Stem cell transplantation for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients in the rituximab era

Distinct clinical characteristics at diagnosis in patients with late relapses compared with early relapses of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP

The distinct clinical characteristics of patients at diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), who experience a late relapse compared with those who relapse early, require reappraisal in the era of R-CHOP. Data from the lymphoma registry of the Asan Medical Center between 2002 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Among 846 DLBCL patients treated with first-line R-CHOP and achieved complete response, 169 (20%) relapsed, occurring late (>2 years) in 51 (6%). Compared with early relapses, late relapses were associated with a lower International Prognostic Index score (p=.001), lower incidence of B-symptoms (p=.004), lower lactate dehydrogenase (p=.001), lower stage (I-II; p=.001), and the median overall survival from relapse was significantly longer (2.4 vs. 1.0 years, p=.001). Patients with a late relapse who responded to salvage chemotherapy and received autologous stem-cell transplantation, had higher 5-year survival rate (55.4% vs. 20.2%). Time of relapse and LDH level were independent prognostic factors affecting survival.

Prognosis of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma not reaching complete response or relapsing after frontline chemotherapy or immunochemotherapy

A retrospective study was performed to assess the outcome of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who did not achieve complete response or who relapsed before and after the use of rituximab. Clinical features and outcome of 816 (425 M/391 F; median age 63 years) patients diagnosed from 1991 to 2001 (pre-rituximab era, N = 348) and from 2002 to 2012 (rituximab era, N = 468) in a single institution were evaluated. Five hundred fifty-three patients achieved complete remission (CR), 57 partial response (PR), and 206 were refractory with a median overall survival of 15, 1.5, and 0.4 years, respectively. Patients receiving rituximab had lower risk of refractoriness or relapse. In primarily refractory and PR patients, there was not a difference in survival depending on whether patients received or not rituximab-containing frontline treatment. Early death rate was 11%, including 3.6% due to infectious complications. Rituximab did not modify these figures. In the relapse setting, 5-year survival from relapse was 25% for patients who never received rituximab, 54% for those who received rituximab only at relapse, and 48% for those treated with immunochemotherapy both as frontline and at relapse. In conclusion, relapsed/refractory patients with DLBCL show poor prognosis despite the use of frontline immunochemotherapy. New therapeutic approaches are needed in this group of patients.

The role of allogeneic haematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation in patients with diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (DLBCL)

Despite the undoubted improvement in the prognosis of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) with the addition of rituximab in the front-line treatment, a significant proportion of patients still relapse. Salvage immune-chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy with autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) remains the treatment of choice for such patients, especially in those who demonstrate chemosensitive disease. In recent years, allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) has increasingly been used for patients who are resistant to salvage treatment or relapse after an auto-HCT. Strategies using reduced intensity conditioning regimens have allowed application of this approach to a broader range of patients. PFS is up to 55% with a risk of relapse up to 80% depending on different studies. In multivariate analysis, several factors have been associated with favourable outcome including chemosensitivity of the disease, younger age and Karnofsky performance status at the time of the transplant being the strongest ones. DLIs have shown to induce durable responses in relapsed or progressed disease; however, its role remains controversial as the results are inferior to the responses seen in other haematological malignancies. More recently, the addition of MoAbs in the non-myeloablative conditioning regimens has shown encouraging results. In conclusion, allo-HCT is a feasible option in selective patients with chemosensitive DBCL, as it reduces the risk of relapse; however, this is achieved at the cost of significant non-relapse mortality.

Characteristics and Results of the Management of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphomas: The Experience of Côte d'Ivoire

Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas have been little studied in black Africans. The purpose of our study was to determine the characteristics and results of the management of these lymphomas. Patients and Methods. In a descriptive and analytic retrospective study we studied the medical records of 63 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma hospitalized during the period from 1991 to 2007. The diagnosis was made after lymph node or organ biopsy. Response to treatment, OS, PFS, and toxicity were studied. The complete response has been analyzed univariate and multivariate analysis. Results. The median age was 42 years. The sex ratio was 2. The HIV serology was positive in 11 cases, and 8 patients had antiretroviral therapy. In 71% the lymphoma was at stages III and IV of Ann Arbor. IPI was ≥3 in 65%. Complete remission was achieved in 43%. Only 43% of patients had had a good compliance. Progression-free survival at 3 years was 32%, and overall survival at 3 years was 50%. 13% of patients were lost to follow up, and 51% of them died. In terms of analysis the complete remission rate was influenced by the stage of Ann Arbor (P < 0.0001), biological b symptoms (P < 0.01), the IPI (P < 0.0001), and the socioeconomic standing (P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, only IPI and stage of Ann Arbor influence the complete remission.

Quality of life following treatment for B-cell lymphoma

Clinical outcome for B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma has been greatly improved through the combination of new treatment options, in particular noncytotoxic drugs that specifically target disease mechanisms. Furthermore, in many cases, lymphoma survivors have to cope with long-term toxicity. Therefore, as with survival and remission length, the assessment of quality of life (QoL) is a major consideration when judging therapeutic benefit in patients. The aim of this article is to discuss the impact of widespread treatments on QoL and the relevance of QoL assessment in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in day-to-day clinical practice. Additional studies of QoL in the general population, the associations between QoL and treatment strategy, QoL and specific situations (i.e., stem-cell transplantation and aging population) are also considered.