonitis, and one patient (1.6%) had grade 5 radiation pneumonitis.

Conclusions

SBRT was feasible in patients aged ≥ 80 years with NSCLC. It achieved good local control with minimal toxicity. SBRT may be beneficial in elderly patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer in octogenarians and older: an alternative treatment

Surgery is the standard modality for early-stage I-II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Generally, patients who are >80 years old tend to have more comorbidities and inferior physical status than younger patients. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) may provide an alternative treatment for this group of patients. Here, we report our experience using SBRT to in the management of early-stage NSCLC in patients >80 years old. Patients aged ≥80 years old who were diagnosed with early-stage NSCLC and treated with definitive lung SBRT from January 2000 to January 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicities were analysed for patients >80 years old. A total of 153 patients were included, with a median age of 85 years (range, 80-94). The median follow-up period and OS was 39.8 months (range, 10-101 months) and 76 months, respectively. The 3-year OS, PFS, CSS, RRFS and LRFS were 65.3, 58.0, 75.7, 73.9 and 85.3%, respectively. Radiation pneumonitis grade 0-1, grade 2, grade 3 and grade 4 was observed in 135 (88.2%), 13 (8.5%), 4 (2.61%) and 1 (0.6%) patient(s), respectively. On multivariate analyses, tumor size, pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) value, histology and pretreatment physical state were significantly associated with OS. Definitive lung SBRT appears to have high LRFS and OS without causing high-grade radiation-related toxicities in early-stage NSCLC patients who were >80 years old.

Impact of previous head and neck cancer on postoperative complications after surgical resection for lung cancer: a case-control study

Background

Head and neck cancer (HNC) and lung cancer are often linked because of common risk factors. We aimed to assess the risk of postoperative complications in patients with previous HNC undergoing thoracic surgery for lung cancer.

Methods

Patients with previous HNC undergoing surgery for lung cancer were included in this retrospective, monocentric, case-control study. All patients were matched for age, sex, FEV₁, smoking history, and year of surgery with lung cancer patients without previous HNC. Major postoperative complication was defined as at least one of the following during the first 30 days post lung resection (LR): death, shock, need for mechanical ventilation, and pneumonia.

Results

From January 2006 to May 2012, 65 patients with previous HNC underwent LR. Fifty-nine of these patients were included and matched with 120 control patients without HNC. Major complications occurred in 25 [42.4% (95% CI, 29.4-55.4%)] vs. 19 [15.8% (95% CI, 9.2-22.5%)] patients in the HNC and non-HNC groups, respectively (P<0.001). Among the complications, pneumonia occurred in 19 (32.2%) vs. 12 (10%) (P=0.01), and death occurred in 5 (8.5%) vs. 2 (1.7%) patients in the HNC and non-HNC groups, respectively (P=0.04). The following factors were identified by multivariate analysis to be independently associated with postoperative complications: previous HNC [odds ratio (OR) =4.24; (95% CI, 1.84-9.74)], male gender [OR =8.99; (95% CI, 1.05-76.78)], cumulative smoking [OR =1.02 per unit; (95% CI, 1.01-1.04)] and elevated Charlson score [OR =1.45; (95% CI, 1.07-1.96)].

Conclusions

Previous HNC is a major independent risk factor for serious postoperative complications after LR for lung cancer. Postoperative pneumonia (POP) is the most frequent complication.

Prediction of Surgical Outcome by Modeling Based on Risk Factors of Morbidity After Pulmonary Resection for Lung Cancer in Older Adults

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment for older patients with lung cancer presents more challenges compared with general population. The aim of the study was to predict surgical outcome after pulmonary resection in older patients with lung cancer by developing a clinical model.

METHODS

Clinical records of 525 patients who were older than 70 years of age and who underwent pulmonary resection for lung cancer in a single center were reviewed. Patients were divided into three ordered categories of surgical outcome according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. By using a development cohort of 401 patients, an ordinal logistic regression was performed to develop a prediction model for surgical outcome. The model was internally validated by the bootstrap method and was externally validated by another cohort of 124 patients. Two previous models were tested as benchmarks of our model.

RESULTS

The model was developed based on five risk factors of morbidity: American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (p < 0.001), pulmonary disease (p = 0.001), tumor size (p = 0.011), tumor location (p = 0.015), and surgical approach (p = 0.036). The c-statistic of the model was 0.75 (95% confidence interval: 0.69 to 0.80), which was similar to the bootstrapping one (0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.68 to 0.80). The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed a strong goodness of fit of the model (p = 0.674). In external validation, the performance of our model was superior to that of the two previous models.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model displayed an acceptable ability to predict surgical outcome in older patients undergoing pulmonary resection for lung cancer. Use of the model can be helpful in decision making about surgical treatment in this special population.

A review of the management of elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

Most patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are elderly but evidence to guide appropriate treatment decisions for this age group is generally scant. Careful evaluation of the elderly should be undertaken to ensure that treatment appropriate for the stage of the tumour is guided by patient characteristics and not by age. The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) remains the preferred option, but briefer tools may be appropriate to select patients for further evaluation. The predicted outcome should be used to guide management decisions together with a reappraisal of polypharmacy. Patient expectations should also be taken into account. Management recommendations are generally similar to those of general guidelines for the NSCLC population, although the risks of surgery and toxicity of chemotherapy and radiotherapy are often increased in the elderly compared with younger patients; therefore, patients should be closely scrutinised and subjected to a CGA to ensure suitability of the planned treatment. If surgery is indicated, then lobectomy is generally the preferred option, although limited resection may be more feasible for some. Radiotherapy with curative intent is an alternative, with stereotactic body radiotherapy the most likely preferred modality. Adjuvant chemotherapy is also an appropriate approach, whereas adjuvant radiotherapy is generally not recommended. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy should be considered for elderly patients with inoperable locally advanced disease and chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease. Efforts should also be made to increase participation of elderly patients with NSCLC in clinical trials, thereby enhancing evidence-based treatment decisions for this majority group. This will require overcoming barriers relating to trial design and to physician and patient awareness and attitudes.

A very elderly lung cancer patient: case report of a long disease free survival

Despite the fact that non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is very common in the older population, these patients are frequently underrepresented in clinical and surgical trials and thus it is difficult to reach evidence-based recommendations for this special population. We present a case of a surgical treatment of asymptomatic lung cancer in a very elderly patient. The patient had no recurrence for 4 years after a complete resection.

Are we treating enough elderly patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer?

Despite the fact that non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is very common in the older population, these patients are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials evaluating new anti-cancer agents, and thus it is difficult to reach evidence-based recommendations for this special population. The purpose of the present paper is to present the currently available evidence regarding treatment of early-stages of NSCLC in older patients. Although, age is still considered as a negative factor influencing treatment decisions and curative cancer-directed surgery is often omitted in the older population several studies support that surgical resection is feasible in the older patient and that age per se is not a contraindication for various surgical procedures. Pneumonectomy is associated with a higher mortality in the older population and this issue should be taken into account when deciding whether a patient is suitable for pneumonectomy. Older patients should be considered for adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection although little information is available regarding the real benefit and tolerability of these regimens for patients over 75 years of age. Given the lack of demonstrated benefit for the use of adjuvant RT it is also not recommended in older population.

EORTC Elderly Task Force and Lung Cancer Group and International Society for Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) experts' opinion for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer in an elderly population

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a common health issue in the elderly population. Nevertheless, the paucity of large, well-conducted prospective trials makes it difficult to provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for these patients. The present paper reviews the currently available evidence regarding treatment of all stages of NSCLC in elderly patients. Surgery remains the standard for early-stage disease, though pneumonectomy is associated with higher incidence of postoperative mortality in elderly patients. Given the lack of demonstrated benefit for the use of adjuvant radiotherapy, it is also not recommended in elderly patients. Elderly patients seem to derive the same benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy as younger patients do, with no significant increase in toxicity. For locally advanced NSCLC, concurrent chemoradiotherapy may be offered to selected elderly patients as there is a higher risk for toxicity reported in the elderly population. Third-generation single-agent treatment is considered the standard of care for patients with advanced/metastatic disease. Platinum-based combination chemotherapy needs to be evaluated in prospective trials. Unfortunately, with the exception of advanced/metastatic NSCLC, prospective elderly-specific NSCLC trials are lacking and the majority of recommendations made are based on retrospective data, which might suffer from selection bias. Prospective elderly-specific trials are needed.

Update on anesthetic management for pneumonectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pneumonectomy has the highest perioperative risk among common pulmonary resections. The purpose of this review is to update clinicians on the importance of anesthetic management for these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two complications associated with increased perioperative mortality are relevant to anesthetic management: postoperative arrhythmias and acute lung injury. The geriatric population is particularly at risk for arrhythmias. Adequate preoperative cardiac assessment and drug prophylaxis may decrease this risk. Patients with decreased respiratory function are at increased risk for acute lung injury. The use of large tidal-volume ventilation during anesthesia may increase this risk. There is a trend to better outcomes in centers with larger surgical volumes.

SUMMARY

Patients should have a preoperative assessment of their respiratory function in three areas: lung mechanical function, pulmonary parenchymal function and cardiopulmonary reserve. Interventions that have been shown to decrease the incidence of respiratory complications include cessation of smoking, physiotherapy and thoracic epidural analgesia. Extrapleural pneumonectomy and sleeve pneumonectomy are surgical variations that place specific increased demands on the anesthesiologist. The rare but treatable complication of cardiac herniation must always be remembered as a potential cause of life-threatening hemodynamic instability in the early postoperative period.