First-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: new approaches and therapeutic algorithms. Always hit hard first?:

A case of long-term survival after repeated response to oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and repeated thermoablation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Should we introduce the concept of oxaliplatin-resistant tumors?

Background

The management of advanced colorectal cancer patients differs among cancer centers. International guidelines recommend offering all the recognized active regimens in order to obtain survival advantage, but little information is given about the sequence and combination in which such regimens should be administered.

Case report

We report the case of a man with multiple liver metastasis from colorectal cancer followed for more than 78 months at our Institution. Repeated response to the same oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid chemotherapy schedule was achieved, and repeated radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases was performed until progression of lung and brain disease at 50 and 72 months, respectively, after the diagnosis of advanced disease. Although the tumor became oxaliplatin and chemo-resistant after the onset of extra-hepatic disease, a more aggressive chemotherapy regimen, including a doublet with a biological, halted tumor growth.

Conclusions

The patient survived for more than 78 months without experiencing a major impact on his quality of life. This case reflects the importance of following tumor biology in the therapeutic decision-making process, reintroducing oxaliplatin whenever possible, and adopting a more aggressive strategy when the tumor becomes oxaliplatin-resistant.

'Liver-first' approach for metastatic colorectal cancer

The liver-first approach was proposed for the first time in 2006 to obtain resectability of stage IV colorectal cancer patients and complete the therapeutic plan. From then some groups have used this new revolutionary approach reporting promising results. Other alternative strategies have been proposed for metastatic patients. The authors reviewed the literature weighing the pros and cons of each strategy proposed to manage these advanced tumor stages. The therapeutic options are analyzed in the light of oncologic problems and evidence. Also problems, questions and perspectives are given. Even if the 'liver-first' approach seems to be a promising strategy, the ideal diagnostic-therapeutic flowchart for metastatic colorectal cancer is still difficult to standardize. The great heterogeneity of this population of patients is one of the main problems. A 'tailored approach' philosophy is necessary to calibrate, in a multidisciplinary setting, a case-by-case choice of therapeutic options.

Phase Ib study of drozitumab combined with first-line mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

In this multicenter phase Ib study, drozitumab was given in combination with the mFOLFOX6 regimen and bevacizumab in patients with previously untreated, locally advanced recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer on day 1 of every 14-day cycle. Nine patients were treated at 2 different cohort dose levels of drozitumab. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred at either dose level and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Two patients had a partial response of 4.93 and 4.96 months duration. Cohort 2 dose level is the recommended starting dose level for future trials.

Randomized trial of two induction chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: an updated analysis

BACKGROUND

In a randomized trial with a median follow-up of 18.4 months, 6 months of induction chemotherapy with a three-drug regimen comprising 5-fluorouracil (by continuous infusion)-leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in response rate, radical surgical resection of metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with 6 months of induction chemotherapy with fluorouracil-leucovorin and irinotecan (FOLFIRI).

METHODS

From November 14, 2001, to April 22, 2005, we enrolled 244 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. To evaluate if the superiority of FOLFOXIRI is maintained in the long term, we updated the overall and progression-free survival data to include events that occurred up to February 12, 2009, with a median follow-up of 60.6 months. We performed a subgroup and a risk-stratified analysis to examine whether outcomes differed in specific patient subgroups, and we analyzed the results of treatment after progression. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression models were fit to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

FOLFOXIRI demonstrated statistically significant improvements in median progression-free survival (9.8 vs 6.8 months, HR for progression = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.45 to 0.76, P < .001) and median overall survival (23.4 vs 16.7 months, HR for death = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.96, P = .026) with a 5-year survival rate of 15% (95% CI = 9% to 23%) vs 8% (95% CI = 4% to 14%). The improvements in progression-free survival and, to a lesser extent, in overall survival were evident even when the analysis excluded patients who received radical resection of metastases. With regard to the risk-stratified analysis, FOLFOXIRI results in longer progression-free survival and overall survival than FOLFIRI in all risk subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Six months of induction chemotherapy with FOLFOXIRI is associated with a clinically significant improvement in the long-term outcome compared with FOLFIRI with an absolute benefit in survival at 5 years of 7%.

Bevacizumab with FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinate) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinate) regimen has been shown to be better than FOLFIRI (fluorouracil, folinate, and irinotecan) in a phase 3 trial in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of various studies have shown that the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy increases treatment efficacy. We therefore assessed the safety and activity of the combination of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with colorectal cancer.

METHODS

In a phase 2 study, patients (aged 18-75 years) with colorectal cancer, which was judged to be unresectable for metastatic disease, were given the combination of intravenous bevacizumab (5 mg/kg on day 1) and intravenous FOLFOXIRI (irinotecan 165 mg/m(2) on day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1, folinate 200 mg/m(2) on day 1, and fluorouracil 3200 mg/m(2) for 48 h continuous infusion starting on day 1 and repeated every 2 weeks) as first-line treatment in seven centres in Italy. Induction treatment (FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab) was administered for a maximum of 6 months, followed by maintenance treatment with bevacizumab (5 mg/kg intravenously on day 1, repeated every 2 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 10 months from study entry in the intention-to-treat population. This study has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01163396.

FINDINGS

From July 2, 2007, to April 1, 2008, 57 patients were enrolled; all patients were assessed for safety and efficacy. Median follow-up time was 28.8 months (95% CI 24.9-32.5). PFS at 10 months was 74% (95% CI 62-85). Main grade 3 or 4 adverse events during induction treatment were neutropenia (n=28 [49%], including one case of febrile neutropenia), diarrhoea (n=8 [14%]), stomatitis (n=2 [4%]), neurotoxicity (n=1 [2%]), deep-vein thrombosis (n=4 [7%]), and hypertension (n=6 [11%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Six serious adverse events occurred during the induction treatment: febrile neutropenia (n=1 [2%]), grade 3 diarrhoea with dehydration (n=2 [4%]), grade 4 stomatitis (n=1 [2%]), grade 4 hypertension (n=1 [2%]), and fluorouracil-related cardiac ischaemia (n=1 [2%]). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events noted in the 37 patients who received maintenance treatment were hypertension (n=5 [14%]) and neurotoxicity (n=3 [8%]). One case of acute myocardial infarction due to coronary thrombosis was noted during the maintenance treatment.

INTERPRETATION

Bevacizumab can be safely used with FOLFOXIRI without causing unforeseen adverse events. Treatment achieved promising results in terms of PFS. A phase 3 study for the comparison of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab is in progress.

FUNDING

Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest, ARCO Foundation, and Roche.

Palliative treatment of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients have rapidly increased in the past years, but 50 - 70% of mCRC patients are still unlikely to undergo radical resection of metastases and are candidates for palliative therapy only.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Oxaliplatin and irinotecan have widened the chemotherapy alternatives available in this setting and effective targeted agents against vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor have further improved treatment efficacy. This review covers the main areas of debate in the optimal treatment of unresectable mCRC patients, focusing on the implications for everyday clinical practice and future research of the most relevant clinical trials and molecular investigations published from 1999 to 2009.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Insights into treatment individualization strategies are provided in the review.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

'One size fits all' can not longer be considered an adequate approach to unresectable mCRC, and treatment with both chemotherapy and biologic agents should be guided by prognostic and predictive factors in order to maximize the benefit while reducing futile toxicities.

A systematic review on the clinical benefit and role of radiofrequency ablation as treatment of colorectal liver metastases

AIM

To evaluate the role of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLMs).

METHOD

A PubMed literature search for original articles published until August 2008 was performed. Studies with 40 patients, 18 month median follow-up and reported 3 year overall survival (OS) rates after RFA of CLM were selected for analysis.

RESULTS

Thirteen clinical series and 8 non-randomised comparative studies were analysed. Median progression free survival after RFA ranged between 6 and 13 months. Median and 5-year OS after RFA (RFA plus resection) ranged between 24-59 months and 18-40% (36-46 months and 27-30%). Comparative studies indicated significantly improved OS after RFA versus chemotherapy alone, RFA plus chemotherapy versus RFA alone and up-front RFA versus RFA following second-line chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support that RFA prolongs time without toxicity and survival as an adjunct to hepatectomy and/or chemotherapy in well-selected patients, but not as an alternative to resection.

Pharmacoepigenomics in colorectal cancer: a step forward in predicting prognosis and treatment response

Despite therapeutic innovations and increasing education on lifestyle to prevent colorectal cancer, it is still one of the most common cancer types, and for men the second cause of cancer-related death. Lately, much attention has been given to identify molecular markers involved in colorectal cancer prognosis and treatment with the aim to develop a more accurate classification system based on (epi)genetic alterations and, in addition, find markers that could potentially enhance management of colorectal cancer by predicting treatment response in advance. Although many genetic markers have been claimed to have prognostic or predictive influence, results are often inconclusive and, with some exception, they are not used in standard practice. Epigenetic alterations have received less attention although they are probably even more interesting as they can potentially be reversed through drug treatment. This review describes the current knowledge on the prognostic and predictive value of epigenetic markers in colorectal cancer.